Tom Roberts wrote:
Tom OUGHT write (snicker), "Look, dimwit, you are a WORLD-POiNT (on a
WORLD-line in SPACEtime) with NO iNside and NO OUTside (i.e. ambient).
All you are, in GR, is a TEST-POiNT on a GR SURFACE of the WORLD-POiNT.
The GR WORLD-POiNT cannot have a centro-symmetric, or even any sort of,
theoretical GR-radius, and the GR TEST-POiNT cannot hover, in any way,
above. As a WORLD-POiNT, neither YOU nor your GR TEST-POiNT can have
mass because G_uv or T_uv cannot be MATHEMATiCALLY connected to either
YOU or ANY OTHER mass, what-so-ever ..NOT in GR THEORY!! (..NOT even
within the GR THEORY, itself ( ..let alone Newtonian mechanics mass )."
But THAT doesn't STOP Tom or even slow him down, at all.!! He babbles
on and on, along. He DOEs NOT speed up ..he "just STOPs slowing down".
Tom often screws up BAD ..trying to squeeze his way out of some newly
bungled GR-CLOWN-ACT on his gtr Ph-Tivity trapeeeeze... Oooooheeeee...
CLUNK.!! Ooooooooheeeeeee.. CLUNK.!! Oooooooooooheeeeeee..... Clunk.!!
Oooooooheeeeeeee..... Clunk.!! GR-TARZAN.!! Ooooooheeeeeeee.. CLUNK.!!
Oh, Tom, how do you mathematically resolve the matter of your GR thing
(theoretical GR "THiNG").?!! Mathematically relate NEWTON and GR mass.
Mathematically distinguish a GR SPEED and a GR VELOCiTY ..you GR Clown.
This aptly describes how mass CANNOT be ascribed, at all, in the gtr.!!
Tom, i'm VERY SORRY to have to get a little "down & dirty" ..befitting
the SCOPE of the GR Tivity PROBLEM and my advance on the GR objective.
But Tom, CLEARLY & PLAiNLY, in NO UNcertain terms ..forthwith:
"The *REAL* TiME has COME for YOU to STAND DOWN on GR Tivity.!!"
brian a m stuckless
<> >><> >><> >><> >><>
Tom Roberts
---------------
Tom wrote, in other words, [...]
I have written nothing at all like the garbage you described.
The "garbage" i described is *REALLY* the GR Tivity ..YOU don't.
( MOST iMPORTANTLY, the "predictions" of GR are ALL Newtonian. )
<> >><> >><> >><> >><>
Tom Roberts
Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
Re: Stand DOWN on GR Tivity.!!
.
|
