| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
27 Mar 2007 11:23:42 PM |
| Object: |
String theory is a symptom of a deep problem |
Mathematicians lie. They lie routinely but they do it in a way that
works to keep them in business by lying in areas where they cannot
easily be checked objectively--so they can just claim arguments are
correct even when they are not--and they're seeding their corruption
of intellectual activity into physics, as consider the following.
Factoring is kind of important. People rely on the idea that
factoring big numbers is hard for security, but consider some basic
math.
Start with the well-known congruence of squares
x^2 = y^2 mod T
introduce another congruence with a new variable,
k = 2x mod T so 2x = k mod T, multiply both sides by k, to get
2xk = k^2 mod T
and now add back to the original congruence of squares to get
x^2 + 2xk = y^2 + k^2 mod T
and then add k^2 to both sides and get
x^2 + 2xk + k^2 = y^2 + 2k^2 mod T, so finally you have
(x+k)^2 = y^2 + 2k^2 mod T
and I just showed how you relate EVERY factorization of one composite
to a factorization of some other composite, which I call the
surrogate.
Actually trying to use this idea to factor you need explicit
equations:
(x+k)^2 = y^2 + 2k^2 + omega*T
And you can factor your target T by instead factoring 2k^2 + omega*T.
And it turns out that with a big T you still get big numbers to
factor, but instead of one, you have as many as you wish.
IF that simple mathematics says to you what it says to me then you
know that mathematicians have the world using a system where factoring
one number can be transferred to factoring some other number, and if
you do detailed analysis, you find that for an arbitrary non-zero
omega and a non-zero k, as long as
2k^2 + omega*T
is over a certain size limit--that size depends on the size of T--then
you can factor your target 50% of the time with some combination of
factors of 2k^2 + omega*T.
If that sounds really complicated, just think of it as a two-way
street where you can go either way factoring numbers and it's rather
neat, and it's worth worrying about but mathematicians will NOT talk
about it because it works, and they lie.
They know me. If they acknowledge this result I'll push forward all
my other mathematical results as I'm using factoring to break them.
Yup, I'm deliberately researching this area to PROVE they lie, so they
can't talk about this research as then they just help me break them.
But why do they lie? I say because doing real mathematics is harder
than faking it, and it's easier for groups of people to lie than most
people accept, which is why they get away with it.
And that brings us to string "theory" with a lot of complexity but
somehow, it doesn't give you much to experiment with, as
mathematicians teach their tricks to the physics community.
Eventually you can have physics that doesn't work, is not correct, and
no one knows or cares because physics people will, like many modern
mathematicians, produce papers that sound physicky, with a lot of
complexity, and there will be people who will cheer and claim stuff
is correct, when it's just wrong.
Of course, you can think I'm wrong, but I just gave some basic math.
And, if I'm not, then the simple mathematics for breaking security
systems is now out there as it has been for a few months as I talk
about this, and I am currently working on coding an implementation to
prove my point.
And mathematicians won't talk about it as I'm using this to get them,
and you may end up collateral damage.
If that algebra above is correct then the world as you know it is
about to change.
But consider, many of you probably know lots of complex mathematics
and can check the algebra in your sleep, but a corrupted mathematical
field means you will hold and wait, despite the implications because
they are that good.
They are that good at lying.
And you are that intellectually weak, in actuality, no matter how
brilliant you have deluded yourself into thinking you are.
If you can't trust some basic algebra, then how smart can you really
be?
James Harris
.
|
|
| User: "Androcles" |
|
| Title: Re: String theory is a symptom of a deep problem |
28 Mar 2007 03:25:53 PM |
|
|
<jstevh@gmail.com> wrote in message =
news:1175055822.834992.182960@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
Mathematicians lie.=20
People lie. Mathematicians are people.
You are a member of the set of "people".=20
Ergo, you lie?
SOME mathematicians lie. - TRUE.
ALL mathematicians lie. - FALSE.
The question is, "Are you a mathematician?"
Clearly, given your incomplete and prejudiced statement,=20
the answer is no.=20
Therefore, *****.
Come back when you can be precise.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: String theory is a symptom of a deep problem |
28 Mar 2007 09:59:58 AM |
|
|
wrote:
Mathematicians lie.
You should learn some math. *Plonk*
.
|
|
|
| User: "G=EMC^2 Glazier" |
|
| Title: Re: String theory is a symptom of a deep problem |
31 Mar 2007 04:47:20 PM |
|
|
Sam A tons of money is being spent for accelerators to bring dark
energy to light. This dark energy is prediction from the string theory.
Bert
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: String theory is a symptom of a deep problem |
30 Mar 2007 08:45:58 AM |
|
|
On Mar 28, 2:23 pm, wrote:
Mathematicians lie. They lie routinely but they do it in a way that
works to keep them in business by lying in areas where they cannot
easily be checked objectively--so they can just claim arguments are
correct even when they are not--and they're seeding their corruption
of intellectual activity into physics, as consider the following.
It's important to distinguish mathematicians from Mathematics,
physicists from Physics, scientists from Science.
Those who bother to apply the philosophy of science unavoidably
discover those institutions built to uphold those principles resemble
everything but.
In the age of deception, it could not be otherwise.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
