Space/time powered by 7D Matrix CPU?



 Science > Physics > Space/time powered by 7D Matrix CPU?

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "p6"
Date: 25 Jun 2005 04:06:55 PM
Object: Space/time powered by 7D Matrix CPU?
[Warning: this message is highly speculative and not
recommended for reading by relativity priests such as
Uncle Al]
What Einstein is showing is that spacetime is always
travelling at a fixed speed of c. Relative to what?
Could some kind of super computer be involved.
When I say spacetime is travelling at c. Spacetime
meaning the 4 dimensions of 3 space + time and it is
the object's speed in this generalized sense that
is equal to that of light.
When an object is stationary. All the object's
motion is used to travel through one dimension -
time. When an object moves in 3d space, some of
the movement through time must be diverted to that
of movement in space. This is why time always slow
down in any moving object, especially apparent
at relativistic speed.
Why is there a fixed amount of speed in the 4
dimensions that can't be exceeded. If you move
faster, your time gets slower.. only when you
are stationary that time movement is fastest or
normal. Why is this? Why didn't the universe use
an Aether fixed frame.
Could the reason we couldn't detect an aether is
because our space/time is kinda like a simulation
where the programmers hid the any sign of aether
because they don't want the AI that is us to figure out
the position in space and realize there is
something odd. So what the computer did is to
make a loop, such that our spacetime looked like
it's travelling at c (in a circle) at a constant
speed?
This means the computer programming our space/time
may exist in higher dimensions.. since that's the
only way they can program the specific characteristic
of the 4 dimensions of 3D space and time.
What if the UFO phenomena is a sign that things are
not what they seem. Years ago. I investigated many
abductees. A couple has encountered the Nordics who
can stop time. They can make time stood still and
only program time to flow normally in the abductee
such that she can see the world stopping and the
Nordics walking in the midst of it.
Also whenever a UFO enters this dimension. Time stood
still too. Trees stopped moving, there is no more
wind, etc. Could the UFOs be some kind of gatekeepers
using portals to enter this 4D simulation like in the
movie Matrix where telephone booths (serving as
portals) is used to enter and exit the Matrix??
There are many heavy UFO activities in the world. Could
this be signs things are not what they seem. I stopped
UFO investigations because I found it stranger and
stranger so to keep sane I just assume all are
hallucinations.. in other words, I just stuck my head
in the sand ignoring all of them.
What I said may seem very strange. But so is relativity
where time, length, velocity, etc. are something not
fixed but malleable.. like some kind of programming.
p6
.

User: "Bill Hobba"

Title: Re: Space/time powered by 7D Matrix CPU? 25 Jun 2005 05:50:50 PM
"p6" <atomicp6@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1119733615.661884.24860@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

[Warning: this message is highly speculative and not
recommended for reading by relativity priests such as
Uncle Al]


What Einstein is showing is that spacetime is always
travelling at a fixed speed of c.

Your reasoning for such a statement would be greatly appreciated.
Rest snipped
Bill
.
User: "p6"

Title: Re: Space/time powered by 7D Matrix CPU? 26 Jun 2005 03:50:54 PM
Bill Hobba wrote:

"p6" <atomicp6@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1119733615.661884.24860@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

[Warning: this message is highly speculative and not
recommended for reading by relativity priests such as
Uncle Al]


What Einstein is showing is that spacetime is always
travelling at a fixed speed of c.


Your reasoning for such a statement would be greatly appreciated.

Rest snipped

Bill

It's not my reasoning. The idea came from Brian Greene
in his "The Elegant Universe". One time I thought time
can slow down because matter is passing thru a very
dense aether where everything slows down.. but then
in the principle of relativity... each party can see
the other party slowing down.. so it's not just a
regional phenomena. Time is likely part of some energy
continuum where in the case of matter. Quantized
space/time function may be in effect such that matter can
only travel at c much like in Ultraviolet Catastrophe
where there is a limit to the energy produced.

p6
.
User: "Bill Hobba"

Title: Re: Space/time powered by 7D Matrix CPU? 26 Jun 2005 08:04:32 PM
"p6" <atomicp6@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1119819054.028132.260080@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...


Bill Hobba wrote:

"p6" <atomicp6@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1119733615.661884.24860@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

[Warning: this message is highly speculative and not
recommended for reading by relativity priests such as
Uncle Al]


What Einstein is showing is that spacetime is always
travelling at a fixed speed of c.


Your reasoning for such a statement would be greatly appreciated.

Rest snipped

Bill


It's not my reasoning. The idea came from Brian Greene
in his "The Elegant Universe".

Others have posted the relevant section from The Elegant Universe and that
is not what he is saying at all.

One time I thought time
can slow down because matter is passing thru a very
dense aether where everything slows down.. but then
in the principle of relativity... each party can see
the other party slowing down.. so it's not just a
regional phenomena. Time is likely part of some energy
continuum where in the case of matter. Quantized
space/time function may be in effect such that matter can
only travel at c much like in Ultraviolet Catastrophe
where there is a limit to the energy produced.

Your word salad of physical concepts may have some meaning to you but to me
and I suggest others reading what you write it is meaningless. That is one
reason physics demands quantitative predictions that can be tested - such
can not be misunderstood. Got any of those?
Bill



p6

.
User: "p6"

Title: Re: Space/time powered by 7D Matrix CPU? 27 Jun 2005 04:23:36 AM
Bill Hobba wrote:

"p6" <atomicp6@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1119819054.028132.260080@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...


Bill Hobba wrote:

"p6" <atomicp6@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1119733615.661884.24860@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

[Warning: this message is highly speculative and not
recommended for reading by relativity priests such as
Uncle Al]


What Einstein is showing is that spacetime is always
travelling at a fixed speed of c.


Your reasoning for such a statement would be greatly appreciated.

Rest snipped

Bill


It's not my reasoning. The idea came from Brian Greene
in his "The Elegant Universe".


Others have posted the relevant section from The Elegant Universe and that
is not what he is saying at all.

One time I thought time
can slow down because matter is passing thru a very
dense aether where everything slows down.. but then
in the principle of relativity... each party can see
the other party slowing down.. so it's not just a
regional phenomena. Time is likely part of some energy
continuum where in the case of matter. Quantized
space/time function may be in effect such that matter can
only travel at c much like in Ultraviolet Catastrophe
where there is a limit to the energy produced.


Your word salad of physical concepts may have some meaning to you but to me
and I suggest others reading what you write it is meaningless. That is one
reason physics demands quantitative predictions that can be tested - such
can not be misunderstood. Got any of those?

Bill

The next paragraph gives the relevant passage from Brian Greene.
Notice he is simply discussing how time can be seen as a
dimension in a conceptual sense and for the sake of illustration.
I add the comment of what possible deeper mechanisms may be
involved. Do not assume that there is no mystery of how time can
be affected by motion, etc. Without knowing the causal mechanisms,
it is natural for people to find it a stretch of the imagination to
know how time can slow down in fast moving objects. This is the
source of the endless debates raging in this newsgroup about
relativity since its inception. In case you are convinced there
is no mystery. Pls. explain the causal mechanisms.
Brian Greene stated:
"Since this view proclaims that space and time are simply
different examples of dimensions, can we speak of an object's
speed through time in a manner resembling the concept of its
speed through space? We can.
A big clue for how to do this comes from a central piece of
information we have already encountered. When an object moves
through space relative to us, its clock runs slow compared to
ours. That is, the speed of its motion through time slows down.
Here's the leap: Einstein proclaimed that all objects in the
universe are always traveling through spacetime at one fixed
speed - that of light. This is a strange idea; we are used to the
notion that objects travel at speeds considerably less than that
of light. We have repeatedly emphasized this as the reason
relativistic effects are so unfamiliar in the everyday world. All
of this is true. We are presently talking about an object's
combined speed through all four dimensions -three space and one
time - and it is the object's speed in this generalized sense that
is equal to that of light. To understand this more fully and to
reveal its importance, we note that like the impractical
single-speed car discussed above, this one fixed speed can be
shared between the different dimensions-different space and time
dimensions, that is. If an object is sitting still (relative to
us) and consequently does not move through space at all, then in
analo gy to the first runs of the car, all of the object's motion
is used to travel through one dimension-in this case, the time
dimension. Moreover, all objects that are at rest relative to us
and to each other move through time-they age-at exactly the same
rate or speed. If an object does move through space, however,
this means that some of the previous motion through time must be
diverted. Like the car traveling at an angle, this sharing of
motion implies that the object will travel more slowly through t
ime than its stationary counterparts, since some o f its motion
is now being used to move through space. That is, its clock will
tick more slowly if it moves through space. This is exactly what
we found earlier We now see that time slows down when an object
moves relative to us because this diverts some of its motion
through time into motion through space. The speed of an object
through space is thus merely a reflection of how much of its
motion through time is diverted.
We also see that this framework immediately incorporates the fact
that there is a limit to an object's spatial velocity: the
maximum speed through space occurs if all of an object's motion
through time is diverted to motion through space. This occurs
when all of its previous light-speed motion through time is
diverted to light-speed motion through space. But having used up
all of its motion through time, this is the fastest speed through
space that the object-any object-can possibly achieve. This is
analogo us to our car being test-driven directly in the
north-south direction. just as the car will have no speed left
for motion in the east-west dimension, something traveling at
light speed through space will have no speed left for motion
through time. Thus light does not get old; a photon that emerged
from the big bang is the same age today as it was then. There is
no passage of time at light speed."
.
User: "Bill Hobba"

Title: Re: Space/time powered by 7D Matrix CPU? 27 Jun 2005 08:16:53 PM
"p6" <atomicp6@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1119864215.973783.150200@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...



Bill Hobba wrote:

"p6" <atomicp6@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1119819054.028132.260080@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...


Bill Hobba wrote:

"p6" <atomicp6@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1119733615.661884.24860@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

[Warning: this message is highly speculative and not
recommended for reading by relativity priests such as
Uncle Al]


What Einstein is showing is that spacetime is always
travelling at a fixed speed of c.


Your reasoning for such a statement would be greatly appreciated.

Rest snipped

Bill


It's not my reasoning. The idea came from Brian Greene
in his "The Elegant Universe".


Others have posted the relevant section from The Elegant Universe and

that

is not what he is saying at all.

One time I thought time
can slow down because matter is passing thru a very
dense aether where everything slows down.. but then
in the principle of relativity... each party can see
the other party slowing down.. so it's not just a
regional phenomena. Time is likely part of some energy
continuum where in the case of matter. Quantized
space/time function may be in effect such that matter can
only travel at c much like in Ultraviolet Catastrophe
where there is a limit to the energy produced.


Your word salad of physical concepts may have some meaning to you but to

me

and I suggest others reading what you write it is meaningless. That is

one

reason physics demands quantitative predictions that can be tested -

such

can not be misunderstood. Got any of those?

Bill


The next paragraph gives the relevant passage from Brian Greene.
Notice he is simply discussing how time can be seen as a
dimension in a conceptual sense and for the sake of illustration.

Sure - no problemo.

I add the comment of what possible deeper mechanisms may be
involved. Do not assume that there is no mystery of how time can
be affected by motion, etc.

SR does not say time is affected by motion. Proper time always remains the
same. It is exactly the same as rotating a rod. Lay the rod on the x axis
and the x axis indicates its full length. Rotate it and the length as
indicated by the length of the x axis changes - but its length has not.
Exactly what deeper mechanism is at work is changing the length of the x
axis? The answer is none. It is simply geometry at work and a logical
consequence of the fact the length is unchanged by the rotation. The same
for SR - the proper time remains unchanged but you have rotated it via
hyperbolic rotation when you measure if from a frame moving at constant
velocity.

Without knowing the causal mechanisms,

What is the casual mechanism that causes the length indicated by the x axis
to change when a rod is rotated?

it is natural for people to find it a stretch of the imagination to
know how time can slow down in fast moving objects. This is the
source of the endless debates raging in this newsgroup about
relativity since its inception. In case you are convinced there
is no mystery. Pls. explain the causal mechanisms.

I will as soon as you explain to me the casual mechanism that causes lengths
to change when a rod is rotated.
Quote given and examined in another thread snipped.
Bill
.
User: "p6"

Title: Re: Space/time powered by 7D Matrix CPU? 28 Jun 2005 06:19:23 PM

Your reasoning for such a statement would be greatly appreciated.

Rest snipped

Bill


It's not my reasoning. The idea came from Brian Greene
in his "The Elegant Universe".


Others have posted the relevant section from The Elegant Universe and

that

is not what he is saying at all.

One time I thought time
can slow down because matter is passing thru a very
dense aether where everything slows down.. but then
in the principle of relativity... each party can see
the other party slowing down.. so it's not just a
regional phenomena. Time is likely part of some energy
continuum where in the case of matter. Quantized
space/time function may be in effect such that matter can
only travel at c much like in Ultraviolet Catastrophe
where there is a limit to the energy produced.


Your word salad of physical concepts may have some meaning to you but to

me

and I suggest others reading what you write it is meaningless. That is

one

reason physics demands quantitative predictions that can be tested -

such

can not be misunderstood. Got any of those?

Bill


The next paragraph gives the relevant passage from Brian Greene.
Notice he is simply discussing how time can be seen as a
dimension in a conceptual sense and for the sake of illustration.


Sure - no problemo.

I add the comment of what possible deeper mechanisms may be
involved. Do not assume that there is no mystery of how time can
be affected by motion, etc.


SR does not say time is affected by motion. Proper time always remains the
same. It is exactly the same as rotating a rod. Lay the rod on the x axis
and the x axis indicates its full length. Rotate it and the length as
indicated by the length of the x axis changes - but its length has not.
Exactly what deeper mechanism is at work is changing the length of the x
axis? The answer is none. It is simply geometry at work and a logical
consequence of the fact the length is unchanged by the rotation. The same
for SR - the proper time remains unchanged but you have rotated it via
hyperbolic rotation when you measure if from a frame moving at constant
velocity.

Without knowing the causal mechanisms,


What is the casual mechanism that causes the length indicated by the x axis
to change when a rod is rotated?

It's perspective. But there is a whole world of difference between
your example and time. If we are both 50 yrs old and I travel near
the speed of light in the cosmos and come back after years (what
I thought years), your age will be like 75 while I'm only 50+.
What is the causal mechanisms of this time relativity. That is
what I'm talking about. You can't give an example like the rod
length thing since time is a lot different. You can slip it under
the rug by saying time is just a coordinate and like the rod. But
it's not explaining the causal mechanisms but just covering it up.
p6
.
User: "Bill Hobba"

Title: Re: Space/time powered by 7D Matrix CPU? 28 Jun 2005 06:57:38 PM
"p6" <atomicp6@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1120000763.507098.146180@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Your reasoning for such a statement would be greatly

appreciated.


Rest snipped

Bill


It's not my reasoning. The idea came from Brian Greene
in his "The Elegant Universe".


Others have posted the relevant section from The Elegant Universe

and

that

is not what he is saying at all.

One time I thought time
can slow down because matter is passing thru a very
dense aether where everything slows down.. but then
in the principle of relativity... each party can see
the other party slowing down.. so it's not just a
regional phenomena. Time is likely part of some energy
continuum where in the case of matter. Quantized
space/time function may be in effect such that matter can
only travel at c much like in Ultraviolet Catastrophe
where there is a limit to the energy produced.


Your word salad of physical concepts may have some meaning to you

but to

me

and I suggest others reading what you write it is meaningless. That

is

one

reason physics demands quantitative predictions that can be tested -

such

can not be misunderstood. Got any of those?

Bill


The next paragraph gives the relevant passage from Brian Greene.
Notice he is simply discussing how time can be seen as a
dimension in a conceptual sense and for the sake of illustration.


Sure - no problemo.

I add the comment of what possible deeper mechanisms may be
involved. Do not assume that there is no mystery of how time can
be affected by motion, etc.


SR does not say time is affected by motion. Proper time always remains

the

same. It is exactly the same as rotating a rod. Lay the rod on the x

axis

and the x axis indicates its full length. Rotate it and the length as
indicated by the length of the x axis changes - but its length has not.
Exactly what deeper mechanism is at work is changing the length of the x
axis? The answer is none. It is simply geometry at work and a logical
consequence of the fact the length is unchanged by the rotation. The

same

for SR - the proper time remains unchanged but you have rotated it via
hyperbolic rotation when you measure if from a frame moving at constant
velocity.

Without knowing the causal mechanisms,


What is the casual mechanism that causes the length indicated by the x

axis

to change when a rod is rotated?


It's perspective.

Wrong - perceptive is an optical illusion that causes parallel lines to
appear to meet at a vanishing point. The changing length of the x axis is
geometry - just like the phenomena of time dilation is geometry.

But there is a whole world of difference between
your example and time. If we are both 50 yrs old and I travel near
the speed of light in the cosmos and come back after years (what
I thought years), your age will be like 75 while I'm only 50+.

The principle of maximal ageing (a geometric principle) at work.

What is the causal mechanisms of this time relativity.

You follow different world lines.

That is what I'm talking about. You can't give an example like the rod
length thing since time is a lot different.

Yes it is different because it involves hyperbolic rotation - but otherwise
it is exactly the same.

You can slip it under
the rug by saying time is just a coordinate and like the rod. But
it's not explaining the causal mechanisms but just covering it up.

You can not hide you do not understand relativity or even elementary stuff
like what perspective is yet claim that you do. You are a victim of
'Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own
Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments'
http://www.phule.net/mirrors/unskilled-and-unaware.html
Bill


p6

.
User: "p6"

Title: Re: Space/time powered by 7D Matrix CPU? 28 Jun 2005 07:07:24 PM
Bill Hobba wrote:

"p6" <atomicp6@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1120000763.507098.146180@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Your reasoning for such a statement would be greatly

appreciated.


Rest snipped

Bill


It's not my reasoning. The idea came from Brian Greene
in his "The Elegant Universe".


Others have posted the relevant section from The Elegant Universe

and

that

is not what he is saying at all.

One time I thought time
can slow down because matter is passing thru a very
dense aether where everything slows down.. but then
in the principle of relativity... each party can see
the other party slowing down.. so it's not just a
regional phenomena. Time is likely part of some energy
continuum where in the case of matter. Quantized
space/time function may be in effect such that matter can
only travel at c much like in Ultraviolet Catastrophe
where there is a limit to the energy produced.


Your word salad of physical concepts may have some meaning to you

but to

me

and I suggest others reading what you write it is meaningless. That

is

one

reason physics demands quantitative predictions that can be tested -

such

can not be misunderstood. Got any of those?

Bill


The next paragraph gives the relevant passage from Brian Greene.
Notice he is simply discussing how time can be seen as a
dimension in a conceptual sense and for the sake of illustration.


Sure - no problemo.

I add the comment of what possible deeper mechanisms may be
involved. Do not assume that there is no mystery of how time can
be affected by motion, etc.


SR does not say time is affected by motion. Proper time always remains

the

same. It is exactly the same as rotating a rod. Lay the rod on the x

axis

and the x axis indicates its full length. Rotate it and the length as
indicated by the length of the x axis changes - but its length has not.
Exactly what deeper mechanism is at work is changing the length of the x
axis? The answer is none. It is simply geometry at work and a logical
consequence of the fact the length is unchanged by the rotation. The

same

for SR - the proper time remains unchanged but you have rotated it via
hyperbolic rotation when you measure if from a frame moving at constant
velocity.

Without knowing the causal mechanisms,


What is the casual mechanism that causes the length indicated by the x

axis

to change when a rod is rotated?


It's perspective.


Wrong - perceptive is an optical illusion that causes parallel lines to
appear to meet at a vanishing point. The changing length of the x axis is
geometry - just like the phenomena of time dilation is geometry.

I'm using the word perspective in a generic sense.


But there is a whole world of difference between
your example and time. If we are both 50 yrs old and I travel near
the speed of light in the cosmos and come back after years (what
I thought years), your age will be like 75 while I'm only 50+.


The principle of maximal ageing (a geometric principle) at work.

What is the causal mechanisms of this time relativity.


You follow different world lines.

That is what I'm talking about. You can't give an example like the rod
length thing since time is a lot different.


Yes it is different because it involves hyperbolic rotation - but otherwise
it is exactly the same.

You can slip it under
the rug by saying time is just a coordinate and like the rod. But
it's not explaining the causal mechanisms but just covering it up.


You can not hide you do not understand relativity or even elementary stuff
like what perspective is yet claim that you do. You are a victim of
'Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own
Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments'
http://www.phule.net/mirrors/unskilled-and-unaware.html

Bill



p6

What the hell is the matter with you. I'm just asking how time
can slow down and what is the deeper mechanism. You can't treat
time as just some geometry. Time is obviously time. And if it
involves geometry. Why does spacetime do that. If you want to
hide the real explanation by flaming. Then *****!!
p6
.
User: "Bill Hobba"

Title: Re: Space/time powered by 7D Matrix CPU? 28 Jun 2005 09:36:31 PM
"p6" <atomicp6@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1120003644.547027.99010@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...



Bill Hobba wrote:

"p6" <atomicp6@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1120000763.507098.146180@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Your reasoning for such a statement would be greatly

appreciated.


Rest snipped

Bill


It's not my reasoning. The idea came from Brian Greene
in his "The Elegant Universe".


Others have posted the relevant section from The Elegant

Universe

and

that

is not what he is saying at all.

One time I thought time
can slow down because matter is passing thru a very
dense aether where everything slows down.. but then
in the principle of relativity... each party can see
the other party slowing down.. so it's not just a
regional phenomena. Time is likely part of some energy
continuum where in the case of matter. Quantized
space/time function may be in effect such that matter can
only travel at c much like in Ultraviolet Catastrophe
where there is a limit to the energy produced.


Your word salad of physical concepts may have some meaning to

you

but to

me

and I suggest others reading what you write it is meaningless.

That

is

one

reason physics demands quantitative predictions that can be

tested -

such

can not be misunderstood. Got any of those?

Bill


The next paragraph gives the relevant passage from Brian Greene.
Notice he is simply discussing how time can be seen as a
dimension in a conceptual sense and for the sake of illustration.


Sure - no problemo.

I add the comment of what possible deeper mechanisms may be
involved. Do not assume that there is no mystery of how time can
be affected by motion, etc.


SR does not say time is affected by motion. Proper time always

remains

the

same. It is exactly the same as rotating a rod. Lay the rod on the

x

axis

and the x axis indicates its full length. Rotate it and the length

as

indicated by the length of the x axis changes - but its length has

not.

Exactly what deeper mechanism is at work is changing the length of

the x

axis? The answer is none. It is simply geometry at work and a

logical

consequence of the fact the length is unchanged by the rotation.

The

same

for SR - the proper time remains unchanged but you have rotated it

via

hyperbolic rotation when you measure if from a frame moving at

constant

velocity.

Without knowing the causal mechanisms,


What is the casual mechanism that causes the length indicated by the

x

axis

to change when a rod is rotated?


It's perspective.


Wrong - perceptive is an optical illusion that causes parallel lines to
appear to meet at a vanishing point. The changing length of the x axis

is

geometry - just like the phenomena of time dilation is geometry.


I'm using the word perspective in a generic sense.

Ok. But regardless of how you use it geometry is still the cause.



But there is a whole world of difference between
your example and time. If we are both 50 yrs old and I travel near
the speed of light in the cosmos and come back after years (what
I thought years), your age will be like 75 while I'm only 50+.


The principle of maximal ageing (a geometric principle) at work.

What is the causal mechanisms of this time relativity.


You follow different world lines.

That is what I'm talking about. You can't give an example like the rod
length thing since time is a lot different.


Yes it is different because it involves hyperbolic rotation - but

otherwise

it is exactly the same.

You can slip it under
the rug by saying time is just a coordinate and like the rod. But
it's not explaining the causal mechanisms but just covering it up.


You can not hide you do not understand relativity or even elementary

stuff

like what perspective is yet claim that you do. You are a victim of
'Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own
Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments'
http://www.phule.net/mirrors/unskilled-and-unaware.html

Bill



p6


What the hell is the matter with you. I'm just asking how time
can slow down and what is the deeper mechanism.

What the hell is the matter with you. It has been explained the reason
different observers measure time differently is geometry. That is the
reason. You for some reason fail to even consider the possibility.

You can't treat time as just some geometry.

You are confusing concepts in a most atrocious manner. No one claims time
is geometry (indeed the concept of time and geometry are incompatible
concepts like saying a length is geometry - geometries contain lengths - but
lengths are not geometry) - what is claimed is space-time events forms a
geometry (namely that of Minkowski space). And boosts (changes in
velocity ) correspond to hyperbolic rotations in such a space - see the
following http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/March01/Carroll3/frames.html
under the heading of special relativity and flat space time.

Time is obviously time. And if it involves geometry.
Why does spacetime do that.

Space-time is the space of all space-time events. By the definition of
geometry is forms a geometry - that of Minnows space. You obviously have
grave difficulty with very fundamental concepts.

If you want to hide the real explanation by flaming. Then *****!!

If you do not what to learn basic concepts than you **** off.
Bill


p6

.
User: "p6"

Title: Re: Space/time powered by 7D Matrix CPU? 28 Jun 2005 10:42:16 PM
Bill Hobba wrote:

"p6" <atomicp6@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1120003644.547027.99010@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...



Bill Hobba wrote:

"p6" <atomicp6@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1120000763.507098.146180@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Your reasoning for such a statement would be greatly

appreciated.


Rest snipped

Bill


It's not my reasoning. The idea came from Brian Greene
in his "The Elegant Universe".


Others have posted the relevant section from The Elegant

Universe

and

that

is not what he is saying at all.

One time I thought time
can slow down because matter is passing thru a very
dense aether where everything slows down.. but then
in the principle of relativity... each party can see
the other party slowing down.. so it's not just a
regional phenomena. Time is likely part of some energy
continuum where in the case of matter. Quantized
space/time function may be in effect such that matter can
only travel at c much like in Ultraviolet Catastrophe
where there is a limit to the energy produced.


Your word salad of physical concepts may have some meaning to

you

but to

me

and I suggest others reading what you write it is meaningless.

That

is

one

reason physics demands quantitative predictions that can be

tested -

such

can not be misunderstood. Got any of those?

Bill


The next paragraph gives the relevant passage from Brian Greene.
Notice he is simply discussing how time can be seen as a
dimension in a conceptual sense and for the sake of illustration.


Sure - no problemo.

I add the comment of what possible deeper mechanisms may be
involved. Do not assume that there is no mystery of how time can
be affected by motion, etc.


SR does not say time is affected by motion. Proper time always

remains

the

same. It is exactly the same as rotating a rod. Lay the rod on the

x

axis

and the x axis indicates its full length. Rotate it and the length

as

indicated by the length of the x axis changes - but its length has

not.

Exactly what deeper mechanism is at work is changing the length of

the x

axis? The answer is none. It is simply geometry at work and a

logical

consequence of the fact the length is unchanged by the rotation.

The

same

for SR - the proper time remains unchanged but you have rotated it

via

hyperbolic rotation when you measure if from a frame moving at

constant

velocity.

Without knowing the causal mechanisms,


What is the casual mechanism that causes the length indicated by the

x

axis

to change when a rod is rotated?


It's perspective.


Wrong - perceptive is an optical illusion that causes parallel lines to
appear to meet at a vanishing point. The changing length of the x axis

is

geometry - just like the phenomena of time dilation is geometry.


I'm using the word perspective in a generic sense.


Ok. But regardless of how you use it geometry is still the cause.



But there is a whole world of difference between
your example and time. If we are both 50 yrs old and I travel near
the speed of light in the cosmos and come back after years (what
I thought years), your age will be like 75 while I'm only 50+.


The principle of maximal ageing (a geometric principle) at work.

What is the causal mechanisms of this time relativity.


You follow different world lines.

That is what I'm talking about. You can't give an example like the rod
length thing since time is a lot different.


Yes it is different because it involves hyperbolic rotation - but

otherwise

it is exactly the same.

You can slip it under
the rug by saying time is just a coordinate and like the rod. But
it's not explaining the causal mechanisms but just covering it up.


You can not hide you do not understand relativity or even elementary

stuff

like what perspective is yet claim that you do. You are a victim of
'Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own
Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments'
http://www.phule.net/mirrors/unskilled-and-unaware.html

Bill



p6


What the hell is the matter with you. I'm just asking how time
can slow down and what is the deeper mechanism.


What the hell is the matter with you. It has been explained the reason
different observers measure time differently is geometry. That is the
reason. You for some reason fail to even consider the possibility.

You can't treat time as just some geometry.


You are confusing concepts in a most atrocious manner. No one claims time
is geometry (indeed the concept of time and geometry are incompatible
concepts like saying a length is geometry - geometries contain lengths - but
lengths are not geometry) - what is claimed is space-time events forms a
geometry (namely that of Minkowski space). And boosts (changes in
velocity ) correspond to hyperbolic rotations in such a space - see the
following http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/March01/Carroll3/frames.html
under the heading of special relativity and flat space time.

Time is obviously time. And if it involves geometry.
Why does spacetime do that.


Space-time is the space of all space-time events. By the definition of
geometry is forms a geometry - that of Minnows space. You obviously have
grave difficulty with very fundamental concepts.

If you want to hide the real explanation by flaming. Then *****!!


If you do not what to learn basic concepts than you **** off.

Bill


p6

What I'm seeking to know is what is behind or the construtions of
the geometry of the Minkowsi space. M-theory says how there may
be as many as 11 dimensions and multi brane universes and our world
may be justa brane floating in a higher brane. As long as there
is no definite answer. You can't say the concept of Minkowski Space
is the final answer. Who knows, the Minkowski Space may be just
a programming from higher dimensions. When investigating abductees
many years back. Many reported encountering Nordics who can stop
time. This is what I mean that there is a hidden mechanism behind
the geometry where one can take advantage of without relativistic
time effect. It's like one can control time directly. Of course,
if you believe all UFOs are 100% hoaxes. Then Einstein Minkowsi
space is your final word. I ignore UFO stuff nowadays. But let's
be open minded about the many brane worlds being explored by
M-theorists.
p6
.
User: "Bill Hobba"

Title: Re: Space/time powered by 7D Matrix CPU? 28 Jun 2005 11:04:24 PM
"p6" <atomicp6@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1120016535.964734.295880@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...



Bill Hobba wrote:

"p6" <atomicp6@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1120003644.547027.99010@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...



Bill Hobba wrote:

"p6" <atomicp6@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1120000763.507098.146180@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Your reasoning for such a statement would be greatly

appreciated.


Rest snipped

Bill


It's not my reasoning. The idea came from Brian Greene
in his "The Elegant Universe".


Others have posted the relevant section from The Elegant

Universe

and

that

is not what he is saying at all.

One time I thought time
can slow down because matter is passing thru a very
dense aether where everything slows down.. but then
in the principle of relativity... each party can see
the other party slowing down.. so it's not just a
regional phenomena. Time is likely part of some energy
continuum where in the case of matter. Quantized
space/time function may be in effect such that matter can
only travel at c much like in Ultraviolet Catastrophe
where there is a limit to the energy produced.


Your word salad of physical concepts may have some meaning

to

you

but to

me

and I suggest others reading what you write it is

meaningless.

That

is

one

reason physics demands quantitative predictions that can be

tested -

such

can not be misunderstood. Got any of those?

Bill


The next paragraph gives the relevant passage from Brian

Greene.

Notice he is simply discussing how time can be seen as a
dimension in a conceptual sense and for the sake of

illustration.


Sure - no problemo.

I add the comment of what possible deeper mechanisms may be
involved. Do not assume that there is no mystery of how time

can

be affected by motion, etc.


SR does not say time is affected by motion. Proper time always

remains

the

same. It is exactly the same as rotating a rod. Lay the rod on

the

x

axis

and the x axis indicates its full length. Rotate it and the

length

as

indicated by the length of the x axis changes - but its length

has

not.

Exactly what deeper mechanism is at work is changing the length

of

the x

axis? The answer is none. It is simply geometry at work and a

logical

consequence of the fact the length is unchanged by the rotation.

The

same

for SR - the proper time remains unchanged but you have rotated

it

via

hyperbolic rotation when you measure if from a frame moving at

constant

velocity.

Without knowing the causal mechanisms,


What is the casual mechanism that causes the length indicated by

the

x

axis

to change when a rod is rotated?


It's perspective.


Wrong - perceptive is an optical illusion that causes parallel lines

to

appear to meet at a vanishing point. The changing length of the x

axis

is

geometry - just like the phenomena of time dilation is geometry.


I'm using the word perspective in a generic sense.


Ok. But regardless of how you use it geometry is still the cause.



But there is a whole world of difference between
your example and time. If we are both 50 yrs old and I travel near
the speed of light in the cosmos and come back after years (what
I thought years), your age will be like 75 while I'm only 50+.


The principle of maximal ageing (a geometric principle) at work.

What is the causal mechanisms of this time relativity.


You follow different world lines.

That is what I'm talking about. You can't give an example like the

rod

length thing since time is a lot different.


Yes it is different because it involves hyperbolic rotation - but

otherwise

it is exactly the same.

You can slip it under
the rug by saying time is just a coordinate and like the rod. But
it's not explaining the causal mechanisms but just covering it up.


You can not hide you do not understand relativity or even elementary

stuff

like what perspective is yet claim that you do. You are a victim of
'Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's

Own

Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments'
http://www.phule.net/mirrors/unskilled-and-unaware.html

Bill



p6


What the hell is the matter with you. I'm just asking how time
can slow down and what is the deeper mechanism.


What the hell is the matter with you. It has been explained the reason
different observers measure time differently is geometry. That is the
reason. You for some reason fail to even consider the possibility.

You can't treat time as just some geometry.


You are confusing concepts in a most atrocious manner. No one claims

time

is geometry (indeed the concept of time and geometry are incompatible
concepts like saying a length is geometry - geometries contain lengths -

but

lengths are not geometry) - what is claimed is space-time events forms a
geometry (namely that of Minkowski space). And boosts (changes in
velocity ) correspond to hyperbolic rotations in such a space - see the
following

http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/March01/Carroll3/frames.html

under the heading of special relativity and flat space time.

Time is obviously time. And if it involves geometry.
Why does spacetime do that.


Space-time is the space of all space-time events. By the definition of
geometry is forms a geometry - that of Minnows space. You obviously

have

grave difficulty with very fundamental concepts.

If you want to hide the real explanation by flaming. Then *****!!


If you do not what to learn basic concepts than you **** off.

Bill


p6



What I'm seeking to know is what is behind or the construtions of
the geometry of the Minkowsi space.

Since it is deduceable from the POR the answer is obvious - the POR.
Specifically it is the symmetries implied by the POR that is the reason.

M-theory says how there may
be as many as 11 dimensions and multi brane universes and our world
may be justa brane floating in a higher brane.

So?

As long as there is no definite answer. You can't say the concept of

Minkowski Space

is the final answer.

The concept of Minkowski space is contained in and not contradicted by M
theory.

Who knows, the Minkowski Space may be just
a programming from higher dimensions.

It may be the result of stew colors cars as well.

When investigating abductees
many years back. Many reported encountering Nordics who can stop
time.

It is well known the abductee phenomena is a modern variant of the ancient
phenomena of seeing angels and such.

This is what I mean that there is a hidden mechanism behind
the geometry where one can take advantage of without relativistic
time effect. It's like one can control time directly. Of course,
if you believe all UFOs are 100% hoaxes. Then Einstein Minkowsi
space is your final word.

I never said it was the final word - I said its geometric properties
explained time dilation and the twin paradox.
Bill

I ignore UFO stuff nowadays. But let's
be open minded about the many brane worlds being explored by
M-theorists.

p6

.











User: "Morituri-|-Max"

Title: Re: Space/time powered by 7D Matrix CPU? 25 Jun 2005 05:16:09 PM
"p6" <atomicp6@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1119733615.661884.24860@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

Could the reason we couldn't detect an aether is
because our space/time is kinda like a simulation
where the programmers hid the any sign of aether
because they don't want the AI that is us to figure out
the position in space and realize there is
something odd. So what the computer did is to
make a loop, such that our spacetime looked like
it's travelling at c (in a circle) at a constant
speed?

Gosh, you can't detect it. It's completely invisible. It has no
detectable affect on space or time.
GASP! Maybe there just ain't no aether!
.

User: "Morituri-|-Max"

Title: Re: Space/time powered by 7D Matrix CPU? 25 Jun 2005 05:14:37 PM
"p6" <atomicp6@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1119733615.661884.24860@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

[Warning: this message is highly speculative and not
recommended for reading by relativity priests [insert] such as
Uncle Al]

<insert>[or by people with brains and any kind of education]<insert>
.

User: "Uncle Al"

Title: Re: Space/time powered by 7D Matrix CPU? 25 Jun 2005 04:22:36 PM
p6 wrote:
[snip crap]

What Einstein is showing is that spacetime is always
travelling at a fixed speed of c. Relative to what?
Could some kind of super computer be involved.

Idiot.

Could the reason we couldn't detect an aether is
because our space/time is kinda like a simulation
where the programmers hid the any sign of aether
because they don't want the AI that is us to figure out
the position in space and realize there is
something odd.

[snip rest of crap]
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER