| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Tom Potter" |
| Date: |
16 Mar 2005 07:15:09 AM |
| Object: |
Surface analyzer |
I am interested in analyzing surfaces of objects
to detect natural and man-made shaping of the object surface,
and I have been experimenting,
using a MP3 player/recorder to record the sound,
as I drag a "feeler" attached to the player across the objects.
I have experimented with various "transducer interface materials"
glued onto the MP3 player, and I have not found a
suitable material, as all materials have many
resonances, and those, combined with the
resonances of the MP3 players I have used,
tend to obscure the data associated with the surfaces,
that I want to analyze.
I would appreciate any input and ideas about
producing an audio signal that models a surface,
in a small portable, inexpensive package.
A small, low-power, laser probe would do a better job,
but I am hopeful of using an MP3 player/recorder for this,
as the cost, size, power consumption and frequency response
seems to be ideal.
I have a number of time series analyzer programs that
I have experimented with, but would also appreciate
any suggestions along these line.
--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
.
|
|
| User: "bz" |
|
| Title: Re: Surface analyzer |
16 Mar 2005 09:37:49 AM |
|
|
"Tom Potter" <tdp@earthlink.net> wrote in news:39qr1eF65vpcaU3
@individual.net:
I am interested in analyzing surfaces of objects
to detect natural and man-made shaping of the object surface,
and I have been experimenting,
using a MP3 player/recorder to record the sound,
as I drag a "feeler" attached to the player across the objects.
I have experimented with various "transducer interface materials"
glued onto the MP3 player, and I have not found a
suitable material, as all materials have many
resonances, and those, combined with the
resonances of the MP3 players I have used,
tend to obscure the data associated with the surfaces,
that I want to analyze.
I would appreciate any input and ideas about
producing an audio signal that models a surface,
in a small portable, inexpensive package.
A small, low-power, laser probe would do a better job,
but I am hopeful of using an MP3 player/recorder for this,
as the cost, size, power consumption and frequency response
seems to be ideal.
I have a number of time series analyzer programs that
I have experimented with, but would also appreciate
any suggestions along these line.
Look up the topic of Force Microscope and Scanning tunneling Microscope.
You will find things that WORK and are being used every day to see atoms on
surfaces.
http://physics.nist.gov/GenInt/STM/stm.html should get you started.
--
bz
please pardon my infinite ignorance, the set-of-things-I-do-not-know is an
infinite set.
bz+sp@ch100-5.chem.lsu.edu remove ch100-5 to avoid spam trap
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Potter" |
|
| Title: Re: Surface analyzer |
18 Mar 2005 08:20:20 AM |
|
|
"bz" <bz+sp@ch100-5.chem.lsu.edu> wrote in message
news:Xns961B61FDC2920WQAHBGMXSZHVspammote@130.39.198.139...
"Tom Potter" <tdp@earthlink.net> wrote in news:39qr1eF65vpcaU3
@individual.net:
I am interested in analyzing surfaces of objects
to detect natural and man-made shaping of the object surface,
and I have been experimenting,
using a MP3 player/recorder to record the sound,
as I drag a "feeler" attached to the player across the objects.
I have experimented with various "transducer interface materials"
glued onto the MP3 player, and I have not found a
suitable material, as all materials have many
resonances, and those, combined with the
resonances of the MP3 players I have used,
tend to obscure the data associated with the surfaces,
that I want to analyze.
I would appreciate any input and ideas about
producing an audio signal that models a surface,
in a small portable, inexpensive package.
A small, low-power, laser probe would do a better job,
but I am hopeful of using an MP3 player/recorder for this,
as the cost, size, power consumption and frequency response
seems to be ideal.
I have a number of time series analyzer programs that
I have experimented with, but would also appreciate
any suggestions along these line.
Look up the topic of Force Microscope and Scanning tunneling Microscope.
You will find things that WORK and are being used every day to see atoms
on
surfaces.
http://physics.nist.gov/GenInt/STM/stm.html should get you started.
Are you suggesting that these devises
are small, portable, low cost,
and provide an output that can be interpreted by a layman?
If so,
please provide a reference.
Regarding my comment about a low cost LASER probe,
does anyone have any input on how
an optical mouse might work as a surface scanner.
--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
.
|
|
|
| User: "bz" |
|
| Title: Re: Surface analyzer |
18 Mar 2005 09:13:18 AM |
|
|
"Tom Potter" <tdp@earthlink.net> wrote in news:3a06dbF66l81nU1
@individual.net:
"bz" <bz+sp@ch100-5.chem.lsu.edu> wrote in message
news:Xns961B61FDC2920WQAHBGMXSZHVspammote@130.39.198.139...
"Tom Potter" <tdp@earthlink.net> wrote in news:39qr1eF65vpcaU3
@individual.net:
I am interested in analyzing surfaces of objects
to detect natural and man-made shaping of the object surface,
and I have been experimenting,
using a MP3 player/recorder to record the sound,
as I drag a "feeler" attached to the player across the objects.
I have experimented with various "transducer interface materials"
glued onto the MP3 player, and I have not found a
suitable material, as all materials have many
resonances, and those, combined with the
resonances of the MP3 players I have used,
tend to obscure the data associated with the surfaces,
that I want to analyze.
I would appreciate any input and ideas about
producing an audio signal that models a surface,
in a small portable, inexpensive package.
A small, low-power, laser probe would do a better job,
but I am hopeful of using an MP3 player/recorder for this,
as the cost, size, power consumption and frequency response
seems to be ideal.
I have a number of time series analyzer programs that
I have experimented with, but would also appreciate
any suggestions along these line.
Look up the topic of Force Microscope and Scanning tunneling Microscope.
You will find things that WORK and are being used every day to see atoms
on
surfaces.
http://physics.nist.gov/GenInt/STM/stm.html should get you started.
Are you suggesting that these devises
are small,
Yes.
portable,
relatively. They need to be attached to a mass that is suspended on springs
in order to isolate them from vibrations traveling through the floor.
low cost,
You might be able to build one, yourself, out of a couple of old floppy
drives, and a couple of phono cartridges.
and provide an output that can be interpreted by a layman?
Depends on the layman, I suppose.
If so,
please provide a reference.
http://www.lugoj.com/NanotechSTMArticles/HomeBrewSTMs.html
[quote]
A home-brewed STM, by comparison, should cost well under $2,000 in parts
and optional hired labor, excluding the cost of a computer needed for data
acquisition and display. Additional effort and ingenuity should bring the
cost to under $1,000. At least a couple hundred man-hours of effort should
be anticipated.
[unquote]
and http://www.e-basteln.de/
Regarding my comment about a low cost LASER probe,
does anyone have any input on how
an optical mouse might work as a surface scanner.
--
bz
please pardon my infinite ignorance, the set-of-things-I-do-not-know is an
infinite set.
bz+sp@ch100-5.chem.lsu.edu remove ch100-5 to avoid spam trap
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Potter" |
|
| Title: Re: Surface analyzer |
19 Mar 2005 07:48:47 AM |
|
|
"bz" <bz+sp@ch100-5.chem.lsu.edu> wrote in message
news:Xns961D5DD02950AWQAHBGMXSZHVspammote@130.39.198.139...
"Tom Potter" <tdp@earthlink.net> wrote in news:3a06dbF66l81nU1
@individual.net:
"bz" <bz+sp@ch100-5.chem.lsu.edu> wrote in message
news:Xns961B61FDC2920WQAHBGMXSZHVspammote@130.39.198.139...
"Tom Potter" <tdp@earthlink.net> wrote in news:39qr1eF65vpcaU3
@individual.net:
I am interested in analyzing surfaces of objects
to detect natural and man-made shaping of the object surface,
and I have been experimenting,
using a MP3 player/recorder to record the sound,
as I drag a "feeler" attached to the player across the objects.
I have experimented with various "transducer interface materials"
glued onto the MP3 player, and I have not found a
suitable material, as all materials have many
resonances, and those, combined with the
resonances of the MP3 players I have used,
tend to obscure the data associated with the surfaces,
that I want to analyze.
I would appreciate any input and ideas about
producing an audio signal that models a surface,
in a small portable, inexpensive package.
A small, low-power, laser probe would do a better job,
but I am hopeful of using an MP3 player/recorder for this,
as the cost, size, power consumption and frequency response
seems to be ideal.
I have a number of time series analyzer programs that
I have experimented with, but would also appreciate
any suggestions along these line.
Look up the topic of Force Microscope and Scanning tunneling Microscope.
You will find things that WORK and are being used every day to see atoms
on
surfaces.
http://physics.nist.gov/GenInt/STM/stm.html should get you started.
Are you suggesting that these devises
are small,
Yes.
portable,
relatively. They need to be attached to a mass that is suspended on
springs
in order to isolate them from vibrations traveling through the floor.
low cost,
You might be able to build one, yourself, out of a couple of old floppy
drives, and a couple of phono cartridges.
This is for a production application,
not a homebrew project.
--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Surface analyzer |
18 Mar 2005 09:14:47 AM |
|
|
Tom Potter wrote:
"bz" <bz+sp@ch100-5.chem.lsu.edu> wrote in message
news:Xns961B61FDC2920WQAHBGMXSZHVspammote@130.39.198.139...
"Tom Potter" <tdp@earthlink.net> wrote in news:39qr1eF65vpcaU3
@individual.net:
I am interested in analyzing surfaces of objects
to detect natural and man-made shaping of the object surface,
and I have been experimenting,
using a MP3 player/recorder to record the sound,
as I drag a "feeler" attached to the player across the objects.
I have experimented with various "transducer interface materials"
glued onto the MP3 player, and I have not found a
suitable material, as all materials have many
resonances, and those, combined with the
resonances of the MP3 players I have used,
tend to obscure the data associated with the surfaces,
that I want to analyze.
I would appreciate any input and ideas about
producing an audio signal that models a surface,
in a small portable, inexpensive package.
A small, low-power, laser probe would do a better job,
but I am hopeful of using an MP3 player/recorder for this,
as the cost, size, power consumption and frequency response
seems to be ideal.
I have a number of time series analyzer programs that
I have experimented with, but would also appreciate
any suggestions along these line.
Look up the topic of Force Microscope and Scanning tunneling
Microscope.
You will find things that WORK and are being used every day to see
atoms
on
surfaces.
http://physics.nist.gov/GenInt/STM/stm.html should get you started.
Are you suggesting that these devises
are small, portable, low cost,
and provide an output that can be interpreted by a layman?
If so,
please provide a reference.
Regarding my comment about a low cost LASER probe,
does anyone have any input on how
an optical mouse might work as a surface scanner.
--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
Tom--
Recommend you post this issue on sci.electronics.repairs. Sam
Goldwasser is a leading expert in lasers and associated technology and
I'm certain will respond to general post.
It seems reasonable that one could shine a laser pointer on your
surface and let the surface dy/dx modulate the light--phonotransistor
could capture and convert to delta Voltage--which you could then
manipulate into required data. Similar to common modulated lightwave
detector.
Sci.electronics.repairs best bet--real smart guys over there also--but
little BS.
Good luck!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Potter" |
|
| Title: Re: Surface analyzer |
19 Mar 2005 07:46:35 AM |
|
|
<cnctutwiler@wmconnect.com> wrote in message
news:1111158887.477658.219230@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Tom Potter wrote:
"bz" <bz+sp@ch100-5.chem.lsu.edu> wrote in message
news:Xns961B61FDC2920WQAHBGMXSZHVspammote@130.39.198.139...
"Tom Potter" <tdp@earthlink.net> wrote in news:39qr1eF65vpcaU3
@individual.net:
I am interested in analyzing surfaces of objects
to detect natural and man-made shaping of the object surface,
and I have been experimenting,
using a MP3 player/recorder to record the sound,
as I drag a "feeler" attached to the player across the objects.
I have experimented with various "transducer interface materials"
glued onto the MP3 player, and I have not found a
suitable material, as all materials have many
resonances, and those, combined with the
resonances of the MP3 players I have used,
tend to obscure the data associated with the surfaces,
that I want to analyze.
I would appreciate any input and ideas about
producing an audio signal that models a surface,
in a small portable, inexpensive package.
A small, low-power, laser probe would do a better job,
but I am hopeful of using an MP3 player/recorder for this,
as the cost, size, power consumption and frequency response
seems to be ideal.
I have a number of time series analyzer programs that
I have experimented with, but would also appreciate
any suggestions along these line.
Look up the topic of Force Microscope and Scanning tunneling
Microscope.
You will find things that WORK and are being used every day to see
atoms
on
surfaces.
http://physics.nist.gov/GenInt/STM/stm.html should get you started.
Are you suggesting that these devises
are small, portable, low cost,
and provide an output that can be interpreted by a layman?
If so,
please provide a reference.
Regarding my comment about a low cost LASER probe,
does anyone have any input on how
an optical mouse might work as a surface scanner.
--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
Tom--
Recommend you post this issue on sci.electronics.repairs. Sam
Goldwasser is a leading expert in lasers and associated technology and
I'm certain will respond to general post.
It seems reasonable that one could shine a laser pointer on your
surface and let the surface dy/dx modulate the light--phonotransistor
could capture and convert to delta Voltage--which you could then
manipulate into required data. Similar to common modulated lightwave
detector.
Sci.electronics.repairs best bet--real smart guys over there also--but
little BS.
Good luck!
Thank for the input.
I think your suggestion
that the guys in Sci.electronics.repairs
can provide the best input,
is the right way to go.
I'll give it a try.
--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: Surface analyzer |
16 Mar 2005 12:08:39 PM |
|
|
Tom Potter wrote:
I am interested in analyzing surfaces of objects
to detect natural and man-made shaping of the object surface,
[snip]
You are now in the Liberal Arts and there is no objective answer.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Surface analyzer |
16 Mar 2005 12:33:19 PM |
|
|
Tom--
Use a phono cartridge with O scope--dVolt ~ dy--some integration over
dt and correlation with linear distance required--but your website
suggests you can handle the politics.... sorry, I mean math. (Portable
scopes available for less than $200--but being a science guy, you
probably have one. ;-)
Good Luck--
Tut
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Potter" |
|
| Title: Re: Surface analyzer |
17 Mar 2005 07:37:30 AM |
|
|
<cnctutwiler@wmconnect.com> wrote in message
news:1110997999.383347.313110@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Tom--
Use a phono cartridge with O scope--dVolt ~ dy--some integration over
dt and correlation with linear distance required--but your website
suggests you can handle the politics.... sorry, I mean math. (Portable
scopes available for less than $200--but being a science guy, you
probably have one. ;-)
Good Luck--
Thanks for your input.
What I am doing now is:
------------------------
1. Gluing various materials (Silk, wool, cotton, etc.) onto an MP3 player.
2. Dragging the M3 player/material interface across the item under test.
3. Recording the sound thus created as a wave file in the MP3 player.
4. Plugging the MP3 player into a USB port and downloading the wave file to
my computer.
5. Using various time series programs, such as "Sigview" to analyze the wav
file.
Sigview provides a nice 3D picture of the data.
The main problem is that there are many resonances in the MP3 player body,
and in the material I use as an interface, that override the signals
that I want to see. I may have to take an MP3 player apart,
and isolate everything possible from the audio input.
Even then, I still need a good, resonant-free, interface material,
to "sweep the surface" with.
I welcome all input.
That addresses this application I describe.
------------------------------------------------
I am interested in analyzing surfaces of objects
to detect natural and man-made shaping of the object surface,
and I have been experimenting,
using a MP3 player/recorder to record the sound,
as I drag a "feeler" attached to the player across the objects.
-------------------------------------------------
--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jan Panteltje" |
|
| Title: Re: Surface analyzer |
17 Mar 2005 07:56:08 AM |
|
|
On a sunny day (Thu, 17 Mar 2005 21:37:30 +0800) it happened "Tom Potter"
<tdp@earthlink.net> wrote in <39tfipF67h4nnU1@individual.net>:
<cnctutwiler@wmconnect.com> wrote in message
news:1110997999.383347.313110@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Tom--
Use a phono cartridge with O scope--dVolt ~ dy--some integration over
dt and correlation with linear distance required--but your website
suggests you can handle the politics.... sorry, I mean math. (Portable
scopes available for less than $200--but being a science guy, you
probably have one. ;-)
Good Luck--
Thanks for your input.
What I am doing now is:
------------------------
1. Gluing various materials (Silk, wool, cotton, etc.) onto an MP3 player.
2. Dragging the M3 player/material interface across the item under test.
3. Recording the sound thus created as a wave file in the MP3 player.
4. Plugging the MP3 player into a USB port and downloading the wave file to
my computer.
5. Using various time series programs, such as "Sigview" to analyze the wav
file.
Sigview provides a nice 3D picture of the data.
The main problem is that there are many resonances in the MP3 player body,
and in the material I use as an interface, that override the signals
that I want to see. I may have to take an MP3 player apart,
and isolate everything possible from the audio input.
Even then, I still need a good, resonant-free, interface material,
to "sweep the surface" with.
I welcome all input.
That addresses this application I describe.
The suggestion here to use a phono pick up cartridge is a very good one.
You have to connect its output in parallel, these stereo cartridges
Look 45 degrees 'sideways'.
Use a good preamp (buy one or make one with a few transistors) to compensate
(these are inductors, and the output voltage goes up linear with frequency),
or if you make you own preamp, drive the inductors in a low impedance perhaps.
(then the current goes up linear with f).
Mp3 is a lossy compression, and favors strong signals over weak ones.
Better is to feed te phone pre-amp into the mic input of the soundcard, and
record as a wave file.
It has been many years since I designed a phono pre-amp (Shure M44-7 in a
Garrard record player deck IIRC), maybe it was in the sixties.
When you design the preamp, you will likely not want the RIAA rollof correction.
Battery power the preamp, and you can use a notebook and go places.
If you want diagrams, maybe I could think of something.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Potter" |
|
| Title: Re: Surface analyzer |
17 Mar 2005 10:14:58 AM |
|
|
"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1111067777.bb9056c9d4484b626337dc56ce75df1b@teranews...
On a sunny day (Thu, 17 Mar 2005 21:37:30 +0800) it happened "Tom Potter"
<tdp@earthlink.net> wrote in <39tfipF67h4nnU1@individual.net>:
<cnctutwiler@wmconnect.com> wrote in message
news:1110997999.383347.313110@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Tom--
Use a phono cartridge with O scope--dVolt ~ dy--some integration over
dt and correlation with linear distance required--but your website
suggests you can handle the politics.... sorry, I mean math. (Portable
scopes available for less than $200--but being a science guy, you
probably have one. ;-)
Good Luck--
Thanks for your input.
What I am doing now is:
------------------------
1. Gluing various materials (Silk, wool, cotton, etc.) onto an MP3 player.
2. Dragging the M3 player/material interface across the item under test.
3. Recording the sound thus created as a wave file in the MP3 player.
4. Plugging the MP3 player into a USB port and downloading the wave file
to
my computer.
5. Using various time series programs, such as "Sigview" to analyze the
wav
file.
Sigview provides a nice 3D picture of the data.
The main problem is that there are many resonances in the MP3 player body,
and in the material I use as an interface, that override the signals
that I want to see. I may have to take an MP3 player apart,
and isolate everything possible from the audio input.
Even then, I still need a good, resonant-free, interface material,
to "sweep the surface" with.
I welcome all input.
That addresses this application I describe.
The suggestion here to use a phono pick up cartridge is a very good one.
You have to connect its output in parallel, these stereo cartridges
Look 45 degrees 'sideways'.
Use a good preamp (buy one or make one with a few transistors) to
compensate
(these are inductors, and the output voltage goes up linear with
frequency),
or if you make you own preamp, drive the inductors in a low impedance
perhaps.
(then the current goes up linear with f).
Mp3 is a lossy compression, and favors strong signals over weak ones.
Better is to feed te phone pre-amp into the mic input of the soundcard,
and
record as a wave file.
It has been many years since I designed a phono pre-amp (Shure M44-7 in a
Garrard record player deck IIRC), maybe it was in the sixties.
When you design the preamp, you will likely not want the RIAA rollof
correction.
Battery power the preamp, and you can use a notebook and go places.
If you want diagrams, maybe I could think of something.
Thanks for the suggestions.
If I can't make an MP3 player into a decent "phono pick up"
by gluing some material to it,
I'll try the magnetic cartridge approach.
( If I can't find a suitable optical transducer.)
I am not compressing to MP3,
I am recording the wave file directly.
In other words, when I download the recorded signals to
a computer I am downloading wav files.
I might need to do some research on how good the
wave recording is of various MP3 players is,
although I don't think this is the problem,
as I get silence across the band with no input,
and I have more than adequate frequency response.
--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "bz" |
|
| Title: Re: Surface analyzer |
17 Mar 2005 08:06:49 AM |
|
|
Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:1111067777.bb9056c9d4484b626337dc56ce75df1b@teranews:
The suggestion here to use a phono pick up cartridge is a very good one.
You have to connect its output in parallel, these stereo cartridges
Look 45 degrees 'sideways'.
Why not record the channels separately?
That will give more data about the surface.
--
bz
please pardon my infinite ignorance, the set-of-things-I-do-not-know is an
infinite set.
bz+sp@ch100-5.chem.lsu.edu remove ch100-5 to avoid spam trap
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jan Panteltje" |
|
| Title: Re: Surface analyzer |
17 Mar 2005 09:01:54 AM |
|
|
On a sunny day (Thu, 17 Mar 2005 14:06:49 +0000 (UTC)) it happened bz
<bz+sp@ch100-5.chem.lsu.edu> wrote in
<Xns961C52897711DWQAHBGMXSZHVspammote@130.39.198.139>:
Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:1111067777.bb9056c9d4484b626337dc56ce75df1b@teranews:
The suggestion here to use a phono pick up cartridge is a very good one.
You have to connect its output in parallel, these stereo cartridges
Look 45 degrees 'sideways'.
Why not record the channels separately?
That will give more data about the surface.
Absolutely true, that is what I thought, but regarding the experimental state,
better get the moon trip together, before talking about mars....
If you only want to register surface flatness, maybe it is not needed.
One would slide the thing at a constant speed.
Some patterns may 'grip' the needle a bit, so one could perhaps get directional
info for the pattern, like how the tools were used, yes.
.
|
|
|
| User: "bz" |
|
| Title: Re: Surface analyzer |
17 Mar 2005 09:30:27 AM |
|
|
Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:1111071721.8fdd2682d45effe10b3016329451f4e9@teranews:
On a sunny day (Thu, 17 Mar 2005 14:06:49 +0000 (UTC)) it happened bz
<bz+sp@ch100-5.chem.lsu.edu> wrote in
<Xns961C52897711DWQAHBGMXSZHVspammote@130.39.198.139>:
Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:1111067777.bb9056c9d4484b626337dc56ce75df1b@teranews:
The suggestion here to use a phono pick up cartridge is a very good
one. You have to connect its output in parallel, these stereo
cartridges Look 45 degrees 'sideways'.
Why not record the channels separately?
That will give more data about the surface.
Absolutely true, that is what I thought, but regarding the experimental
state, better get the moon trip together, before talking about mars....
It doesn't hurt to design your rocket motors so they can provide enough
thrust for either task. You may want to use more motors on the mars mission
launch vehicle, however. :)
If you only want to register surface flatness, maybe it is not needed.
One would slide the thing at a constant speed.
Some patterns may 'grip' the needle a bit, so one could perhaps get
directional info for the pattern, like how the tools were used, yes.
Well, once the signals are recorded [and recording two channels should be
as easy as one] he can sum them together and get the same effect. Hence my
comment.
I think he should look at the current technology for mechanical scanning.
Just dragging the probe over the surface by hand is NOT the best way to do
it.
The devices are really pretty simple and should be something that can be
build in a garage. A couple of phono cartridges DRIVEN with sawtooth waves
of proper frequencies could be used to move his probe over the surface in a
scanning pattern. It is really amazing to see how simple the equipment is
and then see the pictures they make with it.
Or he could get a couple of old floppy drives and use the head positioning
mechanisms to give him x-y scanning capability over several square inches.
--
bz
please pardon my infinite ignorance, the set-of-things-I-do-not-know is an
infinite set.
bz+nanae@ch100-5.chem.lsu.edu
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Surface analyzer |
17 Mar 2005 09:05:55 AM |
|
|
Jan writes.....it has been many years since I designed a phono preamp
(shure M44-7 in a Garrard)....
Tut says--Jan I just have to tell you that you did one heck of a great
job on that system. It was without question the top of the line in
those days--many thanks! Wive agrees. ;-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jan Panteltje" |
|
| Title: Re: Surface analyzer |
17 Mar 2005 09:23:31 AM |
|
|
On a sunny day (17 Mar 2005 07:05:55 -0800) it happened
cnctutwiler@wmconnect.com wrote in
<1111071955.932161.14840@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>:
Jan writes.....it has been many years since I designed a phono preamp
(shure M44-7 in a Garrard)....
Tut says--Jan I just have to tell you that you did one heck of a great
job on that system. It was without question the top of the line in
those days--many thanks! Wive agrees. ;-)
Great you liked that sound, but the one you refer to, likely was not designed
by me.
There were only a very limited amount made here.
M44-7 refers to the element, Garrard was the player.
I dunno if the design was further copied though.
Sound was indeed very nice :-) especially on Beatle records.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Surface analyzer |
17 Mar 2005 09:41:16 AM |
|
|
Jan--would have bet the house I had a M44--went out to the garage and
looked though--Garrard 100 w/M91ED. ;( Well at least you got them
moving in the right direction.
Tut
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "GR_GR" |
|
| Title: Re: Surface analyzer |
16 Mar 2005 07:41:09 AM |
|
|
Tom Potter wrote:
I am interested in analyzing surfaces of objects
to detect natural and man-made shaping of the object surface,
and I have been experimenting,
using a MP3 player/recorder to record the sound,
as I drag a "feeler" attached to the player across the objects.
I have experimented with various "transducer interface materials"
glued onto the MP3 player, and I have not found a
suitable material, as all materials have many
resonances, and those, combined with the
resonances of the MP3 players I have used,
tend to obscure the data associated with the surfaces,
that I want to analyze.
I would appreciate any input and ideas about
producing an audio signal that models a surface,
in a small portable, inexpensive package.
A small, low-power, laser probe would do a better job,
but I am hopeful of using an MP3 player/recorder for this,
as the cost, size, power consumption and frequency response
seems to be ideal.
I have a number of time series analyzer programs that
I have experimented with, but would also appreciate
any suggestions along these line.
I am certain you would not be interested in help from physicists, since
in your opinion they use up tax payers money for no good reason, and
therefore have nothing to help you with.
Also, you are an *****, as seen in your prior posts over the last few
weeks. Therefore, why should anyone waste their time helping you, Tom?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Potter" |
|
| Title: Re: Surface analyzer |
17 Mar 2005 08:25:49 AM |
|
|
"GR_GR" <nyb@colorado.edu> wrote in message
news:d19d1n$2av$2@peabody.colorado.edu...
Tom Potter wrote:
I am interested in analyzing surfaces of objects
to detect natural and man-made shaping of the object surface,
and I have been experimenting,
using a MP3 player/recorder to record the sound,
as I drag a "feeler" attached to the player across the objects.
I have experimented with various "transducer interface materials"
glued onto the MP3 player, and I have not found a
suitable material, as all materials have many
resonances, and those, combined with the
resonances of the MP3 players I have used,
tend to obscure the data associated with the surfaces,
that I want to analyze.
I would appreciate any input and ideas about
producing an audio signal that models a surface,
in a small portable, inexpensive package.
A small, low-power, laser probe would do a better job,
but I am hopeful of using an MP3 player/recorder for this,
as the cost, size, power consumption and frequency response
seems to be ideal.
I have a number of time series analyzer programs that
I have experimented with, but would also appreciate
any suggestions along these line.
I am certain you would not be interested in help from physicists, since in
your opinion they use up tax payers money for no good reason, and
therefore have nothing to help you with.
Also, you are an *****, as seen in your prior posts over the last few
weeks. Therefore, why should anyone waste their time helping you, Tom?
Frankly GR_GR.
I don't think you have the equipment
to help me with this project.
This project requires knowledge and original thinking,
not immature, nasty comments, and parroting.
If I ever have a project that requires your skills,
I'll call on you directly, okay?
--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Surface analyzer |
16 Mar 2005 09:04:15 AM |
|
|
Tom--
GR makes a good point--. Regardless--
Cost effective solution--use phono cartridge--will need O
scope--dVoltage proportional to dy of surface--you can handle the math
from here.
Good Luck
Tut
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Surface analyzer |
16 Mar 2005 12:50:13 PM |
|
|
Tom Potter wrote:
I am interested in analyzing surfaces of objects
to detect natural and man-made shaping of the object surface,
and I have been experimenting,
using a MP3 player/recorder to record the sound,
as I drag a "feeler" attached to the player across the objects.
Fractal compression.
I have experimented with various "transducer interface materials"
glued onto the MP3 player, and I have not found a
suitable material, as all materials have many
resonances, and those, combined with the
resonances of the MP3 players I have used,
tend to obscure the data associated with the surfaces,
that I want to analyze.
I would appreciate any input and ideas about
producing an audio signal that models a surface,
in a small portable, inexpensive package.
A small, low-power, laser probe would do a better job,
but I am hopeful of using an MP3 player/recorder for this,
as the cost, size, power consumption and frequency response
seems to be ideal.
I have a number of time series analyzer programs that
I have experimented with, but would also appreciate
any suggestions along these line.
--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Potter" |
|
| Title: Re: Surface analyzer |
17 Mar 2005 07:36:05 AM |
|
|
<schoenfeld1@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1110999013.968916.186370@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Tom Potter wrote:
I am interested in analyzing surfaces of objects
to detect natural and man-made shaping of the object surface,
and I have been experimenting,
using a MP3 player/recorder to record the sound,
as I drag a "feeler" attached to the player across the objects.
Fractal compression.
Thanks for the input.
I suspect that compression would remove
some of the data I need to analyze the surface.
What I need to do,
is get eliminate the mechanical resonances and filtering,
of the transducer and MP3 player,
so I can just work on the data associated with the
surface I am trying to analyze.
--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Surface analyzer |
17 Mar 2005 08:42:27 AM |
|
|
Tom Potter wrote:
<schoenfeld1@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1110999013.968916.186370@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Tom Potter wrote:
I am interested in analyzing surfaces of objects
to detect natural and man-made shaping of the object surface,
and I have been experimenting,
using a MP3 player/recorder to record the sound,
as I drag a "feeler" attached to the player across the objects.
Fractal compression.
Thanks for the input.
I suspect that compression would remove
some of the data I need to analyze the surface.
What I need to do,
is get eliminate the mechanical resonances and filtering,
of the transducer and MP3 player,
so I can just work on the data associated with the
surface I am trying to analyze.
--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
Tom--
There certainly are betters ways to solve your problem--I posted the
one however that I thought had some remote possibility of being done in
your garage. I suspect if you crack the case on your MP3 it would be
like squeezing a baby bird to hard--it would never sing again.
Not being nosey--but what is the intended purpose? What measurement
standards/accuracies do you want to achieve? Micrometers 0-1" are still
only $10--Need something quick, cheap and mobile--pickup a couple of
plastic calipers for $1. They're good for accuracies to .001"
Probably not going to get alot of help from the physics boys--for a
number of reasons.
Good luck!
Tut
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Potter" |
|
| Title: Re: Surface analyzer |
17 Mar 2005 10:05:16 AM |
|
|
<cnctutwiler@wmconnect.com> wrote in message
news:1111070547.326809.65810@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Tom Potter wrote:
<schoenfeld1@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1110999013.968916.186370@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Tom Potter wrote:
I am interested in analyzing surfaces of objects
to detect natural and man-made shaping of the object surface,
and I have been experimenting,
using a MP3 player/recorder to record the sound,
as I drag a "feeler" attached to the player across the objects.
Fractal compression.
Thanks for the input.
I suspect that compression would remove
some of the data I need to analyze the surface.
What I need to do,
is get eliminate the mechanical resonances and filtering,
of the transducer and MP3 player,
so I can just work on the data associated with the
surface I am trying to analyze.
--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
Tom--
There certainly are betters ways to solve your problem--I posted the
one however that I thought had some remote possibility of being done in
your garage. I suspect if you crack the case on your MP3 it would be
like squeezing a baby bird to hard--it would never sing again.
Not being nosey--but what is the intended purpose? What measurement
standards/accuracies do you want to achieve? Micrometers 0-1" are still
only $10--Need something quick, cheap and mobile--pickup a couple of
plastic calipers for $1. They're good for accuracies to .001"
Probably not going to get alot of help from the physics boys--for a
number of reasons.
I have no issue with the "physics boys"
who are capable of addressing this application.
I only have an issue with a few phonies,
who parrot conventional wisdom,
and ego trip on creative posters.
I dare say that the intelligent ""physics boys"
understand this.
But cut to the chase:
I am interested in relative,
rather than absolute values.
Calipers won't work,
as I want to do a time series analysis
of signals that model surfaces.
An ideal transducer would be
a small, cheap, low power consumption, optical one,
that fed audio into an MP3 player.
Fingerprint scanners operated about 500 DPI,
and the "ridges" that I want to "transducer"
are much coarser than that.
The actual frequency output by the transducer
would naturally be a function of the scan rate,
but the actual time series pattern would be the same
for the same surface, regardless of the scan rate.
--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Surface analyzer |
17 Mar 2005 10:43:57 AM |
|
|
Tom Potter wrote:
<cnctutwiler@wmconnect.com> wrote in message
news:1111070547.326809.65810@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Tom Potter wrote:
<schoenfeld1@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1110999013.968916.186370@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Tom Potter wrote:
I am interested in analyzing surfaces of objects
to detect natural and man-made shaping of the object surface,
and I have been experimenting,
using a MP3 player/recorder to record the sound,
as I drag a "feeler" attached to the player across the objects.
Fractal compression.
Thanks for the input.
I suspect that compression would remove
some of the data I need to analyze the surface.
What I need to do,
is get eliminate the mechanical resonances and filtering,
of the transducer and MP3 player,
so I can just work on the data associated with the
surface I am trying to analyze.
--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
Tom--
There certainly are betters ways to solve your problem--I posted
the
one however that I thought had some remote possibility of being
done in
your garage. I suspect if you crack the case on your MP3 it would
be
like squeezing a baby bird to hard--it would never sing again.
Not being nosey--but what is the intended purpose? What measurement
standards/accuracies do you want to achieve? Micrometers 0-1" are
still
only $10--Need something quick, cheap and mobile--pickup a couple
of
plastic calipers for $1. They're good for accuracies to .001"
Probably not going to get alot of help from the physics boys--for a
number of reasons.
I have no issue with the "physics boys"
who are capable of addressing this application.
I only have an issue with a few phonies,
who parrot conventional wisdom,
and ego trip on creative posters.
I dare say that the intelligent ""physics boys"
understand this.
But cut to the chase:
I am interested in relative,
rather than absolute values.
Calipers won't work,
as I want to do a time series analysis
of signals that model surfaces.
An ideal transducer would be
a small, cheap, low power consumption, optical one,
that fed audio into an MP3 player.
Fingerprint scanners operated about 500 DPI,
and the "ridges" that I want to "transducer"
are much coarser than that.
The actual frequency output by the transducer
would naturally be a function of the scan rate,
but the actual time series pattern would be the same
for the same surface, regardless of the scan rate.
--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
How much are you willing to spend to solve this problem? Time/money? If
you've got big bucks--no problem. If your intention is to modify your
bicycle to fly at sonic speeds (I'm not saying it can't be done) there
is a problem. There are multiple scanners on the market but my
experience has been that pulling them appart, especially with no
circuit diagrams, and readapting to a new function is not as easy as
changing an bad tube on an old RCA--but I'm sure you know that.
It would help if you could provide a better discription of what you're
trying to do. Like--"I'm trying to plot the dy vs dr on the surface of
a dime." I don't mean to offend, but at this point if you were
submitting for grant money--nope.
Tut
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Potter" |
|
| Title: Re: Surface analyzer |
19 Mar 2005 07:47:15 AM |
|
|
<cnctutwiler@wmconnect.com> wrote in message
news:1111077837.935343.248310@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Tom Potter wrote:
<cnctutwiler@wmconnect.com> wrote in message
news:1111070547.326809.65810@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Tom Potter wrote:
<schoenfeld1@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1110999013.968916.186370@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Tom Potter wrote:
I am interested in analyzing surfaces of objects
to detect natural and man-made shaping of the object surface,
and I have been experimenting,
using a MP3 player/recorder to record the sound,
as I drag a "feeler" attached to the player across the objects.
Fractal compression.
Thanks for the input.
I suspect that compression would remove
some of the data I need to analyze the surface.
What I need to do,
is get eliminate the mechanical resonances and filtering,
of the transducer and MP3 player,
so I can just work on the data associated with the
surface I am trying to analyze.
--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
Tom--
There certainly are betters ways to solve your problem--I posted
the
one however that I thought had some remote possibility of being
done in
your garage. I suspect if you crack the case on your MP3 it would
be
like squeezing a baby bird to hard--it would never sing again.
Not being nosey--but what is the intended purpose? What measurement
standards/accuracies do you want to achieve? Micrometers 0-1" are
still
only $10--Need something quick, cheap and mobile--pickup a couple
of
plastic calipers for $1. They're good for accuracies to .001"
Probably not going to get alot of help from the physics boys--for a
number of reasons.
I have no issue with the "physics boys"
who are capable of addressing this application.
I only have an issue with a few phonies,
who parrot conventional wisdom,
and ego trip on creative posters.
I dare say that the intelligent ""physics boys"
understand this.
But cut to the chase:
I am interested in relative,
rather than absolute values.
Calipers won't work,
as I want to do a time series analysis
of signals that model surfaces.
An ideal transducer would be
a small, cheap, low power consumption, optical one,
that fed audio into an MP3 player.
Fingerprint scanners operated about 500 DPI,
and the "ridges" that I want to "transducer"
are much coarser than that.
The actual frequency output by the transducer
would naturally be a function of the scan rate,
but the actual time series pattern would be the same
for the same surface, regardless of the scan rate.
--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
How much are you willing to spend to solve this problem? Time/money? If
you've got big bucks--no problem. If your intention is to modify your
bicycle to fly at sonic speeds (I'm not saying it can't be done) there
is a problem. There are multiple scanners on the market but my
experience has been that pulling them appart, especially with no
circuit diagrams, and readapting to a new function is not as easy as
changing an bad tube on an old RCA--but I'm sure you know that.
It would help if you could provide a better discription of what you're
trying to do. Like--"I'm trying to plot the dy vs dr on the surface of
a dime." I don't mean to offend, but at this point if you were
submitting for grant money--nope.
Thanks for your input.
I think your suggestion that the guys in Sci.electronics.repairs
can provide the best response,
is the way to go.
--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Surface analyzer |
16 Mar 2005 08:03:27 AM |
|
|
Tom Potter--
A phono cartridge might work for small variances in test surface--the
voltage out would be proportional to the mechanical deflection of the
needle (variance of test object). Would need O scope and might have to
integrate voltage changes with respect to time/distance if you want to
plot the surface.
Good luck
Tut
.
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
Help with EG&G PARC 1461 Optical Multichannel Analyzer Quantum Probability Analyzer Quantum Probability Analyzer world news: Opto Dynamic Surface Tension dyne control at films as BOPP, LDPE, HDPE, PET, PP, PE, EVA, PTFE, etc. world news: Opto Dynamic Surface Tension dyne control at films as BOPP, LDPE, HDPE, PET, PP, PE, EVA, PTFE, etc. GR: Metric of Surface Temp gradient inside a sphere with heat source at the surface surface tension
| surface tension New version of the free Blender open source graphics creation program can do surface fluid simultion. world news: Opto Dynamic Surface Tension dyne control at films as BOPP, LDPE, HDPE, PET, PP, PE, EVA, PTFE, etc. A problem on surface tension Opportunity, the second Mars Explorer Rover is on the surface andtransmitting! Bullet striking metal surface produce spark? Dislocation creates 'whirlpool' that pulls surface atoms into crystal
|
|
|