| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Jack Sarfatti" |
| Date: |
31 Oct 2006 09:37:16 PM |
| Object: |
String Theory Hoopla |
Supersymmetry rotates bosons into fermions and vice versa in D + 1
space-time. When D = 2 we get anyons with fractional quantum statistics
and fractional angular momenta. D = 2 is special if we believe the world
hologram principle.
There is no evidence for supersymmetry as yet. String theorists are
hoping for a miracle with the LHC.
Supersymmetry does say the cosmological constant is zero, but in fact
it's not zero and that gives Ed Witten a severe migraine. ;-)
One interesting equation is, in simplest toy model
{Qi,Qj} = (Pauli Spin Matrix|u)ijP^u
LHS is anti-commutator of the supersymmetry Lie algebra
Where P^u is the Lie algebra "momenergy" of T4 which when locally gauged
gives Einstein's 1915 GR with zero torsion fields i.e. the SPIN 1
spin-connection 1-forms S^a^b are determined completely by the SPIN 1
Einstein-Cartan tetrad 1-forms e^a i.e.
De^a = 0
D = d + S/\
i.e.
de^a + S^ab/\eb = 0 i.e. vanishing torsion field 2-form
R^a^b = DS^a^b = dS^a^b + S^ac/\S^cb = curvature 2-form.
i.e.
R^a^b = R^a^buvdx^u/\dx^v 2-form
S^a^b = S^a^budx^u 1-form
e^a = e^audx^u 1-form
e^a = I^a + (hLambdaG/c^3)^1/2(@^a/\d&^a - d@^a/\&^a) ?
{@^a,&^b} are eight Goldstone phases of a vacuum ODLRO "Higgs" inflation
field.
(@^a/\d&^a - d@^a/\&^a) is the compensating spin 1 T4 local gauge
"curved tetrad" potential field.
S^a^b = (1/2)(@^a/\d&^b - d@^b/\&^a - @^b/\d&^a + d@^a/\&^b) ) = - S^b^a
is the spin-connection that will give the more familiar Riemannian
connection later.
These spin 1 tetrad and torsion spin-connection fields when quantized
should be renormalizable as point particle quantum fields. They may also
have a 3 + 1 "string" generalization.
* We do not want to preserve causality and unitarity as normally
understood! Bring those Sacred Cows to Slaughter House Five. ;-)
On Oct 31, 2006, at 11:30 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
Roger Penrose thinks quantum theory needs to be changed. This is the
approach I have taken.
Special Relativity with global frames and zero curvature is superceded
by General Relativty with local frames and variable curvature.
In a similar way micro-quantum theory with linear superposition in
Hilbert space, unitarity/Born probability, entanglement in phase space
and signal locality is superceded by macro-quantum theory i.e. "more is
different" emergent complexity ODLRO (macroscopic eigenvalues of the
quantum correlation functions) breakdown of superposition in Hilbert
space, breakdown of Born probability in the "Goldstone phase rigid"
condensate sector of the theory with presponse/retrocausal "signal
nonlocality," i.e. residual entanglement as stand-alone C^3 violation of
"no-cloning" theorem. Horizons (event and particle) no longer signal
barriers.
Idea of strings and branes replacing point particles is OK but we may
not need the extra space dimensions as currently understood. Note, however
Tetrad/spin connection spin 1 substratum of Einstein's spin 2
geometrodynamics should be renormalizable as micro-quantum 3+1 string
field theories for the fluctuations into and out of the smooth dynamical
macro-quantum condensate. No need to directly quantize the
metric/connection/curvature tensor fields.
Holography still a good idea. That is anyonic 2 + 1 field theory on
boundary of spacelike 3D volumes with fractional quantum statistics as
fundamental.
On Oct 30, 2006, at 11:09 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
The issue of unitarity of the string scattering amplitudes also plays a
key role in the leap to extra space dimensions. However, with
macro-quantum ODLRO from the tachyon vacuum instability we lose
unitarity and the Born probability interpretation implying signal
nonlocality (A. Valentini) AKA "retro-causality." This is then
consistent with Hawking's original position on information loss down
black holes before he, wrongly IMHO, changed his mind in his 2004 Dublin
GR 17 talk. Since Einstein's metric field emerges from the vacuum ODLRO
one also gets a handle on why the Weyl vacuum tensor should encode the
entropy of the gravity field according to S ~ A/4 (Bekenstein).
On Oct 30, 2006, at 10:10 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
Roger Penrose in "The Road to Reality" makes a devastating refutation of
the extra space dimensions of string theory on purely mathematical
grounds. The extra space dimensions come from there being a faster than
light tachyon in the string theory in 3 space dimensions. However, that
simply means that some continuous symmetry of the action of the string
is spontaneously broken inducing a vacuum phase transition of the theory
with macro-quantum ODLRO - emergence of a Higgs-type inflation field
with one or more Goldstone phases like in a superconductor. Therefore, a
string theory in ordinary 3 + 1 space-time may be possible after all.
Indeed, curved space-time's renormalizable spin 1 tetrad quantum fields
and spin-connections with dark energy and dark matter seem to naturally
emerge from the Goldstone phases induced by the tachyon instability. The
spin 2 metric field is an emergent entangled composite of pairs of spin
1 tetrad fields and torsion fields.
.
|
|
| User: "malibu" |
|
| Title: Re: String Theory Hoopla |
01 Nov 2006 12:12:28 AM |
|
|
Jack Sarfatti wrote:
Supersymmetry rotates bosons into fermions and vice versa in D + 1
space-time. When D = 2 we get anyons with fractional quantum statistics
and fractional angular momenta. D = 2 is special if we believe the world
hologram principle.
There is no evidence for supersymmetry as yet. String theorists are
hoping for a miracle with the LHC.
Supersymmetry does say the cosmological constant is zero, but in fact
it's not zero and that gives Ed Witten a severe migraine. ;-)
One interesting equation is, in simplest toy model
{Qi,Qj} = (Pauli Spin Matrix|u)ijP^u
LHS is anti-commutator of the supersymmetry Lie algebra
Where P^u is the Lie algebra "momenergy" of T4 which when locally gauged
gives Einstein's 1915 GR with zero torsion fields i.e. the SPIN 1
spin-connection 1-forms S^a^b are determined completely by the SPIN 1
Einstein-Cartan tetrad 1-forms e^a i.e.
De^a = 0
D = d + S/\
i.e.
de^a + S^ab/\eb = 0 i.e. vanishing torsion field 2-form
R^a^b = DS^a^b = dS^a^b + S^ac/\S^cb = curvature 2-form.
i.e.
R^a^b = R^a^buvdx^u/\dx^v 2-form
S^a^b = S^a^budx^u 1-form
e^a = e^audx^u 1-form
e^a = I^a + (hLambdaG/c^3)^1/2(@^a/\d&^a - d@^a/\&^a) ?
{@^a,&^b} are eight Goldstone phases of a vacuum ODLRO "Higgs" inflation
field.
(@^a/\d&^a - d@^a/\&^a) is the compensating spin 1 T4 local gauge
"curved tetrad" potential field.
S^a^b = (1/2)(@^a/\d&^b - d@^b/\&^a - @^b/\d&^a + d@^a/\&^b) ) = - S^b^a
is the spin-connection that will give the more familiar Riemannian
connection later.
These spin 1 tetrad and torsion spin-connection fields when quantized
should be renormalizable as point particle quantum fields. They may also
have a 3 + 1 "string" generalization.
* We do not want to preserve causality and unitarity as normally
understood! Bring those Sacred Cows to Slaughter House Five. ;-)
On Oct 31, 2006, at 11:30 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
Roger Penrose thinks quantum theory needs to be changed. This is the
approach I have taken.
Special Relativity with global frames and zero curvature is superceded
by General Relativty with local frames and variable curvature.
In a similar way micro-quantum theory with linear superposition in
Hilbert space, unitarity/Born probability, entanglement in phase space
and signal locality is superceded by macro-quantum theory i.e. "more is
different" emergent complexity ODLRO (macroscopic eigenvalues of the
quantum correlation functions) breakdown of superposition in Hilbert
space, breakdown of Born probability in the "Goldstone phase rigid"
condensate sector of the theory with presponse/retrocausal "signal
nonlocality," i.e. residual entanglement as stand-alone C^3 violation of
"no-cloning" theorem. Horizons (event and particle) no longer signal
barriers.
Idea of strings and branes replacing point particles is OK but we may
not need the extra space dimensions as currently understood. Note, however
Tetrad/spin connection spin 1 substratum of Einstein's spin 2
geometrodynamics should be renormalizable as micro-quantum 3+1 string
field theories for the fluctuations into and out of the smooth dynamical
macro-quantum condensate. No need to directly quantize the
metric/connection/curvature tensor fields.
Holography still a good idea. That is anyonic 2 + 1 field theory on
boundary of spacelike 3D volumes with fractional quantum statistics as
fundamental.
On Oct 30, 2006, at 11:09 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
The issue of unitarity of the string scattering amplitudes also plays a
key role in the leap to extra space dimensions. However, with
macro-quantum ODLRO from the tachyon vacuum instability we lose
unitarity and the Born probability interpretation implying signal
nonlocality (A. Valentini) AKA "retro-causality." This is then
consistent with Hawking's original position on information loss down
black holes before he, wrongly IMHO, changed his mind in his 2004 Dublin
GR 17 talk. Since Einstein's metric field emerges from the vacuum ODLRO
one also gets a handle on why the Weyl vacuum tensor should encode the
entropy of the gravity field according to S ~ A/4 (Bekenstein).
On Oct 30, 2006, at 10:10 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
Roger Penrose in "The Road to Reality" makes a devastating refutation of
the extra space dimensions of string theory on purely mathematical
grounds. The extra space dimensions come from there being a faster than
light tachyon in the string theory in 3 space dimensions. However, that
simply means that some continuous symmetry of the action of the string
is spontaneously broken inducing a vacuum phase transition of the theory
with macro-quantum ODLRO - emergence of a Higgs-type inflation field
with one or more Goldstone phases like in a superconductor. Therefore, a
string theory in ordinary 3 + 1 space-time may be possible after all.
Indeed, curved space-time's renormalizable spin 1 tetrad quantum fields
and spin-connections with dark energy and dark matter seem to naturally
emerge from the Goldstone phases induced by the tachyon instability. The
spin 2 metric field is an emergent entangled composite of pairs of spin
1 tetrad fields and torsion fields.
Well, you gotta draw me a picture, man.
Can you? Several, if you like.
But I agree string theory is nowhere.
Extra dimensions or whatever. There are three.
It's how you structure your three.
There can be no smallest, so you do a repeating cycle, like so:
the black hole at the galaxy's center with it's arm of
stars is a proton with an electron; so each electron is
a cloud of hundreds of millions of stars composed of
atoms which are themselves galaxies to the next
level down.
Go as many levels as you like.
They're not new dimensions, just smaller and smaller
gradations.
John
Galaxy Model
http://users.accesscomm.ca/john
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: String Theory Hoopla |
02 Nov 2006 08:11:24 PM |
|
|
Jack Sarfatti wrote:
Supersymmetry rotates bosons into fermions and vice versa in D + 1
space-time. When D = 2 we get anyons with fractional quantum statistics
and fractional angular momenta. D = 2 is special if we believe the world
hologram principle.
Well, you can definitely believe that.
Since the only reason morons like category theorists
even intevented it, is to keep their Wal-Mart
nightwatchman jobs, both an open and closed
Mandelbrot Set.
There is no evidence for supersymmetry as yet. String theorists are
hoping for a miracle with the LHC.
Supersymmetry does say the cosmological constant is zero, but in fact
it's not zero and that gives Ed Witten a severe migraine. ;-)
But the reason why it's non-zero is more important.
It's because Witten is a Lunar Space Station,
adaptive optics reject from the Hubble crowd.
One interesting equation is, in simplest toy model
{Qi,Qj} = (Pauli Spin Matrix|u)ijP^u
LHS is anti-commutator of the supersymmetry Lie algebra
Where P^u is the Lie algebra "momenergy" of T4 which when locally gauged
gives Einstein's 1915 GR with zero torsion fields i.e. the SPIN 1
spin-connection 1-forms S^a^b are determined completely by the SPIN 1
Einstein-Cartan tetrad 1-forms e^a i.e.
De^a = 0
D = d + S/\
i.e.
de^a + S^ab/\eb = 0 i.e. vanishing torsion field 2-form
R^a^b = DS^a^b = dS^a^b + S^ac/\S^cb = curvature 2-form.
i.e.
R^a^b = R^a^buvdx^u/\dx^v 2-form
S^a^b = S^a^budx^u 1-form
e^a = e^audx^u 1-form
e^a = I^a + (hLambdaG/c^3)^1/2(@^a/\d&^a - d@^a/\&^a) ?
{@^a,&^b} are eight Goldstone phases of a vacuum ODLRO "Higgs" inflation
field.
(@^a/\d&^a - d@^a/\&^a) is the compensating spin 1 T4 local gauge
"curved tetrad" potential field.
S^a^b = (1/2)(@^a/\d&^b - d@^b/\&^a - @^b/\d&^a + d@^a/\&^b) ) = - S^b^a
is the spin-connection that will give the more familiar Riemannian
connection later.
These spin 1 tetrad and torsion spin-connection fields when quantized
should be renormalizable as point particle quantum fields. They may also
have a 3 + 1 "string" generalization.
* We do not want to preserve causality and unitarity as normally
understood! Bring those Sacred Cows to Slaughter House Five. ;-)
On Oct 31, 2006, at 11:30 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
Roger Penrose thinks quantum theory needs to be changed. This is the
approach I have taken.
Special Relativity with global frames and zero curvature is superceded
by General Relativty with local frames and variable curvature.
In a similar way micro-quantum theory with linear superposition in
Hilbert space, unitarity/Born probability, entanglement in phase space
and signal locality is superceded by macro-quantum theory i.e. "more is
different" emergent complexity ODLRO (macroscopic eigenvalues of the
quantum correlation functions) breakdown of superposition in Hilbert
space, breakdown of Born probability in the "Goldstone phase rigid"
condensate sector of the theory with presponse/retrocausal "signal
nonlocality," i.e. residual entanglement as stand-alone C^3 violation of
"no-cloning" theorem. Horizons (event and particle) no longer signal
barriers.
Idea of strings and branes replacing point particles is OK but we may
not need the extra space dimensions as currently understood. Note, however
Tetrad/spin connection spin 1 substratum of Einstein's spin 2
geometrodynamics should be renormalizable as micro-quantum 3+1 string
field theories for the fluctuations into and out of the smooth dynamical
macro-quantum condensate. No need to directly quantize the
metric/connection/curvature tensor fields.
Holography still a good idea. That is anyonic 2 + 1 field theory on
boundary of spacelike 3D volumes with fractional quantum statistics as
fundamental.
On Oct 30, 2006, at 11:09 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
The issue of unitarity of the string scattering amplitudes also plays a
key role in the leap to extra space dimensions. However, with
macro-quantum ODLRO from the tachyon vacuum instability we lose
unitarity and the Born probability interpretation implying signal
nonlocality (A. Valentini) AKA "retro-causality." This is then
consistent with Hawking's original position on information loss down
black holes before he, wrongly IMHO, changed his mind in his 2004 Dublin
GR 17 talk. Since Einstein's metric field emerges from the vacuum ODLRO
one also gets a handle on why the Weyl vacuum tensor should encode the
entropy of the gravity field according to S ~ A/4 (Bekenstein).
On Oct 30, 2006, at 10:10 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
Roger Penrose in "The Road to Reality" makes a devastating refutation of
the extra space dimensions of string theory on purely mathematical
grounds. The extra space dimensions come from there being a faster than
light tachyon in the string theory in 3 space dimensions. However, that
simply means that some continuous symmetry of the action of the string
is spontaneously broken inducing a vacuum phase transition of the theory
with macro-quantum ODLRO - emergence of a Higgs-type inflation field
with one or more Goldstone phases like in a superconductor. Therefore, a
string theory in ordinary 3 + 1 space-time may be possible after all.
Indeed, curved space-time's renormalizable spin 1 tetrad quantum fields
and spin-connections with dark energy and dark matter seem to naturally
emerge from the Goldstone phases induced by the tachyon instability. The
spin 2 metric field is an emergent entangled composite of pairs of spin
1 tetrad fields and torsion fields.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tim BandTechnology" |
|
| Title: Re: String Theory Hoopla |
03 Nov 2006 11:01:21 AM |
|
|
Jack Sarfatti wrote:
Supersymmetry rotates bosons into fermions and vice versa in D + 1
space-time. When D = 2 we get anyons with fractional quantum statistics
and fractional angular momenta. D = 2 is special if we believe the world
hologram principle.
Idea of strings and branes replacing point particles is OK but we may
not need the extra space dimensions as currently understood. Note, however
Holography still a good idea. That is anyonic 2 + 1 field theory on
boundary of spacelike 3D volumes with fractional quantum statistics as
fundamental.
<several large snips>
Some of these thoughts are consistent with the polysign numbers:
http://www.bandtechnology.com/PolySigned/index.html
Not just space, but spacetime with proper unidirectional time can be
had by bringing the supposed 2+1 D system all the way down to zero:
0 + 1 + 2
This zero represents one-signed numbers which agree with time and its
paradoxes.
A natural break occurs beyond D=2 since D=3 and up do not conserve
distance under the polysign product. In effect the usual sense of
distance is broken. So a natural mathematical progression supports a
spacetime basis. This progressive topology is suggestive of brane type
operations betwixt dimensions. Whether the progression continues or not
I have not concluded. Either way the support for spacetime remains.
Geometrically one could try to view this structure as a point crossed
with a line crossed with a plane, but arithmetically there is more to
it since the D=2 component also posesses rotational behavior within its
own product(it is the same as the complex numbers). Under this
arrangement electromagnetic phenomena may resolve within the spacetime
topology. Still, we have to get out to isotropic space and so this
isotropic space we inhabit may be a product space of the underlying
topology. This then furthers the polysign support since it relies on a
product breakpoint.
The progressive topology is a substrate space of which we are products.
The ability for the products to observe the substrate directly may be
limited. The complexity of the substrate space should allow for simpler
particle (or any material) models. Models on this topology will vary
markedly from tradition since the natural form of representation is:
a11
a21 a22
a31 a32 a33
...
which I call a 'tatrix' format for triangular matrix. This structure
does not match traditional matrix mathematics, especially since no
standard matrix operation can generate the product though that product
is simply defined. The polysign sum and product operations are
commutative, distrubutive, and associative just as the real numbers.
This behavior is true in any dimension. The construction is primitive.
Simply consider that time is unidirectional. So the real numbers do not
apply to time. Instead we consider one-signed numbers for time. This
then poses a question of whether three-signed numbers might exist.
Simply enough a property of the real numbers
- x + x = 0
can be extended to three signs:
- x + x * x = 0.
This law works for any natural number of signs
Sum for s = 1 to n ( s x ) = 0
where s is sign and x is magnitude.
Product math is very simple and consistent with the real numbers.
In its most elemental form
( s1 x1 )( s2 x 2 ) = ( s1 + s2 ) x1x2
where s is sign and x is magnitude and the sign sum is performed modulo
the signature with zero representing the high sign (also the identity
sign).
This product exists in any natural numbered dimension.
It is inherently rotational and yields an algebraically well behaved
family.
The three-signed numbers are the complex numbers in a simpler form.
The polysign basis has yet to prove itself as a physics model.
It is promising and suggestive; if a physics model can be had from it
that model would derive spacetime as well as the material in spacetime.
-Tim
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: String Theory Hoopla |
04 Nov 2006 08:59:32 PM |
|
|
Well, these groups are officially *****. I thought it might be good to
informally discuss physics with interested experts and non-experts
alike, but all I find is a bunch of idiots pushing their own *****
`theories'.
Congratulations on wasting your lives.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
String Theory and conservation of mass/energy
Interview] Brian Greene and string theory
Talk.Origins banned subject: BigBang theory on string?
Re: String Theory
If String Theory Cannot Be Proved--Can It Be Disproved? Yes!
String Theory: Good, Bad and Bogus
Scientific evidence of string theory?
Dave Eggers Killed Literature, Poetry, Philosophy, and Physics With Ironic, Postmodern Anti-Theories Like String Theory
| String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten
String theory?
R.Feymann & the String Theory
Moving Dimensions Theory--Not String Theory--Satisfies Einstein's Requirements for a Physical Theory
Re: smallest measurable length scale implies cutoff, so why do we still believe string theory?
Tied Up & Strung Out: Hollywood String Theory Movie!!! Looking For Extras!!! David Duchovney of X-Files Fame to Play Brian Greene!!!!
String Theory is a Postmodern Joke!!!!!!!! Even its textbooks say so!!! "The great irony of string theory, however, is that the theory itself is not unified. To someone learning the theory for the first time, it is often a frustrating collection of
|
|
|
