STRING THEORISTS TARNISH EINSTEIN'S DIVINITY



 Science > Physics > STRING THEORISTS TARNISH EINSTEIN'S DIVINITY

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Pentcho Valev"
Date: 11 Sep 2006 06:44:00 AM
Object: STRING THEORISTS TARNISH EINSTEIN'S DIVINITY
wrote in sci.physics.relativity:

http://physicsmathforums.com/

The first step to recovery is admitting that there is a problem.

"Houston, we have a problem. Pomo-hipster String Theory."

Books like Smolin's give me faith that Reason, Science, and Physics
will again be celebrated in our lifetimes.

Smolin provides an excellent review of the Standard Model, and a
well-balanced overview of where we can go from here.

'Tis the dawn of a new era.

This book, together with Woit's Not Even Wrong signifies the beginning
of the end of a dark, postmodern age in physics.

Postmodern philosophies brought us all the Enrons, all the plagiarism
scandals that plague the literary industry, and string theory. All were
all based on the same pomo-hipster trick--an elite group of snarky
insiders deconstructing classical ideals and instituting secret
handhsakes and jumbled jargon in their stead, corrupting those very
entities that supported them.

Truth, beauty, and physics were sacrificed--indeed--today string
theorists would rather get rid of science than admit that string
theology has not only failed, but it has created a dependent class of
thousands of physicists who depend on string theory hoaxes for salaries
and benefits.

Search nsf.org and arxiv.org for "String," or "Strings," or "Stringy,"
and you will see the sad, embarrassing results of massive egoes gone
wild. Self-referential, meaningless paper after self-referential,
meaningless paper--all penned by those with ambitions overshadowning
their talents. And no physics in sight--indeed, physics became the
cause of expulsion from the physics department.

Logic, reason, and Reality must be held over all else in physics.

For physics is not math--it is physics.

It is not politics--it is physics.

It is not jargon nor cutesy jokes--it is physics.

Einstein, Bohr, Wheeler, Feynman, and Dirac were all very humble
men--humble before Reality.

We would be wise to follow their lead, to not deconstruct these giants
and all they stood for, but to stand upon their shoulders so as to see
further.

Yes, a century ago Divine Albert combined two very simple postulates
and obtained truths as crystally clear as "I measure your clock to be
slower than mine and you measure mine to be slower than yours but if
you go and return you will find mine to be faster than yours". Instead
of continuing this line of absolute divine rationality, string
theorists are going to confuse everything. Shame on them!
Pentcho Valev
.

User: ""

Title: Re: STRING THEORISTS TARNISH EINSTEIN'S DIVINITY 11 Sep 2006 09:53:51 AM
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/cdp/member-reviews/A16KVC6VZZX8V5?ie=3DUTF8
Page 180 gives Feynman's published statement about superstring theory:
'nonsense ... not calculating anything ... maybe there's a way of
wrapping up six of the dimensions. Yes, that's possible mathematically,
but why not seven? When they write down an equation, the EQUATION
should decide how many of these things get wrapped up, not the desire
to agree with experiment ... So the fact that it might disagree with
experiment is very tenuous, it doesn't produce anything; it has to be
excused most of the time.'
Feynman added: 'String theorists don't make predictions, they make
excuses.'
The next hundred pages explains boring stringy pseudo science
dominating the media with hype. I pray for the day when it will be
possible for Woit to bring out a new edition renamed 'Not Wrong!', with
those last 100 pages replaced by a discussion of naturally checkable
theory, hopefully something from Lee Smolin or someone. Overall, this
is the best book I've ever read.
Page 227 describes the some silly attacks on Woit by string theorists:
'=2E.. some superstring theorists have chosen to attack me personally
[via the Not Even Wrong weblog comments section] ... One of the more
excitable of such superstring theorists, a Harvard faculty member,
[commented] that those who criticised the funding of superstring theory
were terrorists who deserved to be eliminated by the United States
military.'
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/cdp/member-reviews/A16KVC6VZZX8V5?ie=3DUTF8
The Birth of MDT: MDT > LQG & ST
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
=AD-----
I wish Woit would have talked more about his views on the future of
physics.
String Theory was the only game in town, and now there are two--ST &
deconstructing ST.
But there is another that actually unifies QM & SR & GR with a physical
model: MDT--it's physics!
Moving Dimensions Theory is in complete agreement with all experimental
tests and phenomena associated with special and general relativity. MDT
is in complete agreement with all physical phenomena as predicted by
quantum mechanics and demonstrated in extensive experiments. The genius
and novelty of MDT is that it presents a common physical model which
shows that phenomena from both relativity and quantum mechanics derive
from the same fundamental physical reality.
Nowhere does String Theory nor Loop Quantum Gravity account for quantum
entanglement nor relativistic time dilation. MDT shows these derive
from the same underlying physical reality. Nowhere does ST nor LQG
account for wave-particle duality nor relativistic length contraction.
MDT shows these derive from the same underlying physical reality.
Nowhere does ST nor LQG account for the constant speed of light, nor
the independence of the speed of light on the velocity of the source,
nor entropy, nor time's arrow. MDT shows these derive from the same
underlying physical reality. Nowhere does String Theory nor Loop
Quantum Gravity resolve the paradox of Godel's Block Universe which
troubled Eisntein. MDT resolves this paradox.
Simply put, MDT replaces the contemporary none-theories with a physical
theory, complete with a simple postulate that unifies formerly
disparate phenomena within a simple context.
THE GENERAL POSTULATE
OF DYNAMIC DIMENSIONS THEORY
The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions.
If at first the idea is not absurd, then there is no hope for it.
-Albert Einstein
But after thirty years of the absurdity of String Theory, millions of
dollars from the NSF, and billions of complementary dollars from tax
and tuition and endowments spent on killing physics and indie
physicists, perhaps it's time for something that makes sense-for a
physical theory that actually accounts for a deeper reality from which
both Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, from which time, entanglement,
gravity, entropy, interference, the constant speed of light,
relativistic time dilation, length contraction, and the equivalence of
mass and energy emerge. It's time for Moving Dimensions Theory-MDT.
-The Physicist with No Name
I know what you're thinking. Did he say there were thirty-six
dimensions or only thirty-five? Well to tell you the truth in all this
excitement I've kinda lost track myself. But being this is a .45
Revolver-the most powerful hand gun in the world and would blow your
head clean off, you've got to ask yourself one question--Do I feel
lucky? Well, do ya punk!? -Clint Eastwood
I'm interested in the fact that the less secure a man is, the more
likely he is to have extreme prejudice. -Clint Eastwood
Go ahead. Make my day. -Clint Eastwood
MDT IN BRIEF
Without further adieu, allow me to present the beauty and elegance of
MDT by showing both its simplicity and far-reaching ability to account
for and answer fundamental questions. All of the below will be
elaborated on throughout the book.
Questions Addressed by MDT:
Why does light have a maximum, constant speed independent of the
source? The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions. A photon is momenergy that exists orthogonal to the three
spatial dimensions. It is carried along by the expanding fourth
dimension. So no matter how fast the source is moving when the photon
is emitted, the photon travels at the rate with which the fourth
dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions. Thus c
is always independent of the movement of the source.
Why are light and energy quantized? The fourth dimension is expanding
in a quantized manner relative to the three spatial dimensions. Light
and energy are matter rotated completely into the fourth expanding
dimension, and as it expands in a quantized manner, light and energy
are thus quantized.
Why is the velocity of light constant in all frames? Time is an
emergent phenomena that arises because the fourth dimension is
expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions. The flow of time is
inextricably wed to the emission and propagation of photons. In all
biological, mechanical, and electronic clocks, the emission and
propagation of photons is what determines time. The velocity of light
is always measured with respect to time, which is inextricably linked
to the velocity of light. This tautology ensures that the velocity of
light, measured relative to the velocity of light, will always be the
same.
How can photons display both wave and particle properties? The
fundamental photon propagates as a spherical wave-front, surfing the
fourth expanding dimension. This is because the fourth expanding
dimension appears as a spherical wavefront as it expands through the
three spatial dimensions. The act of measurement localizes the photon's
momenergy, taking it out of the expanding fourth dimension and trapping
it in the three stationary spatial dimensions, and it appears as a
localized particle, trapped by electrons as it blackens a grain on a
photographic plate.
How can matter display both wave and particle properties? The
fundamental electron is abuzz with photons. Photons are continually
being emitted into the fourth expanding dimension and reabsorbed by the
electron. The continual dance with these photons gives the electron its
wave properties. Nothing moves without photons which up the net
probability that the combine momenergy will be in the expanding fourth
dimension. The more photons one adds to an object, the greater the
chance it has of existing in the expanding fourth dimension, and thus
it moves.
Why are there non-local effects in quantum mechanics? The fourth
dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions. That
means that what begins as a point in the fourth dimension is a sphere
with a 186,000 mile radius one second later. So it is that the entire
spherical wavefront of the photon exists in the exact same place in
time. Hence the non-locality observed in double slit experiments, the
EPR effect, and quantum entanglement. Take two interacting spin =BD
photons and let them propagate at the speed of c in opposite
directions. They are yet at the exact same place in time! And too, they
are yet in the exact same place of the fourth expanding dimension.
Why does time stop at the speed of light?
Time depends on the emission and propagation of photons. If no photons
are emitted, time does not occur. This holds true whether the clock is
an unwinding copper spring, a biological system such as a heart, or an
oscillating quartz crystal. No photom emission=3Dno time! As an object
approaches the speed of light, its ability to emit photons without
reabsorbing them diminishes. An object traveling at the speed of light
cannot emit a photon.
How come a photon does not age?
A photon represents momenergy rotated entirely into the fourth
expanding dimension. A photon stays the exact same place in the fourth
dimension, no matter how far it travels. A photon stays the exact same
place in time, no matter how far it travels. Again, time is not the
fourth dimension, but in inherits properties of the fourth dimension.
Why are inertial mass and gravitational mass the same thing?
Why do moving bodies exhibit length contraction?
Movement is always accompanied by a shortening in length. This is
because the only way for a body to move is for it to undergo a rotation
into the forth dimension, which is expanding relative to the three
spatial dimensions. The more energy an electron has, the more photons
it possesses, and the higher probability it exists in the expanding
fourth dimension. Hence its length appears contracted as perceived from
the three spatial dimensions.
Why are mass and energy equivalent?
The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions. That means that a baseball sitting on a lab table
stationary in our three-dimensional inertial reference frame, is yet
moving at a fantastic velocity relative to the fourth dimension. Hence
every seemingly stationary mass has a vast energy, as given by E=3Dmc2.
In a nuclear reaction matter is rotated into the expanding fourth
dimension, appearing as high-enegry photons (gamma rays) propagating at
the same velocity of the fourth expanding dimension-c.
Why does time's arrow point in the direction it points in? The fourth
dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions. Hence
every photon naturally expands in a spherically symmetric manner. Hence
every electron, or piece of matter that interacts with photons, is
naturally carried outward from a central point in a spherically
symmetric manner. Hence the particles in a drop of dye in a swimming
pool dissipate in a spherically symmetric manner, and are never
reunited. Hence time's arrow and entropy.
Why do photons appear as spherically-symmetric wavefronts traveling at
a velocity c? The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three
spatial dimensions at the velocity c. Hence photons, which are tiny
packets of momenergy rotated entirely into the fourth dimension, appear
as spherically-symmetric wavefronts propagating at the velocity c.
Why is there a minus sign in the following metric?
x^2+y^2+z^2-c^2t^2=3Ds^2
The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions at the velocity c. Hence the only way to stay still in the
space-time continuum, and to achieve a 0 interval, is to move with the
velocity of light.
What deeper reality underlies Einstein's postulates of relativity?
The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions at the velocity c. This single postulate assures that the
speed of light is constant for all observers and that the laws of
physics are the same in all inertial frames.
What deeper reality underlies Newton's laws?
Newton's laws are an approximation of relativity and quantum mechanics,
and as MDT underlies QM & relativity, it underlies Newton's laws.
Why is an increase in velocity always accompanied by a decrease in
length as measured by an external observer? All increases in velocity
are accompanied by rotations into the fourth dimension. All particles
can be represented by momenergy 4-vectors. The greater the momenrgy
component in the expanding fourth dimension, the greater the velocity
and speed of the particle. Rest mass is the invariant here. It never
changes. It prefers the three spatial dimensions. In order for it to
move, one must gain energy in the form of photons. These photons prefer
the fourth expanding dimension. The more photons one adds, the greater
the component of the momenergy 4-vector that appears in the fourth
expanding dimension, the more energy the particle has, the shorter it
appears, and the faster it moves.
How MDT Is Aiding Fellow Physicists
"The conclusions from Bell's theorem are philosophically startling;
either one must totally abandon the realistic philosophy of most
working scientists or dramatically revise our concept of space-time."
-Abner Shimony and John Clauser
Moving Dimensions Theory provides this new concept of space-time. The
vast ambitions of most tenure-track physicists, including string
theorists and LQG hypers, causes them to focus on irrelevant, minute
questions, and thus, though funded by millions for over thirty years,
have not yet been able to string the bow. Deeper, true physicists, such
as Abner Shimony and John Clauser are alert to the fact that physics
need news ideas.
The expanding fourth dimension gives rise to non-local phenomena and
quantum entanglement, as the expanding fourth dimension means that two
events separated in the three spatial dimensions can yet appear to be
at the exact same place in the fourth dimension. MDT thus provides the
new concept of space-time.
"For me, then, this is the real problem with quantum theory: the
apparently essential conflict between any sharp formulation and
fundamental relativity. It may be that a real synthesis of quantum and
relativity theories requires not just technical developments but
radical conceptual renewal." -John Bell
Moving Dimensions Theory provides this radical conceptual renewal. The
expanding fourth dimension gives rise to non-local phenomena and
quantum entanglement, as the expanding fourth dimension means that two
events separated in the three spatial dimensions can yet appear to be
at the exact same place in the fourth dimension. MDT thus provides the
new concept of space-time.
"Entanglement is not one but rather the characteristic trait of quantum
mechanics." -Erwin Schrodinger
The expanding fourth dimension gives rise to non-local phenomena and
quantum entanglement, as the expanding fourth dimension means that two
events separated in the three spatial dimensions can yet be at the
exact same place in the fourth dimension. MDT thus provides the new
concept of space-time.
"For me, then, this is the real problem with quantum theory: the
apparently essential conflict between any sharp formulation and
fundamental relativity. It may be that a real synthesis of quantum and
relativity theories requires not just technical developments but
radical conceptual renewal." -John Bell
Moving Dimensions Theory provides this radical conceptual renewal. The
expanding fourth dimension gives rise to non-local phenomena and
quantum entanglement, as the expanding fourth dimension means that two
events separated in the three spatial dimensions can yet appear to be
at the exact same place in the fourth dimension. MDT thus provides the
new concept of space-time.
"Entanglement is not one but rather the characteristic trait of quantum
mechanics." -Erwin Schrodinger
The expanding fourth dimension gives rise to non-local phenomena and
quantum entanglement, as the expanding fourth dimension means that two
events separated in the three spatial dimensions can yet be at the
exact same place in the fourth dimension. MDT thus provides the new
concept of space-time.
http://physicsmathforums.com
mhrussel wrote:

On another note, are there any websites that might provide a visual
depiction of the BB?

Pentcho Valev wrote:

drelliot@gmail.com wrote in sci.physics.relativity:

http://physicsmathforums.com/

The first step to recovery is admitting that there is a problem.

"Houston, we have a problem. Pomo-hipster String Theory."

Books like Smolin's give me faith that Reason, Science, and Physics
will again be celebrated in our lifetimes.

Smolin provides an excellent review of the Standard Model, and a
well-balanced overview of where we can go from here.

'Tis the dawn of a new era.

This book, together with Woit's Not Even Wrong signifies the beginning
of the end of a dark, postmodern age in physics.

Postmodern philosophies brought us all the Enrons, all the plagiarism
scandals that plague the literary industry, and string theory. All were
all based on the same pomo-hipster trick--an elite group of snarky
insiders deconstructing classical ideals and instituting secret
handhsakes and jumbled jargon in their stead, corrupting those very
entities that supported them.

Truth, beauty, and physics were sacrificed--indeed--today string
theorists would rather get rid of science than admit that string
theology has not only failed, but it has created a dependent class of
thousands of physicists who depend on string theory hoaxes for salaries
and benefits.

Search nsf.org and arxiv.org for "String," or "Strings," or "Stringy,"
and you will see the sad, embarrassing results of massive egoes gone
wild. Self-referential, meaningless paper after self-referential,
meaningless paper--all penned by those with ambitions overshadowning
their talents. And no physics in sight--indeed, physics became the
cause of expulsion from the physics department.

Logic, reason, and Reality must be held over all else in physics.

For physics is not math--it is physics.

It is not politics--it is physics.

It is not jargon nor cutesy jokes--it is physics.

Einstein, Bohr, Wheeler, Feynman, and Dirac were all very humble
men--humble before Reality.

We would be wise to follow their lead, to not deconstruct these giants
and all they stood for, but to stand upon their shoulders so as to see
further.


Yes, a century ago Divine Albert combined two very simple postulates
and obtained truths as crystally clear as "I measure your clock to be
slower than mine and you measure mine to be slower than yours but if
you go and return you will find mine to be faster than yours". Instead
of continuing this line of absolute divine rationality, string
theorists are going to confuse everything. Shame on them!
=20
Pentcho Valev

.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Help from String Theorists (Physicits) Needed!
==[ How do string theorists DEAL with this incredible abuse??
The New York Times Reports: Leading String Theorists Admit String Theory is a Government-Funded Hoax--A Faith Based Initiative With No Science To show For It. Moving Dimesnion Theory Will Replace It
Help from String Theorists (Physicists) Needed
String theorists should start out first with the 1/N expansion Re: #15# new book "Correcting Present Day Mathematics...." (19) Proof of the Poincare Conjecture
HOW STRING THEORISTS AVOID THE IMPERFECTIONS OF DIVINE ALBERT
Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots
String theorists, and the vast majority of modern theoretical physicists, aren't just presenting theories that are not even wrong-they're not even asking the right questions.
String Theorists Support Moving Dimensions Theory's postulate thatDark Energy is caused by the slowing of a Fourth Dimension Expanding Relativeto The Three Spatial Dimensions
How much money do string theorists make?
=?utf-8?q?Beyond_Not_Even_Wrong:_The_End_of_String_Theory_According_To_Nobel_Prize_Winners:_String_theorists_don't_make_predictions,_they_make_excuses._=E2=80=94Feynman_String_theory_is_like_a_50_year_old_woman_wearing_too_much_lipstick._=E2=80=93Lau
Re: Pentagon 757 Theorists Dry Up And Blow Away, Suddenly
Re: Pentagon 757 Theorists Dry Up And Blow Away, Suddenly
SAT and Formal Predicate theorists.
Re: Pentagon 757 Theorists Dry Up And Blow Away, Suddenly
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER