$$ Tom [He between his error-bars ][MUST a _must_] Roberts wrote:
mluttgens@wanadoo.fr wrote:
GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims.
No. It merely shows your confusions are false. <shrug>
$$ LUCKY his "confusions" areN'T *REAL* ..like YOURs are, Dimwit.
"In the GPS, all atomic clocks in all reference frames (in
orbit and on the ground) are set once and stay synchronized.
$$ Synchronized simultaneously different PRE-set tic COUNTs:
$$ One SYNCHRONiZATiON time t, SiMULTANEOUSLY DiFFERENT readings.
$$ Syncronized at ONE time ..but with TWO (2) DiFFERENT readings.
$$ ONE syncronized with the OTHER with TWO (2) DiFFERENT " .
$$ BOTH syncronized ..AT ONCE, but with TWO (2) DiFFERENT " .
$$ BOTH syncronized at TiME t ..but with TWO (2) DiFFERENT " .
$$ BOTH syncronized at the SAME time with TWO (2) DiFFERENT " .
$$ BOTH syncronized SiMULTANEOUSLY but with TWO (2) DiFFERENT " .
Ignoring small corrections for minor effects (e.g. errors in
orbits, planets, moon, ...), yes. But note that the clocks on
the ground are not identical to the clocks on satellites: the
engineered difference between them is precisely the difference
predicted by [ ..the NEWTON part of] GR (about 38 usec/day,
which is enormous compared to the GPS accuracy).
Indeed, even not all clocks on the ground are identical (due
to differences in altitude).
$$ "ALTiTUDE" the *ONLY* reason, for any NON-PRE-set DiFFERENCEs.
However, initial expectations based on special relativity were
that clocks in different reference frames should have different
readings and rates.
SR is irrelevant. One _must_ use GR for this physical situation.
<shrug>
$$ ^.
$$ [GR _must_ ..a MUST.!!].
$$ What does "_must_" mean, [ He between his error-bars ] Tom?.
(Apeiron, Vol. 10, No. 1, January 2003 69
What the Global Positioning System Tells Us about the Twin's
Paradox, Tom Van Flandern).
That explains it -- you are quoting someone just as clueless
as yourself, from a "journal" that publishes most any nonsense.
<shrug> [He MUST a _must_ Roberts]
Tom [ He between his error-bars ] Roberts [
].
Re: Synchronized simultaneously different PRE-set tic readings.
.
