| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"W. Watson" |
| Date: |
21 Feb 2006 11:04:39 AM |
| Object: |
Superposed vs Superimposed |
Why does it seem like superposed is used more in physics rather than
superimposed.
Wayne T. Watson (Watson Adventures, Prop., Nevada City, CA)
(121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N) GMT-8 hr std. time)
Obz Site: 39° 15' 7" N, 121° 2' 32" W, 2700 feet
--
"When you get to the end of your rope, tie a knot
and hang on." -- Franklin D. Roosevelt
Web Page: <home.earthlink.net/~mtnviews>
.
|
|
| User: "Edward Green" |
|
| Title: Re: Superposed vs Superimposed |
24 Feb 2006 11:33:47 PM |
|
|
W. Watson wrote:
Why does it seem like superposed is used more in physics rather than
superimposed.
If that's true, I would say the urge to use the less common word as
sounding more technical: general principle of argot.
Is it true?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "platopes" |
|
| Title: Re: Superposed vs Superimposed |
25 Feb 2006 03:18:55 AM |
|
|
W. Watson wrote:
Why does it seem like superposed is used more in physics rather than
superimposed.
http://www.answers.com/superimposed&r=67
http://www.answers.com/superposed&r=67
p
.
|
|
|
|
|
