Sick Bob Cain's Most Recent Psychopathic Tirade



 Science > Physics > Sick Bob Cain's Most Recent Psychopathic Tirade

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: ""
Date: 15 Oct 2006 05:57:09 PM
Object: Sick Bob Cain's Most Recent Psychopathic Tirade
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/msg/a20b8b2d0a30c044?dmode=source&hl=en
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified.
.

User: "Bob Cain"

Title: Gary Sokolich 15 Oct 2006 07:58:14 PM
While stalking me anonymously Gary Sokolich wrote:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/msg/a20b8b2d0a30c044?dmode=source&hl=en

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified.

Heed:
http://news.com.com/Create+an+e-annoyance%2C+go+to+jail/2010-1028_3-6022491.html
As a U.S. citizen he is now a criminal.
Bob
--
"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler."
A. Einstein
.
User: "Gary Sokolich"

Title: Re: Gary Sokolich; Response to Bob Cain's False Accusations 16 Oct 2006 07:28:52 PM
Bob Cain <arcane@arcanemethods.com> wrote in
news:xY2dnakvjr26RK_YnZ2dnUVZ_t-dnZ2d@giganews.com:

While stalking me anonymously Gary Sokolich wrote:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/msg/a20b8b2d0
a30c044?dmode=source&hl=en

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified.


Heed:

http://news.com.com/Create+an+e-annoyance%2C+go+to+jail/2010-1028_3-602
2491.html

As a U.S. citizen he is now a criminal.
Bob

This is just Bob Cain's latest tactic in a long-standing campaign of
stalking and harassing me on the internet. Bob Cain's previous stalking
and harassing tactic involved impersonating me by means of falsified
headers. Fortunately, a quick series of complaints to Bob Cain's news
provider stopped that in relatively short order. However, not to be
dissuaded, Bob Cain is now posting articles anonymously for the sole
purposes of enabling him to reply to them, using his own name, and to
falsely accuse me of the very stalking and harassing behavior in which he
is engaged. Unfortunately, because the anonymous articles are posted using
multiple anonymous remailers and a mail2news gateway, I can't prove that
Bob Cain is the poster and Bob Cain can't prove that he isn't.




.
User: "Bob Cain"

Title: Re: Gary Sokolich; Response to Bob Cain's False Accusations 17 Oct 2006 02:03:21 AM
Gary Sokolich wrote:

However, not to be
dissuaded, Bob Cain is now posting articles anonymously for the sole
purposes of enabling him to reply to them, using his own name, and to
falsely accuse me of the very stalking and harassing behavior in which he
is engaged. Unfortunately, because the anonymous articles are posted using
multiple anonymous remailers and a mail2news gateway, I can't prove that
Bob Cain is the poster and Bob Cain can't prove that he isn't.

Wow. You have finally gone completely off hook.
Bob
--
"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler."
A. Einstein
.
User: "Gary Sokolich"

Title: Re: Gary Sokolich; Response to Bob Cain's False Accusations 17 Oct 2006 07:44:50 PM
Bob Cain <arcane@arcanemethods.com> wrote in
news:3YGdnTa5jP-jHanYnZ2dnUVZ_s2dnZ2d@giganews.com:

Gary Sokolich wrote:

However, not to be
dissuaded, Bob Cain is now posting articles anonymously for the sole
purposes of enabling him to reply to them, using his own name, and to
falsely accuse me of the very stalking and harassing behavior in
which he is engaged. Unfortunately, because the anonymous articles
are posted using multiple anonymous remailers and a mail2news
gateway, I can't prove that Bob Cain is the poster and Bob Cain can't
prove that he isn't.


Wow. You have finally gone completely off hook.
Bob

Only in your sick, twisted and perverted mind. The truth of the matter is
that all I am doing is defending myself against your recent barage of lies
and increasingly bizarre, defamatory allegations.
Why you believe that your replies to my posts are commentary, but that my
replies to your posts constitute stalking, is a matter that can only be
addressed by a psychiatrist. From the perspective of a layman, like
myself, it's simply blatant hypocrisy.
Early on, I thought that you were just mentally ill, but I have since come
to realize that you are a truly malicious and evil person who may well be
demon possessed. If so, you need the help of an exorcist as well as the
help of a psychiatrist.


.

User: "Lorin David Schultz"

Title: Will all you stalking hacking psuedonymsters get a freakin' LIFE already?! 17 Oct 2006 03:47:53 AM
Bob, Rob, Gary et al...
WHOEVER the ***** you all are (not that anyone gives ***** One), would you
all please sort out your various personalities OFFLINE?!
This is about as interesting as second grade children trading seats to
"fool" the substitute teacher, and about as clever.
Now, get this: WE DON'T CARE about your petty, trivial little
disagreements. WE DON'T CARE who's impersonating who. WE THINK YOU'RE
ALL FUCKING IDIOTS! ALL OF YOU!
For love of freakin' Christ, KNOCK IT OFF already.
Yeesh...
--
"It CAN'T be too loud... some of the red lights aren't even on yet!"
- Lorin David Schultz
in the control room
making even bad news sound good
(Remove spamblock to reply)
.
User: "Roy W. Rising"

Title: Re: Will all you stalking hacking psuedonymsters get a freakin' LIFE already?! 17 Oct 2006 11:04:15 AM
"Lorin David Schultz" <Lorin@DAMNSPAMv5v.ca> wrote:

Bob, Rob, Gary et al...

WHOEVER the ***** you all are (not that anyone gives ***** One), would you
all please sort out your various personalities OFFLINE?!

This is about as interesting as second grade children trading seats to
"fool" the substitute teacher, and about as clever.

Now, get this: WE DON'T CARE about your petty, trivial little
disagreements. WE DON'T CARE who's impersonating who. WE THINK YOU'RE
ALL FUCKING IDIOTS! ALL OF YOU!

For love of freakin' Christ, KNOCK IT OFF already.

Yeesh...

I know I'll get flamed for this, and I don't care. Nor will I respond to
the inevitable inane smoke that blows my way.
"Lorin David Schultz" (or whatever you are) ~ When you learn to make your
point (whatever that is) without resorting to gutterspeak you will have
elevated yourself to a level above those you are whining about. Until
then, go away!
--
~ Roy
"If you notice the sound, it's wrong!"
.
User: "Lorin David Schultz"

Title: Re: Will all you stalking hacking psuedonymsters get a freakin' LIFE already?! 17 Oct 2006 01:34:56 PM
Roy W. Rising <rwrising@dslextreme.com> wrote:


"Lorin David Schultz" (or whatever you are)

"Whatever you are?" What's that mean? Is my given name such a
difficult concept?

When you learn to make your point (whatever that is)

Oh you have GOT to be kidding me! There's just no WAY you could miss my
"point." It was so obvious that you wouldn't even have to speak English
to get it!

without resorting to gutterspeak you will have elevated yourself to
a level above those you are whining about. Until then, go away!

Lemme get this straight Roy, the problem is my use of sailor words when
addressing serial idiots? And for this you would like me to "go away?"
Presentation supercedes content, huh? Form over function?
You know, maybe it is time for me to "go away." Then you can have free
reign to share your enviable expertise with egg crates and Mackie
preamps.
--
"It CAN'T be too loud... some of the red lights aren't even on yet!"
- Lorin David Schultz
in the control room
making even bad news sound good
(Remove spamblock to reply)
.

User: "Vladimir Vassilevsky"

Title: Re: Will all you stalking hacking psuedonymsters get a freakin' LIFEalready?! 17 Oct 2006 11:18:26 AM
Roy W. Rising wrote:

"Lorin David Schultz" <Lorin@DAMNSPAMv5v.ca> wrote:

Bob, Rob, Gary et al...

dWE DON'T CARE who's impersonating who. WE THINK YOU'RE
ALL FUCKING IDIOTS! ALL OF YOU!

I know I'll get flamed for this, and I don't care. Nor will I respond to
the inevitable inane smoke that blows my way.

"Lorin David Schultz" (or whatever you are) ~ When you learn to make your
point (whatever that is) without resorting to gutterspeak you will have
elevated yourself to a level above those you are whining about. Until
then, go away!

"Do not argue with idiots. It makes more difficult to the other people
to differentiate you from them" (Proverb).
VLV
.


User: "Bob Cain"

Title: Re: Will all you stalking hacking psuedonymsters get a freakin' LIFEalready?! 17 Oct 2006 12:45:21 PM
Lorin David Schultz wrote:

For love of freakin' Christ, KNOCK IT OFF already.

Lorin, and the others who couldn't resist, if you find it difficult to
let this stuff go by without comment, try to imagine the difficulty
you'd have if you were the perpetual target of it.
I do let the bulk of the attacks go by, but occasionally I can't
resist comment either. That's just the way it is.
Bob
--
"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler."
A. Einstein
.
User: "Gary Sokolich"

Title: Re: Will all you stalking hacking psuedonymsters get a freakin' LIFE already?! 17 Oct 2006 07:57:23 PM
Bob Cain <arcane@arcanemethods.com> wrote in
news:ZdadncUfxqIri6jYnZ2dnUVZ_rydnZ2d@giganews.com:
ship....ship

I do let the bulk of the attacks go by, but occasionally I can't
resist comment either. That's just the way it is.
Bob

Occasionally? If you believe that you are either delusional or in total
denial of reality. As the record clearly demonstrates, you resist about 1
out of 100 so-called attacks, if that; and you "occasionally" comment on
about 99 of the 100.
Perhaps in the summary of my posts that you claim to be compiling, you
should include a special section on the so-called attacks that you have
"resisted".....so everyone reading it can have a real good belly laugh.
.

User: "hank alrich"

Title: Re: Will all you stalking hacking psuedonymsters get a freakin' LIFE already?! 17 Oct 2006 04:11:37 PM
Bob Cain wrote:

Lorin David Schultz wrote:

For love of freakin' Christ, KNOCK IT OFF already.


Lorin, and the others who couldn't resist, if you find it difficult to
let this stuff go by without comment, try to imagine the difficulty
you'd have if you were the perpetual target of it.

I do let the bulk of the attacks go by, but occasionally I can't
resist comment either. That's just the way it is.

I'd not grant the pricks a response. In this forum you are the only one
among Lorin's listed crowd who could possibly muster that kind of
self-control. Let 'em keeping jacking off in their closets.
--
ha
.
User: "Bob Cain"

Title: Re: Will all you stalking hacking psuedonymsters get a freakin' LIFEalready?! 17 Oct 2006 10:45:47 PM
hank alrich wrote:

I'd not grant the pricks a response. In this forum you are the only one
among Lorin's listed crowd who could possibly muster that kind of
self-control.

I'll try harder but perfection has escaped me to date. ;-)
I really appreciate your civility, Hank.
Bob
--
"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler."
A. Einstein
.




User: "PARTICLEREDDY STRAYDOG"

Title: Re: Gary Sokolich; Response to Bob Cain's False Accusations 17 Oct 2006 03:45:06 AM
hi guys,
till now we have come up with solutions for the problems
related to dsp,signals and systems, any solution for this from great
experts of this group.
give up bob cain and gary sokolich
be cool :)
regards
particlereddy
Bob Cain wrote:

Gary Sokolich wrote:

However, not to be
dissuaded, Bob Cain is now posting articles anonymously for the sole
purposes of enabling him to reply to them, using his own name, and to
falsely accuse me of the very stalking and harassing behavior in which he
is engaged. Unfortunately, because the anonymous articles are posted using
multiple anonymous remailers and a mail2news gateway, I can't prove that
Bob Cain is the poster and Bob Cain can't prove that he isn't.


Wow. You have finally gone completely off hook.


Bob
--

"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler."

A. Einstein

.


User: "I. Care"

Title: Re: Gary Sokolich; Response to Bob Cain's False Accusations 16 Oct 2006 07:37:32 PM
In article <wbCdnd_aw4BZvqnYnZ2dnUVZ_qidnZ2d@giganews.com>,
spam@spam.com says...

Bob Cain <arcane@arcanemethods.com> wrote in
news:xY2dnakvjr26RK_YnZ2dnUVZ_t-dnZ2d@giganews.com:

While stalking me anonymously Gary Sokolich wrote:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/msg/a20b8b2d0
a30c044?dmode=source&hl=en

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified.


Heed:

http://news.com.com/Create+an+e-annoyance%2C+go+to+jail/2010-1028_3-602
2491.html

As a U.S. citizen he is now a criminal.
Bob




This is just Bob Cain's latest tactic in a long-standing campaign of
stalking and harassing me on the internet. Bob Cain's previous stalking
and harassing tactic involved impersonating me by means of falsified
headers. Fortunately, a quick series of complaints to Bob Cain's news
provider stopped that in relatively short order. However, not to be
dissuaded, Bob Cain is now posting articles anonymously for the sole
purposes of enabling him to reply to them, using his own name, and to
falsely accuse me of the very stalking and harassing behavior in which he
is engaged. Unfortunately, because the anonymous articles are posted using
multiple anonymous remailers and a mail2news gateway, I can't prove that
Bob Cain is the poster and Bob Cain can't prove that he isn't.
















What does this have to do with the rest of us besides reading your rant?
--
I. Care
Address fake until the SPAM goes away ;-}
.


User: "MathFreak NoMore"

Title: Re: Gary Sokolich 15 Oct 2006 08:31:25 PM
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 17:58:14 -0700, Bob Cain wrote:

http://news.com.com/Create+an+e-annoyance%2C+go+to+jail/2010-1028_3-6022491.html

As a U.S. citizen he is now a criminal.

I heard about it but I thought it was only for
telephone communication. Hmm. I don't have time but if
you could come up with more info on this (i.e. if it
applies to usenet also or not) please post. It would
have _substantial_ effect on the quality of my messages
for you suckers :)
--
"marA be kheyre to omid nist sharr maresAn"
.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER