Science > Physics > String theorists, and the vast majority of modern theoretical physicists, aren't just presenting theories that are not even wrong-they're not even asking the right questions.
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
08 Sep 2006 01:50:23 PM |
| Object: |
String theorists, and the vast majority of modern theoretical physicists, aren't just presenting theories that are not even wrong-they're not even asking the right questions. |
String theorists, and the vast majority of modern theoretical
physicists, aren't just presenting theories that are not even
wrong-they're not even asking the right questions.
Physicists need to ask physical questions that include, "What is the
deeper nature of physical reality that renders energy and mass are
equivalent? What underlying physical reality results in quantum
mechanical phenomena such the EPR effect, entanglement, and doubles
slit interference? What underlying physical reality results in time as
we know it, as opposed to the frozen block time presented in GR? What
underlying physical reality accounts for entropy and time's arrow?
What is the deeper physical nature of reality that dictates length
contraction and time dilation? In short, what is the common physical
reality that relativistic, quantum mechanical, classical and
thermodynamic phenomena arise from?" Moving Dimensions theory asks
these very questions and then answers them with a simple postulate,
"The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions."
Modern theorists have outlawed such questions so as to reconfigure
science so as to support the pillaging of NSF funds, tax, and tuition
dollars.
But such questions must be asked by bold physicists willing to ride
alone in the spirit of Einstein, Feynman, Dirac, Socrates, and Benjamin
Franklin. For groupthink tenures tyrants and leads to String Theory.
It is anomalous to replace the four-dimensional continuum by a
five-dimensional one and then subsequently to tie up artificially one
of those five dimensions in order to account for the fact that it does
not manifest itself. -Einstein to Paul Ehrenfest
String theorists don't make predictions, they make excuses. -Feynman,
Noble Laureate
String theory is like a 50 year old woman wearing too much lipstick.
-Laughlin, Nobel Laureate
"It is tragic, but now, we have the string theorists, thousands of
them, that also dream of explaining all the features of nature. They
just celebrated the 20th anniversary of superstring theory. So when one
person spends 30 years, it's a waste, but when thousands waste 20
years in modern day, they celebrate with champagne. I find that
curious." Sheldon Glashow, Nobel Laureate
I don't like that they're not calculating anything. I don't like
that they don't check their ideas. I don't like that for anything
that disagrees with a n experiment, they cook up an explanation-a
fix-up to say, "Well, it might be true." For example, the theory
requires ten dimensions. Well, maybe there's a way of wrapping up
six of the dimensions. Yes, that's all possible mathematically, but
why not seven? When they write their equation, the equation should
decide how many of these things get wrapped up, not the desire to agree
with experiment. In other words, there's no reason whatsoever in
superstring theory that it isn't eight out of the ten dimensions that
get wrapped up and that the result is only two dimensions, which would
be completely in disagreement with experience. So the fact that it
might disagree with experience is very tenuous, it doesn't produce
anything; it has to be excused most of the time. It doesn't look
right. -Richard Feynman, Nobel Laureate in Physics
But superstring physicists have not yet shown that theory really works.
They cannot demonstrate that the standard theory is a logical outcome
of string theory. They cannot even be sure that their formalism
includes a description of such things as protons and electrons. And
they have not yet made even one teeny-tiny experimental prediction.
Worst of all, superstring theory does not follow as a logical
consequence of some appealing set of hypotheses about nature. Why, you
may ask, do the string theorists insist space is none-dimensional?
Simply because string theory doesn't make sense in any other kind of
space. Sheldon Glashow, Nobel Laureate in Physics
Moving Dimensions Theory is in complete agreement with all experimental
tests and phenomena associated with special and general relativity.
MDT is in complete agreement with all physical phenomena as predicted
by quantum mechanics and demonstrated in extensive experiments. The
genius and novelty of MDT is that it presents a common physical model
which shows that phenomena from both relativity and quantum mechanics
derive from the same fundamental physical reality-the fourth
dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions.
Moving Dimensions Theory advances science by showing that curious
phenomena in both quantum mechanics and relativity arise from a common
space-time structure wherein the fourth dimension is expanding relative
to the three spatial dimensions. MDT offers a physical path to the
unification of previously disparate phenomena within a common context
founded upon a simple physical model of spacetime. MDT addresses the
deeper questions that many leading researchers, seeking to further
fictional fads instead of science, have chosen to ignore.
Nowhere does String Theory nor Loop Quantum Gravity account for quantum
entanglement nor relativistic time dilation. MDT shows these derive
from the same underlying physical reality. Nowhere does ST nor LQG
account for wave-particle duality nor relativistic length contraction.
MDT shows these derive from the same underlying physical reality.
Nowhere does ST nor LQG account for the constant speed of light, nor
the independence of the speed of light on the velocity of the source,
nor entropy, nor time's arrow. MDT shows these derive from the same
underlying physical reality. Nowhere does String Theory nor Loop
Quantum Gravity resolve the paradox of Godel's Block Universe which
troubled Eisntein. MDT resolves this paradox.
Simply put, MDT replaces the contemporary none-theories with a physical
theory, complete with a simple postulate that unifies formerly
disparate phenomena within a simple context.
The tenured priests, after rampaging the castles of academia, destroyed
the ladders of truth, logic, and reason by which academics would once
ascend to prominence.
The Bogdanov story suggest that, at least for papers in quantum gravity
in some journals, this etin is no longer worth much. Another reason
for the survival of journals is that they fulfill an important role in
academia, where too often the mian standard used to evaluate
researchers' work is the number of their publications in
peer-reviewed journals, something that was in the work prior to Igor
Borgdanov's thesis. The breakdown in refereeing is thus a serious
threat to the whole academic research enterprise. -Peter Woit, The
Bogdanov Affair, p. 219, Not Even Wrong: The Failure of Stiong Theory
and the Search For Unity in Physical Law
One of the more excitable such superstring enthusiasts, a Harvard
Faculty member, even at one point used this comment section to express
the opinion that those who criticized the funding of superstring theory
were terrorists who deserved to be eliminated by the U.S. military.
I'm afraid he seemed to be serious about this. -Peter Woit, Not
Even Wrong: The Failure of Stiong Theory and the Search For Unity in
Physical Law , p. 224
Scientists have yet to develop more than fragments of what they presume
will ultimately be a complete theory. . . Nevertheless, string
theorists are already collecting the spoils that ordinarily go to the
victors, including federal grants prestigious wards and tenured faculty
postions. Less than a decade ago, there were hardly any jobs for
string theorists, said Dr. David Gross... "Nowadays," Dr. Gross
said, "if you're a hotshot young string theorist you've got it
made." --The New York Times, Even Without Evidence, String Theory
Gains Influence, 2001
THE GENERAL POSTULATE
OF DYNAMIC DIMENSIONS THEORY
The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions.
If at first the idea is not absurd, then there is no hope for it.
-Albert Einstein
But after thirty years of the absurdity of String Theory, millions of
dollars from the NSF, and billions of complementary dollars from tax
and tuition and endowments spent on killing physics and indie
physicists, perhaps it's time for something that makes sense-for a
physical theory that actually accounts for a deeper reality from which
both Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, from which time, entanglement,
gravity, entropy, interference, the constant speed of light,
relativistic time dilation, length contraction, and the equivalence of
mass and energy emerge. It's time for Moving Dimensions
Theory-MDT.
-The Physicist with No Name
I know what you're thinking. Did he say there were thirty-six
dimensions or only thirty-five? Well to tell you the truth in all this
excitement I've kinda lost track myself. But being this is a .45
Revolver-the most powerful hand gun in the world and would blow your
head clean off, you've got to ask yourself one question--Do I feel
lucky? Well, do ya punk!? -Clint Eastwood
I'm interested in the fact that the less secure a man is, the more
likely he is to have extreme prejudice. -Clint Eastwood
Go ahead. Make my day. -Clint Eastwood
http://physicsmathforums.com
.
|
|
| User: "Bill Hobba" |
|
| Title: Re: String theorists, and the vast majority of modern theoretical physicists, aren't just presenting theories that are not even wrong-they're not even asking the right questions. |
08 Sep 2006 09:19:47 PM |
|
|
<Autumn.Wests@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1157741423.438844.23480@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
String theorists, and the vast majority of modern theoretical
physicists, aren't just presenting theories that are not even
wrong-they're not even asking the right questions.
Physicists need to ask physical questions that include, "What is the
deeper nature of physical reality that renders energy and mass are
equivalent?
Well first energy and mass are not equivalent - mass is a form of energy but
not all energy is a form of mass. However we already know the deep reason
mass is a form of energy - Noethers theorem, the principle of least action,
and SR demands it.
What underlying physical reality results in quantum
mechanical phenomena such the EPR effect, entanglement, and doubles
slit interference?
QM. Every theory every single one is based on assumptions. If you have a
deeper explanation of QM then its assumptions are not explained so you have
gained nothing. What you want is a theory that conforms to how you want a
theory to be - nature on the other hand does not have to be so obliging.
What underlying physical reality results in time as
we know it, as opposed to the frozen block time presented in GR?
That is not how GR has it.
What
underlying physical reality accounts for entropy and time's arrow?
The law of large numbers.
Rest of misconceptions in same vein snipped.
Bill
.
|
|
|
| User: "Koobee Wublee" |
|
| Title: Re: String theorists, and the vast majority of modern theoretical physicists, aren't just presenting theories that are not even wrong-they're not even asking the right questions. |
08 Sep 2006 11:28:07 PM |
|
|
Bill Hobba wrote:
Well first energy and mass are not equivalent - mass is a form of energy but
not all energy is a form of mass. However we already know the deep reason
mass is a form of energy - Noethers theorem, the principle of least action,
and SR demands it.
Actually, the variation of calculus with the associated Lagrangian does
indicate each component of the observed speed and each component of the
metric form a constant. This constant is none other than (E / m / c^2)
raised to the power of another constant. Thus, the observed energy, E,
is the observed mass, and vice versa.
QM. Every theory every single one is based on assumptions. If you have a
deeper explanation of QM then its assumptions are not explained so you have
gained nothing. What you want is a theory that conforms to how you want a
theory to be - nature on the other hand does not have to be so obliging.
Some theories like SR and GR are stacked on boatloads of assumptions.
Most of them are groundless, absurd, and easily challenged to be wrong.
If you like, we can go through them one by one.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: String theorists, and the vast majority of modern theoretical physicists, aren't just presenting theories that are not even wrong-they're not even asking the right questions. |
09 Sep 2006 08:40:42 PM |
|
|
Koobee Wublee wrote:
Bill Hobba wrote:
Well first energy and mass are not equivalent - mass is a form of energy but
not all energy is a form of mass. However we already know the deep reason
mass is a form of energy - Noethers theorem, the principle of least action,
and SR demands it.
Actually, the variation of calculus with the associated Lagrangian does
indicate each component of the observed speed and each component of the
metric form a constant. This constant is none other than (E / m / c^2)
raised to the power of another constant. Thus, the observed energy, E,
is the observed mass, and vice versa.
QM. Every theory every single one is based on assumptions. If you have a
deeper explanation of QM then its assumptions are not explained so you have
gained nothing. What you want is a theory that conforms to how you want a
theory to be - nature on the other hand does not have to be so obliging.
Some theories like SR and GR are stacked on boatloads of assumptions.
Most of them are groundless, absurd, and easily challenged to be wrong.
If you like, we can go through them one by one.
VERGON
Yes, I for one would be very interested in the assumptions of STR.
I know the theory presented here is full of them. Further, he has a as
a premise and b as a conclusion --- with no apparent conection between
them. I believe in cause and effect and that uncertainty is only our
limitation to observe.
Also, he invents certain things with no obvious reality.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: String theorists, and the vast majority of modern theoretical physicists, aren't just presenting theories that are not even wrong-they're not even asking the right questions. |
10 Sep 2006 01:16:11 PM |
|
|
http://physicsmathforums.com
susskind hates nobel prize winners, feynman, and einstein
susskind hates nobel laureates, feynman, and einstein
that is because feyman, einstein, and nobel laureates get in the way of
him pillaging your tax and tuition dollars with crank physics.
It is anomalous to replace the four-dimensional continuum by a
five-dimensional one and then subsequently to tie up artificially one
of those five dimensions in order to account for the fact that it does
not manifest itself. -Einstein to Paul Ehrenfest
String theorists don't make predictions, they make excuses. -Feynman,
Noble Laureate
String theory is like a 50 year old woman wearing too much lipstick.
-Laughlin, Nobel Laureate
Actually, I would not even be prepared to call string theory a
"theory"rather a "model" or not even that: just a hunch. After
all, a theory should come together with instructions on how to deal
with it to identify the things one wishes to describe, in our case the
elementary particles, and one should, at least in principle, be able to
formulate the rules for calculating the properties of these particles,
and how to make new predictions for them. Imagine that I give you a
chair, while explaining that the legs are still missing, and that the
seat, back and armrest will perhaps be delivered soon; whatever I did
give you, can I still call it a chair? -Gerard 't Hooft, Nobel
Laureate in String Theory
"It is tragic, but now, we have the string theorists, thousands of
them, that also dream of explaining all the features of nature. They
just celebrated the 20th anniversary of superstring theory. So when one
person spends 30 years, it's a waste, but when thousands waste 20
years in modern day, they celebrate with champagne. I find that
curious." Sheldon Glashow, Nobel Laureate
I don't like that they're not calculating anything. I don't like
that they don't check their ideas. I don't like that for anything
that disagrees with a n experiment, they cook up an explanation-a
fix-up to say, "Well, it might be true." For example, the theory
requires ten dimensions. Well, maybe there's a way of wrapping up six
of the dimensions. Yes, that's all possible mathematically, but why
not seven? When they write their equation, the equation should decide
how many of these things get wrapped up, not the desire to agree with
experiment. In other words, there's no reason whatsoever in
superstring theory that it isn't eight out of the ten dimensions that
get wrapped up and that the result is only two dimensions, which would
be completely in disagreement with experience. So the fact that it
might disagree with experience is very tenuous, it doesn't produce
anything; it has to be excused most of the time. It doesn't look
right. -Richard Feynman, Nobel Laureate in Physics
But superstring physicists have not yet shown that theory really works.
They cannot demonstrate that the standard theory is a logical outcome
of string theory. They cannot even be sure that their formalism
includes a description of such things as protons and electrons. And
they have not yet made even one teeny-tiny experimental prediction.
Worst of all, superstring theory does not follow as a logical
consequence of some appealing set of hypotheses about nature. Why, you
may ask, do the string theorists insist space is none-dimensional?
Simply because string theory doesn't make sense in any other kind of
space. Sheldon Glashow, Nobel Laureate in Physics
http://physicsmathforums.com
vergon@gawab.com wrote:
Koobee Wublee wrote:
Bill Hobba wrote:
Well first energy and mass are not equivalent - mass is a form of energy but
not all energy is a form of mass. However we already know the deep reason
mass is a form of energy - Noethers theorem, the principle of least action,
and SR demands it.
Actually, the variation of calculus with the associated Lagrangian does
indicate each component of the observed speed and each component of the
metric form a constant. This constant is none other than (E / m / c^2)
raised to the power of another constant. Thus, the observed energy, E,
is the observed mass, and vice versa.
QM. Every theory every single one is based on assumptions. If you have a
deeper explanation of QM then its assumptions are not explained so you have
gained nothing. What you want is a theory that conforms to how you want a
theory to be - nature on the other hand does not have to be so obliging.
Some theories like SR and GR are stacked on boatloads of assumptions.
Most of them are groundless, absurd, and easily challenged to be wrong.
If you like, we can go through them one by one.
VERGON
Yes, I for one would be very interested in the assumptions of STR.
I know the theory presented here is full of them. Further, he has a as
a premise and b as a conclusion --- with no apparent conection between
them. I believe in cause and effect and that uncertainty is only our
limitation to observe.
Also, he invents certain things with no obvious reality.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Gisse" |
|
| Title: Re: String theorists, and the vast majority of modern theoretical physicists, aren't just presenting theories that are not even wrong-they're not even asking the right questions. |
09 Sep 2006 12:55:15 AM |
|
|
Koobee Wublee wrote:
[...]
Some theories like SR and GR are stacked on boatloads of assumptions.
Most of them are groundless, absurd, and easily challenged to be wrong.
If you like, we can go through them one by one.
I think you have demonstrated that you don't actually understand either
theory enough times to make the discussion fruitless.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Koobee Wublee" |
|
| Title: Re: String theorists, and the vast majority of modern theoretical physicists, aren't just presenting theories that are not even wrong-they're not even asking the right questions. |
09 Sep 2006 01:17:19 AM |
|
|
Eric Gisse wrote:
Koobee Wublee wrote:
[...]
Some theories like SR and GR are stacked on boatloads of assumptions.
Most of them are groundless, absurd, and easily challenged to be wrong.
If you like, we can go through them one by one.
I think you have demonstrated that you don't actually understand either
theory enough times to make the discussion fruitless.
Have you learned calculus of Variations yet? This discipline of
mathematics was developed more than 200 years ago. Today, it is still
very simple. You wrote
"I finally get on speaking terms with tensors, then I have to learn
calculus of
variations to vary the metric. Arggh."
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/672b53adf1991110
Tensors in the context of GR are merely 4-by-4 matrix. Tensor calculus
in the context of GR is actually very simple if the kryptic symbols are
well defined. Calculus of Variations is just way simpler than any
matrix manipulations. If you cannot even grasp that, how can you even
trust yourself to accuse me of not understanding whatever? You don't
understand the simplest and the foundation of GR mathematics. You have
no right to make these accusations.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: String theorists, and the vast majority of modern theoretical physicists, aren't just presenting theories that are not even wrong-they're not even asking the right questions. |
21 Sep 2006 12:39:04 PM |
|
|
But there is another that actually unifies QM & SR & GR with a physical
model: MDT--it's physics!
Moving Dimensions Theory is in complete agreement with all experimental
tests and phenomena associated with special and general relativity. MDT
is in complete agreement with all physical phenomena as predicted by
quantum mechanics and demonstrated in extensive experiments. The genius
and novelty of MDT is that it presents a common physical model which
shows that phenomena from both relativity and quantum mechanics derive
from the same fundamental physical reality.
Nowhere does String Theory nor Loop Quantum Gravity account for quantum
entanglement nor relativistic time dilation. MDT shows these derive
from the same underlying physical reality. Nowhere does ST nor LQG
account for wave-particle duality nor relativistic length contraction.
MDT shows these derive from the same underlying physical reality.
Nowhere does ST nor LQG account for the constant speed of light, nor
the independence of the speed of light on the velocity of the source,
nor entropy, nor time's arrow. MDT shows these derive from the same
underlying physical reality. Nowhere does String Theory nor Loop
Quantum Gravity resolve the paradox of Godel's Block Universe which
troubled Eisntein. MDT resolves this paradox.
Simply put, MDT replaces the contemporary none-theories with a physical
theory, complete with a simple postulate that unifies formerly
disparate phenomena within a simple context.
THE GENERAL POSTULATE
OF DYNAMIC DIMENSIONS THEORY
The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions.
If at first the idea is not absurd, then there is no hope for it.
-Albert Einstein
But after thirty years of the absurdity of String Theory, millions of
dollars from the NSF, and billions of complementary dollars from tax
and tuition and endowments spent on killing physics and indie
physicists, perhaps it's time for something that makes sense-for a
physical theory that actually accounts for a deeper reality from which
both Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, from which time, entanglement,
gravity, entropy, interference, the constant speed of light,
relativistic time dilation, length contraction, and the equivalence of
mass and energy emerge. It's time for Moving Dimensions Theory-MDT.
-The Physicist with No Name
I know what you're thinking. Did he say there were thirty-six
dimensions or only thirty-five? Well to tell you the truth in all this
excitement I've kinda lost track myself. But being this is a .45
Revolver-the most powerful hand gun in the world and would blow your
head clean off, you've got to ask yourself one question--Do I feel
lucky? Well, do ya punk!? -Clint Eastwood
I'm interested in the fact that the less secure a man is, the more
likely he is to have extreme prejudice. -Clint Eastwood
Go ahead. Make my day. -Clint Eastwood
MDT IN BRIEF
Without further adieu, allow me to present the beauty and elegance of
MDT by showing both its simplicity and far-reaching ability to account
for and answer fundamental questions. All of the below will be
elaborated on throughout the book.
Questions Addressed by MDT:
Why does light have a maximum, constant speed independent of the
source? The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions. A photon is momenergy that exists orthogonal to the three
spatial dimensions. It is carried along by the expanding fourth
dimension. So no matter how fast the source is moving when the photon
is emitted, the photon travels at the rate with which the fourth
dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions. Thus c
is always independent of the movement of the source.
Why are light and energy quantized? The fourth dimension is expanding
in a quantized manner relative to the three spatial dimensions. Light
and energy are matter rotated completely into the fourth expanding
dimension, and as it expands in a quantized manner, light and energy
are thus quantized.
Why is the velocity of light constant in all frames? Time is an
emergent phenomena that arises because the fourth dimension is
expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions. The flow of time is
inextricably wed to the emission and propagation of photons. In all
biological, mechanical, and electronic clocks, the emission and
propagation of photons is what determines time. The velocity of light
is always measured with respect to time, which is inextricably linked
to the velocity of light. This tautology ensures that the velocity of
light, measured relative to the velocity of light, will always be the
same.
How can photons display both wave and particle properties? The
fundamental photon propagates as a spherical wave-front, surfing the
fourth expanding dimension. This is because the fourth expanding
dimension appears as a spherical wavefront as it expands through the
three spatial dimensions. The act of measurement localizes the photon's
momenergy, taking it out of the expanding fourth dimension and trapping
it in the three stationary spatial dimensions, and it appears as a
localized particle, trapped by electrons as it blackens a grain on a
photographic plate.
How can matter display both wave and particle properties? The
fundamental electron is abuzz with photons. Photons are continually
being emitted into the fourth expanding dimension and reabsorbed by the
electron. The continual dance with these photons gives the electron its
wave properties. Nothing moves without photons which up the net
probability that the combine momenergy will be in the expanding fourth
dimension. The more photons one adds to an object, the greater the
chance it has of existing in the expanding fourth dimension, and thus
it moves.
Why are there non-local effects in quantum mechanics? The fourth
dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions. That
means that what begins as a point in the fourth dimension is a sphere
with a 186,000 mile radius one second later. So it is that the entire
spherical wavefront of the photon exists in the exact same place in
time. Hence the non-locality observed in double slit experiments, the
EPR effect, and quantum entanglement. Take two interacting spin =BD
photons and let them propagate at the speed of c in opposite
directions. They are yet at the exact same place in time! And too, they
are yet in the exact same place of the fourth expanding dimension.
Why does time stop at the speed of light?
Time depends on the emission and propagation of photons. If no photons
are emitted, time does not occur. This holds true whether the clock is
an unwinding copper spring, a biological system such as a heart, or an
oscillating quartz crystal. No photom emission=3Dno time! As an object
approaches the speed of light, its ability to emit photons without
reabsorbing them diminishes. An object traveling at the speed of light
cannot emit a photon.
How come a photon does not age?
A photon represents momenergy rotated entirely into the fourth
expanding dimension. A photon stays the exact same place in the fourth
dimension, no matter how far it travels. A photon stays the exact same
place in time, no matter how far it travels. Again, time is not the
fourth dimension, but in inherits properties of the fourth dimension.
Why are inertial mass and gravitational mass the same thing?
Why do moving bodies exhibit length contraction?
Movement is always accompanied by a shortening in length. This is
because the only way for a body to move is for it to undergo a rotation
into the forth dimension, which is expanding relative to the three
spatial dimensions. The more energy an electron has, the more photons
it possesses, and the higher probability it exists in the expanding
fourth dimension. Hence its length appears contracted as perceived from
the three spatial dimensions.
Why are mass and energy equivalent?
The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions. That means that a baseball sitting on a lab table
stationary in our three-dimensional inertial reference frame, is yet
moving at a fantastic velocity relative to the fourth dimension. Hence
every seemingly stationary mass has a vast energy, as given by E=3Dmc2.
In a nuclear reaction matter is rotated into the expanding fourth
dimension, appearing as high-enegry photons (gamma rays) propagating at
the same velocity of the fourth expanding dimension-c.
Why does time's arrow point in the direction it points in? The fourth
dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions. Hence
every photon naturally expands in a spherically symmetric manner. Hence
every electron, or piece of matter that interacts with photons, is
naturally carried outward from a central point in a spherically
symmetric manner. Hence the particles in a drop of dye in a swimming
pool dissipate in a spherically symmetric manner, and are never
reunited. Hence time's arrow and entropy.
Why do photons appear as spherically-symmetric wavefronts traveling at
a velocity c? The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three
spatial dimensions at the velocity c. Hence photons, which are tiny
packets of momenergy rotated entirely into the fourth dimension, appear
as spherically-symmetric wavefronts propagating at the velocity c.
Why is there a minus sign in the following metric?
x^2+y^2+z^2-c^2t^2=3Ds^2
The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions at the velocity c. Hence the only way to stay still in the
space-time continuum, and to achieve a 0 interval, is to move with the
velocity of light.
What deeper reality underlies Einstein's postulates of relativity?
The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions at the velocity c. This single postulate assures that the
speed of light is constant for all observers and that the laws of
physics are the same in all inertial frames.
What deeper reality underlies Newton's laws?
Newton's laws are an approximation of relativity and quantum mechanics,
and as MDT underlies QM & relativity, it underlies Newton's laws.
Why is an increase in velocity always accompanied by a decrease in
length as measured by an external observer? All increases in velocity
are accompanied by rotations into the fourth dimension. All particles
can be represented by momenergy 4-vectors. The greater the momenrgy
component in the expanding fourth dimension, the greater the velocity
and speed of the particle. Rest mass is the invariant here. It never
changes. It prefers the three spatial dimensions. In order for it to
move, one must gain energy in the form of photons. These photons prefer
the fourth expanding dimension. The more photons one adds, the greater
the component of the momenergy 4-vector that appears in the fourth
expanding dimension, the more energy the particle has, the shorter it
appears, and the faster it moves.
How MDT Is Aiding Fellow Physicists
"The conclusions from Bell's theorem are philosophically startling;
either one must totally abandon the realistic philosophy of most
working scientists or dramatically revise our concept of space-time."
-Abner Shimony and John Clauser
Moving Dimensions Theory provides this new concept of space-time. The
vast ambitions of most tenure-track physicists, including string
theorists and LQG hypers, causes them to focus on irrelevant, minute
questions, and thus, though funded by millions for over thirty years,
have not yet been able to string the bow. Deeper, true physicists, such
as Abner Shimony and John Clauser are alert to the fact that physics
need news ideas.
The expanding fourth dimension gives rise to non-local phenomena and
quantum entanglement, as the expanding fourth dimension means that two
events separated in the three spatial dimensions can yet appear to be
at the exact same place in the fourth dimension. MDT thus provides the
new concept of space-time.
"For me, then, this is the real problem with quantum theory: the
apparently essential conflict between any sharp formulation and
fundamental relativity. It may be that a real synthesis of quantum and
relativity theories requires not just technical developments but
radical conceptual renewal." -John Bell
Moving Dimensions Theory provides this radical conceptual renewal. The
expanding fourth dimension gives rise to non-local phenomena and
quantum entanglement, as the expanding fourth dimension means that two
events separated in the three spatial dimensions can yet appear to be
at the exact same place in the fourth dimension. MDT thus provides the
new concept of space-time.
"Entanglement is not one but rather the characteristic trait of quantum
mechanics." -Erwin Schrodinger
The expanding fourth dimension gives rise to non-local phenomena and
quantum entanglement, as the expanding fourth dimension means that two
events separated in the three spatial dimensions can yet be at the
exact same place in the fourth dimension. MDT thus provides the new
concept of space-time.
"For me, then, this is the real problem with quantum theory: the
apparently essential conflict between any sharp formulation and
fundamental relativity. It may be that a real synthesis of quantum and
relativity theories requires not just technical developments but
radical conceptual renewal." -John Bell
Moving Dimensions Theory provides this radical conceptual renewal. The
expanding fourth dimension gives rise to non-local phenomena and
quantum entanglement, as the expanding fourth dimension means that two
events separated in the three spatial dimensions can yet appear to be
at the exact same place in the fourth dimension. MDT thus provides the
new concept of space-time.
"Entanglement is not one but rather the characteristic trait of quantum
mechanics." -Erwin Schrodinger
The expanding fourth dimension gives rise to non-local phenomena and
quantum entanglement, as the expanding fourth dimension means that two
events separated in the three spatial dimensions can yet be at the
exact same place in the fourth dimension. MDT thus provides the new
concept of space-time.
http://physicsmathforums.com
Koobee Wublee wrote:
Eric Gisse wrote:
Koobee Wublee wrote:
[...]
Some theories like SR and GR are stacked on boatloads of assumptions.
Most of them are groundless, absurd, and easily challenged to be wron=
g=2E
If you like, we can go through them one by one.
I think you have demonstrated that you don't actually understand either
theory enough times to make the discussion fruitless.
Have you learned calculus of Variations yet? This discipline of
mathematics was developed more than 200 years ago. Today, it is still
very simple. You wrote
"I finally get on speaking terms with tensors, then I have to learn
calculus of
variations to vary the metric. Arggh."
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/672b53adf1991110
Tensors in the context of GR are merely 4-by-4 matrix. Tensor calculus
in the context of GR is actually very simple if the kryptic symbols are
well defined. Calculus of Variations is just way simpler than any
matrix manipulations. If you cannot even grasp that, how can you even
trust yourself to accuse me of not understanding whatever? You don't
understand the simplest and the foundation of GR mathematics. You have
no right to make these accusations.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: String theorists, and the vast majority of modern theoretical physicists, aren't just presenting theories that are not even wrong-they're not even asking the right questions. |
01 Oct 2006 12:05:30 PM |
|
|
While Randall Quotes Eminem, She Forgets to Quote Einstein
http://physicsmathforums.com
Randall forgets to quote Einstein, Feynman, and other winners of the
Nobel Prize in Physics.
"String theory is textbook post-modernism fueled by irresponsible
expenditures of money," Nobel Prize-winner Robert Laughlin griped to
the San Francisco Chronicle earlier this year.
It is anomalous to replace the four-dimensional continuum by a
five-dimensional one and then subsequently to tie up artificially one
of those five dimensions in order to account for the fact that it does
not manifest itself. -Einstein to Paul Ehrenfest
String theorists don't make predictions, they make excuses. -Feynman,
Noble Laureate
String theory is like a 50 year old woman wearing too much lipstick.
-Laughlin, Nobel Laureate
"It is tragic, but now, we have the string theorists, thousands of
them, that also dream of explaining all the features of nature. They
just celebrated the 20th anniversary of superstring theory. So when one
person spends 30 years, it's a waste, but when thousands waste 20
years in modern day, they celebrate with champagne. I find that
curious." Sheldon Glashow, Nobel Laureate
I don't like that they're not calculating anything. I don't like
that they don't check their ideas. I don't like that for anything
that disagrees with a n experiment, they cook up an explanation-a
fix-up to say, "Well, it might be true." For example, the theory
requires ten dimensions. Well, maybe there's a way of wrapping up
six of the dimensions. Yes, that's all possible mathematically, but
why not seven? When they write their equation, the equation should
decide how many of these things get wrapped up, not the desire to agree
with experiment. In other words, there's no reason whatsoever in
superstring theory that it isn't eight out of the ten dimensions that
get wrapped up and that the result is only two dimensions, which would
be completely in disagreement with experience. So the fact that it
might disagree with experience is very tenuous, it doesn't produce
anything; it has to be excused most of the time. It doesn't look
right. -Richard Feynman, Nobel Laureate in Physics
But superstring physicists have not yet shown that theory really works.
They cannot demonstrate that the standard theory is a logical outcome
of string theory. They cannot even be sure that their formalism
includes a description of such things as protons and electrons. And
they have not yet made even one teeny-tiny experimental prediction.
Worst of all, superstring theory does not follow as a logical
consequence of some appealing set of hypotheses about nature. Why, you
may ask, do the string theorists insist space is none-dimensional?
Simply because string theory doesn't make sense in any other kind of
space. --Sheldon Glashow, Nobel Laureate in Physics
Moving Dimensions Theory is in complete agreement with all experimental
tests and phenomena associated with special and general relativity. MDT
is in complete agreement with all physical phenomena as predicted by
quantum mechanics and demonstrated in extensive experiments. The genius
and novelty of MDT is that it presents a common physical model which
shows that phenomena from both relativity and quantum mechanics derive
from the same fundamental physical reality.
Nowhere does String Theory nor Loop Quantum Gravity account for quantum
entanglement nor relativistic time dilation. MDT shows these derive
from the same underlying physical reality. Nowhere does ST nor LQG
account for wave-particle duality nor relativistic length contraction.
MDT shows these derive from the same underlying physical reality.
Nowhere does ST nor LQG account for the constant speed of light, nor
the independence of the speed of light on the velocity of the source,
nor entropy, nor time's arrow. MDT shows these derive from the same
underlying physical reality. Nowhere does String Theory nor Loop
Quantum Gravity resolve the paradox of Godel's Block Universe which
troubled Eisntein. MDT resolves this paradox.
Simply put, MDT replaces the contemporary none-theories with a physical
theory, complete with a simple postulate that unifies formerly
disparate phenomena within a simple context.
THE GENERAL POSTULATE
OF DYNAMIC DIMENSIONS THEORY
The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions.
If at first the idea is not absurd, then there is no hope for it.
-Albert Einstein
But after thirty years of the absurdity of String Theory, millions of
dollars from the NSF, and billions of complementary dollars from tax
and tuition and endowments spent on killing physics and indie
physicists, perhaps it's time for something that makes sense-for a
physical theory that actually accounts for a deeper reality from which
both Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, from which time, entanglement,
gravity, entropy, interference, the constant speed of light,
relativistic time dilation, length contraction, and the equivalence of
mass and energy emerge. It's time for Moving Dimensions Theory-MDT.
-The Physicist with No Name
I know what you're thinking. Did he say there were thirty-six
dimensions or only thirty-five? Well to tell you the truth in all this
excitement I've kinda lost track myself. But being this is a .45
Revolver-the most powerful hand gun in the world and would blow your
head clean off, you've got to ask yourself one question--Do I feel
lucky? Well, do ya punk!? -Clint Eastwood
I'm interested in the fact that the less secure a man is, the more
likely he is to have extreme prejudice. -Clint Eastwood
Go ahead. Make my day. -Clint Eastwood
MDT IN BRIEF
Without further adieu, allow me to present the beauty and elegance of
MDT by showing both its simplicity and far-reaching ability to account
for and answer fundamental questions. All of the below will be
elaborated on throughout the book.
Questions Addressed by MDT:
Why does light have a maximum, constant speed independent of the
source? The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions. A photon is momenergy that exists orthogonal to the three
spatial dimensions. It is carried along by the expanding fourth
dimension. So no matter how fast the source is moving when the photon
is emitted, the photon travels at the rate with which the fourth
dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions. Thus c
is always independent of the movement of the source.
Why are light and energy quantized? The fourth dimension is expanding
in a quantized manner relative to the three spatial dimensions. Light
and energy are matter rotated completely into the fourth expanding
dimension, and as it expands in a quantized manner, light and energy
are thus quantized.
Why is the velocity of light constant in all frames? Time is an
emergent phenomena that arises because the fourth dimension is
expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions. The flow of time is
inextricably wed to the emission and propagation of photons. In all
biological, mechanical, and electronic clocks, the emission and
propagation of photons is what determines time. The velocity of light
is always measured with respect to time, which is inextricably linked
to the velocity of light. This tautology ensures that the velocity of
light, measured relative to the velocity of light, will always be the
same.
How can photons display both wave and particle properties? The
fundamental photon propagates as a spherical wave-front, surfing the
fourth expanding dimension. This is because the fourth expanding
dimension appears as a spherical wavefront as it expands through the
three spatial dimensions. The act of measurement localizes the photon's
momenergy, taking it out of the expanding fourth dimension and trapping
it in the three stationary spatial dimensions, and it appears as a
localized particle, trapped by electrons as it blackens a grain on a
photographic plate.
How can matter display both wave and particle properties? The
fundamental electron is abuzz with photons. Photons are continually
being emitted into the fourth expanding dimension and reabsorbed by the
electron. The continual dance with these photons gives the electron its
wave properties. Nothing moves without photons which up the net
probability that the combine momenergy will be in the expanding fourth
dimension. The more photons one adds to an object, the greater the
chance it has of existing in the expanding fourth dimension, and thus
it moves.
Why are there non-local effects in quantum mechanics? The fourth
dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions. That
means that what begins as a point in the fourth dimension is a sphere
with a 186,000 mile radius one second later. So it is that the entire
spherical wavefront of the photon exists in the exact same place in
time. Hence the non-locality observed in double slit experiments, the
EPR effect, and quantum entanglement. Take two interacting spin =BD
photons and let them propagate at the speed of c in opposite
directions. They are yet at the exact same place in time! And too, they
are yet in the exact same place of the fourth expanding dimension.
Why does time stop at the speed of light?
Time depends on the emission and propagation of photons. If no photons
are emitted, time does not occur. This holds true whether the clock is
an unwinding copper spring, a biological system such as a heart, or an
oscillating quartz crystal. No photom emission=3Dno time! As an object
approaches the speed of light, its ability to emit photons without
reabsorbing them diminishes. An object traveling at the speed of light
cannot emit a photon.
How come a photon does not age?
A photon represents momenergy rotated entirely into the fourth
expanding dimension. A photon stays the exact same place in the fourth
dimension, no matter how far it travels. A photon stays the exact same
place in time, no matter how far it travels. Again, time is not the
fourth dimension, but in inherits properties of the fourth dimension.
Why are inertial mass and gravitational mass the same thing?
Why do moving bodies exhibit length contraction?
Movement is always accompanied by a shortening in length. This is
because the only way for a body to move is for it to undergo a rotation
into the forth dimension, which is expanding relative to the three
spatial dimensions. The more energy an electron has, the more photons
it possesses, and the higher probability it exists in the expanding
fourth dimension. Hence its length appears contracted as perceived from
the three spatial dimensions.
Why are mass and energy equivalent?
The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions. That means that a baseball sitting on a lab table
stationary in our three-dimensional inertial reference frame, is yet
moving at a fantastic velocity relative to the fourth dimension. Hence
every seemingly stationary mass has a vast energy, as given by E=3Dmc2.
In a nuclear reaction matter is rotated into the expanding fourth
dimension, appearing as high-enegry photons (gamma rays) propagating at
the same velocity of the fourth expanding dimension-c.
Why does time's arrow point in the direction it points in? The fourth
dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions. Hence
every photon naturally expands in a spherically symmetric manner. Hence
every electron, or piece of matter that interacts with photons, is
naturally carried outward from a central point in a spherically
symmetric manner. Hence the particles in a drop of dye in a swimming
pool dissipate in a spherically symmetric manner, and are never
reunited. Hence time's arrow and entropy.
Why do photons appear as spherically-symmetric wavefronts traveling at
a velocity c? The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three
spatial dimensions at the velocity c. Hence photons, which are tiny
packets of momenergy rotated entirely into the fourth dimension, appear
as spherically-symmetric wavefronts propagating at the velocity c.
Why is there a minus sign in the following metric?
x^2+y^2+z^2-c^2t^2=3Ds^2
The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions at the velocity c. Hence the only way to stay still in the
space-time continuum, and to achieve a 0 interval, is to move with the
velocity of light.
What deeper reality underlies Einstein's postulates of relativity?
The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions at the velocity c. This single postulate assures that the
speed of light is constant for all observers and that the laws of
physics are the same in all inertial frames.
What deeper reality underlies Newton's laws?
Newton's laws are an approximation of relativity and quantum mechanics,
and as MDT underlies QM & relativity, it underlies Newton's laws.
Why is an increase in velocity always accompanied by a decrease in
length as measured by an external observer? All increases in velocity
are accompanied by rotations into the fourth dimension. All particles
can be represented by momenergy 4-vectors. The greater the momenrgy
component in the expanding fourth dimension, the greater the velocity
and speed of the particle. Rest mass is the invariant here. It never
changes. It prefers the three spatial dimensions. In order for it to
move, one must gain energy in the form of photons. These photons prefer
the fourth expanding dimension. The more photons one adds, the greater
the component of the momenergy 4-vector that appears in the fourth
expanding dimension, the more energy the particle has, the shorter it
appears, and the faster it moves.
How MDT Is Aiding Fellow Physicists
"The conclusions from Bell's theorem are philosophically startling;
either one must totally abandon the realistic philosophy of most
working scientists or dramatically revise our concept of space-time."
-Abner Shimony and John Clauser
Moving Dimensions Theory provides this new concept of space-time. The
vast ambitions of most tenure-track physicists, including string
theorists and LQG hypers, causes them to focus on irrelevant, minute
questions, and thus, though funded by millions for over thirty years,
have not yet been able to string the bow. Deeper, true physicists, such
as Abner Shimony and John Clauser are alert to the fact that physics
need news ideas.
The expanding fourth dimension gives rise to non-local phenomena and
quantum entanglement, as the expanding fourth dimension means that two
events separated in the three spatial dimensions can yet appear to be
at the exact same place in the fourth dimension. MDT thus provides the
new concept of space-time.
"For me, then, this is the real problem with quantum theory: the
apparently essential conflict between any sharp formulation and
fundamental relativity. It may be that a real synthesis of quantum and
relativity theories requires not just technical developments but
radical conceptual renewal." -John Bell
Moving Dimensions Theory provides this radical conceptual renewal. The
expanding fourth dimension gives rise to non-local phenomena and
quantum entanglement, as the expanding fourth dimension means that two
events separated in the three spatial dimensions can yet appear to be
at the exact same place in the fourth dimension. MDT thus provides the
new concept of space-time.
"Entanglement is not one but rather the characteristic trait of quantum
mechanics." -Erwin Schrodinger
The expanding fourth dimension gives rise to non-local phenomena and
quantum entanglement, as the expanding fourth dimension means that two
events separated in the three spatial dimensions can yet be at the
exact same place in the fourth dimension. MDT thus provides the new
concept of space-time.
http://physicsmathforums.com
drelliot@gmail.com wrote:
But there is another that actually unifies QM & SR & GR with a physical
model: MDT--it's physics!
Moving Dimensions Theory is in complete agreement with all experimental
tests and phenomena associated with special and general relativity. MDT
is in complete agreement with all physical phenomena as predicted by
quantum mechanics and demonstrated in extensive experiments. The genius
and novelty of MDT is that it presents a common physical model which
shows that phenomena from both relativity and quantum mechanics derive
from the same fundamental physical reality.
Nowhere does String Theory nor Loop Quantum Gravity account for quantum
entanglement nor relativistic time dilation. MDT shows these derive
from the same underlying physical reality. Nowhere does ST nor LQG
account for wave-particle duality nor relativistic length contraction.
MDT shows these derive from the same underlying physical reality.
Nowhere does ST nor LQG account for the constant speed of light, nor
the independence of the speed of light on the velocity of the source,
nor entropy, nor time's arrow. MDT shows these derive from the same
underlying physical reality. Nowhere does String Theory nor Loop
Quantum Gravity resolve the paradox of Godel's Block Universe which
troubled Eisntein. MDT resolves this paradox.
Simply put, MDT replaces the contemporary none-theories with a physical
theory, complete with a simple postulate that unifies formerly
disparate phenomena within a simple context.
THE GENERAL POSTULATE
OF DYNAMIC DIMENSIONS THEORY
The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions.
If at first the idea is not absurd, then there is no hope for it.
-Albert Einstein
But after thirty years of the absurdity of String Theory, millions of
dollars from the NSF, and billions of complementary dollars from tax
and tuition and endowments spent on killing physics and indie
physicists, perhaps it's time for something that makes sense-for a
physical theory that actually accounts for a deeper reality from which
both Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, from which time, entanglement,
gravity, entropy, interference, the constant speed of light,
relativistic time dilation, length contraction, and the equivalence of
mass and energy emerge. It's time for Moving Dimensions Theory-MDT.
-The Physicist with No Name
I know what you're thinking. Did he say there were thirty-six
dimensions or only thirty-five? Well to tell you the truth in all this
excitement I've kinda lost track myself. But being this is a .45
Revolver-the most powerful hand gun in the world and would blow your
head clean off, you've got to ask yourself one question--Do I feel
lucky? Well, do ya punk!? -Clint Eastwood
I'm interested in the fact that the less secure a man is, the more
likely he is to have extreme prejudice. -Clint Eastwood
Go ahead. Make my day. -Clint Eastwood
MDT IN BRIEF
Without further adieu, allow me to present the beauty and elegance of
MDT by showing both its simplicity and far-reaching ability to account
for and answer fundamental questions. All of the below will be
elaborated on throughout the book.
Questions Addressed by MDT:
Why does light have a maximum, constant speed independent of the
source? The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions. A photon is momenergy that exists orthogonal to the three
spatial dimensions. It is carried along by the expanding fourth
dimension. So no matter how fast the source is moving when the photon
is emitted, the photon travels at the rate with which the fourth
dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions. Thus c
is always independent of the movement of the source.
Why are light and energy quantized? The fourth dimension is expanding
in a quantized manner relative to the three spatial dimensions. Light
and energy are matter rotated completely into the fourth expanding
dimension, and as it expands in a quantized manner, light and energy
are thus quantized.
Why is the velocity of light constant in all frames? Time is an
emergent phenomena that arises because the fourth dimension is
expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions. The flow of time is
inextricably wed to the emission and propagation of photons. In all
biological, mechanical, and electronic clocks, the emission and
propagation of photons is what determines time. The velocity of light
is always measured with respect to time, which is inextricably linked
to the velocity of light. This tautology ensures that the velocity of
light, measured relative to the velocity of light, will always be the
same.
How can photons display both wave and particle properties? The
fundamental photon propagates as a spherical wave-front, surfing the
fourth expanding dimension. This is because the fourth expanding
dimension appears as a spherical wavefront as it expands through the
three spatial dimensions. The act of measurement localizes the photon's
momenergy, taking it out of the expanding fourth dimension and trapping
it in the three stationary spatial dimensions, and it appears as a
localized particle, trapped by electrons as it blackens a grain on a
photographic plate.
How can matter display both wave and particle properties? The
fundamental electron is abuzz with photons. Photons are continually
being emitted into the fourth expanding dimension and reabsorbed by the
electron. The continual dance with these photons gives the electron its
wave properties. Nothing moves without photons which up the net
probability that the combine momenergy will be in the expanding fourth
dimension. The more photons one adds to an object, the greater the
chance it has of existing in the expanding fourth dimension, and thus
it moves.
Why are there non-local effects in quantum mechanics? The fourth
dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions. That
means that what begins as a point in the fourth dimension is a sphere
with a 186,000 mile radius one second later. So it is that the entire
spherical wavefront of the photon exists in the exact same place in
time. Hence the non-locality observed in double slit experiments, the
EPR effect, and quantum entanglement. Take two interacting spin =BD
photons and let them propagate at the speed of c in opposite
directions. They are yet at the exact same place in time! And too, they
are yet in the exact same place of the fourth expanding dimension.
Why does time stop at the speed of light?
Time depends on the emission and propagation of photons. If no photons
are emitted, time does not occur. This holds true whether the clock is
an unwinding copper spring, a biological system such as a heart, or an
oscillating quartz crystal. No photom emission=3Dno time! As an object
approaches the speed of light, its ability to emit photons without
reabsorbing them diminishes. An object traveling at the speed of light
cannot emit a photon.
How come a photon does not age?
A photon represents momenergy rotated entirely into the fourth
expanding dimension. A photon stays the exact same place in the fourth
dimension, no matter how far it travels. A photon stays the exact same
place in time, no matter how far it travels. Again, time is not the
fourth dimension, but in inherits properties of the fourth dimension.
Why are inertial mass and gravitational mass the same thing?
Why do moving bodies exhibit length contraction?
Movement is always accompanied by a shortening in length. This is
because the only way for a body to move is for it to undergo a rotation
into the forth dimension, which is expanding relative to the three
spatial dimensions. The more energy an electron has, the more photons
it possesses, and the higher probability it exists in the expanding
fourth dimension. Hence its length appears contracted as perceived from
the three spatial dimensions.
Why are mass and energy equivalent?
The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions. That means that a baseball sitting on a lab table
stationary in our three-dimensional inertial reference frame, is yet
moving at a fantastic velocity relative to the fourth dimension. Hence
every seemingly stationary mass has a vast energy, as given by E=3Dmc2.
In a nuclear reaction matter is rotated into the expanding fourth
dimension, appearing as high-enegry photons (gamma rays) propagating at
the same velocity of the fourth expanding dimension-c.
Why does time's arrow point in the direction it points in? The fourth
dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions. Hence
every photon naturally expands in a spherically symmetric manner. Hence
every electron, or piece of matter that interacts with photons, is
naturally carried outward from a central point in a spherically
symmetric manner. Hence the particles in a drop of dye in a swimming
pool dissipate in a spherically symmetric manner, and are never
reunited. Hence time's arrow and entropy.
Why do photons appear as spherically-symmetric wavefronts traveling at
a velocity c? The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three
spatial dimensions at the velocity c. Hence photons, which are tiny
packets of momenergy rotated entirely into the fourth dimension, appear
as spherically-symmetric wavefronts propagating at the velocity c.
Why is there a minus sign in the following metric?
x^2+y^2+z^2-c^2t^2=3Ds^2
The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions at the velocity c. Hence the only way to stay still in the
space-time continuum, and to achieve a 0 interval, is to move with the
velocity of light.
What deeper reality underlies Einstein's postulates of relativity?
The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions at the velocity c. This single postulate assures that the
speed of light is constant for all observers and that the laws of
physics are the same in all inertial frames.
What deeper reality underlies Newton's laws?
Newton's laws are an approximation of relativity and quantum mechanics,
and as MDT underlies QM & relativity, it underlies Newton's laws.
Why is an increase in velocity always accompanied by a decrease in
length as measured by an external observer? All increases in velocity
are accompanied by rotations into the fourth dimension. All particles
can be represented by momenergy 4-vectors. The greater the momenrgy
component in the expanding fourth dimension, the greater the velocity
and speed of the particle. Rest mass is the invariant here. It never
changes. It prefers the three spatial dimensions. In order for it to
move, one must gain energy in the form of photons. These photons prefer
the fourth expanding dimension. The more photons one adds, the greater
the component of the momenergy 4-vector that appears in the fourth
expanding dimension, the more energy the particle has, the shorter it
appears, and the faster it moves.
How MDT Is Aiding Fellow Physicists
"The conclusions from Bell's theorem are philosophically startling;
either one must totally abandon the realistic philosophy of most
working scientists or dramatically revise our concept of space-time."
-Abner Shimony and John Clauser
Moving Dimensions Theory provides this new concept of space-time. The
vast ambitions of most tenure-track physicists, including string
theorists and LQG hypers, causes them to focus on irrelevant, minute
questions, and thus, though funded by millions for over thirty years,
have not yet been able to string the bow. Deeper, true physicists, such
as Abner Shimony and John Clauser are alert to the fact that physics
need news ideas.
The expanding fourth dimension gives rise to non-local phenomena and
quantum entanglement, as the expanding fourth dimension means that two
events separated in the three spatial dimensions can yet appear to be
at the exact same place in the fourth dimension. MDT thus provides the
new concept of space-time.
"For me, then, this is the real problem with quantum theory: the
apparently essential conflict between any sharp formulation and
fundamental relativity. It may be that a real synthesis of quantum and
relativity theories requires not just technical developments but
radical conceptual renewal." -John Bell
Moving Dimensions Theory provides this radical conceptual renewal. The
expanding fourth dimension gives rise to non-local phenomena and
quantum entanglement, as the expanding fourth dimension means that two
events separated in the three spatial dimensions can yet appear to be
at the exact same place in the fourth dimension. MDT thus provides the
new concept of space-time.
"Entanglement is not one but rather the characteristic trait of quantum
mechanics." -Erwin Schrodinger
The expanding fourth dimension gives rise to non-local phenomena and
quantum entanglement, as the expanding fourth dimension means that two
events separated in the three spatial dimensions can yet be at the
exact same place in the fourth dimension. MDT thus provides the new
concept of space-time.
"For me, then, this is the real problem with quantum theory: the
apparently essential conflict between any sharp formulation and
fundamental relativity. It may be that a real synthesis of quantum and
relativity theories requires not just technical developments but
radical conceptual renewal." -John Bell
Moving Dimensions Theory provides this radical conceptual renewal. The
expanding fourth dimension gives rise to non-local phenomena and
quantum entanglement, as the expanding fourth dimension means that two
events separated in the three spatial dimensions can yet appear to be
at the exact same place in the fourth dimension. MDT thus provides the
new concept of space-time.
"Entanglement is not one but rather the characteristic trait of quantum
mechanics." -Erwin Schrodinger
The expanding fourth dimension gives rise to non-local phenomena and
quantum entanglement, as the expanding fourth dimension means that two
events separated in the three spatial dimensions can yet be at the
exact same place in the fourth dimension. MDT thus provides the new
concept of space-time.
http://physicsmathforums.com
Koobee Wublee wrote:
Eric Gisse wrote:
Koobee Wublee wrote:
[...]
Some theories like SR and GR are stacked on boatloads of assumption=
s=2E
Most of them are groundless, absurd, and easily challenged to be wr=
ong.
If you like, we can go through them one by one.
I think you have demonstrated that you don't actually understand eith=
er
theory enough times to make the discussion fruitless.
Have you learned calculus of Variations yet? This discipline of
mathematics was developed more than 200 years ago. Today, it is still
very simple. You wrote
"I finally get on speaking terms with tensors, then I have to learn
calculus of
variations to vary the metric. Arggh."
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/672b53adf1991=
110
Tensors in the context of GR are merely 4-by-4 matrix. Tensor calculus
in the context of GR is actually very simple if the kryptic symbols are
well defined. Calculus of Variations is just way simpler than any
matrix manipulations. If you cannot even grasp that, how can you even
trust yourself to accuse me of not understanding whatever? You don't
understand the simplest and the foundation of GR mathematics. You have
no right to make these accusations.
.
|
|
|
| User: "T Wake" |
|
| Title: Re: String theorists (snip) |
01 Oct 2006 04:04:24 PM |
|
|
<Autumn.Wests@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1159722330.729302.311250@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
While Randall Quotes Eminem, She Forgets to Quote Einstein
<garbage snipped>
Seriously, do mental health institutions not work on Sunday?
No. Don't bother replying (not that a spamming buffoon like you was ever
planning to), just get some serious treatment.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \dlzc\ N: dlzc1 D:cox" |
|
| Title: Re: String theorists, and the vast majority of modern theoretical physicists, aren't just presenting theories that are not even wrong-they're not even asking the right questions. |
01 Oct 2006 12:12:54 PM |
|
|
Dear Autumn.Wests:
<Autumn.Wests@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1159722330.729302.311250@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
While Randall Quotes Eminem, She Forgets to
Quote Einstein
Please don't spam like this. 20 repeats of the same message on
different threads is still spamming.
David A. Smith
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Gisse" |
|
| Title: Re: String theorists, and the vast majority of modern theoretical physicists, aren't just presenting theories that are not even wrong-they're not even asking the right questions. |
09 Sep 2006 02:10:54 AM |
|
|
Koobee Wublee wrote:
Eric Gisse wrote:
Koobee Wublee wrote:
[...]
Some theories like SR and GR are stacked on boatloads of assumptions.
Most of them are groundless, absurd, and easily challenged to be wrong.
If you like, we can go through them one by one.
I think you have demonstrated that you don't actually understand either
theory enough times to make the discussion fruitless.
Have you learned calculus of Variations yet? This discipline of
mathematics was developed more than 200 years ago. Today, it is still
very simple. You wrote
"I finally get on speaking terms with tensors, then I have to learn
calculus of
variations to vary the metric. Arggh."
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/672b53adf1991110
Tensors in the context of GR are merely 4-by-4 matrix. Tensor calculus
in the context of GR is actually very simple if the kryptic symbols are
well defined. Calculus of Variations is just way simpler than any
matrix manipulations. If you cannot even grasp that, how can you even
trust yourself to accuse me of not understanding whatever? You don't
understand the simplest and the foundation of GR mathematics. You have
no right to make these accusations.
Says the guy who has trouble with multivariable calculus.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: String theorists, and the vast majority of modern theoretical physicists, aren't just presenting theories that are not even wrong-they're not even asking the right questions. |
09 Sep 2006 10:48:34 AM |
|
|
http://physicsmathforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=60
Feedback? Tv Show On The Death Of String Theory
http://revver.com/video/48391/
THE END OF STRING THEORY: Calling the String Theorists' Bluff: All Tied
Up & Strung Along--Hollywood String Theory Movie
http://revver.com/video/48391/
http://physicsmathforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=60
Tied Up & Strung Out: Hollywood String Theory Movie!!! Looking For
Extras!!!
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
ALL TIED UP & STRUNG ALONG, a movie about String Theorists and their
expansive theories which extend human ignorance, pomposity, and frailty
into higher dimensions, is set to start filming this fall. Jessica
Alba, John Cleese, Eugene Levie, Jackie Chan, and David Duchovney of
X-files fame have all signed on to the $700 million Hollywood project,
which is still cheaper than String Theory itself, and will likely
displace less physicists from the academy.
"As contemporary physics is about money, hype, mythology, and chicks,"
Ed Witten explained from his offices at the Princeton Institute for
Advanced Study, "The next logical step was Hollywood, although I
thought Burt Reynolds should play me instead of Eugene Levy."
Brian Greene, the famous String Theorist who will be played by David
"the truth is out there" Duchovney, explained the plot: "String
theory's muddled, contorted theories that lack postulates, laws, and
experimentally-verified equations have Einstein spinning so fast in his
grave that it creates a black hole. In order to save the world, we
String Theorists have to stop reformulating String Theory faster than
the speed of light. We are called upon to stop violating the
conservation of energy by mining higher dimensions to publish more BS
than can accounted for with the Big Bang alone, and I win the Nobel
prize for showing that M-Theory is in fact the dark matter it has been
searching for."
Greene continues: "At first my character is reluctant to stop
theorizing and start postulating, but when my love interest Jessica
Alba is sucked into the black hole, I search my soul and find Paul
Davies there, played by John Cleese. I ask him what he's doing in my
soul, and he explains that the answer is contained in the mind of God,
which only he is privy too, but for a small fee, some tax and tuition
dollars, a couple grants here and there, and an all-expense-paid book
tour with stops in Zurich and Honolulu, he can let me in on it. And he
shows me God in all her greater glory, as he points out that we can
make more money in Hollywood than writing coffee-table books that
recycle Einstein, Bohr, Dirac, Feynman, and Wheeler. I am quickly
converted, and I agree to turn my back on String Theory's hoax and save
Jessica Alba."
But it's not that easy, as standing in Greene's way is Michio "king of
pop-theory-hipster-irony-the-theory-of-everything-or-anything-made-
you-read-this" Kaku, played by Jackie Chan. Kaku beats the crap out of
Greene for alomst blowing the "ironic" pretense his salary, benefits,
and all-expense paid trips depend on. "WE MUST HOLD BACK THE YOUNG
SCIENTISTS WITH OUR NON-THEORIES!! WE MUST FILL THE ACADEMY WITH THE
POMO DARK MATTER THAT IS STRING THEORY TO KEEP OUR UNIVERSE FROM FLYING
APART, OUR PYRAMID SCHEMES FROM TOPPLING, AND OUR PERPETUAL-MOTION NSF
MONEY MACHINE FROM STOPPING!!" Kaku argues as he delivers a flying
back-kick, "There can be ony ONE! I WILL be String Theory's GODFATHER
as referenced on my web page!! I have better hair!"
But Greene fights back as he signs his seventeenth book deal to make
the hand-waving incoherence of String Theory accessible to the South
Park generation, senior citizens, and starving chirldren around the
world. "Kaku! Kaku! (pronounced Ka-Kaw! Ka-Kaw! like Owen Wilson did in
Bottle Rocket)," Greene shouts. "It is theoretically impossible to
build a coffee tables strong enough to support any more coffee-table
physics books!!!"
"Time travel is also theoretically impossible, but there's a helluva
lot more money for us in flushing physics down a wormhole. Nobody knows
what the #&#%&$ M stands for in M theory ya hand-waving, TV-hogging
crank!!! Get it?? Ha Ha Ha! We're laughing at the public! We're the
insider pomo hipsters! Get with the gangsta-wanksta-pranksta CRANKSTER
bling-bling program!!"
How does it all end? Does physics go bankrupt funding theories that
have expanded our ignorance from four dimensions into ten, twenty, and
thirty dimensions? Do tax payers revolt? Do young physicists overthrow
the hand-waving, contortionist bullies and revive physics with a
classical renaissance favoring logic, reason, and Truth over
meaningless mathematical abstractions? Does Moving Dimensions Theory
(MDT) prevail with its simple postulate? We'll all just have to wait!
But in the meantime, how do you think it will play out?
Will theories with postulates ever be allowed in physics again? Or will
the well-funded, tenured pomo String Theory / M-Theory (Maffia-Theory)
Priests send their armies of desperate, snarky postdocs and starving
graduate students forth to displace and destroy all common sense,
logic, reason, and physics in the academy? It must be so--for the
greater good of physics, the individual physicist, and thus physics,
must be sacrificed.
MDT's postulate: THE FOURTH DIMENSION IS EXPANDING AT A RATE OF C
RELATIVE TO THE THREE SPATIAL DIMENSIONS IN QUANTIZED UNITS OF THE
PLANCK LENGTH, GIVING RISE TO TIME AND ALL CLASSICAL, QUANTUM
MECHANICAL, AND RELATIVISTIC PHENOMENA.
http://physicsmathforums.com
Eric Gisse wrote:
Koobee Wublee wrote:
Eric Gisse wrote:
Koobee Wublee wrote:
[...]
Some theories like SR and GR are stacked on boatloads of assumptions.
Most of them are groundless, absurd, and easily challenged to be wrong.
If you like, we can go through them one by one.
I think you have demonstrated that you don't actually understand either
theory enough times to make the discussion fruitless.
Have you learned calculus of Variations yet? This discipline of
mathematics was developed more than 200 years ago. Today, it is still
very simple. You wrote
"I finally get on speaking terms with tensors, then I have to learn
calculus of
variations to vary the metric. Arggh."
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/672b53adf1991110
Tensors in the context of GR are merely 4-by-4 matrix. Tensor calculus
in the context of GR is actually very simple if the kryptic symbols are
well defined. Calculus of Variations is just way simpler than any
matrix manipulations. If you cannot even grasp that, how can you even
trust yourself to accuse me of not understanding whatever? You don't
understand the simplest and the foundation of GR mathematics. You have
no right to make these accusations.
Says the guy who has trouble with multivariable calculus.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "hanson" |
|
| Title: Re: String theorists, and the vast majority of modern theoretical physicists, aren't just presenting theories that are not even wrong-they're not even asking the right questions. |
09 Sep 2006 06:43:18 PM |
|
|
jowr, the Junior or Relativity Whiners <jowr.pi@gmail.com> "Eric Gisse"
aka jowr, the Juvenile of Weak Reasoning wrote in message
news:1157785854.519941.115380@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
Koobee Wublee wrote:
Some theories like SR and GR are stacked on boatloads
of assumptions. Most of them are groundless, absurd,
and easily challenged to be wrong.
If you like, we can go through them one by one.
Eric Gisse wrote:
I think you have demonstrated that you don't actually
understand either theory enough times to make the
discussion fruitless.
Koobee Wublee wrote:
Have you learned calculus of Variations yet? This
discipline of mathematics was developed more than 200
years ago. Today, it is still very simple. You wrote
Eric Gisse wrote
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/672b53adf1991110
"I finally get on speaking terms with tensors, then I have to learn
calculus of variations to vary the metric. Arggh."
Koobee Wublee wrote:
Tensors in the context of GR are merely 4-by-4 matrix. Tensor calculus
in the context of GR is actually very simple if the kryptic symbols are
well defined. Calculus of Variations is just way simpler than any
matrix manipulations. If you cannot even grasp that, how can you even
trust yourself to accuse me of not understanding whatever? You don't
understand the simplest and the foundation of GR mathematics. You have
no right to make these accusations.
Eric Gisse wrote
Says the guy who has trouble with multivariable calculus.
[hanson]
so, maintains Eric, who said - I hear it from "The voices in my head" --
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/92314880427bfd83
.... ahahaha... ahahaha... ahahanson
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: String theorists, and the vast majority of modern theoretical physicists, aren't just presenting theories that are not even wrong-they're not even asking the right questions. |
11 Sep 2006 12:19:19 AM |
|
|
http://physicsmathforums.com
It is anomalous to replace the four-dimensional continuum by a
five-dimensional one and then subsequently to tie up artificially one
of those five dimensions in order to account for the fact that it does
not manifest itself. -Einstein to Paul Ehrenfest
Moving Dimensions Theory is in complete agreement with all experimental
tests and phenomena associated with special and general relativity. MDT
is in complete agreement with all physical phenomena as predicted by
quantum mechanics and demonstrated in extensive experiments. The genius
and novelty of MDT is that it presents a common physical model which
shows that phenomena from both relativity and quantum mechanics derive
from the same fundamental physical reality-the fourth dimension is
expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions.
Moving Dimensions Theory advances science by showing that curious
phenomena in both quantum mechanics and relativity arise from a common
space-time structure wherein the fourth dimension is expanding relative
to the three spatial dimensions. MDT offers a physical path to the
unification of previously disparate phenomena within a common context
founded upon a simple physical model of spacetime. MDT addresses the
deeper questions that many leading researchers, seeking to further
fictional fads instead of science, have chosen to ignore.
Nowhere does String Theory nor Loop Quantum Gravity account for quantum
entanglement nor relativistic time dilation. MDT shows these derive
from the same underlying physical reality. Nowhere does ST nor LQG
account for wave-particle duality nor relativistic length contraction.
MDT shows these derive from the same underlying physical reality.
Nowhere does ST nor LQG account for the constant speed of light, nor
the independence of the speed of light on the velocity of the source,
nor entropy, nor time's arrow. MDT shows these derive from the same
underlying physical reality. Nowhere does String Theory nor Loop
Quantum Gravity resolve the paradox of Godel's Block Universe which
troubled Eisntein. MDT resolves this paradox.
Simply put, MDT replaces the contemporary none-theories with a physical
theory, complete with a simple postulate that unifies formerly
disparate phenomena within a simple context.
http://physicsmathforums.com
hanson wrote:
jowr, the Junior or Relativity Whiners <jowr.pi@gmail.com> "Eric Gisse"
aka jowr, the Juvenile of Weak Reasoning wrote in message
news:1157785854.519941.115380@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
Koobee Wublee wrote:
Some theories like SR and GR are stacked on boatloads
of assumptions. Most of them are groundless, absurd,
and easily challenged to be wrong.
If you like, we can go through them one by one.
Eric Gisse wrote:
I think you have demonstrated that you don't actually
understand either theory enough times to make the
discussion fruitless.
Koobee Wublee wrote:
Have you learned calculus of Variations yet? This
discipline of mathematics was developed more than 200
years ago. Today, it is still very simple. You wrote
Eric Gisse wrote
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/672b53adf1991110
"I finally get on speaking terms with tensors, then I have to learn
calculus of variations to vary the metric. Arggh."
Koobee Wublee wrote:
Tensors in the context of GR are merely 4-by-4 matrix. Tensor calculus
in the context of GR is actually very simple if the kryptic symbols are
well defined. Calculus of Variations is just way simpler than any
matrix manipulations. If you cannot even grasp that, how can you even
trust yourself to accuse me of not understanding whatever? You don't
understand the simplest and the foundation of GR mathematics. You have
no right to make these accusations.
Eric Gisse wrote
Says the guy who has trouble with multivariable calculus.
[hanson]
so, maintains Eric, who said - I hear it from "The voices in my head" --
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/92314880427bfd83
... ahahaha... ahahaha... ahahanson
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: String theorists, and the vast majority of modern theoretical physicists, aren't just presenting theories that are not even wrong-they're not even asking the right questions. |
11 Sep 2006 12:19:23 AM |
|
|
http://physicsmathforums.com
It is anomalous to replace the four-dimensional continuum by a
five-dimensional one and then subsequently to tie up artificially one
of those five dimensions in order to account for the fact that it does
not manifest itself. -Einstein to Paul Ehrenfest
Moving Dimensions Theory is in complete agreement with all experimental
tests and phenomena associated with special and general relativity. MDT
is in complete agreement with all physical phenomena as predicted by
quantum mechanics and demonstrated in extensive experiments. The genius
and novelty of MDT is that it presents a common physical model which
shows that phenomena from both relativity and quantum mechanics derive
from the same fundamental physical reality-the fourth dimension is
expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions.
Moving Dimensions Theory advances science by showing that curious
phenomena in both quantum mechanics and relativity arise from a common
space-time structure wherein the fourth dimension is expanding relative
to the three spatial dimensions. MDT offers a physical path to the
unification of previously disparate phenomena within a common context
founded upon a simple physical model of spacetime. MDT addresses the
deeper questions that many leading researchers, seeking to further
fictional fads instead of science, have chosen to ignore.
Nowhere does String Theory nor Loop Quantum Gravity account for quantum
entanglement nor relativistic time dilation. MDT shows these derive
from the same underlying physical reality. Nowhere does ST nor LQG
account for wave-particle duality nor relativistic length contraction.
MDT shows these derive from the same underlying physical reality.
Nowhere does ST nor LQG account for the constant speed of light, nor
the independence of the speed of light on the velocity of the source,
nor entropy, nor time's arrow. MDT shows these derive from the same
underlying physical reality. Nowhere does String Theory nor Loop
Quantum Gravity resolve the paradox of Godel's Block Universe which
troubled Eisntein. MDT resolves this paradox.
Simply put, MDT replaces the contemporary none-theories with a physical
theory, complete with a simple postulate that unifies formerly
disparate phenomena within a simple context.
http://physicsmathforums.com
hanson wrote:
jowr, the Junior or Relativity Whiners <jowr.pi@gmail.com> "Eric Gisse"
aka jowr, the Juvenile of Weak Reasoning wrote in message
news:1157785854.519941.115380@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
Koobee Wublee wrote:
Some theories like SR and GR are stacked on boatloads
of assumptions. Most of them are groundless, absurd,
and easily challenged to be wrong.
If you like, we can go through them one by one.
Eric Gisse wrote:
I think you have demonstrated that you don't actually
understand either theory enough times to make the
discussion fruitless.
Koobee Wublee wrote:
Have you learned calculus of Variations yet? This
discipline of mathematics was developed more than 200
years ago. Today, it is still very simple. You wrote
Eric Gisse wrote
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/672b53adf1991110
"I finally get on speaking terms with tensors, then I have to learn
calculus of variations to vary the metric. Arggh."
Koobee Wublee wrote:
Tensors in the context of GR are merely 4-by-4 matrix. Tensor calculus
in the context of GR is actually very simple if the kryptic symbols are
well defined. Calculus of Variations is just way simpler than any
matrix manipulations. If you cannot even grasp that, how can you even
trust yourself to accuse me of not understanding whatever? You don't
understand the simplest and the foundation of GR mathematics. You have
no right to make these accusations.
Eric Gisse wrote
Says the guy who has trouble with multivariable calculus.
[hanson]
so, maintains Eric, who said - I hear it from "The voices in my head" --
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/92314880427bfd83
... ahahaha... ahahaha... ahahanson
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: String theorists, and the vast majority of modern theoretical physicists, aren't just presenting theories that are not even wrong-they're not even asking the right questions. |
10 Sep 2006 11:06:46 AM |
|
|
wrote:
String theorists, and the vast majority of modern theoretical
physicists, aren't just presenting theories that are not even
wrong-they're not even asking the right questions.
Physicists need to ask physical questions that include,
"What is the deeper nature of physical reality that renders
energy and mass are equivalent?
What underlying physical reality results in quantum
mechanical phenomena such the EPR effect, entanglement, and doubles
slit interference?
What underlying physical reality results in time as
we know it, as opposed to the frozen block time presented in GR?
What underlying physical reality accounts for entropy and time's arrow?
What is the deeper physical nature of reality that dictates length
contraction and time dilation?
In short, what is the common physical
reality that relativistic, quantum mechanical, classical and
thermodynamic phenomena arise from?"
Vergon
ALL these questions and more are answered by a theory entitled On the
Quantum as a Physical Entity at http://www.wbabin.net Go to
LIST OF AUTHORS and click on Vertner Vergon
The presentation is clear and easy to absorb. It displays a fundamental
sub particle of which all the universe is composed.
.
|
|
| |
