| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"glbrad01" |
| Date: |
07 Feb 2005 07:00:45 AM |
| Object: |
Supernova's Aura and Dark Matter and Energy |
Some people here know about my references to the aura spotted by
astronomers 70,000 light years away using the Hubble telescope. They took
pictures of it and those pictures ended up on Space.com's website about a
year ago.
The aura is practically is observed in practically two dimensions of it, a
circle with left, right, up and down of a two-dimensional ring but no back
and forth to the aura visible whatsoever, which would should complete the
three-dimensionality of that supernova's aura but is not there at all. There
is no frontage of that aura toward us, nor is there any back to that aura
away from us on the other side of the virtually two dimensional circle of it
(left, right, up, down, of a 2-dimensional circle) which is all we have
observed of it.
I don't have a computer program to do this but in my mind's eye I drew a
simple diamond shape square using a computer aided design program and inlaid
it into a circle where all four points are points on the circle. I marked
the bottom point 6 for the 6 o'clock position on a flat clock face, the left
point 9 for the 9 o'clock position, the far point from 6, 12 for the 12
o'clock position, and last point remaining 3 for the 3 o'clock position on
the flat face of my square of four points within circle.
I place a point dead center of the overall circle and, of course, the four
points. Then I draw a very small but quite visible as such circle around it
representing the aura left of the supernova 70,000 light years away from
each and every one of the four points--6, 9, 12 and 3--on the circle of the
flat clock face drawn. I erase the point leaving the circle. I am now
looking at the all but 2-dimensional aura's ring from a vertical position
opposing the horizontal of 6, 9, 12 and 3.
I have the computer program turn the face almost--but not quite--edge on
with the 6 o'clock position toward me. The nearly 2-dimensional circle
(aura) in the center never turns, never changes from what it was before I
had the program turn the face to almost edge on. It is now perpendicular to
me facing it from the 6 o'clock point so nearly on the foreground edge of a
flat disk. There is no nearly flattened very eliptical circle visible in the
picture foreground to background. The entire circle remains as it was
unchanged in any way plastered in the middle of the screen while the program
changed all else to nearly edge on. That damned aura is matter and energy!
Why can't I see the eliptical of this thing that should be in the central
part of picture of the clock face turned edge on to an eliptic picture of
the disk? Why am I observing exactly the same nearly 2-dimensional circle
(aura) in exactly the same way I observed it before I had the program turn
the disk to nearly edge on?
I have the program rotate the disk before me to the 9 o'clock until it is
in the foreground of my screen. That damned nearly 2-dimensional circle
(aura) in the center never once changes aspect as if it too is turning with
the rotation of the disk to remain facing me as exactly the same nearly
2-dimensional circle (aura) I had the computer draw in the first place. No
flattened eliptic whatsoever visible with the foreground/background of an
eliptic to match the eliptic of the disk. The same at the 12 o'clock
position. The same at the 3 o'clock position. No matter how I have the
computer turn the disk, horizontally or to the vertical facing, that nearly
2-dimensional circle (aura) in the center never changes a frozen fixed
aspect picture as a nearly 2-dimensional perfect circle (aura) in the
center.
Why no 3-dimensionality observed to the aura? Because the
foreground/background of a thing that is a 3-dimensional bubble in actuality
is not in that light-time frame 70,000 light years distant. Nor is the
matter and thus the matter's energy at the surface of that aura 70,000 light
years distant deep enough anywhere--foreground to background--to be visible
to the observer at the distance away in time but in the tenuous
foreground/background curvature at nearly maximum extent of the aural ring
left, right, up, and down.
The matter and thus the matter's energy--foreground and background
surface--of the supernova's expanding 3-dimensional bubble certainly exists
but it is too tenuous to be observed by any observer at 70,000 light years
of distance. Far more than 90% of its matter and thus the matter's energy is
invisible to observation, and possibly to simple detection also, at any
great distance. So where in what dimension or dimensions is that far more
than 90% of it missing from all observation? Probably in the third and
possibly fourth dimensions--greater than two--missing in all observation of
the aura at any distance, excepting the curvature left, right, up, down,
from the expanding wave front of the bubble (dimensions probably missing
from all observation of the universe at large as well).
Brad
.
|
|
| User: "Franz Heymann" |
|
| Title: Re: Supernova's Aura and Dark Matter and Energy |
07 Feb 2005 09:31:19 AM |
|
|
"glbrad01" <glbrad01@insightbb.com> wrote in message
news:1EJNd.54903$eT5.44844@attbi_s51...
Some people here know about my references to the aura spotted by
astronomers 70,000 light years away using the Hubble telescope. They
took
pictures of it and those pictures ended up on Space.com's website
about a
year ago.
The aura is practically is observed in practically two dimensions
of it, a
circle with left, right, up and down of a two-dimensional ring but
no back
and forth to the aura visible whatsoever, which would should
complete the
three-dimensionality of that supernova's aura but is not there at
all. There
is no frontage of that aura toward us, nor is there any back to that
aura
away from us on the other side of the virtually two dimensional
circle of it
(left, right, up, down, of a 2-dimensional circle) which is all we
have
observed of it.
Why did it take so many words to say that, as would be expected, it
was a flat two-dimensional image?
Or did you express yourself so poorly that I missed your point?
I don't have a computer program to do this but in my mind's eye I
drew a
simple diamond shape square
The word you need is "rhombus"
using a computer aided design program and inlaid
it into a circle where all four points are points on the circle.
It is imposible for a rhombus to do that, unless it is a square.
It gave me so much excruciating pain to try and follow your awful
circumlocutions that I gave up and snipped instead.
[snip]
Franz
.
|
|
|
| User: "glbrad01" |
|
| Title: Re: Supernova's Aura and Dark Matter and Energy |
07 Feb 2005 11:21:32 AM |
|
|
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:cu81k6$8va$1@hercules.btinternet.com...
"glbrad01" <glbrad01@insightbb.com> wrote in message
news:1EJNd.54903$eT5.44844@attbi_s51...
Some people here know about my references to the aura spotted by
astronomers 70,000 light years away using the Hubble telescope. They
took
pictures of it and those pictures ended up on Space.com's website
about a
year ago.
The aura is practically is observed in practically two dimensions
of it, a
circle with left, right, up and down of a two-dimensional ring but
no back
and forth to the aura visible whatsoever, which would should
complete the
three-dimensionality of that supernova's aura but is not there at
all. There
is no frontage of that aura toward us, nor is there any back to that
aura
away from us on the other side of the virtually two dimensional
circle of it
(left, right, up, down, of a 2-dimensional circle) which is all we
have
observed of it.
Why did it take so many words to say that, as would be expected, it
was a flat two-dimensional image?
Or did you express yourself so poorly that I missed your point?
I don't have a computer program to do this but in my mind's eye I
drew a
simple diamond shape square
The word you need is "rhombus"
using a computer aided design program and inlaid
it into a circle where all four points are points on the circle.
It is imposible for a rhombus to do that, unless it is a square.
It gave me so much excruciating pain to try and follow your awful
circumlocutions that I gave up and snipped instead.
[snip]
Franz
Which shows how impossible it is for you to think 3-, much less 4-, time
dimensionally (alternatively, space dimensionally). You, among so many
others, vanish into the woodwork of a declining civilization in that respect
though.
There is no mass, nor energy, to a flat 2-dimensional. There is little
mass, little energy, to a nearly 2-dimensional flatness. Where is all the
matter, all the energy, missing that should be there from a "flat" universe?
It should not be there since there is no matter, no energy, whatsoever to a
[fully] zero volume, [fully] 2-dimensional, anything. And no such thing as
3-, much less 4-, dimensionality can be observed at any distance by any
observer where the speed of limitation isn't indistinguishable from zero.
Those added dimensions must be perceived, then possibly displayed in some
hologramic, or holographic, form.
Your x, y, z, t, 4-dimensionality is entirely 2-dimensional. Your x(),
y(), z(), t(), 4-dimensionality is simply flatly entropic projection, pure
persistence, in the wholly 2-dimensional. Never once do you reach
3-dimensional geometry, much less 4-dimensional geometry. And such a
constant mental environment reduces you, reduces your thinking, reduces your
minds, to 2-dimensional at best.
What is the bitter pill for me is that I can follow, I can visualize, what
you see, what you are--and what you are doing--but you can never reach up to
any really higher (greater) dimensional thought processes and processing,
thus never reaching up to any really higher (greater) dimensional
realization. Just the fact that I can see what is the matter, the
fundamental problem, means that I'm inherently looking at it from the
perspective of already being a 4-dimensional observer and thinker instead of
2-.
Now reduce to 1-dimensional being and say "*****!" or "idiot!" or utter
some foul one syllable words.
Brad
.
|
|
|
| User: "Franz Heymann" |
|
| Title: Re: Supernova's Aura and Dark Matter and Energy |
07 Feb 2005 04:22:05 PM |
|
|
"glbrad01" <glbrad01@insightbb.com> wrote in message
news:wsNNd.24607$C24.19746@attbi_s52...
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:cu81k6$8va$1@hercules.btinternet.com...
"glbrad01" <glbrad01@insightbb.com> wrote in message
news:1EJNd.54903$eT5.44844@attbi_s51...
Some people here know about my references to the aura spotted
by
astronomers 70,000 light years away using the Hubble telescope.
They
took
pictures of it and those pictures ended up on Space.com's website
about a
year ago.
The aura is practically is observed in practically two
dimensions
of it, a
circle with left, right, up and down of a two-dimensional ring
but
no back
and forth to the aura visible whatsoever, which would should
complete the
three-dimensionality of that supernova's aura but is not there at
all. There
is no frontage of that aura toward us, nor is there any back to
that
aura
away from us on the other side of the virtually two dimensional
circle of it
(left, right, up, down, of a 2-dimensional circle) which is all
we
have
observed of it.
Why did it take so many words to say that, as would be expected,
it
was a flat two-dimensional image?
Or did you express yourself so poorly that I missed your point?
I don't have a computer program to do this but in my mind's eye
I
drew a
simple diamond shape square
The word you need is "rhombus"
using a computer aided design program and inlaid
it into a circle where all four points are points on the circle.
It is imposible for a rhombus to do that, unless it is a square.
It gave me so much excruciating pain to try and follow your awful
circumlocutions that I gave up and snipped instead.
[snip]
Franz
Which shows how impossible it is for you to think 3-, much less
4-, time
dimensionally (alternatively, space dimensionally). You, among so
many
others, vanish into the woodwork of a declining civilization in that
respect
though.
There is no mass, nor energy, to a flat 2-dimensional. There is
little
mass, little energy, to a nearly 2-dimensional flatness. Where is
all the
matter, all the energy, missing that should be there from a "flat"
universe?
It should not be there since there is no matter, no energy,
whatsoever to a
[fully] zero volume, [fully] 2-dimensional, anything. And no such
thing as
3-, much less 4-, dimensionality can be observed at any distance by
any
observer where the speed of limitation isn't indistinguishable from
zero.
Those added dimensions must be perceived, then possibly displayed in
some
hologramic, or holographic, form.
Your x, y, z, t, 4-dimensionality is entirely 2-dimensional. Your
x(),
y(), z(), t(), 4-dimensionality is simply flatly entropic
projection, pure
persistence, in the wholly 2-dimensional. Never once do you reach
3-dimensional geometry, much less 4-dimensional geometry. And such a
constant mental environment reduces you, reduces your thinking,
reduces your
minds, to 2-dimensional at best.
What is the bitter pill for me is that I can follow, I can
visualize, what
you see, what you are--and what you are doing--but you can never
reach up to
any really higher (greater) dimensional thought processes and
processing,
thus never reaching up to any really higher (greater) dimensional
realization. Just the fact that I can see what is the matter, the
fundamental problem, means that I'm inherently looking at it from
the
perspective of already being a 4-dimensional observer and thinker
instead of
2-.
Now reduce to 1-dimensional being and say "*****!" or "idiot!"
or utter
some foul one syllable words.
Composted Horse manure
Franz
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Morituri-|-Max" |
|
| Title: Re: Supernova's Aura and Dark Matter and Energy |
07 Feb 2005 12:13:06 PM |
|
|
glbrad01 wrote:
Which shows how impossible it is for you to think 3-, much less 4-,
time dimensionally (alternatively, space dimensionally). You, among
so many others, vanish into the woodwork of a declining civilization
in that respect though.
I think it shows that you just like to let your mouth run away and say with
200 words what normal people can say with 5 words.
As for you having some special ability that nobody else does, again, you
just let your mouth run on and on and on... you can't even figure out what
is a typo in a newspaper and what is not.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: Supernova's Aura and Dark Matter and Energy |
07 Feb 2005 11:30:23 AM |
|
|
glbrad01 wrote:
Some people here know about my references to the aura spotted by
astronomers 70,000 light years away using the Hubble telescope. They took
pictures of it and those pictures ended up on Space.com's website about a
year ago.
Note lack of reference to the supernova's designation.
[snip crap]
Why no 3-dimensionality observed to the aura? Because the
foreground/background of a thing that is a 3-dimensional bubble in actuality
is not in that light-time frame 70,000 light years distant.
[snip rest of crap]
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
