| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Jack Sarfatti" |
| Date: |
21 Jul 2006 02:39:13 PM |
| Object: |
Star Gate 1 |
Star Gate
Commentaries on The New Physics
for the 21st Century
Jack Sarfatti, Ph.D.
Theoretical Physics
University of California
Gravity
Everyone thought that gravity universally attracts everything to each
other until very recently when astronomers discovered dark energy at the
beginning of the 21st Century. The dark energy is a very weak
universally repelling cosmic field on large scales that causes the rate
of expansion of three-dimensional space to speed up, to accelerate,
rather than to slow down, to decelerate, as everyone mistakenly thought.
The discovery of the cosmic dark energy is like the discovery of the
shape of the blackbody radiation spectrum at the beginning of the 20th
Century. The fact that the radiated energy of the blackbody radiation
decreased with increasing frequency caused Max Planck to begin to invent
quantum theory. The classical physics of Maxwell’s electromagnetic field
theory broke down for blackbody radiation because it wrongly predicted
an absurd infinity. The very cold Cosmic Black Body Radiation (CMBR)
filling the three-dimensional space of our expanding accelerating
universe today is important evidence that there was a hot Big Bang at
the creation of our local pocket universe in the Megaverse Cosmic
Landscape of parallel pocket universes suggested by the theory of
eternal chaotic inflation describing the cold moment before the hot Big
Bang - first Ice then Fire! How come the pre-Big Bang pocket universe
was cold with small entropy? That’s a happy coincidence needed to
understand the “Arrow of Time” of the irreversible aging leading to our
mortal deaths of the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Why do we get older
as our pocket universe’s 3D space expands? The answer seems to be that
advanced signal nonlocality from the far future reaches back to the
initial inflationary quantum vacuum phase transition to lower its
thermodynamic entropy. More on this later in the book. This idea is
similar to the Islamic Sufi concept of "Tauhid" according to Dr. Robert
Dickson Crane.
.
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Star Gate 1 |
21 Jul 2006 09:03:39 PM |
|
|
Jack Sarfatti wrote:
Star Gate
Commentaries on The New Physics
for the 21st Century
Jack Sarfatti, Ph.D.
Theoretical Physics
University of California
Gravity
Everyone thought that gravity universally attracts everything to each
other until very recently when astronomers discovered dark energy at the
beginning of the 21st Century. <deleted>
I was interested in this because of "Star Gate" in the title, but I
didn't see anything on that, but while I may have your attention, I
have some thoughts.
First off, dark energy I think is a bogus attempt at holding on to
distances proven to be false by the findings of Halton Arp, where he
shows that quasars are closer to use than astronomers are willing to
admit.
Second, it occurs to me that regions that astronomers think are places
where there are black holes are actually regions where extremely dense
left over pieces of the original Big Bang--pieces of the Cosmic
Egg--are radiating out matter, which is why new stars are found there.
So astronomers totally have their head's up their asses, where places
they think have black holes are places where new stars are being formed
as matters streams OUT from super dense regions instead of being pulled
in.
Your thoughts?
James Harris
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mr Cheese" |
|
| Title: Re: Star Gate 1 |
21 Jul 2006 10:01:54 PM |
|
|
<jstevh@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1153533819.174457.300670@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
This guy is pure crackpot, checkout his blog
http://jstevh.blogspot.com/
.
|
|
|
| User: "rusty" |
|
| Title: Re: Star Gate 1 |
22 Jul 2006 02:33:49 PM |
|
|
Mr Cheese wrote:
<jstevh@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1153533819.174457.300670@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
This guy is pure crackpot, checkout his blog
http://jstevh.blogspot.com/
I think you mean :
http://mymath.blogspot.com/
--
rusty
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Star Gate 1 |
22 Jul 2006 10:20:44 AM |
|
|
Mr Cheese wrote:
<jstevh@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1153533819.174457.300670@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
This guy is pure crackpot, checkout his blog
http://jstevh.blogspot.com/
That's NOT my blog. It used to be, but I got tired of it one day and
deleted it off, and someone else took it over.
I am in a war with the mathemtical community where they use political
tools, so it's nothing for one of them to do such a thing.
In political wars, such behavior is not surprising.
Problem for you though is, if math people can sink to such levels, what
might they tell you that is false about mathematics itself?
I suggest to you a LOT because most people are too lazy or feel
incompetent to check mathematicians on their claims which has given
them the power to get away with false statements, and history shows
that people with such power abuse it.
But do a search on fraud in the math field, and see how little you can
find, versus what you can find by searching on fraud in the physics
field.
Common sense and Occam's Razor tell you that the simpler explanation
isn't that mathematicians are somehow more perfect and ethical than
physicists, but that fraud is just not reported or caught in that
field.
Now tell me, how do any of you suppose fraud in mathematics CAN be
caught?
I'm curious about what the general opinion is of the protection to
society as my guess is that beliefs on this subject are naive and
people don't comprehend just how difficult it can be to detect and
uproot math fraud.
James Harris
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mr Cheese" |
|
| Title: Re: Star Gate 1 |
22 Jul 2006 07:11:23 PM |
|
|
<jstevh@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1153581644.034758.119930@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Mr Cheese wrote:
<jstevh@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1153533819.174457.300670@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
This guy is pure crackpot, checkout his blog
http://jstevh.blogspot.com/
That's NOT my blog.
Yes it is. You HATE Mathematicians.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mr Cheese" |
|
| Title: Re: Star Gate 1 |
22 Jul 2006 06:20:44 PM |
|
|
<jstevh@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1153581644.034758.119930@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Mr Cheese wrote:
<jstevh@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1153533819.174457.300670@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
This guy is pure crackpot, checkout his blog
http://jstevh.blogspot.com/
That's NOT my blog. It used to be, but I got tired of it one day and
deleted it off, and someone else took it over.
I am in a war with the mathemtical community where they use political
tools, so it's nothing for one of them to do such a thing.
In political wars, such behavior is not surprising.
Problem for you though is, if math people can sink to such levels, what
might they tell you that is false about mathematics itself?
I suggest to you a LOT because most people are too lazy or feel
incompetent to check mathematicians on their claims which has given
them the power to get away with false statements, and history shows
that people with such power abuse it.
But do a search on fraud in the math field, and see how little you can
find, versus what you can find by searching on fraud in the physics
field.
Common sense and Occam's Razor tell you that the simpler explanation
isn't that mathematicians are somehow more perfect and ethical than
physicists, but that fraud is just not reported or caught in that
field.
Now tell me, how do any of you suppose fraud in mathematics CAN be
caught?
WE CAUGHT YOU JSH. THE SYSTEM WORKS.
.
|
|
|
| User: "rusty" |
|
| Title: Re: Star Gate 1 |
23 Jul 2006 02:53:03 AM |
|
|
Mr Cheese wrote:
<jstevh@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1153581644.034758.119930@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Mr Cheese wrote:
<jstevh@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1153533819.174457.300670@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
This guy is pure crackpot, checkout his blog
http://jstevh.blogspot.com/
That's NOT my blog. It used to be, but I got tired of it one day and
deleted it off, and someone else took it over.
I am in a war with the mathemtical community where they use political
tools, so it's nothing for one of them to do such a thing.
In political wars, such behavior is not surprising.
Problem for you though is, if math people can sink to such levels, what
might they tell you that is false about mathematics itself?
I suggest to you a LOT because most people are too lazy or feel
incompetent to check mathematicians on their claims which has given
them the power to get away with false statements, and history shows
that people with such power abuse it.
But do a search on fraud in the math field, and see how little you can
find, versus what you can find by searching on fraud in the physics
field.
Common sense and Occam's Razor tell you that the simpler explanation
isn't that mathematicians are somehow more perfect and ethical than
physicists, but that fraud is just not reported or caught in that
field.
Now tell me, how do any of you suppose fraud in mathematics CAN be
caught?
WE CAUGHT YOU JSH. THE SYSTEM WORKS.
His blog has moved to :
http://mymath.blogspot.com/
Among other problems, his almost-published "article" seems to me to assume
that every ring of algebraic integers has unique factorisation, which is
simply untrue [it is true only when the class number is one].
For more clarification on these issues, I suggest that James Harris should
write directly to the world expert on such problems, Giles MURCHISTON of
DPMMS, Cambridge. He is extremely old and is known to have had multiple
personalities over the years; nevertheless he knows his class numbers
inside out.
--
rusty
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Phineas T Puddleduck" |
|
| Title: Re: Star Gate 1 |
21 Jul 2006 09:05:08 PM |
|
|
In article <1153533819.174457.300670@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
<jstevh@msn.com> wrote:
So astronomers totally have their head's up their asses, where places
they think have black holes are places where new stars are being formed
as matters streams OUT from super dense regions instead of being pulled
in.
Please enlighten us on your qualifications to make these statements.
--
Relf's Law? -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
"***** repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses."
Corollary -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
³It approaches the asymptote faster, the more Œpseduos¹ you throw in
your formulas.²
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
³Gravity is one of the four fundamental interactions. The classical
theory of gravity - Einstein's general relativity - is the subject
of this book.² : Hartle/ Gravity pg 1
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orange jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson
why parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Star Gate 1 |
22 Jul 2006 10:15:07 AM |
|
|
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
In article <1153533819.174457.300670@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
<jstevh@msn.com> wrote:
So astronomers totally have their head's up their asses, where places
they think have black holes are places where new stars are being formed
as matters streams OUT from super dense regions instead of being pulled
in.
Please enlighten us on your qualifications to make these statements.
Interested science geek.
___JSH
.
|
|
|
| User: "Phineas T Puddleduck" |
|
| Title: Re: Star Gate 1 |
22 Jul 2006 11:00:17 AM |
|
|
In article <1153581307.018661.253290@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>,
<jstevh@msn.com> wrote:
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
In article <1153533819.174457.300670@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
<jstevh@msn.com> wrote:
So astronomers totally have their head's up their asses, where places
they think have black holes are places where new stars are being formed
as matters streams OUT from super dense regions instead of being pulled
in.
Please enlighten us on your qualifications to make these statements.
Interested science geek.
___JSH
Yet claims mathematicians are all liars, and doesn't understand balck
hole formation
*PLONK*
--
Relf's Law? -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
"***** repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses."
Corollary -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
³It approaches the asymptote faster, the more Œpseduos¹ you throw in
your formulas.²
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Richard Herring" |
|
| Title: Re: Star Gate 1 |
24 Jul 2006 05:02:44 AM |
|
|
In message <1153533819.174457.300670@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
jstevh@msn.com writes
Jack Sarfatti wrote:
Star Gate
Commentaries on The New Physics
for the 21st Century
Jack Sarfatti, Ph.D.
Theoretical Physics
University of California
Gravity
Everyone thought that gravity universally attracts everything to each
other until very recently when astronomers discovered dark energy at the
beginning of the 21st Century. <deleted>
I was interested in this because of "Star Gate" in the title, but I
didn't see anything on that, but while I may have your attention, I
have some thoughts.
James, meet Jack.
No point in saying "Jack, meet James", since although he posts this
stuff, he doesn't read these newsgroups.
Your thoughts?
I think you're wasting your time trying to hold a conversation. But as
a special treat, you can hear Jack sing:
http://www.qedcorp.com/book/psi/aeroplane.html
--
Richard Herring
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Star Gate 1 |
21 Jul 2006 09:03:48 PM |
|
|
Jack Sarfatti wrote:
Star Gate
Commentaries on The New Physics
for the 21st Century
Jack Sarfatti, Ph.D.
Theoretical Physics
University of California
Gravity
Everyone thought that gravity universally attracts everything to each
other until very recently when astronomers discovered dark energy at the
beginning of the 21st Century. <deleted>
I was interested in this because of "Star Gate" in the title, but I
didn't see anything on that, but while I may have your attention, I
have some thoughts.
First off, dark energy I think is a bogus attempt at holding on to
distances proven to be false by the findings of Halton Arp, where he
shows that quasars are closer to use than astronomers are willing to
admit.
Second, it occurs to me that regions that astronomers think are places
where there are black holes are actually regions where extremely dense
left over pieces of the original Big Bang--pieces of the Cosmic
Egg--are radiating out matter, which is why new stars are found there.
So astronomers totally have their head's up their asses, where places
they think have black holes are places where new stars are being formed
as matters streams OUT from super dense regions instead of being pulled
in.
Your thoughts?
James Harris
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mr Cheese" |
|
| Title: Re: Star Gate 1 |
21 Jul 2006 10:00:44 PM |
|
|
<jstevh@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1153533828.580579.48510@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
checkout:
http://jstevh.blogspot.com/
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Star Gate 1 |
21 Jul 2006 10:07:15 PM |
|
|
Mr Cheese wrote:
<jstevh@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1153533828.580579.48510@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
checkout:
http://jstevh.blogspot.com/
CAtually, that used to be his blog. He deleted it and someone took it
over and is pretending to be him. He is still a major crackpot and a
crank, but that blog isn't his anymore. All you have to do to see
evidence of him being a crackpot is look for his other posts and read
them.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
