SMOKING GUN OF FOREKNOWLEDGE OF 911 -- Naudet's OTHER Video -- Pedestrians' Reaction



 Science > Physics > SMOKING GUN OF FOREKNOWLEDGE OF 911 -- Naudet's OTHER Video -- Pedestrians' Reaction

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Ed Conrad"
Date: 17 Apr 2006 05:00:07 AM
Object: SMOKING GUN OF FOREKNOWLEDGE OF 911 -- Naudet's OTHER Video -- Pedestrians' Reaction
<
<
There indeed a "Smoking Gun" that proves beyond ALL
reasonable doubt that there was a government conspiracy
responsible for the horror of 911 -- and the horrific aftermath
of the on-going war in Iraq..
<
It is the "SECOND" Naudet Brothers' video taken when the first
WTC tower exploded (PLEASE note that I'm not referring to their
first video when they allegedly caught the first plane supposedly
commandeered by "terrorists" flying into the first tower.)
<
That video, incidentally, is as phony as a $4 bill, having a plane
superimposed onto the video in the hours after it was taken
and before it was telecast to the world. .
<
But the SECOND video taken at the time the first tower exploded
is proof of FOREKNOWLEDGE -- confirming, beyond all reasonable
doubt, that the Naudets' were stooges in the 911 conspiracy.
<
The video in question, showing crowd reaction to the first
explosion, is this one:
<

http://www.911foreknowledge.com/bravenewworld.htm

<
Meanwhile, If there is any New Yorker who actually saw American
Airlines Flight 11 IN FLIGHT before striking the first tower, stand up
and be heard. I maintain no plane struck the first tower.

All anyone can say -- in all honesty -- is that they HEARD
the explosion, looked up and ASSUMED a plane had hit the first
tower because there was none, neither a missile. The explosion
was caused by explosives stockpiled inside.
<
The Naudet Brothers' video, showing a plane striking the tower,
was supposed to convince us that this IS what happened.
<
True, the roar of a low-flying plane can be heard in the video
just before the imaginary plane hit, but inserting such a roar
into a video would be child's play to someone with expertise.
<
This SECOND video is self-explanatory (read the accompanying
URL text), and there was no reason in the world to have taken it
unless it was an attempt to provide more fraudulent "evidence"
that a plane had hit the first tower.
<
This SECOND Naudet video was just one of a series of comedic
errors in the whole 911 shenanigans.
<
They include -- the phony cell phone calls, the Pentagon fiasco, the
bogus Osama bin Laden video in which he confesses to masterminding
911, etc.
<
They were all propaganda to convince the American public that 19
terrorists (at least a half-dozen still alive) were responsible for
911, thus opening wide the door for the invasion of Afghanistan and
Iraq.
<
If the conspirators had any common sense, the "SECOND" Naudet
video of the pedestrians would NEVER have seen the light of day.
<
I don't know the full name of the person who deserves credit for
providing the URL of "pedestrian reaction." But, whomever it was --
his first name is Ray -- deserves a sincere thank you.
<
==========
<
I MIGHT ADD -- On Sept. 11, 2001 -- 911-- radio and TV news in
the Russia reported that one of its satellites revealed that a U.S.
military jet shot down United Flight 175 (near Shanksville, Pa.)
<
=================================
<

WORLDWIDE NEWS AGENCIES

Associated Press AP
African Eye News Service
Agence France Presse
APTN
Bloomberg
Cable News Network
EFE News
Indo Asian News Service
Iran Press Service
Iranian Students News Agency (ISNA)
Iraq Press
IRIN News
Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA)
Inter Press Service
Itar-Tass -- Russia
Latin American Press
Middle East News Agency
Pravda -- Russian News and Analysis
Prima News Agency
Reuters
Television News Archive
United Nations News Wire Service
United Press International UPI
Xinhua News Agency -- China
==========
Agence France Press, AFP
Agencia EFE, EFE
Agencia Estado
Agencia Lusa
Agency Telegraphique Belge De Press, AGNECE BELGA
Agenzia Nazionale Stampa Associata, ANSA
Agenzia Giornalistica Italia, AGI
Algemeen Nederlands Persbureau, ANP
Albanian Telegraphic Agency, ATA
Alternativna Informativna Mreza, AIM
Anadolu News Agency
Armanian News Agency, NOYAN TAPAN
ArmenPress
Asbar News Agency
Associated Press, AP
Athens News Agency, APE
ATH news agency - Kharkov, Ukraine
Atlantic News Service
Austria Press-Agentur, APA
Australian Associated Press, AAP
Baltic News Service, BNS
Bolivia Web - News from the ERBOL News Agency
Bulgarian Telegraph Agency, BTA
Canadian Press, CP
Central News Agency, CNA
Ceskolovenska Tiskova Kancelat, CTK
China News Service
COMPASS Media, Inc.
Cubapress
Cyprus News Agency, CNA
Deutsche Presse - Agentur Gmbh , DPA
ELTA - Lithuanian news agency
Eesti Teadete Agentur, ETA
H.K China News Agency
Hrvatska Izvjestajna Novinska Agencija, HINA
Indonesian National News Agency, ANTARA
Interfax News Agency
Islamic Republic News Agency, IRNA
Jiji Press (Jiji Tsushin-Sha)
Korean Central News Agency, KCNA
Kyodo News Service
LETA News Agency
MIA - Macedonian Information Agency
Makfax - Macedonian News Agency
Reality Macedonia
Magyar Tavirati Iroda, MTI
Malaysian National News Agency - BERNAMA
Mediafax - Romanian News Agency
Mercopress News Agency
Montsame News Agency, SABA
New Zealand Press Association, NEPA
Official Jordania News Agency, PETRA
Oman News Agency
Pakistan Press International, PPI
Panafrican News Agency
Polska Agencja Prasowa, PAP
Prensa Latina
Press association
Prime-TASS Economic News Agency
Reuters
Russian Information Agency, Ria "Novosti"
Schweizerische Depeschen Agentur, SDA
Serbian Press Agency, SRNA
Slovene Press Agency, STA
SNARK News Agency
Suomen Tietotoimisto
Tanjug News Agency
Telegrafnoye Agnetstvo Sovietskogo Snyuza, TASS
Tidningranas Talegrambyra, TT
Tlacova agentura Slovenskej republiky, TASR
Vietnam News Agency
Yemen News Agency, SABA
Yonhap News Agency
Xinhua News Agency
<

WORLD'S LARGEST NEWSPAPERS

Rank Country Circulation
1. Yomiuri Shimbun (Japan) 14,532,694
2. Asahi Shimbun (Japan) 12,601,375
3. Sichuan Ribao (China) 8,000,000
4. Mainichi Shimbun (Japan) 5,845,857
5. Bild (Germany) 5,674,400
6. Chunichi Shimbun (Japan) 4,323,144
7. Sun (England) 3,718,354
8. Renmin Ribao (China) 3,000,000
9. Sankei Shimbun (Japan) 2,890,835
10. Nihon Keizai Shimbun Japan2,705,877
11. Gongren Ribao (China) 2,500,000
12. Daily Mail (England) 2,387,867
13. Daily Mirror (England) 2,339,001
14. Chosun Ilbo (South Korea) 2,225,000
15. Dong-A Ilbo (South Korea) 2,150,000
16. Hokkaido Shimbun (Japan) 1,962,666
17. Eleftherotypia (Greece) 1,858,316
18. Xin Min Wan Bao (China) 1,750,000
19. Wall Street Journal (U.S.) 1,740,450
20. Yangcheng Wanbao China 1,730,000
21. Kerala Kaumudi (India) 1,720,000
22. Wen Hui Bao Daily (China 1,700,000
23. USA Today (United States) 1,653,428
24. Joong-Ang Ilbo (S. Korea) 1,550,000
25. Economic Daily (China) 1,500,000
26. Rodong Sinmun (N. Korea) 1,500,000
27. Kyung-Hyang Daily News 1,478,537
28. Sports Nippon (Japan) 1,452,699
29. Shizuoka Shimbun (Japan)) 1,442,310
30. Sankei Sports (Japan) 1,367,734
31. Deutche Allgemeine Germ 1,313,400
32. United Daily News (Taiwan )1,300,000
33. China Times (Taiwan) 1,270,000
34. O Estado de Sao Paulo Brazil) 1,230,160
35. Jang Daily (Pakistan) 1,200,000
36. Jang Lahore (Pakistan) 1,200,000
37. Akhbar El Yom/Al Akhbar (Egypt) 1,159,339
38. Hankook Ilbo (South Korea) 1,156,000
39. Hochi Shimbun (Japan) 1,119,031
40. Daily Express (England) 1,118,981
41. Los Angeles Times (U.S.) 1,067,540
42. New York Times (U>S) 1,066,540
43. Tokyo Shimbun (Japan 1,062,080
44. Daily Telegraph (England) 1,047,861
45. Nishinippon Shimbun Japan 1,041,104
46. Jiefang Ribao (China) 1,000,000
47. Nanfang Ribao (China) 1,000,000
48. Nongmin Ribao (China) 1,000,000
49. Zhongguo Qingnian Ribao (China) 1,000,000
50. Nikkan Sports (Japan) 984,058
51. Al Akhbar (Egypt) 980,000
52. Guangming Ribao (China) 950,000
53. Al Ahram (Egypt) 900,000
54. Al Goumhouriya (Egypt) 900,000
55. Seoul Shinmun (S. Korea) 900,000
56. Xin Hua Ribao (China) 900,000
57. Verdens Gang (Norway) 870,267
58. Corriere della Sera (Italy) 868,266
59. Kyoto Shimbun (Japan) 839,499
60. Chugoku Shimbun (Japan) 820,000
61 Kobe Shimbun Japan 820,000
62. Times of India (India) 813,000
63. Kobe Shimbun (Japan) 810,353
64. Beijing Wanbao (China) 800,000
65. Hubei Ribao (China) 800,000
66. Jiefangjun Ribao (China) 800,000
67. Trybuna Slaska (Poland) 800,000
68. La Gazzetta dello Sport Italy 798,243
69. Ouest-France (France) 790,133
70. Holos Ukrainy (Ukraine) 768,000
71. The Times (England) 766,999
72. ABC (Spain) 765,668
73. Washington Post (U.SSS>) 759,122
74. La Repubblica (Italy) 754,930
75. De Telegraf (Netherlands) 751,400
76. Gazeta Wyborcza (Poland) 750,000
77. Zero Hora (Brazil) 727,188
78. Diario dos Campos (Brazil) 725,000
79. New York Daily News (U.S.) 723,143
80. Sabah (Turkey) 722,950
81. Jornal da Tarde (Brazil) 709,793
82. Beijing Ribao (China) 700,000
83. Chongqing Ribao (China) 700,000
84. Clarin (Argentina) 700,000
85. Thai Rath (Thailand 700,000
86. Zhejiang Ribao (China) 700,000
87. Diario Insular (Portugal) 684,143
88. Granma Internacional (Cuba) 675,000
89. Chicago Tribune (U.S>) 673,508
90. Daily Record (Scotland) 671,267
91. China Daily News (Taiwan) 670,000
92. The Daily Star (England) 650,406
93. Guangxi Ribao (China) 650,000
94. Malayala Manorama (India) 630,068
95. La Nacion (Argentina) 630,000
96. Hurriyet (Turkey) 615,579
97. Herald Sun (Australia) 600,000
98. Hurriyet (Pakistan) 600,000
99. Liaoning Ribao (China) 600,000
100. Oriental Daily News (Hong Kong) 600,000
<

100 LARGEST U.S. NEWSPAPERS

Rank Circulation
1. USA Today (Arlington, Va.) 2,154,539
2. Wall Street Journal (NY N.Y.) 2,091,062
3. Times (New York, N.Y.) 1,118,565
4. Times (Los Angeles) 914,584
5. Post (Washington, DC) 732,872
6. Daily News (New York, N.Y.) 729,124
7. Tribune (Chicago) 680,879
8. Post (New York, N.Y.) 652,426
9. Newsday (Long Island, N.Y.) 580,069
10. Chronicle (Houston) 553,018
11. Chronicle (San Francisco) 512,640
12. Morning News (Dallas) 510,133
13. Sun-Times (Chicago) 481,798
14 Globe (Boston) 450,538
15. Arizona Republic (Phoenix) 432,284
16. Star-Ledger (Newark, N.J.) 408,672
17. Star Tribune (Minneapolis) 380,354
18. Inquirer (Philadelphia) 376,493
19. Journal-Constitution (Atlanta) 371,853
20. Plain Dealer (Cleveland) 365,288
21. Free Press (Detroit) 352,714
22. Oregonian (Portland) 342,789
23. Times (St. Petersburg, Fla.) 334,742
24. Union-Tribune (San Diego) 328,531
25. Herald (Miami) 315,850
26. Register Orange County CA 302,864
27. Sun (Baltimore) 301,186
28. Bee (Sacramento, Calif.) 289,905
29. Post (Denver) 288,937
30. Rocky Mtn. News Denver 288,889
31. Post-Dispatch (St. Louis) 285,869
32. Mercury News San Jose CA 271,997
33. Star (Kansas City, Mo.) 267,273
34. Sentinel (Orlando, Fla.) 257,222
35. Times-Picayune N Orleans 253,610
36. Dispatch (Columbus, Ohio) 252,564
37. Star (Indianapolis) 249,891
38. Journal Sentinel Milwaukee 244,288
39. Post-Gazette Pittsburgh Pa 242,546
40. Herald (Boston) 241,457
41. Sun-Sentinel (Ft L'dale, Fla ) 233,634
42. Times (Seattle) 231,505
43. News (Detroit) 227,392
44. Observer (Charlotte, N.C.) 226,849
45. Tribune (Tampa, Fla.) 224,220
46. Express-News S Antonio Tx 222,536
47. Investor's Business Daily LA 215,788
48. Star-Telegram Ft Worth, TX) 215,452
49. Courier-Journal L'ville Ky 213,176
50. News (Buffalo, N.Y.) 207,989
51. Daily Oklahoman Okla City 207,538
52. Virginian-Pilot (Norfolk, Va.) 201,141
53. World-Herald Omaha Neb. 192,075
54. Pioneer Press(St Pau, Minn 190,392
55. Times-Dispatch Richmond 188,540
56. Courant (Hartford, Conn.) 185,570
57. Press-Enterprise R'side CA 183,974
58. Democrat-Gazette (L'l Rock 183,343
59. American-Statesman Austin 183,312
60. Contra Costa Times (Calif.) 182,541
61. Enquirer (Cincinnati) 182,176
62. Record (Bergen County, N.J.) 179,270
63. Daily News (Los Angeles) 178,360
64. Democrat (Rochester, N.Y.) 173,900
65. Tennessean (Nashville) 172,149
66. Post (W. Palm Beach, Fla.) 168,147
67. Times-Union (Jacksonville, Fla) 167,851
68. Journal (Providence, R.I.) 167,609
69. Asbury Park Press (N.J.) 167,284
70. News & Observer Raleigh NC 163,769
71. Review-Journal (Las Vegas) 160,391
72. Bee (Fresno, Calif.) 158,651
73. Commercial Appeal Memphis 157,820
74. Register (Des Moines, Iowa) 150,851
75. Post-Intelligencer (Seattle) 150,851
76. Daily Herald (Chicago) 150,364
77. News (Birmingham, Ala.) 148,938
78. Daily News (Philadelphia) 143,631
79. Journal News Westchester NY142,873
80. Advertiser (Honolulu) 142,025
81. Blade (Toledo, Ohio) 139,520
82. World (Tulsa, Okla.) 139,383
83. Press (Grand Rapids, Mich.) 138,620
84. Tribune (Salt Lake City) 134,985
85. Beacon Journal (Akron, Ohio) 128,511
86. News Tribune (Tacoma, Wash.) 128,511
87. Daily News (Dayton, Ohio) 126,642
88. La Opinion (Los Angeles, Calif.) 124,692
89. Post-Standard (Syracuse, N.Y.) 120,701
90. Tribune-Review (Greensburg Pa) 119,646
91. News Journal (Wilmington, Del.) 116,398
92. News-Sentinel (Knoxville, Tenn.) 114,593
93. State (Columbia, S.C.) 114,442
94. Morning Call (Allentown, Pa.) 111,594
95. Journal (Albuquerque) 109,693
96. Herald-Leader (Lexington, Ky.) 106,941
97. Herald-Tribune (Sarasota, Fla.) 105,636
98. News-Journal (Daytona Fla.) 104,654
99. Telegram (Worcester MA) 102,592
100. Times (Washington, DC) 102,255
<

COUNTRIES OF THE WORLD

Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
Andorra
Angola
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
B
Bahamas
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Benin
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
Brunei Darussalam
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burma (Myanmar)
Burundi
C
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Cape Verde
Central African Republic
Chad Chile
China
Colombia
Comoros
Congo
Congo,
Democratic Republic of the Costa Rica
Côte d'Ivoire
Croatia
Cuba
Cyprus
Czech Republic
D
Denmark
Djibouti Dominica
Dominican Republic
E
East Timor
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
England (U.K.)
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Estonia
Ethiopia
F Fiji
Finland
France
G
Gabon
Gambia
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Great Britain (U.K.)
Greece
Grenada
Guatemala
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guyana
H Haiti
Honduras
Hungary
I
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Ireland
Israel
Italy
J
Jamaica
Japan
Jordan
K
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kiribati
Korea, North
Korea
South Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
L
Laos
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
M
Macedonia
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali Malta
Marshall Islands
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mexico
Micronesia
Moldova
Monaco
Mongolia
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
N
Namibia
Nauru
Nepal
The Netherlands
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
Northern Ireland (U.K.)
Norway
O
Oman
P
Pakistan
Palau
Palestinian State*
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
The Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Q
Qatar
R
Romania
Russi
Rwanda
S
St. Kitts and Nevis
St. Lucia
St. Vincent and The Grenadines
Samoa
San Marino
São Tomé and Príncipe
Saudi Arabia
Scotland (U.K.)
Senegal
Serbia and Montenegro
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
Somalia
South Africa
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sudan
Suriname
Swaziland
Sweden
Switzerland
Syria
T
Taiwan
Tajikistan
Tanzania
Thailand
Togo
Tonga
Trinidad and Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Tuvalu
U
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
United States
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
V
Vanuatu
Vatican City (Holy See)
Venezuela
Vietnam
W
Wales (U.K.
Western Sahara*
Y
Yemen
Yugoslavia
Z
Zaire
Zambia
Zimbabwe


(cc) Karl Rove ***** Cheney President Bush Scooter
Libby Tony Blair Saddam Hussein New York firemen
World Trade Center Larry Silverstein Rudy Giuliani
<
.

User: "Bob Cain"

Title: Re: SMOKING GUN OF FOREKNOWLEDGE OF 911 -- Naudet's OTHER Video --Pedestrians' Reaction 27 Apr 2006 04:22:56 AM
Ed Conrad wrote:

Meanwhile, If there is any New Yorker who actually saw American
Airlines Flight 11 IN FLIGHT before striking the first tower, stand up
and be heard. I maintain no plane struck the first tower.

My (then) 30 year old daughter saw the 1st plane coming in and saw it do
corrective maneuvers to make the hit. It still haunts her awake or
asleep. You are a harmful moron and should simply disappear.
Bob
--
"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler."
A. Einstein
.

User: "Freedom Fighter"

Title: Re: SMOKING GUN OF FOREKNOWLEDGE OF 911 -- Naudet's OTHER Video -- Pedestrians' Reaction 17 Apr 2006 06:28:39 PM
I smell propaganda and disinformation here - a ridiculous assertion that no
plane struck the first tower, though one DID strike the second to be hit.
Frankly, this seems to be an attempt to make 9/11 truth-seekers look like
the "kooks" that trolls and official-story shills smear them as being.
The REAL smoking guns are the demolition explosives collapse of building 7,
and the total failure of NORAD to intercept even ONE of the FOUR subsonic
jets on courses towards known terrorist targets.
9/11 was an INSIDE JOB - and HERE IS THE PROOF:
The deliberate demolition by explosives of WTC building 7, just
hours after the collapse of the twin towers, is a matter of record,
not one requiring proof. The planes that struck the towers did not
structurally damage building 7. No steel frame building has EVER
collapsed from even a serious fire, and the fires in building 7
were limited, not extensive. Videos show the collapse began with
the roof penthouse, though the fires were only on a few of the
lower floors. These probably were the result of arson, as falling debris
from the towers would have only ignited the roof and upper floors.
See documentation at http://www.wtc7.net/
and http://www.prisonplanet.com/012004watson.html
Strangely, the 9/11 Commission's final report IGNORED building 7
entirely!
Explosive demolitions take considerable time to set up (see
http://science.howstuffworks.com/building-implosion1.htm). The
explosives could not possibly have been properly placed around the
structural supports and wired for detonation in building 7 in the
few hours between the attacks and that building's collapse. Yet
that collapse was clearly a professionally executed demolition by
explosives.
Therefore -
THE DEMOLITION EXPLOSIVES IN BUILDING 7 WERE PUT IN
PLACE PRIOR TO THE PLANES IMPACTING THE TWIN TOWERS!
Therefore -
The 9/11 attacks were KNOWN OF IN ADVANCE, and DELIBERATELY
ALLOWED TO OCCUR! It was intended beforehand that building 7 and
the twin towers all be completely destroyed, KILLING THE THOUSANDS
OF PEOPLE REMAINING IN THEM!
The above documented facts alone do not rigorously prove that
previously placed explosives likewise brought down the twin towers,
but see the following:
A paper published by Steven E. Jones, Professor of Physics, Brigham
Young University, concludes that prepositioned demolition
explosives brought down all three collapsed WTC buildings, not the
plane impacts or fires. Photos, audio, and video clips accompany
this report. You can see this at
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html
Further evidence can be found at:
http://www.attackonamerica.net/proofofcontrolleddemolitionatwtc.htm
This author has a master's degree in Engineering from Stanford
University, and a Ph.D. in Psychology from the University of
Oregon.
Many human body fragments have been found on the roofs of nearby buildings.
These were too far away for jumpers from the towers to have landed on them.
If the towers simply collapsed from damage and fire, what blew these bodies
to bits and sent the fragments flying for considerable distances?
Two unexplained "spikes" in seismic records indicate huge bursts of
energy shook the ground beneath the twin towers immediately prior
to their collapse.
http://www.americanfreepress.net/09_03_02/NEW_SEISMIC_/new_seismic.html
In addition, the total failure of our sophisticated NORAD aerospace
defense system to intercept even one of the four "hijacked" jets in
subsonic flight for hours, towards known terrorist targets, can
only be explained as deliberate.
Many deniers of these unprecedented crimes of mass murder are
simply psychologically incapable of considering them possible.
Misled by the corporate/government-controlled media, deceived by an
elaborate cover-up, and indoctrinated with a perverted sense of
"patriotism," they are under the delusion that only barbaric
foreign terrorists could commit such inhuman atrocities. But
foreign terrorists could not have planted demolition explosives in
advance. HOMELAND TERRORISTS had to do that! The implications of
this are literally unthinkable to many, which is just what the evil
perpetrators of this crime against humanity are counting on.
Given the shock and horror, the massive death and destruction of
these events, irrational denial is understandable. History reveals
despicable acts of terror by unscrupulous powers in the USSR,
Germany, China, and elsewhere. Why would this evil side of human
nature not surface here in America?
Overcoming denial and exposing the truth is the only hope for
saving us from a fascist regime of vicious killers as bad as the
Nazis ever were. Should we wait to find out if they can be even
worse?
CONTACT YOUR REPRESENTATIVES IN CONGRESS AND THE SENATE.
DEMAND A NEW AND INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION OF THIS
CRIME OF THE CENTURY!
More 9/11 documentation:
http://www.st911.org/
http://www.septembereleventh.org/kc/multimedia/
http://911busters.com/911-Commission.html
http://www.septembereleventh.org/audio.php
http://911busters.com/SanFran04/index.html
http://www.911truth.org/index.php?topic=gallery
http://www.reopen911.org/
http://www.911truth.org/
http://www.911truthseekers.org/
http://www.911truthseekers.org/modules/news/
http://www.gnn.tv/
http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_apc.pdf
http://www.911studies.com/index.html
http://www.septembereleventh.org/index.php
http://infowars.com/
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/
http://www.mujca.com/index.htm
http://proliberty.com/observer/20051213.htm
http://911research.wtc7.net/index.html
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html
http://911review.com/
http://guardian.250free.com/wtc/dust-cloud.htm
http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/2001/t11182001_t1012pm.html
.
User: "Animal Nomailfor me@com,com"

Title: Re: SMOKING GUN OF FOREKNOWLEDGE OF 911 -- Naudet's OTHER Video -- Pedestrians' Reaction 17 Apr 2006 06:55:11 PM
"Freedom Fighter" <liberty@once.net> wrote in message
news:HwV0g.16775$az4.8614@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...

I smell propaganda and disinformation here - a ridiculous assertion that

no

plane struck the first tower, though one DID strike the second to be

hit.

Frankly, this seems to be an attempt to make 9/11 truth-seekers look

like

the "kooks" that trolls and official-story shills smear them as being.

The smell is from having you head stuck up your ***** for so long.


The REAL smoking guns are the demolition explosives collapse of building

7,

and the total failure of NORAD to intercept even ONE of the FOUR

subsonic

jets on courses towards known terrorist targets.

No smoking gun, just kook urban myths.


<rest of kook kut and paste snipped>
.

User: "Vandar"

Title: Re: SMOKING GUN OF FOREKNOWLEDGE OF 911 -- Naudet's OTHER Video --Pedestrians' Reaction 17 Apr 2006 07:18:42 PM
Freedom Fighter wrote:

I smell propaganda and disinformation here - a ridiculous assertion that no
plane struck the first tower, though one DID strike the second to be hit.
Frankly, this seems to be an attempt to make 9/11 truth-seekers look like
the "kooks" that trolls and official-story shills smear them as being.

The self-proclaimed "truth-seekers" do a fine enough job of that
themselves, as you so willingly demonstrate every time you post the
diatribe below.

The REAL smoking guns are the demolition explosives collapse of building 7,
and the total failure of NORAD to intercept even ONE of the FOUR subsonic
jets on courses towards known terrorist targets.

9/11 was an INSIDE JOB - and HERE IS THE PROOF:

The deliberate demolition by explosives of WTC building 7, just
hours after the collapse of the twin towers, is a matter of record,
not one requiring proof. The planes that struck the towers did not
structurally damage building 7. No steel frame building has EVER
collapsed from even a serious fire, and the fires in building 7
were limited, not extensive. Videos show the collapse began with
the roof penthouse, though the fires were only on a few of the
lower floors. These probably were the result of arson, as falling debris
from the towers would have only ignited the roof and upper floors.

See documentation at http://www.wtc7.net/
and http://www.prisonplanet.com/012004watson.html

Strangely, the 9/11 Commission's final report IGNORED building 7
entirely!

Explosive demolitions take considerable time to set up (see
http://science.howstuffworks.com/building-implosion1.htm). The
explosives could not possibly have been properly placed around the
structural supports and wired for detonation in building 7 in the
few hours between the attacks and that building's collapse. Yet
that collapse was clearly a professionally executed demolition by
explosives.

Therefore -
THE DEMOLITION EXPLOSIVES IN BUILDING 7 WERE PUT IN
PLACE PRIOR TO THE PLANES IMPACTING THE TWIN TOWERS!

Therefore -
The 9/11 attacks were KNOWN OF IN ADVANCE, and DELIBERATELY
ALLOWED TO OCCUR! It was intended beforehand that building 7 and
the twin towers all be completely destroyed, KILLING THE THOUSANDS
OF PEOPLE REMAINING IN THEM!

The above documented facts alone do not rigorously prove that
previously placed explosives likewise brought down the twin towers,
but see the following:

A paper published by Steven E. Jones, Professor of Physics, Brigham
Young University, concludes that prepositioned demolition
explosives brought down all three collapsed WTC buildings, not the
plane impacts or fires. Photos, audio, and video clips accompany
this report. You can see this at
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html

Further evidence can be found at:
http://www.attackonamerica.net/proofofcontrolleddemolitionatwtc.htm
This author has a master's degree in Engineering from Stanford
University, and a Ph.D. in Psychology from the University of
Oregon.

Many human body fragments have been found on the roofs of nearby buildings.
These were too far away for jumpers from the towers to have landed on them.
If the towers simply collapsed from damage and fire, what blew these bodies
to bits and sent the fragments flying for considerable distances?

Two unexplained "spikes" in seismic records indicate huge bursts of
energy shook the ground beneath the twin towers immediately prior
to their collapse.
http://www.americanfreepress.net/09_03_02/NEW_SEISMIC_/new_seismic.html

In addition, the total failure of our sophisticated NORAD aerospace
defense system to intercept even one of the four "hijacked" jets in
subsonic flight for hours, towards known terrorist targets, can
only be explained as deliberate.

Many deniers of these unprecedented crimes of mass murder are
simply psychologically incapable of considering them possible.
Misled by the corporate/government-controlled media, deceived by an
elaborate cover-up, and indoctrinated with a perverted sense of
"patriotism," they are under the delusion that only barbaric
foreign terrorists could commit such inhuman atrocities. But
foreign terrorists could not have planted demolition explosives in
advance. HOMELAND TERRORISTS had to do that! The implications of
this are literally unthinkable to many, which is just what the evil
perpetrators of this crime against humanity are counting on.

Given the shock and horror, the massive death and destruction of
these events, irrational denial is understandable. History reveals
despicable acts of terror by unscrupulous powers in the USSR,
Germany, China, and elsewhere. Why would this evil side of human
nature not surface here in America?

Overcoming denial and exposing the truth is the only hope for
saving us from a fascist regime of vicious killers as bad as the
Nazis ever were. Should we wait to find out if they can be even
worse?

CONTACT YOUR REPRESENTATIVES IN CONGRESS AND THE SENATE.
DEMAND A NEW AND INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION OF THIS
CRIME OF THE CENTURY!

More 9/11 documentation:
http://www.st911.org/
http://www.septembereleventh.org/kc/multimedia/
http://911busters.com/911-Commission.html
http://www.septembereleventh.org/audio.php
http://911busters.com/SanFran04/index.html
http://www.911truth.org/index.php?topic=gallery
http://www.reopen911.org/
http://www.911truth.org/
http://www.911truthseekers.org/
http://www.911truthseekers.org/modules/news/
http://www.gnn.tv/
http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_apc.pdf
http://www.911studies.com/index.html
http://www.septembereleventh.org/index.php
http://infowars.com/
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/
http://www.mujca.com/index.htm
http://proliberty.com/observer/20051213.htm
http://911research.wtc7.net/index.html
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html
http://911review.com/
http://guardian.250free.com/wtc/dust-cloud.htm
http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/2001/t11182001_t1012pm.html


.
User: "dudalb"

Title: Re: SMOKING GUN OF FOREKNOWLEDGE OF 911 -- Naudet's OTHER Video -- Pedestrians' Reaction 17 Apr 2006 10:17:26 PM
The 9/11 conspiracy kooks are giving those of us who despise The Bush
administration a bad name.
.
User: "Vandar"

Title: Re: SMOKING GUN OF FOREKNOWLEDGE OF 911 -- Naudet's OTHER Video --Pedestrians' Reaction 17 Apr 2006 10:36:43 PM
dudalb wrote:

The 9/11 conspiracy kooks are giving those of us who despise The Bush
administration a bad name.

I've said it before: There a lot of perfectly legitimate reasons to take
this administration to task. Those who proclaim themselves part of some
"9/11 truth movement" help the administration avoid being taken to task.
.
User: "tj Frazir"

Title: Re: SMOKING GUN OF FOREKNOWLEDGE OF 911 -- Naudet's OTHER Video --... 18 Apr 2006 01:03:09 AM
Shure ,,the moon hoax ***** is nasa screaming so much stupid ***** to
hide any real information under a mountain of *****.

.




User: "BDK"

Title: Re: SMOKING GUN OF FOREKNOWLEDGE OF 911 -- Naudet's OTHER Video -- Pedestrians' Reaction 18 Apr 2006 03:37:31 AM
In article <HwV0g.16775$az4.8614@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
liberty@once.net says...

I smell propaganda and disinformation here - a ridiculous assertion that no
plane struck the first tower, though one DID strike the second to be hit.
Frankly, this seems to be an attempt to make 9/11 truth-seekers look like
the "kooks" that trolls and official-story shills smear them as being.

Well, sometimes it's just the truth hurting..


The REAL smoking guns are the demolition explosives collapse of building 7,
and the total failure of NORAD to intercept even ONE of the FOUR subsonic
jets on courses towards known terrorist targets.

Here we go again...


9/11 was an INSIDE JOB - and HERE IS THE PROOF:

The deliberate demolition by explosives of WTC building 7, just
hours after the collapse of the twin towers, is a matter of record,
not one requiring proof. The planes that struck the towers did not
structurally damage building 7. No steel frame building has EVER
collapsed from even a serious fire, and the fires in building 7
were limited, not extensive. Videos show the collapse began with
the roof penthouse, though the fires were only on a few of the
lower floors. These probably were the result of arson, as falling debris
from the towers would have only ignited the roof and upper floors.

See documentation at http://www.wtc7.net/
and http://www.prisonplanet.com/012004watson.html

Strangely, the 9/11 Commission's final report IGNORED building 7
entirely!

Explosive demolitions take considerable time to set up (see
http://science.howstuffworks.com/building-implosion1.htm). The
explosives could not possibly have been properly placed around the
structural supports and wired for detonation in building 7 in the
few hours between the attacks and that building's collapse. Yet
that collapse was clearly a professionally executed demolition by
explosives.

Therefore -
THE DEMOLITION EXPLOSIVES IN BUILDING 7 WERE PUT IN
PLACE PRIOR TO THE PLANES IMPACTING THE TWIN TOWERS!

Therefore -
The 9/11 attacks were KNOWN OF IN ADVANCE, and DELIBERATELY
ALLOWED TO OCCUR! It was intended beforehand that building 7 and
the twin towers all be completely destroyed, KILLING THE THOUSANDS
OF PEOPLE REMAINING IN THEM!

The above documented facts alone do not rigorously prove that
previously placed explosives likewise brought down the twin towers,
but see the following:

A paper published by Steven E. Jones, Professor of Physics, Brigham
Young University, concludes that prepositioned demolition
explosives brought down all three collapsed WTC buildings, not the
plane impacts or fires. Photos, audio, and video clips accompany
this report. You can see this at
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html

Jones again, you can't do better? Like a real expert in something having
to do with maybe....building construction?
No, I didn't think so..


Further evidence can be found at:
http://www.attackonamerica.net/proofofcontrolleddemolitionatwtc.htm
This author has a master's degree in Engineering from Stanford
University, and a Ph.D. in Psychology from the University of
Oregon.

Many human body fragments have been found on the roofs of nearby buildings.
These were too far away for jumpers from the towers to have landed on them.
If the towers simply collapsed from damage and fire, what blew these bodies
to bits and sent the fragments flying for considerable distances?

Two unexplained "spikes" in seismic records indicate huge bursts of
energy shook the ground beneath the twin towers immediately prior
to their collapse.
http://www.americanfreepress.net/09_03_02/NEW_SEISMIC_/new_seismic.html

Jeezus, you really can't be this stupid. You can't think of another
reason that there might be seismic activity?
Probably not, but most of the rest of us can, and it actually makes
sense.


In addition, the total failure of our sophisticated NORAD aerospace
defense system to intercept even one of the four "hijacked" jets in
subsonic flight for hours, towards known terrorist targets, can
only be explained as deliberate.

Many deniers of these unprecedented crimes of mass murder are
simply psychologically incapable of considering them possible.
Misled by the corporate/government-controlled media, deceived by an
elaborate cover-up, and indoctrinated with a perverted sense of
"patriotism," they are under the delusion that only barbaric
foreign terrorists could commit such inhuman atrocities. But
foreign terrorists could not have planted demolition explosives in
advance. HOMELAND TERRORISTS had to do that! The implications of
this are literally unthinkable to many, which is just what the evil
perpetrators of this crime against humanity are counting on.

It's not that we can't consider them possible, it's just that your
scenarios ARE impossible.


Given the shock and horror, the massive death and destruction of
these events, irrational denial is understandable. History reveals
despicable acts of terror by unscrupulous powers in the USSR,
Germany, China, and elsewhere. Why would this evil side of human
nature not surface here in America?

You are the poster boy for irrational.


Overcoming denial and exposing the truth is the only hope for
saving us from a fascist regime of vicious killers as bad as the
Nazis ever were. Should we wait to find out if they can be even
worse?

CONTACT YOUR REPRESENTATIVES IN CONGRESS AND THE SENATE.
DEMAND A NEW AND INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION OF THIS
CRIME OF THE CENTURY!

More 9/11 documentation:
http://www.st911.org/
http://www.septembereleventh.org/kc/multimedia/
http://911busters.com/911-Commission.html
http://www.septembereleventh.org/audio.php
http://911busters.com/SanFran04/index.html
http://www.911truth.org/index.php?topic=gallery
http://www.reopen911.org/
http://www.911truth.org/
http://www.911truthseekers.org/
http://www.911truthseekers.org/modules/news/
http://www.gnn.tv/
http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_apc.pdf
http://www.911studies.com/index.html
http://www.septembereleventh.org/index.php
http://infowars.com/
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/
http://www.mujca.com/index.htm
http://proliberty.com/observer/20051213.htm
http://911research.wtc7.net/index.html
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html
http://911review.com/
http://guardian.250free.com/wtc/dust-cloud.htm
http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/2001/t11182001_t1012pm.html


Ed Conrad and Freedumb Flunky, what a pair of investigators...
BDK
.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER