AJAY SHARMA wrote:

dockiers wrote:

AJAY SHARMA wrote:

Sheer lies, cheating by Dr Alexander Inpain , who introduced as
Scientist and Administrator at CERN ( European Organization for Nuc=

Research ) in various post . But it proved all fraud. He was disu=

about my work Einstein Sep 1905 paper and my book
100 Years Of E=3Dmc2.
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3D23_=

An open letter to Dr Alexander Inpain as he introduced on Wrap Foru=

What you got in Cheating and Misusing Name of CERN ?
www.cern.ch
Part I
In previous many posts on Special Relativity Forum you introduced
yourself as Dr Alexander Inpain who working at CERN and running Nuc=

Reactors.

Also your reply showed that you are an administrators and post my
replies on the Notice Boards of the CERN.
So I gave lot of weightage to yours comments, which were absolutely
unscientific.
So , I could not assess how a person with SUCH POOR KNOWLEDGE can b=

CERN?
It became clear when I inquired from CERN regarding it.
So you CHEATED scientific community on the WHOLE. It is matter of
shame.
ON 28 Sep I got letter from Head Physics Dept., Dr Jean-Jacques
Blaising ( pasted below).

Subject: RE: Is Dr Inpain at CERN
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:27:30 +0200
From: "Jean-Jacques Blaising" <Jean-Jacques.Blaising@cern.ch> Add=

Address Book Add Mobile Alert

To: "ajay sharma" <physicsajay@yahoo.com>
CC: "Jean-Jacques Blaising" <Jean-Jacques.Blaising@cern.ch>

Dear Mrs Sharma,
Mr Inpain is not a member of the the CERN personnel and is not
registered at CERN as a scientific associate.
Regards,
Jean-Jacques Blaising


That you are not associated with CERN with any capacity.
So you are a liar WHO WILL BELIEVE YOU.
You have cheated the scientific community.


Part II
You don=E2=80=99t deserve the reply , but let me add.
However I am posting this reply on various Internet Groups for
information.
You have posted some links
Un moderated Internet Groups has NO scientific validity.
Even a child knows this; it is merely a forums for interactions.
My work is published in international journals after PEER REVIEW.

I will welcome ANYONE to contradict it in the PHYSICS ESSAYS (as it
originally published in it) www.physicsessays.com

See how links given by you are scientifically MEANINGLESS..

http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/browse_frm/thread/b9b8f=

It has nothing to do with my work.
http://gase1234.tripod.com/ASharma.pdf
This link is without Name and Place.
100s times I asked

in it.
But it was not put. How can you believe a person who cannot put his
name and address on the post? Apparently he is also like your elder
brother.
So EVERYTHING IS CLEAR. Only persons like you can give importance to
this
Even then if you put angle phi 89 then it SUPPORS my work . The end
result is the same.
It is incomplete in the sense that final numerical values are not
calculated.
Further
http://www.sulekha.com/blogs/blogdisplay.aspx?contributor=3Dmacactu=

This link shows the lack of UNDERSTADING of 11th Class Physics i.e.
application of Conservation of Momentum. What I can do? I can advis=

read 11th class book.
Earlier it was big NOTE by some UNKNOWN but now cut to Half.
However this author has promised me long back that author will
contradict me in PHYSICS ESSAYS. But the promise is not kept.

Part III

MY WORK IS ABSOLUTELY CORRECT, FLAWLESS.
Author/Editors/Publishers/Referees is all correct
Still there ANYONE is welcome to contradict the work in Physics Ess=

giving the facts e.g.
What is Einstein=E2=80=99s Sep 1905 paper ?
What are conditions under which it is derived?
Under what conditions experimentally it holds good?
How to generalize it under all conditions?
What is Ajay Sharma=E2=80=99s Interpretation?
How Ajay Sharma=E2=80=99s apper is different from Einstein=E2=80=

paper
How Ajay Sharma=E2=80=99s interpretation is incorrect (if it)?
What are the correct interpretations?
I HAVE ANSWERS TO ALL QUESTIONS.
If Editor Physics Essays and his Editorial Board finds your
interpretation and published the paper it is OK.
There are thousands of link to my work on the internet. All the
references are given below for the purpose.

Part IV
References.

References of Einstein=E2=80=99s work
.
A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641.
. DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND
UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?
Weblink is
Einstein=E2=80=99s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/

PartII
References of Ajay Sharma=E2=80=99s work

My work is available at
A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222.
=E2=80=9DThe Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation =EF=81=84E =

its applications in General physics and Cosmology=E2=80=9D.
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf

For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3D23_=

International Conferences
It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over =

world
--------------------------------------few of them
1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the
Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25
August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA

2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Sys=

(
Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53.

3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 20=

10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol )
University of Warwick , ENGLAND

4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD
ENGLAND

5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in
Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA ,
(2003) 585.
6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United
Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81
plus more
--------------------------------------
Journals
This paper
=E2=80=9DThe Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation =EF=81=84E =

its applications in General physics and Cosmology=E2=80=9D.
is published in journal
Physics Essays , CANADA
www.physicsessays.com
The paper
The past ,present and future of E=3Dmc2
will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts,
USA.
In parts it is published in various others journals.
----------------------
Book 100 Years of E=3Dmc2
For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3D23_=

Ajay Sharma Email

2006

--------------------------
---AJAY SHARMA responds ------------
My be true. But it is unscientifc.
Are we living in years of GALIEO ?
Then what is the place of such cheaters.
People will loose interest on the internet information like this.
It is loss of science and its progress.

I have replied him on the link
http://www.adamauton.com/warp/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3D5
Let us see what he has to say. Whatever is the case I will post here.
AJAY SHARMA

---------------------------------------------------
Can Dr Alexander Inpain will respond? . Ever since
the letter dated 28 Sep 2206 from Head TP , CERN, Dr "Jean-Jacques
Blaising" <Jean-Jacques.Blaising@cern.ch> was put on the web , Dr
Inpain stopped responding on the net.
Dr Jean-Jacques Blaising has pointed out he is not AT ALL associated
with CERN.
The world of science simply wants to know what necessity of DEEFAMING
CERN and this scientific ABUSE.
It is die to actions of such persons , the whole Internet community
is being taken lightly.
Otherwise , Internet is boon for exchange of ideas.
Can Dr Alexander Inpain will respond ?