| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Ed Conrad" |
| Date: |
19 Feb 2006 09:29:09 AM |
| Object: |
SMOKING GUN That Confirms 911 Conspiracy |
<
<
If there's indeed a "Smoking Gun" that proves beyond ALL
reasonable doubt that there was a government conspiracy
responsible for the horror of 911 -- and the gory aftermath of
the war in Iraq -- the following URL is it (below).
<
It is the "second" Naudet video taken when the first WTC tower
exploded (you'll notice, I did NOT say when a plane struck the
building).
<
The Naudet Brothers' video of a plane striking the first tower --
fraudulent -- is one thing.
<
I say fraudulent because I believe there was NO plane visible
when the first tower exploded. I'm convinced the plane was edited
into the video during the time it was made (seconds before and
during the explosion) and many hours later when it finally was
released to the networks. This explains the plane's peculiar behavior
in the video when it was shown to the American public.
<
If there is any New Yorker who actually saw a plane IN FLIGHT
striking the first tower, stand up and be heard. All anyone can
honestly say is that they heard the explosion and ASSUMED
a plane had hit the tower. No one actually saw the plane hit
the North Tower because it was not hit by a plane or even
a missile. I'm convinced the explosion was caused by demolition.
<
The Naudet Brothers' video, showing a plane striking the tower,
was supposed to convince us this IS what happened.
<
The insertion of a plane into the video after it was taken explains
the many discrepancies in the footage that was finally released
showing a plane striking the tower. The insertion of a plane into
the video was a less-than-professional job.
<
However, that was not the ONLY Naudet video taken when the
explosion inside the first tower occurred.
<
You see, the Naudet Brothers also took another video at the same
time, showing pedestrians casually hurrying to wherever they were
going.
<
This second video is self-explanatory (read the accompanying URL
text), and there was no reason in the world to shoot it.
<
Unless, of course, it was a feeble attempt to add insult to injury and
provide more fraudulent "evidence" that a plane had hit the first
tower, which I say definitely did not occur.
<
This second Naudet video was just one of a series of comedic errors
in the whole 911 shenanigans -- the phony cell phone calls, for
example, the Pentagon fiasco -- aimed at convincing American
citizens that a 19 terrorists (at least a half-dozen still alive) was
responsible for 911, thus opening wide the door for our invasion of
Afghanistan and Iraq.
<
If they had any sense, the "second" Naudet video of the pedestrians
would never have seen the light of day.
<
THE SMOKING GUN:
http://www.911foreknowledge.com/bravenewworld.htm
I don't know who deserves credit for this URL. But, whomever
it was -- his first name is Ray -- a sincere thank you.
<
======================
OTHER CONSPIRACIES
Man as Old as Coal
Proof of Life After Death
http://www.edconrad.com
<
============================
<
WORLD'S LARGEST NEWSPAPERS
Rank Country Circulation
1. Yomiuri Shimbun (Japan) 14,532,694
2. Asahi Shimbun (Japan) 12,601,375
3. Sichuan Ribao (China) 8,000,000
4. Mainichi Shimbun (Japan) 5,845,857
5. Bild (Germany) 5,674,400
6. Chunichi Shimbun (Japan) 4,323,144
7. Sun (England) 3,718,354
8. Renmin Ribao (China) 3,000,000
9. Sankei Shimbun (Japan) 2,890,835
10. Nihon Keizai Shimbun Japan 2,705,877
11. Gongren Ribao (China) 2,500,000
12. Daily Mail (England) 2,387,867
13. Daily Mirror (England) 2,339,001
14. Chosun Ilbo (South Korea) 2,225,000
15. Dong-A Ilbo (South Korea) 2,150,000
16. Hokkaido Shimbun (Japan) 1,962,666
17. Eleftherotypia (Greece) 1,858,316
18. Xin Min Wan Bao (China) 1,750,000
19. Wall Street Journal (U.S.) 1,740,450
20. Yangcheng Wanbao China 1,730,000
21. Kerala Kaumudi (India) 1,720,000
22. Wen Hui Bao Daily (China 1,700,000
23. USA Today (United States) 1,653,428
24. Joong-Ang Ilbo (S. Korea) 1,550,000
25. Economic Daily (China) 1,500,000
26. Rodong Sinmun (N. Korea) 1,500,000
27. Kyung-Hyang Daily News 1,478,537
28. Sports Nippon (Japan) 1,452,699
29. Shizuoka Shimbun (Japan)) 1,442,310
30. Sankei Sports (Japan) 1,367,734
31. Deutche Allgemeine Germ 1,313,400
32. United Daily News (Taiwan ) 1,300,000
33. China Times (Taiwan) 1,270,000
34. O Estado de Sao Paulo Brazil) 1,230,160
35. Jang Daily (Pakistan) 1,200,000
36. Jang Lahore (Pakistan) 1,200,000
37. Akhbar El Yom/Al Akhbar (Egypt) 1,159,339
38. Hankook Ilbo (South Korea) 1,156,000
39. Hochi Shimbun (Japan) 1,119,031
40. Daily Express (England) 1,118,981
41. Los Angeles Times (U.S.) 1,067,540
42. New York Times (U>S) 1,066,540
43. Tokyo Shimbun (Japan 1,062,080
44. Daily Telegraph (England) 1,047,861
45. Nishinippon Shimbun Japan 1,041,104
46. Jiefang Ribao (China) 1,000,000
47. Nanfang Ribao (China) 1,000,000
48. Nongmin Ribao (China) 1,000,000
49. Zhongguo Qingnian Ribao (China) 1,000,000
50. Nikkan Sports (Japan) 984,058
51. Al Akhbar (Egypt) 980,000
52. Guangming Ribao (China) 950,000
53. Al Ahram (Egypt) 900,000
54. Al Goumhouriya (Egypt) 900,000
55. Seoul Shinmun (S. Korea) 900,000
56. Xin Hua Ribao (China) 900,000
57. Verdens Gang (Norway) 870,267
58. Corriere della Sera (Italy) 868,266
59. Kyoto Shimbun (Japan) 839,499
60. Chugoku Shimbun (Japan) 820,000
61 Kobe Shimbun Japan 820,000
62. Times of India (India) 813,000
63. Kobe Shimbun (Japan) 810,353
64. Beijing Wanbao (China) 800,000
65. Hubei Ribao (China) 800,000
66. Jiefangjun Ribao (China) 800,000
67. Trybuna Slaska (Poland) 800,000
68. La Gazzetta dello Sport Italy 798,243
69. Ouest-France (France) 790,133
70. Holos Ukrainy (Ukraine) 768,000
71. The Times (England) 766,999
72. ABC (Spain) 765,668
73. Washington Post (U.SSS>) 759,122
74. La Repubblica (Italy) 754,930
75. De Telegraf (Netherlands) 751,400
76. Gazeta Wyborcza (Poland) 750,000
77. Zero Hora (Brazil) 727,188
78. Diario dos Campos (Brazil) 725,000
79. New York Daily News (U.S.) 723,143
80. Sabah (Turkey) 722,950
81. Jornal da Tarde (Brazil) 709,793
82. Beijing Ribao (China) 700,000
83. Chongqing Ribao (China) 700,000
84. Clarin (Argentina) 700,000
85. Thai Rath (Thailand 700,000
86. Zhejiang Ribao (China) 700,000
87. Diario Insular (Portugal) 684,143
88. Granma Internacional (Cuba) 675,000
89. Chicago Tribune (U.S>) 673,508
90. Daily Record (Scotland) 671,267
91. China Daily News (Taiwan) 670,000
92. The Daily Star (England) 650,406
93. Guangxi Ribao (China) 650,000
94. Malayala Manorama (India) 630,068
95. La Nacion (Argentina) 630,000
96. Hurriyet (Turkey) 615,579
97. Herald Sun (Australia) 600,000
98. Hurriyet (Pakistan) 600,000
99. Liaoning Ribao (China) 600,000
100. Oriental Daily News (Hong Kong) 600,000
<
100 LARGEST NEWSPAPERS IN U.S.
Rank Circulation
1. USA Today (Arlington, Va.) 2,154,539
2. Wall Street Journal (NY N.Y.) 2,091,062
3. Times (New York, N.Y.) 1,118,565
4. Times (Los Angeles) 914,584
5. Post (Washington, DC) 732,872
6. Daily News (New York, N.Y.) 729,124
7. Tribune (Chicago) 680,879
8. Post (New York, N.Y.) 652,426
9. Newsday (Long Island, N.Y.) 580,069
10. Chronicle (Houston) 553,018
11. Chronicle (San Francisco) 512,640
12. Morning News (Dallas) 510,133
13. Sun-Times (Chicago) 481,798
14 Globe (Boston) 450,538
15. Arizona Republic (Phoenix) 432,284
16. Star-Ledger (Newark, N.J.) 408,672
17. Star Tribune (Minneapolis) 380,354
18. Inquirer (Philadelphia) 376,493
19. Journal-Constitution (Atlanta) 371,853
20. Plain Dealer (Cleveland) 365,288
21. Free Press (Detroit) 352,714
22. Oregonian (Portland) 342,789
23. Times (St. Petersburg, Fla.) 334,742
24. Union-Tribune (San Diego) 328,531
25. Herald (Miami) 315,850
26. Register Orange County CA 302,864
27. Sun (Baltimore) 301,186
28. Bee (Sacramento, Calif.) 289,905
29. Post (Denver) 288,937
30. Rocky Mtn. News Denver 288,889
31. Post-Dispatch (St. Louis) 285,869
32. Mercury News San Jose CA 271,997
33. Star (Kansas City, Mo.) 267,273
34. Sentinel (Orlando, Fla.) 257,222
35. Times-Picayune N Orleans 253,610
36. Dispatch (Columbus, Ohio) 252,564
37. Star (Indianapolis) 249,891
38. Journal Sentinel Milwaukee 244,288
39. Post-Gazette Pittsburgh Pa 242,546
40. Herald (Boston) 241,457
41. Sun-Sentinel (Ft L'dale, Fla ) 233,634
42. Times (Seattle) 231,505
43. News (Detroit) 227,392
44. Observer (Charlotte, N.C.) 226,849
45. Tribune (Tampa, Fla.) 224,220
46. Express-News S Antonio Tx 222,536
47. Investor's Business Daily LA 215,788
48. Star-Telegram Ft Worth, TX) 215,452
49. Courier-Journal L'ville Ky 213,176
50. News (Buffalo, N.Y.) 207,989
51. Daily Oklahoman Okla City 207,538
52. Virginian-Pilot (Norfolk, Va.) 201,141
53. World-Herald Omaha Neb. 192,075
54. Pioneer Press(St Pau, Minn 190,392
55. Times-Dispatch Richmond 188,540
56. Courant (Hartford, Conn.) 185,570
57. Press-Enterprise R'side CA 183,974
58. Democrat-Gazette (L'l Rock 183,343
59. American-Statesman Austin 183,312
60. Contra Costa Times (Calif.) 182,541
61. Enquirer (Cincinnati) 182,176
62. Record (Bergen County, N.J.) 179,270
63. Daily News (Los Angeles) 178,360
64. Democrat (Rochester, N.Y.) 173,900
65. Tennessean (Nashville) 172,149
66. Post (W. Palm Beach, Fla.) 168,147
67. Times-Union (Jacksonville, Fla) 167,851
68. Journal (Providence, R.I.) 167,609
69. Asbury Park Press (N.J.) 167,284
70. News & Observer (Raleigh NC) 163,769
71. Review-Journal (Las Vegas) 160,391
72. Bee (Fresno, Calif.) 158,651
73. Commercial Appeal (Memphis) 157,820
74. Register (Des Moines, Iowa) 150,851
75. Post-Intelligencer (Seattle) 150,851
76. Daily Herald (Chicago) 150,364
77. News (Birmingham, Ala.) 148,938
78. Daily News (Philadelphia) 143,631
79. Journal News Westchester NY) 142,873
80. Advertiser (Honolulu) 142,025
81. Blade (Toledo, Ohio) 139,520
82. World (Tulsa, Okla.) 139,383
83. Press (Grand Rapids, Mich.) 138,620
84. Tribune (Salt Lake City) 134,985
85. Beacon Journal (Akron, Ohio) 128,511
86. News Tribune (Tacoma, Wash.) 128,511
87. Daily News (Dayton, Ohio) 126,642
88. La Opinion (Los Angeles, Calif.) 124,692
89. Post-Standard (Syracuse, N.Y.) 120,701
90. Tribune-Review (Greensburg Pa) 119,646
91. News Journal (Wilmington, Del.) 116,398
92. News-Sentinel (Knoxville, Tenn.) 114,593
93. State (Columbia, S.C.) 114,442
94. Morning Call (Allentown, Pa.) 111,594
95. Journal (Albuquerque) 109,693
96. Herald-Leader (Lexington, Ky.) 106,941
97. Herald-Tribune (Sarasota, Fla.) 105,636
98. News-Journal (Daytona Fla.) 104,654
99. Telegram (Worcester MA) 102,592
100. Times (Washington, DC) 102,255
<
.
|
|
| User: "BDK" |
|
| Title: Re: SMOKING GUN That Confirms 911 Conspiracy |
19 Feb 2006 01:31:38 PM |
|
|
In article <j9ifv1l18sf03ajlgg7nmei0nfn0quohqi@4ax.com>,
edconrad@verizon.net says...
<
<
If there's indeed a "Smoking Gun" that proves beyond ALL
reasonable doubt that there was a government conspiracy
responsible for the horror of 911 -- and the gory aftermath of
the war in Iraq -- the following URL is it (below).
<
It is the "second" Naudet video taken when the first WTC tower
exploded (you'll notice, I did NOT say when a plane struck the
building).
Poor Ed, so so sick..and clueless as ever.
The Naudet Brothers' video of a plane striking the first tower --
fraudulent -- is one thing.
And why do you think it's fake?
I say fraudulent because I believe there was NO plane visible
when the first tower exploded. I'm convinced the plane was edited
into the video during the time it was made (seconds before and
during the explosion) and many hours later when it finally was
released to the networks. This explains the plane's peculiar behavior
in the video when it was shown to the American public.
An awful lot of people saw it crash into the tower. Like always Ed, you
see all kinds of things and clues and proof nobody else does. What was
peculiar about the plane's behavior? That it blew up when it crashed
into the building?
<
If there is any New Yorker who actually saw a plane IN FLIGHT
striking the first tower, stand up and be heard. All anyone can
honestly say is that they heard the explosion and ASSUMED
a plane had hit the tower. No one actually saw the plane hit
the North Tower because it was not hit by a plane or even
a missile. I'm convinced the explosion was caused by demolition.
WTF are talking about? I've seen dozens of people interviewed on TV who
saw the first hit! What nonsense. Even the "remote control" kooks aren't
so diseased as to be able to swallow what you're spewing...
<
The Naudet Brothers' video, showing a plane striking the tower,
was supposed to convince us this IS what happened.
<
The insertion of a plane into the video after it was taken explains
the many discrepancies in the footage that was finally released
showing a plane striking the tower. The insertion of a plane into
the video was a less-than-professional job.
Sure, the giant conspiracy couldn't fake a decent video of the plane
hitting the tower...
You really need to talk to a mental health professional Ed, but you've
heard that a million times already..
<
However, that was not the ONLY Naudet video taken when the
explosion inside the first tower occurred.
<
You see, the Naudet Brothers also took another video at the same
time, showing pedestrians casually hurrying to wherever they were
going.
<
This second video is self-explanatory (read the accompanying URL
text), and there was no reason in the world to shoot it.
Why not ask them? It might be as simple a thing as video of people
walking to work...
<
Unless, of course, it was a feeble attempt to add insult to injury and
provide more fraudulent "evidence" that a plane had hit the first
tower, which I say definitely did not occur.
As usual, you are incorrect.
<
This second Naudet video was just one of a series of comedic errors
in the whole 911 shenanigans -- the phony cell phone calls, for
example, the Pentagon fiasco -- aimed at convincing American
citizens that a 19 terrorists (at least a half-dozen still alive) was
responsible for 911, thus opening wide the door for our invasion of
Afghanistan and Iraq.
None are alive Ed, please stop reading the kookpages. This has been
debunked many times.
<
If they had any sense, the "second" Naudet video of the pedestrians
would never have seen the light of day.
Sense to you is insanity to a sane person.
<
THE SMOKING GUN:
http://www.911foreknowledge.com/bravenewworld.htm
I don't know who deserves credit for this URL. But, whomever
it was -- his first name is Ray -- a sincere thank you.
It is kind of funny. What's scary is people swallow the insanity.
Another scary thing is that you are running around loose, and have
internet access.
Scary indeed.
BDK
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob Cain" |
|
| Title: Re: SMOKING GUN That Confirms 911 Conspiracy |
19 Feb 2006 10:43:21 PM |
|
|
In article <j9ifv1l18sf03ajlgg7nmei0nfn0quohqi@4ax.com>,
edconrad@verizon.net says...
If there is any New Yorker who actually saw a plane IN FLIGHT
striking the first tower, stand up and be heard. All anyone can
honestly say is that they heard the explosion and ASSUMED
a plane had hit the tower. No one actually saw the plane hit
the North Tower because it was not hit by a plane or even
a missile. I'm convinced the explosion was caused by demolition.
My daughter did. She was on the way to work and screaming at those who
could not hear her to maneuver the plane _away_ instead of _toward_ the
building as it homed in and struck. Witnessing that willful slaughter
still has her stuck in a bad place. ***** them for that alone, and
damn those of you who trivialize all of the wounding this caused and is
still causing with your insane need for attention at any cost.
Bob
--
"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler."
A. Einstein
.
|
|
|
| User: "@." |
|
| Title: Re: SMOKING GUN That Confirms 911 Conspiracy |
22 Feb 2006 08:43:40 PM |
|
|
Insane Bob Cain <arcane@arcanemethods.com> wrote in
news:dtbhd81lrm@enews1.newsguy.com:
In article <j9ifv1l18sf03ajlgg7nmei0nfn0quohqi@4ax.com>,
edconrad@verizon.net says...
If there is any New Yorker who actually saw a plane IN FLIGHT
striking the first tower, stand up and be heard. All anyone can
honestly say is that they heard the explosion and ASSUMED
a plane had hit the tower. No one actually saw the plane hit
the North Tower because it was not hit by a plane or even
a missile. I'm convinced the explosion was caused by demolition.
My daughter did. She was on the way to work and screaming at those who
could not hear her to maneuver the plane _away_ instead of _toward_ the
building as it homed in and struck. Witnessing that willful slaughter
still has her stuck in a bad place. ***** them for that alone, and
damn those of you who trivialize all of the wounding this caused and is
still causing with your insane need for attention at any cost.
Bob
I seriously doubt that a ***** like you has a daughter. On the other
hand, sane people don't go around screaming at aircraft, and insanity does
run in the family.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob Cain" |
|
| Title: Re: SMOKING GUN That Confirms 911 Conspiracy - Response to Gary Sokolich |
23 Feb 2006 12:36:06 PM |
|
|
Gary Sokolich foamed at the mouth and stalked:
Insane Bob Cain <arcane@arcanemethods.com> wrote in
news:dtbhd81lrm@enews1.newsguy.com:
In article <j9ifv1l18sf03ajlgg7nmei0nfn0quohqi@4ax.com>,
edconrad@verizon.net says...
If there is any New Yorker who actually saw a plane IN FLIGHT
striking the first tower, stand up and be heard. All anyone can
honestly say is that they heard the explosion and ASSUMED
a plane had hit the tower. No one actually saw the plane hit
the North Tower because it was not hit by a plane or even
a missile. I'm convinced the explosion was caused by demolition.
My daughter did. She was on the way to work and screaming at those who
could not hear her to maneuver the plane _away_ instead of _toward_ the
building as it homed in and struck. Witnessing that willful slaughter
still has her stuck in a bad place. ***** them for that alone, and
damn those of you who trivialize all of the wounding this caused and is
still causing with your insane need for attention at any cost.
Bob
I seriously doubt that a ***** like you has a daughter. On the other
hand, sane people don't go around screaming at aircraft, and insanity does
run in the family.
Sokolick is utterly depraved. Being you has got to be the worst
punishment possible but also awaiting you is:
"Whoever...utilizes any device or software that can be used to originate
telecommunications or other types of communications that are
transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet... without disclosing
his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any
person...who receives the communications...shall be fined under title 18
or imprisoned not more than two years, or both."
H.R.3402 signed into federal law 1/5/2006
Whatever you may think about it and whatever technicalities you think
you can appeal to to evade it, this law was written precisely for case
building against insane sociopaths and psychopaths such as you Gary.
--
"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler."
A. Einstein
.
|
|
|
| User: "@." |
|
| Title: Re: SMOKING GUN That Confirms 911 Conspiracy - Response to Gary Sokolich |
23 Feb 2006 08:46:24 PM |
|
|
Insane Bob Cain <arcane@arcanemethods.com> wrote in
news:dtkvar01hr6@enews2.newsguy.com:
Gary Sokolich foamed at the mouth and stalked:
Insane Bob Cain <arcane@arcanemethods.com> wrote in
news:dtbhd81lrm@enews1.newsguy.com:
A quick look in sci.physics will reveal that you are presently engaged in a
discussion with your purported, so-called stalker. Obiously, you are not
just a congenital liar and hypocrite and insane psychopath, you are also a
psychotic schizophrenic.
In article <j9ifv1l18sf03ajlgg7nmei0nfn0quohqi@4ax.com>,
edconrad@verizon.net says...
If there is any New Yorker who actually saw a plane IN FLIGHT
striking the first tower, stand up and be heard. All anyone can
honestly say is that they heard the explosion and ASSUMED
a plane had hit the tower. No one actually saw the plane hit
the North Tower because it was not hit by a plane or even
a missile. I'm convinced the explosion was caused by demolition.
My daughter did. She was on the way to work and screaming at those
who could not hear her to maneuver the plane _away_ instead of
_toward_ the building as it homed in and struck. Witnessing that
willful slaughter still has her stuck in a bad place. ***** them
for that alone, and damn those of you who trivialize all of the
wounding this caused and is still causing with your insane need for
attention at any cost.
Bob
I seriously doubt that a ***** like you has a daughter. On the
other hand, sane people don't go around screaming at aircraft, and
insanity does run in the family.
Sokolick is utterly depraved. Being you has got to be the worst
punishment possible
Hardly. Being condemed to spend eternity in hell with contemptable pieces
of human waste like you would be the worst punishment possible.
but also awaiting you is:
"Whoever...utilizes any device or software that can be used to
originate telecommunications or other types of communications that are
transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet... without
disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or
harass any person...who receives the communications...shall be fined
under title 18 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both."
H.R.3402 signed into federal law 1/5/2006
Whatever you may think about it and whatever technicalities you think
you can appeal to to evade it, this law was written precisely for case
building against insane sociopaths and psychopaths such as you Gary.
As usual, and in keeping with you total disregard for the truth, you quote
the law incompletely, inaccurately and out of context in order to suit your
deceptive purposes. The fact of the matter is that the law which you cite
does not apply to comments made and/or opinions expressed in public
newsgroups on the internet. If it did the vast majority of people posting
in newsgroups on the internet would be subject to arrest. Such an insane
notion could only make sense to someone like who is clearly insane.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "milou" |
|
| Title: [ moron ] SMOKING GUN That Confirms 911 Conspiracy |
23 Feb 2006 03:02:05 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 02:43:40 GMT, @. wrote:
I seriously doubt that a ***** like you has a daughter. On the other
hand, sane people don't go around screaming at aircraft, and insanity does
run in the family.
idiot
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|