SR clocks v. real clocks



 Science > Physics > SR clocks v. real clocks

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Nth Complexity"
Date: 17 Sep 2004 02:38:32 AM
Object: SR clocks v. real clocks
Trivia question for all budding SRians:
The Earth spins on its axis once each day.
To a person viewing the Earth from an inertial frame of reference in
space, which clock runs slower, a clock at the north pole or one at
the equator? Why?
--
"The teaching of science and mathematics must be purged of its
authoritarian and elitist characteristics, and the content of these
subjects enriched by incorporating the insights of the feminist,
queer, multiculturalist and ecological critiques." -- A.D.S.
.

User: "Uncle Al"

Title: Re: SR clocks v. real clocks 17 Sep 2004 12:21:43 PM
Nth Complexity wrote:


Trivia question for all budding SRians:

The Earth spins on its axis once each day.
To a person viewing the Earth from an inertial frame of reference in
space, which clock runs slower, a clock at the north pole or one at
the equator? Why?

Apply Special Relativity and then a tiny tickle of General for the
1/298.257 perturbation squared. BTW, you must start by knowing the
difference between a solar and a sidereal day. Only one of the two is
pertinent here.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.

User: "Eric Gisse"

Title: Re: SR clocks v. real clocks 17 Sep 2004 11:38:48 AM
On 17 Sep 2004 02:38:32 -0500, spam@this-dot-instead.no-spam.invalid
(Nth Complexity) wrote:

Trivia question for all budding SRians:

The Earth spins on its axis once each day.
To a person viewing the Earth from an inertial frame of reference in
space, which clock runs slower, a clock at the north pole or one at
the equator? Why?

Would you be so kind as to post your professor's name and university
here so that we could be so kind as to tell him about your innovative
approach to not doing homework?
Makes no real difference to me, you are too stupid to have a future in
any hard science...
.

User: "Mark Martin"

Title: Re: SR clocks v. real clocks 17 Sep 2004 10:05:19 AM
spam@this-dot-instead.no-spam.invalid (Nth Complexity) wrote in message news:<414a9478$3_2@127.0.0.1>...

Trivia question for all budding SRians:

The Earth spins on its axis once each day.
To a person viewing the Earth from an inertial frame of reference in
space, which clock runs slower, a clock at the north pole or one at
the equator? Why?

You know- this tactic *might* get you through the weekly homework.
But eventually you'll have a closed book exam, and you'll actually
need to have learned something.
-Mark Martin
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
The BEST atomic clock is SiMPLY a *mega-frequency COUNTER*.!! And, even "the BEST atomic clocks" CANNOT BE SYNCRONiZED, on any WORLD-line in SPACE-time (..NEiTHER with each other, NOR with any COMMONLY conceived THiRD clock simulating REAL time.
Re: Real experiments with two clocks
Re: The BEST atomic clock is SiMPLY a *mega-frequency COUNTER*.!! And, even "the BEST atomic clocks" CANNOT BE SYNCRONiZED, on any WORLD-line in SPACE-time (..NEiTHER with each other, NOR with any COMMONLY conceived THiRD clock simulating REAL time.
Re: God Is Real Atheist Are Not
Time travel is real - bid for your chance to try it
The Neutron Bomb is a Photon Bomb for real.
Re: Al-Qaeda nukes real threat to USA
Re: Al-Qaeda nukes real threat to USA
Is the Hutchison Effect a hoax or real?
John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
Wavefunction Increases Causation Toward Real Axis
Re: REAL Internet Bullying
Quarks and gluons get real
Will the real Mike Varney post so this savain/hanson idiot shuts up?
Reciprocal Real Numbers
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER