Science > Physics > Susskind, Linde, Krauss AAAS 2007 2 classical electron dark mattercore
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Jack Sarfatti" |
| Date: |
18 Feb 2007 10:17:36 PM |
| Object: |
Susskind, Linde, Krauss AAAS 2007 2 classical electron dark mattercore |
Lenny called his talk "Rats leaving the sinking ship." "ship" =
reductionism. However Lenny called "emergence" = "reductionism" in
reverse POV. I am not sure if I agree with that. I am not sure if ODLRO
"More is different" can be viewed that way. I say that with emergent
ODLRO bottom -> up emergence (related to effective low energy field
theories in flows of renormalization group?) is not simply the flip side
of reductionism since it is non-perturbative).
Lenny wrote my basic equation that I use over and over again in Super
Cosmos to make some model calculations e.g. charge clusters
F = ma = GMm/r^2 + mc^2/\zpfr
For a simple Lorentz-Poincare electron
ma = @e^2/r^2 + (hbar/2)^2/2mr^3 + mc^2/\zpfr = 0 equilibrium
Solves the finite classical electron problem with /\zpf < 0 dark matter
core.
i.e. @e^2r* + (hbar/2)^2/2m + mc^2/\zpfr*^4 = 0 stable equilibrium
with
@e^2 + 4mc^2/\zpfr*^3 > 0
@ + 4(mc^2/e^2)/\zpfr*^3 > 0
@ is shell shape factor.
Extending to charge cluster is trivial.
Linde - "multiverse is a feast with all dishes served"
Gravity energy + matter energy = 0
i.e.
Guv + /\zpfguv + kTuv = 0
Quantum fluctuations inflate when /\zpf stays constant from viscosity
like in damped oscillator - slow roll.
Jiggle of the Higgs scalar ODLRO field at bottom of landscape well heats
up the big bang creating on-mass-shell matter.
Coincidence problem means Weak Anthropic or else intelligent design.
On Feb 18, 2007, at 6:25 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
Just got back from Hilton. Surprisingly Sean Carroll was there asked a
question but I forget what it was. Lenny looks great - very Regal
Shakespearean, but with the voice of Sid Caesar in The Show of Shows. He
even had a slide of Woody Allen. Linde is also a good Russian comedian.
Linde gave an impassioned impromptu answer at end to a question showing
is real motivation for the landscape multiverse before in early 80's
really identical to my own - more on that in another message. I have
almost finished Peter Woit's book "Not Even Wrong." Peter writes well
and is very convincing so it was propitious that I went to hear Lenny
and Linde speak on how inflation and string theory reinforce each other
in a way not totally disconnected from up-coming experiments like PLANCK
NASA Probe. Lenny says that even a positive space curvature of 10^-3
would be trouble for multiverse-inflation. Lenny admits to the basic
issues raised by Woit, but the situation is more complex. More on this
to come. The situation is not as bad as Woit paints it, but not as good
as Lenny wishes. When I spoke to Lenny personally he agreed that signal
nonlocality using entanglement (a violation of orthodox QM - see papers
by A. Valentini) would make the landscape directly observable, but it
would spoil other parts of his theory connected with no-cloning. Lenny
said he is not ready to move into that area of speculation - so I guess
it's up to me (also Cramer's retrocausality experiment will be crucial).
Someone mentioned Lee Smolin and Lenny said "who"? He pretended not to
know of Smolin's work - a joke. ;-)
PS Krauss showed how dark energy proves Worst Possible World, i.e. life
not sustainable. Some talk about string theory as religion.
Jack Sarfatti
sarfatti@pacbell.net
"If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called research,
would it?"
- Albert Einstein
http://www.authorhouse.com/BookStore/ItemDetail.aspx?bookid=23999
http://lifeboat.com/ex/bios.jack.sarfatti
http://qedcorp.com/APS/Dec122006.ppt
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1310681739984181006&q=Sarfatti+Causation&hl=en
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lub/sets/72157594439814784
.
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
