Science > Physics > self-field theory, strings, BECs, lattices of multiverses
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"tony fleming" |
| Date: |
17 Apr 2006 09:36:15 PM |
| Object: |
self-field theory, strings, BECs, lattices of multiverses |
Androcles
Anyone trying to pass off a singular matrix
would be stupid enough to say "Happy Easter".
Well let's look at what happens when c=0.
What we get is the photon becoming 'frozen' so we get the photon's
internal structure forming a lattice as either strings in remote space.
2-D, or 3-D forms can also precipitate. in other words bose-einstein
condensates fcrystalize out of the self-field theory as it applies to
the photon and as we make c approach zero. so we take the limiting
case, the asymptote as
c -> 0.
do we see this inside any other theory? no not directly. but we do see
the basis of string theory in self-field theory, both in terms of the
streams of photons, and the BECs that form in deep space. It may be
that these BEC strings connect our universe to other universes.
.
|
|
| User: "Hexenmeister" |
|
| Title: Re: self-field theory, strings, BECs, lattices of multiverses |
18 Apr 2006 12:21:56 PM |
|
|
"tony fleming" <tfleming1@hotkey.net.au> wrote in message =
news:1145327775.076641.291690@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
| Androcles
|=20
|=20
| >Anyone trying to pass off a singular matrix
| >would be stupid enough to say "Happy Easter".
|=20
|=20
| Well let's look at what happens when c=3D0.
You are confusing Einstein's symbol 'c' with the emission
velocity of electromagnetic radiation relative to the source, "Dr" =
Phlegming
from the Outback.
See http://tinyurl.com/oou5f
Androcles PhD
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Hexenmeister" |
|
| Title: Re: self-field theory, strings, BECs, lattices of multiverses |
18 Apr 2006 12:21:55 PM |
|
|
"tony fleming" <tfleming1@hotkey.net.au> wrote in message =
news:1145327775.076641.291690@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
| Androcles
|=20
|=20
| >Anyone trying to pass off a singular matrix
| >would be stupid enough to say "Happy Easter".
|=20
|=20
| Well let's look at what happens when c=3D0.
|=20
| What we get is the photon becoming 'frozen' so we get the photon's
| internal structure forming a lattice as either strings in remote =
space.
*****, you are confusing Einstein's symbol 'c' with the emission
velocity of electromagnetic radiation relative to the source, "Dr" =
Phlegming
from the Outback.
See http://tinyurl.com/oou5f
Androcles PhD
.
|
|
|
| User: "tony fleming" |
|
| Title: Re: self-field theory, strings, BECs, lattices of multiverses |
18 Apr 2006 06:31:38 PM |
|
|
actually, the effects of relativity come from the internal structure of
light. it is the internal dynamics of the photon that is the cause of
the lorentz transformation not some external warping of space-time.
in any case there have been many frozen light experiments. see
http://www.physics.hku.hk/~tboyce/sf/topics/lightfreeze/lightfreeze.html
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hexenmeister" |
|
| Title: Re: self-field theory, strings, BECs, lattices of multiverses |
19 Apr 2006 01:30:13 AM |
|
|
"tony fleming" <tfleming1@hotkey.net.au> wrote in message =
news:1145403098.823848.147750@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
| actually, the effects of relativity come from the internal structure =
of
| light. it is the internal dynamics of the photon that is the cause of
| the lorentz transformation not some external warping of space-time.
|=20
| in any case there have been many frozen light experiments. see
| =
http://www.physics.hku.hk/~tboyce/sf/topics/lightfreeze/lightfreeze.html
|=20
| Tony
Thanks for the laugh.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Dork/relcause.htm
Androcles.
.
|
|
|
| User: "tony fleming" |
|
| Title: Re: self-field theory, strings, BECs, lattices of multiverses |
19 Apr 2006 06:51:48 AM |
|
|
relativity is due to the internal motions of the photon, simple as
that!!
see http://www.unifiedphysics.com/Photon%20chemistry_UP_Mar_2004.pdf
for a description of the way photon chemistry describes a physics BELOW
atomic chemistry belonging to the photons INSIDE the atom.
this chemistry provides the fields for a range of forces including
atomic physics.
it is the two-particle substructure of the photon (two particles of
equal mass and opposite charge) that provides the well known E=h*nu
continuous energy equation for the photon. when the frequency goes to
zero, then the BEC lattices form.
very much a simple picture, in contrast to that of QFT. and of course
no HUP.
Tony Fleming PhD
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hexenmeister" |
|
| Title: Re: self-field theory, strings, BECs, lattices of multiverses |
19 Apr 2006 12:21:30 PM |
|
|
"tony fleming" <tfleming1@hotkey.net.au> wrote in message =
news:1145447508.649574.280130@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
| relativity is due to the internal motions of the photon, simple as
| that!!
*****. You make it up as you go along.
I can snip too.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Dork/relcause.htm
Androcles
.
|
|
|
| User: "tony fleming" |
|
| Title: Re: self-field theory, strings, BECs, lattices of multiverses |
19 Apr 2006 05:37:21 PM |
|
|
i've been saying that relativity is based physically on the internal
motion of the photon for years!!
see http://www.unifiedphysics.com/Photon%20chemistry_UP_Mar_2004.pdf
this was presented in 2004 and it was maybe a decade before that when i
began to see that relativity is NOT a space-time warp but due to what
we could not see becuase it was an internal motion.
that is why SFT is so simple (except to a buffoon).
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hexenmeister" |
|
| Title: Re: self-field theory, strings, BECs, lattices of multiverses |
20 Apr 2006 03:31:33 AM |
|
|
"tony fleming" <tfleming1@hotkey.net.au> wrote in message =
news:1145486241.856530.209770@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
| i've been saying that relativity is based physically on the internal
| motion of the photon for years!!
hahahahaha... HAHAHAHA... hahahaha...
|=20
For those who seek mathematical truth see
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SingularMatrix.html
For those who seek singular matricies seek=20
http://www.unifiedphysics.com/SFT_Mathematics.pdf
Look, Fleming... Einstein's relativity is *****, but is certainly is =
not
based the internal "motion" of a photon.=20
Photons are alternating em fields, they do not have internal motion.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/AC/AC.htm
Androcles.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "none mike\@none" |
|
| Title: Re: self-field theory, strings, BECs, lattices of multiverses |
19 Apr 2006 06:20:39 PM |
|
|
tony fleming wrote:
i've been saying that relativity is based physically on the internal
motion of the photon for years!!
see http://www.unifiedphysics.com/Photon%20chemistry_UP_Mar_2004.pdf
this was presented in 2004 and it was maybe a decade before that when i
began to see that relativity is NOT a space-time warp but due to what
we could not see becuase it was an internal motion.
that is why SFT is so simple (except to a buffoon).
actually, the internal structure of a photon is a struggle between
epileptic angels and demons. That's why the Prince of Darkness is called
Lucifer, from the latin for "let there be light".
Then again , perhaps not.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "tony fleming" |
|
| Title: Re: self-field theory, strings, BECs, lattices of multiverses |
18 Apr 2006 06:38:04 AM |
|
|
so the c -> 0 condition puts SFT into a 'static' mode where the
substructure of the photon becomes fixed in a type of either a string,
plane, or 3D 'crystal' lattice. all other modes have c not equal 0.
this is how the BECs come about.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hexenmeister" |
|
| Title: Re: self-field theory, strings, BECs, lattices of multiverses |
18 Apr 2006 12:21:55 PM |
|
|
"tony fleming" <tfleming1@hotkey.net.au> wrote in message =
news:1145360284.891529.221950@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
*****, you are confusing Einstein's symbol 'c' with the emission
velocity of electromagnetic radiation relative to the source, "Dr" =
Phlegming
from the Outback.
See http://tinyurl.com/oou5f
Androcles PhD
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Hexenmeister" |
|
| Title: Re: self-field theory, strings, BECs, lattices of multiverses |
18 Apr 2006 12:21:56 PM |
|
|
"tony fleming" <tfleming1@hotkey.net.au> wrote in message =
news:1145360284.891529.221950@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
*****, you are confusing Einstein's symbol 'c' with the emission
velocity of electromagnetic radiation relative to the source, "Dr" =
Phlegming
from the Outback.
See http://tinyurl.com/oou5f
Androcles PhD
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
