Science > Physics > Some Holes In Temperature, Density, Big Bang Infinity Premise
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"glbrad01" |
| Date: |
17 Dec 2005 07:27:45 AM |
| Object: |
Some Holes In Temperature, Density, Big Bang Infinity Premise |
Excerpt from The Universe In A Nutshell, by Stephen Hawking:
"THE HOT BIG BANG
If general relativity were correct, the universe started with an infinite
temperature and density at the big bang singularity."
An "infinite temperature" and "infinite density" relative to what [at the
time]? Relative to nothing: One-dimensionally infinite. There could be no
other answer.
Infinity is not one-dimensional:
Infinite must measure at all times, eternally, against 'infinitesimal' in
order to be "infinite" at all. The reverse is also true: Infinitesimal must
measure at all times, eternally, against 'infinite' in order to be
"infinitesimal" at all. Neither exists any time anywhere, period, without
the other. These two are two interlocked dimensions of infinity.
What is any 'finite' whatsoever to infinite? Low end. Low end is
'infinitesimal'. Finite converts to infinitesimal in all relationship to
infinite. Finite is a permanently accelerating contraction in relationship
to infinite, nothing more, nothing less. It has no certainty, no fixed
values, regarding infinite whatsoever.
What is any 'finite' whatsoever to infinitesimal? High end. High end is
'infinite'. Finite converts to infinite in all relationship to
infinitesimal. Finite is a permanently accelerating expansion in
relationship to infinitesimal, nothing more, nothing less. It has no
certainty, no fixed values, regarding infinitesimal whatsoever.
Infinitesimal offsets infinite, just as infinite offsets infinitesimal.
But there is no difference at all between the two that anyone or anything
could tell until 'finite' brings into play the definitions "that is infinite
relative to me" and "that is infinitesimal relative to me." Infinite and
infinitesimal offset each other and cancel each other's worth to anything
but to the whole entity of Universe...and to the essence of 'constant'.
Otherwise they are self-similarities that in their case are
indistinguishable from each other -- indistinguishable from "1" and at the
same time (either/or) indistinguishable from "0" -- without other
dimensions. Finite is a result of the mutual cancellation (through their
being indistinguishably self-similar), it makes the difference between the
two, and 'finite' is immortally the third dimension of infinity. All three
dimensions have inseparable 'affinity' to one another. They are
interlocking. Finite could neither be something more nor something less, nor
something larger nor something smaller, nor something weaker nor something
stronger....whatever, without the dimensions to the Universe of 'infinite'
and 'infinitesimal' (there could be no differentiation of 'finite' into
relative 'finites').
Infinite, infinitesimal, and finite, are 'constants' of the Universe, but
rather than the "Universe" itself being the fourth dimension of infinity it
is "constant" that is the fourth dimension. 'Universe' and four-dimensional
'Infinity' being interchangeable (being synonymous). "Constant" is the
interlocking dimension with infinite, infinitesimal, and finite. And those
three are what make each and every one of the plurality of constants so
implacably constant within their specified contexts. Constant has
inseparable affinity with infinite, infinitesimal, and finite. The four
dimensions of infinity are immortally, eternally, simultaneous.
There is no chance of either pre-Big Bang or immediate Big Bang conditions
of one-dimensionally infinite "temperature" and infinite "density." No
chance at all except in farest out imaginative fiction.
But having said that I have to say that distance itself going away from
local anything and anywhere has to collapse into some farthest distant
horizon as far as any observer from any observation point is concerned. That
is the decree of dimension 'finite' of the four dimensions of infinity. Now
there are far distant collapsed horizons regarding anywhere, or any time, or
anything whatever "finite." Far distant collapsed horizons can be
interpreted just about anyway anyone pleases to interpret them according to
their psychological makeup, philosophy, religion, culture....you name it.
The ongoing effort to [abstractly] merge four fundamental forces is effort
to "collapse" all four into just one something else. Some particular event
"horizon." A 'collapsed horizon'. The view to whatever extent of rapidity
inexorably 'collapses' before it finally disappears into a collapsed
horizon. Yet if it is a permanently frozen picture in the distance -- a
'constant' picture in the distance -- it could be turned around 180 degrees
and interpreted as un-collapsing (sic), unfolding, rather than collapsing.
Opening up toward 'infinite' rather than closing toward 'infinitesimal'.
GLB
.
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
