| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
07 Jul 2006 12:28:33 AM |
| Object: |
Surface tension theory, Glaring mistakes |
http://www.geocities.com/hamid_vasigh_ansari
.
|
|
| User: "T Wake" |
|
| Title: Re: Surface tension theory, Glaring mistakes |
07 Jul 2006 11:31:17 AM |
|
|
<h_v_ansari@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1152250113.563543.108460@s16g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
http://www.example.com/hamid_vasigh_ansari
Do you honestly think no one here has an anti-virus package? You are an
idiot.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Ghost In The Machine" |
|
| Title: Re: Surface tension theory, Glaring mistakes |
08 Jul 2006 11:13:51 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 07 Jul 2006 17:31:17 +0100, T Wake wrote:
<h_v_ansari@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1152250113.563543.108460@s16g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
http://www.example.com/hamid_vasigh_ansari
Do you honestly think no one here has an anti-virus package? You are an
idiot.
I don't. :-) Don't need one for Linux. :-)
Not that I'm all that interested in visiting the website anyway.
Followups.
--
#191,
It's still legal to go .sigless.
.
|
|
|
| User: "T Wake" |
|
| Title: Re: Surface tension theory, Glaring mistakes |
09 Jul 2006 04:50:05 AM |
|
|
"The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill3@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:pan.2006.07.08.19.55.43.27236@earthlink.net...
On Fri, 07 Jul 2006 17:31:17 +0100, T Wake wrote:
<h_v_ansari@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1152250113.563543.108460@s16g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
http://www.example.com/hamid_vasigh_ansari
Do you honestly think no one here has an anti-virus package? You are an
idiot.
I don't. :-) Don't need one for Linux. :-)
You can still get them (AV packages that is). :-)
Not that I'm all that interested in visiting the website anyway.
Don't blame you :-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Phineas T Puddleduck" |
|
| Title: Re: Surface tension theory, Glaring mistakes |
09 Jul 2006 04:54:56 AM |
|
|
On 9/7/06 10:50, in article neSdnUABAfrMTC3ZnZ2dnUVZ8s2dnZ2d@pipex.net, "T
Wake" <Usenet.es7AT@gishpuppy.com> wrote:
"The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill3@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:pan.2006.07.08.19.55.43.27236@earthlink.net...
On Fri, 07 Jul 2006 17:31:17 +0100, T Wake wrote:
<h_v_ansari@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1152250113.563543.108460@s16g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
http://www.example.com/hamid_vasigh_ansari
Do you honestly think no one here has an anti-virus package? You are an
idiot.
I don't. :-) Don't need one for Linux. :-)
You can still get them (AV packages that is). :-)
Not that I'm all that interested in visiting the website anyway.
Don't blame you :-)
There's always ClamAv
The chances of a virus arriving for Linux (or Mac) are a million to one they
say..
But still, they'll come....
;-)
--
Relf's Law? -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
"***** repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses."
Corollary -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
³It approaches the asymptote faster, the more pseduos¹ you throw in your
formulas.²
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orange jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson
Why parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Official emperor of sci.physics, head mumbler of the "Cult of INSANE
SCIENCE". Pay no attention to my butt poking forward, it is expanding.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ben Rudiak-Gould" |
|
| Title: Re: Surface tension theory, Glaring mistakes |
07 Jul 2006 01:09:22 PM |
|
|
T Wake wrote:
Do you honestly think no one here has an anti-virus package?
Since the site in question does contain crank physics screeds, and since the
virus in question copies itself into html files on the victim's machine, it
seems likely that Mr. Ansari doesn't even know he has it.
-- Ben
.
|
|
|
| User: "T Wake" |
|
| Title: Re: Surface tension theory, Glaring mistakes |
07 Jul 2006 03:28:45 PM |
|
|
"Ben Rudiak-Gould" <br276deleteme@cam.ac.uk> wrote in message
news:e8m80h$mc7$1@gemini.csx.cam.ac.uk...
T Wake wrote:
Do you honestly think no one here has an anti-virus package?
Since the site in question does contain crank physics screeds, and since
the virus in question copies itself into html files on the victim's
machine, it seems likely that Mr. Ansari doesn't even know he has it.
Fair one - and eminently possible.
I am somewhat suspicious about the three threads he started. (I don't know
what was on the HTML files though so cant comment any more).
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "PD" |
|
| Title: Re: Surface tension theory, Glaring mistakes |
07 Jul 2006 05:20:40 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Virus. Stay away.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Salmon Egg" |
|
| Title: Re: Surface tension theory, Glaring mistakes |
07 Jul 2006 04:25:28 PM |
|
|
On 7/6/06 10:28 PM, in article
1152250113.563543.108460@s16g2000cws.googlegroups.com,
"h_v_ansari@yahoo.com" <h_v_ansari@yahoo.com> wrote:
http://www.geocities.com/hamid_vasigh_ansari
This is not much of a post to start with. Nevertheless, I did go to the web
site presented. I was going to examine one of the subjects I actually knew
about. It seemed to be a typical pile of crap listed by crackpots.
If clear use of language is an indicator of logical thinking, consider the
following quote.
"Conductive core of the earth is as hot as causing freedom of the
valence electrons after which these released electrons distribute
themselves toward the core surface and move along with the rotation
of the earth causing that magnetic field which forms the big magnet
inside the earth. This is summary of the article which also includes
presentation of some experiments for testing the validity of the
discussion and a conclusion justifying the magnetic inversions of
the earth. Based on the presented discussions a practical way for
direct determination of ionization energies of different elements
is proposed."
I rest my case.
Bill
-- Ferme le Bush
.
|
|
|
| User: "T Wake" |
|
| Title: Re: Surface tension theory, Glaring mistakes |
07 Jul 2006 04:50:14 PM |
|
|
"Salmon Egg" <salmonegg@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:C0D41F58.30FF6%salmonegg@sbcglobal.net...
On 7/6/06 10:28 PM, in article
1152250113.563543.108460@s16g2000cws.googlegroups.com,
"h_v_ansari@yahoo.com" <h_v_ansari@yahoo.com> wrote:
http://www.geocities.com/hamid_vasigh_ansari
This is not much of a post to start with. Nevertheless, I did go to the
web
site presented. I was going to examine one of the subjects I actually knew
about. It seemed to be a typical pile of crap listed by crackpots.
If clear use of language is an indicator of logical thinking, consider the
following quote.
"Conductive core of the earth is as hot as causing freedom of the
valence electrons after which these released electrons distribute
themselves toward the core surface and move along with the rotation
of the earth causing that magnetic field which forms the big magnet
inside the earth. This is summary of the article which also includes
presentation of some experiments for testing the validity of the
discussion and a conclusion justifying the magnetic inversions of
the earth. Based on the presented discussions a practical way for
direct determination of ionization energies of different elements
is proposed."
I rest my case.
Did you have any troubles with viruses?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Surface tension theory, Glaring mistakes |
07 Jul 2006 07:49:27 PM |
|
|
"Salmon Egg" <salmonegg@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:C0D41F58.30FF6%salmonegg@sbcglobal.net...
On 7/6/06 10:28 PM, in article
1152250113.563543.108460@s16g2000cws.googlegroups.com,
"h_v_ansari@yahoo.com" <h_v_ansari@yahoo.com> wrote:
http://www.geocities.com/hamid_vasigh_ansari
This is not much of a post to start with. Nevertheless, I did go to the
web
site presented. I was going to examine one of the subjects I actually knew
about. It seemed to be a typical pile of crap listed by crackpots.
If clear use of language is an indicator of logical thinking, consider the
following quote.
"Conductive core of the earth is as hot as causing freedom of the
valence electrons after which these released electrons distribute
themselves toward the core surface and move along with the rotation
of the earth causing that magnetic field which forms the big magnet
inside the earth. This is summary of the article which also includes
presentation of some experiments for testing the validity of the
discussion and a conclusion justifying the magnetic inversions of
the earth. Based on the presented discussions a practical way for
direct determination of ionization energies of different elements
is proposed."
Seems pretty clear to me that this is bot-produced drivel similar to what
I've seen a couple of posters spamming sci.chem and other science/math
groups with lately.
Eric Lucas
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "PD" |
|
| Title: Re: Surface tension theory, Glaring mistakes |
07 Jul 2006 05:20:09 PM |
|
|
Salmon Egg wrote:
On 7/6/06 10:28 PM, in article
1152250113.563543.108460@s16g2000cws.googlegroups.com,
"h_v_ansari@yahoo.com" <h_v_ansari@yahoo.com> wrote:
http://www.geocities.com/hamid_vasigh_ansari
This is not much of a post to start with. Nevertheless, I did go to the web
site presented. I was going to examine one of the subjects I actually knew
about. It seemed to be a typical pile of crap listed by crackpots.
If clear use of language is an indicator of logical thinking, consider the
following quote.
"Conductive core of the earth is as hot as causing freedom of the
valence electrons after which these released electrons distribute
themselves toward the core surface and move along with the rotation
of the earth causing that magnetic field which forms the big magnet
inside the earth. This is summary of the article which also includes
presentation of some experiments for testing the validity of the
discussion and a conclusion justifying the magnetic inversions of
the earth. Based on the presented discussions a practical way for
direct determination of ionization energies of different elements
is proposed."
I rest my case.
Might as well rest your computer, too. It's infected.
Bill
-- Ferme le Bush
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
Surface tension theory; Glaring mistakes
Surface tension theory, Glaring mistakes
overcome surface tension at microscopic dimensions
Opposite of surface tension?
world news: Opto Dynamic Surface Tension dyne control at films as BOPP, LDPE, HDPE, PET, PP, PE, EVA, PTFE, etc.
surface tension
A problem on surface tension
surface tension
| Heraclitus "Everything is Change" (tension & strife)
Wetting agent: seek surface tension of various concentrations of alcohol-water
surface tension
Surface Tension and Vapor Pressure of Titania
Re: Tension, scalar or vector? (Brown sucks up)
surface tension
gas bubble in liquid with surface tension and viscosity
|
|
|
