On Wednesday, July 9, 2003, at 06:10 AM, stealthskaters wrote:

"In the conclusion of your excellent Ukraine.doc paper, you mentioned
the Brookhaven RHIC project whose goal was to create the "cosmic
soup" that the inflationary model of the Big Bang predicted existed
at the start. [note: I don't know how this compares to later
Ekopyrotic models which utilize a slow collision of 5-D membranes
instead that produces the same results without a need for gravity
waves or monopoles] As I recall, many scientists world-wide objected
to this project because of conditons that might arise and prove
catastrophic to the Earth (if not the Universe). "Strangelets" was
one such possibility. (In fact, didn't someone propose it was a
strangelet snaking across the Universe that was responsible for that
Siberian explosion?)

One of the major questions in the UFO field has always been WHY are
they here? Some suggest we are either direct creations of them or
have been "genetically altered" over thousands-of-years by them. A
more selfish reason is what your ending paragraphs alluded to -- that
being simple self-preservation. In their eyes, we are tinkering with
forces that -- under the right situations -- cause them as much harm
as ourselves. That would certainly explain why UFOs and atomic
energy (especially weapons testing/production) seem to go hand-in-
hand. If the latter is minimized, then so are the UFO sightings."

Yes, exactly.

"Before I finish, I appreciate the years of soul-searching,
reflection, and debates with colleagues over all these theories.
They offer one side of the "equation". The other side being of
course is the technologies required to create 'exotic matter' and
bend/fold spacetime. I realize theorists are "immune" to this part,
but are there any clues as to what form this technology would be in
(e.g., rotating magnetic fields, nano-engineered Type III
superconductors, quantum lasers, etc.)? Any good
books/papers/websites that you could recommend?"

The basic equations are toward the end of my paper on the Josephson
coupling of
<g|e-e-|g> to <0|e+e-|0>. A big problem is the "impedance matching", see
Ray Chiao's "gravity radio" papers on a related problem - it's not

to what I am talking about but not orthogonal either.

There are no papers in the field other than my own because I have only
recently created this new approach. It has not sunk in and it may take
years. The flying saucers show us that a technology of the /\zpf field
exists only that US DOD, DOE, NSA, CIA et-al do not have it. I am the
best they got at the moment. In fact I am ALL they got that's real
pointing the right way IMO of course. Hal Puthoff & Co's "PV theory"
represents what they hope they have and that theory is a joke IMHO. See
the recent Mitre Conference on HFGR.


"Of course what I'm
asking for is a "Manhattan Project" equivalent where you had all the
theorists on one side and the engineers coming up with schemes to
make the former's equations come to fruition. This has been the most
frustrating part for me all along. I think I could understand the
physics better if I had some clue as to what physical mechanisms were
to be employed to "make it happen, captain!"

That's what Joe Firmage wanted to do with ISSO. He made unwise financial
decisions and the project only lasted a year and a half 1999 - 2000.
That's what CIA Station Chief Harold Chipman wanted to do in 1985. Those
documents are in my book "Destiny Matrix". However, the time was not
ripe, I did not have the right ideas back then. The right ideas
had to wait for the discoveries of both "dark matter" first and "dark
energy" second. The full experimental picture only was made available to
public Feb 11, 2003 although my two books Destiny Matrix and Space-Time
and Beyond II at end of 2002 anticipate the results of NASA WMAP that
were confirmed. That's what Hal Puthoff's IAS is supposed to
be about but he is barking up the wrong tree, same for Eric Davis's
"Warp Metrics". That's what Senator Robert Byrd's ISR in W. Va was
supposed to be about also with Jim Corum's stuff, but that does not work
either as we found out at ISSO with our million dollar
contract with SARA of Huntington Beach where Corum came from before he
went to ISR. So far The Right Stuff you see in
http://qedcorp.com/APS/Ukraine.doc is a One Man Show.
WYSYYG. However there are some interesting theory things brewing in
Russia, Finland and Kiev in the Ukraine, and possibly some experimental
stuff in Beograd with the J.P. Vigier group. My theory does justify
Vigier's basic idea for "cold fusion" i.e. "tight atomic states"
i.e. spatially extended electron as a Bohm hidden variable, that appears
as a point particle in high energy scattering even though it really
isn't in low energy scattering and most importantly in atomic bound
states. This is what the Serbs are trying to achieve in a practical way.
Will they succeed? I don't know. I am not in touch with them though
maybe I will see them in Paris this September. We had Vigier at ISSO and
that was one good thing in terms of development of my theory in
http://qedcorp.com/APS/Ukraine.doc


On Tuesday, July 8, 2003, at 01:12 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:


On Tuesday, July 8, 2003, at 11:14 AM, stealthskaters wrote:

(1) "Making a Wormhole just got easier …" =>
http://www.nature.com/nsu/030527/030527-12.html (MS-Word version
archived at http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Time_02.doc).

This is important. Very good for my program at
http://qedcorp.com/APS/Ukraine.doc
to appear in Progress in Quantum Physics Research (Nova Scientific
Publishers)

"Good news for time travellers - it just got cheaper. The amount
material needed to build a window through time is infinitesimally small,
new research shows.

To travel through time, all you need to do is open a wormhole in
space-time and step through it. And to do that you need a magic
ingredient called 'exotic matter', which is repelled rather than
attracted by gravity.

The hitch is that no one has the remotest idea how to make exotic
matter. But don't despair, say Matt Visser, of the Victoria University
of Wellington in New Zealand, and his colleagues. They have shown that
when we do figure out how to make the stuff, we won't
need very much of it (1)."

The Pundits have not yet realized that the "dark energy" that is ~ 73%
of the large-scale structure of the universe for scale L > 10
megaparsecs, is, on the smaller scales, exactly what they are looking
for! They do not understand that the Einstein cosmological constant /\
in the spatially flat K = 0 FRW post-inflationary bubble metrics
(Tegmark "Level I" in May 2003 Scientific American "Parallel Universes")
is simply a limit of a local field "Wigner wavelet"

/\zpf (x,L) when L --> c/Ho ~ 10^26 meters and the x dependence at that
scale is very weak.

Normal "equilibrium vacuum" (G.E. Volovik, "Universe in a Helium
Droplet", Oxford 2003) does not gravitate because /\zpf(x,L) = 0 from
the dominating ODLRO vacuum-polarization coherence <0|e+(x)e-(x)|0>.
Upsetting this delicate equilibrium with Josephson links using real
superconductors, impedance matched to the physical vacuum. can make
/\zpf be positive or negative with negative (repulsive) and positive
(attractive) zero point energy pressures respectively because w =
pressure/(energy density) = -1 and the pressure dominates the energy
density by a factor of 3 in Einstein's geometrodynamic generalized
source Newtonian-Poisson equation for the effective potential energy per
unit test mass of the exotic vacuum volume element at coarse-grained
position x and at scale L in the sense of wavelet transform theory.

It's nice to know that we do not need a large spacetime region of exotic
vacuum /\zpf(x,L) to do the tricks that we see "flying saucers" in fact
doing rendering our entire present-day military defense technology
essentially "impotent and obsolete" should such advanced knowledge fall
into the hands of small groups of irresponsible individuals. Sir Martin
Rees discusses this in "Our Final Hour". See also the book "The Star
Gate Conspiracy" by Picknett & Prince and my two books "Destiny Matrix"
and "Space-Time and Beyond II" for a set of alternate POV's on this
topic. Also see http://www.fiu.edu/~mizrachs/techgnosis.html and
http://www.techgnosis.com/

"As Star Trek: Deep Space 9 ,Quantum Leap and Stargate have taught us,
wormholes are the preferred mode of transport for today's fashionable
time-traveller. These hypothetical tunnels connect distant parts of
space-time, the fabric of our Universe. And despite the philosophical
havoc that wormholes wreak with notions of causality,
Einstein's theory of general relativity - which describes space-time -
allows them to exist.

Six years ago, Visser and his colleague David Hochberg showed that in
order to stay open, wormholes need exotic matter. It's weird stuff,
however - it can be considered to have negative energy, meaning that it
has even less than empty space. It's the same as saying
that it experiences gravity as a repulsive force, and physicists have
never encountered anything of the sort."

"Nature" (i.e., the magazine not "GOD(D)" "in the Quad" ;-)) has screwed
up here. Their explanation is wrong. What matters is the sign of the
pressure. In fact, for w = -1 exotic vacua, our universe is ~ 96% exotic
vacuum stuff of both signs in proportion 73% repulsive "exotic matter"
/\zpf > 0, and 23% attractive "dark matter" /\zpf < 0 with negative and
positive pressures respectively.

It's the sign of the pressure that counts!

"So they imagine it. They key to exotic matter lies in quantum
fluctuations, which give empty space a kind of fizziness. Quantum theory
says that subatomic particles and their corresponding antiparticles are
continually popping in and out of existence in the
vacuum of empty space. Exotic matter might arise by suppressing this
fizz, or as a physicist would say, by violating the averaged null energy
condition (ANEC)."

Bingo! Exactly, I show how the macro-quantum coherence <0|e+(x)e-(x)|0>
"suppresses this fizz" in
http://qedcorp.com/APS/Ukraine.doc


"If this were to happen, quantum effects could give rise to tiny amounts
of exotic matter. But how much is needed to sustain a > wormhole?

That is what Visser and colleagues have now calculated. They find that,
if the wormhole is designed carefully, "the total quantity of
ANEC-violating matter can be made infinitesimally small". This makes a
wormhole considerably easier to create."

Exactly. That's what the "flying saucer" have been telling us. That is
why what Eric Davis proposes in MUFON 2001 is entirely the wrong
approach needing impractical enormous amounts of electromagnetic field
stress-energy density to get a very useless small bang for an impossibly
large buck since G/c^4 = 10^-33 cm per 10^19 Gev i.e. space-time is too
stiff to bend directly with a Tuv source field in Einstein's
geometrodynamic field equation

Guv = -8pi(G/c^4)Tuv

What you need to do the trick is

Guv + /\zpfguv = -8pi(G/c^4)Tuv ~ 0

where /\zpf is controlled by Josephson links tweaking around /\zpf = 0.

"Back to the future again

It's not the first time that traversable wormholes have been pulled out
of a pit of implausibility. In the 1980s the British astrophysicist
Stephen Hawking conjectured that even if you could make a wormhole
stabilized by exotic matter, you couldn't go through it to travel in
time and space, because even a single particle would destabilize it.

This became known as the Chronology Protection Conjecture. It was a
relief for philosophers who were trying to protect the notion of
causality. The paradox they envisioned - immortalised in the movie Back
to the Future - was that if wormholes could exist it
would theoretically be possible to go back in time and prevent your
parents from meeting. This would prevent your own existence, and
therefore your ability to go back in time."

I suspect that Hawking's conjecture here is wrong. We have evidence it
is wrong from the flying saucers. It's like saying we could not break
the sound barrier.

"{It's not the first time that traversable wormholes have been pulled
out of a pit of implausibility

But physicists subsequently thought of a way around this problem - there
are, for example, 'time loops' threading through a wormhole along which
backwards time travel is possible, but without its being able to alter
the future.

Sadly, an infinitely small amount of exotic matter is not the same as
none at all."

This is an example of Sir Michael Berry's "singular limit".

"So until someone figures out how to get hold of it (not to mention how
to open up a wormhole in the first place), you can forget about trips to
the Jurassic era - or your parents' first date."

Don't count on that. "The times they are a chang'in."

See "Time Travel: The Art of the Possible"
http://www.dvdjournal.com/reviews/s/startrek04voyage.shtml

"The Star Trek Universe

In the mini-documentary Time Travel: The Art of the Possible (11:14),
three physicists (mainly me), taped separately, provide their thoughts
on the real-world hypotheses behind the concept of time travel. Physics
201 topics are discussed and playfully illustrated, from basic
Einsteinian relativity to Carl Sagan's "wormhole" devised for the novel
(and film) Contact . It's an interesting, if only superficially
relevant, addition that would be right at home on the Science or
Discovery channels."

References
Visser, M., Kar,S. &Dadhich, N. Traversable wormholes with arbitrarily
small energy condition violations. Physical Review Letters ,90, 201102 ,
(2003). |Article|


© Nature News Service / Macmillan Magazines Ltd 2003

"(2) New concept of "black holes" proposes they are a special "form"
of 'dark energy' and not a singularity => "Frozen Stars" at
http://www.sciam.com. "What you have been taught in school is almost
certainly wrong, because classical black hole spacetimes are
inconsistent with quantum mechanics," says physicist George Chapline
of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. (MS-Word version archived
at http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/BlackHole_01.doc)"