Science > Physics > Take the time rate out of the Equivalence Principle.
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Nick" |
| Date: |
03 Mar 2005 01:24:14 AM |
| Object: |
Take the time rate out of the Equivalence Principle. |
The EP is Einsteins version of acceleration described by
gravity. He compares an accelerating frame with an
object that has weight in gravity. In gravity's weight
nothings moving but it is equivalent to acceleration;
but it must be a timeless one because there is- no change in
motion through space - and therefore no rate is applicaple.
Take the time rate out of the Equivalence Principle.
It's sitting still in gravity that the equivalence principle describes.
Sitting still in gravity is weight.
That's my point. The equivalence of acceleration in gravity is
timeless. The time variable needs be removed because nothing is moving.
Weight is limited - mass and general acceleration gives gravity's
weight; not like weight of an accelerating(in space-time) object; rate
is valid there - so acceleration can be limitless.
Weight in gravity has a limit defined by a timeless acceleration.
Timeless acceleration is what gravity's weight is about.
Its the the Equivalence Principle made right.
Nothings moving therefore there can be no rate.
Mitch Raemsch
.
|
|
| User: "Morituri-|-Max" |
|
| Title: Re: Take the time rate out of the Equivalence Principle. |
03 Mar 2005 02:42:17 AM |
|
|
"Nick" <macromitch@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1109834654.357104.113170@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Nothings moving therefore there can be no rate.
Who exactly do you think you are confusing? The educated people here know
you are full of *****, so why don't you just keep your opinions to yourself?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Nick" |
|
| Title: Re: Take the time rate out of the Equivalence Principle. |
06 Mar 2005 12:20:18 AM |
|
|
No change of position in space.
No rate of change.
The EP is Einsteins version of acceleration described by
gravity. He compares an accelerating frame with an
object that has weight in gravity. In gravity's weight
nothings moving but it is equivalent to acceleration;
but it must be a timeless one because there is- no change in
motion through space - and therefore no rate is applicaple.
Take the time rate out of the Equivalence Principle.
It's sitting still in gravity that the equivalence principle describes.
Sitting still in gravity is weight.
That's my point. The equivalence of acceleration in gravity is
timeless. The time variable needs be removed because nothing is moving.
Weight is limited - mass and general acceleration gives gravity's
weight; not like weight of an accelerating(in space-time) object; rate
is valid there - so acceleration can be limitless.
Weight in gravity has a limit defined by a timeless acceleration.
Timeless acceleration is what gravity's weight is about.
Its the the Equivalence Principle made right.
Nothings moving therefore there can be no rate.
Mitch Raemsch - Light falls -
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: Take the time rate out of the Equivalence Principle. |
06 Mar 2005 01:24:56 PM |
|
|
Nick wrote:
No change of position in space.
No rate of change.
[snip crap]
*****. Lepton spin and spin flip. Leptons are point particles,
git.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: Take the time rate out of the Equivalence Principle. |
03 Mar 2005 10:09:53 AM |
|
|
Nick wrote:
[snip]
Weight is limited - mass and general acceleration gives gravity's
weight; not like weight of an accelerating(in space-time) object; rate
is valid there - so acceleration can be limitless.
[snip]
Ineducable idiot.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Gisse" |
|
| Title: Re: Take the time rate out of the Equivalence Principle. |
06 Mar 2005 01:29:44 PM |
|
|
Nick wrote:
[snip]
durr hurr equivlance principle hurr hurr time rate hurr *drool*
Your radio is set to "stupid", time to change the station. Seeing the
*SAME* inane uneducated ***** posted day after day grows tiresome.
Why don't you develop an interest in women or something to keep
yourself occupied?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Nick" |
|
| Title: Re: Take the time rate out of the Equivalence Principle. |
06 Mar 2005 11:41:31 PM |
|
|
Timeless acceleration Eric.
Take the time rate out of the equivalence principle.
No change in position, no time rate necesary.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Gisse" |
|
| Title: Re: Take the time rate out of the Equivalence Principle. |
07 Mar 2005 12:21:37 AM |
|
|
Nick wrote:
Timeless acceleration Eric.
Stupid *****.
acceleration is d^2x/dt^2.
Take the time rate out of the equivalence principle.
durr
No change in position, no time rate necesary.
durr hurr
.
|
|
|
| User: "Nick" |
|
| Title: Re: Take the time rate out of the Equivalence Principle. |
07 Mar 2005 12:53:32 AM |
|
|
Eric Gisse wrote:
Nick wrote:
Timeless acceleration Eric.
Stupid *****.
acceleration is d^2x/dt^2.
As you've said. That's for a change of motion in space.
But in gravity there is only an equivalence to acceleration -
no change in position - but there's weight.
No change in position, no change in motion,
no time rate necesary.
That's gravity.
Otherwise show me why a time rate would be necesary for weight in
gravity Eric.
Can you?
I don't think so.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Gisse" |
|
| Title: Re: Take the time rate out of the Equivalence Principle. |
07 Mar 2005 04:57:09 AM |
|
|
Nick wrote:
Eric Gisse wrote:
Nick wrote:
Timeless acceleration Eric.
Stupid *****.
acceleration is d^2x/dt^2.
As you've said. That's for a change of motion in space.
But in gravity there is only an equivalence to acceleration -
no change in position - but there's weight.
No change in position, no change in motion,
no time rate necesary.
Equivlance principle, numbnuts.
Backed by 400 years of experimental poking and prodding since Galileo
rolled ***** down an incline plane.
Don't like it? Find an experiment that can distinguish between
acceleration and gravity without breaking the rules of locality.
That's gravity.
Otherwise show me why a time rate would be necesary for weight in
gravity Eric.
F = ma
Can you?
I don't think so.
What you meant to say was "I don't think.", it explains you much more
nicely.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Take the time rate out of the Equivalence Principle. |
07 Mar 2005 05:28:43 PM |
|
|
No time rate in weight of gravity Eric.
It's timeless.
Objects that accelerate in space do have a rate of change.
Objects in gravity that don't move have weight without any time rate.
After all if they are not even moving why would you need a rate
of change?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
