From: Landle - view profile
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2005 7:46 pm
Email: "Landle" <landlem...@yahoo.com>
Groups: sci.physics
Not yet ratedRating:
show options
Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original
| Report Abuse | Find messages by this author
Dr. Photon wrote:
guess I should can the following, it's coming in useful already.
I've seen a few people ask about how "real" orbitals are, and could
they ever be measured.
Well they have been measured. Take a look at
"Direct observation of d-orbital holes and Cu-Cu bonding in Cu2O",
J. M. Zuo, M. Kim, M. O'Keeffe & J. C. H. Spence
Nature, volume 401, pp 49-52, September 1999.
The first paragraph is free at
http://www.nature.com/cgi-taf/DynaPage.taf?file=3D/nature/journal/v401/...
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
and you can download the full article with subscription. Try to get a
copy somehow, search the author's names, or search for references to
the article.
As a d orbital is much weirder looking than an s orbital (which might
just be measured as a fuzzy blob, for example), then their result is
totally convincing that the orbital shapes exist and are exactly as
QM
says they are.
Figure 3 is a beauty.
See also
"Tomographic imaging of molecular orbitals"
J. ITATANI, J. LEVESQUE, D. ZEIDLER, HIROMICHI NIIKURA H. P=C9PIN, J.
C=2E
KIEFFER3, P. B. CORKUM & D. M. VILLENEUVE
Nature volume 432, pp 867 - 871, 16 December 2004
where the authors image the molecular N2 bonding orbital. The
abstract
is at
http://www.nature.com/cgi-taf/DynaPage.taf?file=3D/nature/journal/v432/...
In other words, experiments have been made and not only do orbitals
exist in both atomic and molecular cases, they look just as QM says
they do.
best,
BR
This is big news.
Has anyone read the complete article? Is there no possibility
of misinterpretation like the laser bouncing somewhere else and
taken as outside? Do we finally have solid proof that the electrons
energy levels existing around the nucleus is real?? If so, I hope
one can send a copy to S. Enterprize for his comments as it
may his atomic model final moment. In which case. He can spend
his days on M-theory or other models that revolved around the existence
of electron shells. Can anyone please post the complete article for
the sake of science and truth? If it has solid basis with no
possibility of error, then S. Enterprize has to shut down his
web site and start a new page. Failure to do so is outright
stubbornness hence I'd not object Enterprize stuff to be put
at crank dot net. Let the facts be the judge.
Thanks.
Landle
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-------------------------------------------------
[Smart1234]
These LINKS show "Helix Spiral Field Holes - Smart Model Theory" or
"QM Vortex Field Holes" . This is not an electron orbital hole or a
d-electron shell hole like the above LINK claims.
Look at this: This shows real atomic images of the Helix Spiral Fields
http://www.lkb.ens.fr/recherche/atfroids/anglais/vortex_an.html
The atoms shown here show the result of this Helix Spiral field
taking place the atomic level as you can see with real atomic images
like this,
Side view
Hole entrance
( )
( )
((((( )))))
( )
( )
Top view
_
/ \ \ <---- Hole entrance to the "Vortex" Or Helix Spiral
Field
\ _ /
Smart Model Theory Predictions made earlier...
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/Rb.gif
http://members.aol.com/smart314159/HSFPhotoEffect.gif
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/BasicPart3f.gif
My Predicted view of Rb before they made a real atomic image years
before...
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/Rubidium.gif
You can even see the structural pentagonal or hexagonal shapes of the
interacting atoms in the Helix Spiral Fields with the real atomic
images.
Also, superconducting fields show the Helix Spiral Field Holes too
at the entrance. They just call it Vortex Holes. This isn't an
electron. In fact, the Standard model says an electron is a point
particle without even size.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/solids/scbc.html#c4
You can even see their explanation showing how the superconductor
fields are spinning here.
If there was an electron orbital d-hole, where's the positive
nucleus of that atom. It isn't even shown in the links you pointed out.
This Helix Spiral Field _IS_ the atom itself including the nucleus.
Particles really spin. They don't have a spin number. In Cloud Chambers
they show the electron or particles breaking apart into a spiral
direction, either toward a positive side or negative side potential.
The real atomic image of the positron or sub-electron is shown
spiraling away from each other.
There is no d-hole or electron orbital shells shown spiraling away
from each other with anti-matter and matter sub-particles.
QM and the Standard Model don't even agree with each other at the
sub-atomic level.
The Smart Model is the most accurate structural model of the atom
and the particles. It show an intelligent perpetual interacting field
that can maintain the movement of a prton for >10^30 years mean life
span. The perpetual motion, internal and external structure of the atom
and particles is shown with the Smart Model. The Smart Model Theory can
also be called the Helix Spiral Field Theory.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---------------------------
.
