Tatooine's Twin Suns Not So Far Fetched



 Science > Physics > Tatooine's Twin Suns Not So Far Fetched

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Sam Wormley"
Date: 30 Mar 2007 08:32:40 PM
Object: Tatooine's Twin Suns Not So Far Fetched
Tatooine's Twin Suns Not So Far Fetched
http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2007/330/2
By Phil Berardelli
ScienceNOW Daily News
30 March 2007
Who can forget the dramatic moment, early in the original Star Wars
film, when Luke Skywalker gazed wistfully at the twin setting suns on
his home planet of Tatooine? The image was so arresting that it didn't
seem to matter how fast and loose the story played with science. After
all, two stars so close together couldn't really support a stable
planetary system, right? Well, not so fast.
Astronomers using the Spitzer Space Telescope to survey the local
galactic neighborhood have found that binary star systems produce
protoplanetary disks--the necessary precursors for planet formation--at
least as often as single stars such as our sun. But that's only half
the story. It turns out that binary systems whose stars orbit very
close together are even more likely to harbor disks--and, potentially,
planets--than single-star systems. "There appears to be no bias against
having planetary system formation in binary systems," says team leader
David Trilling of the University of Arizona in Tucson. "There could be
countless planets out there with two or more suns."
See: http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2007/330/2
.

User: "Hondo"

Title: Re: Tatooine's Twin Suns Not So Far Fetched 01 Apr 2007 02:01:26 AM
Sam Wormley wrote:

Tatooine's Twin Suns Not So Far Fetched
http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2007/330/2

By Phil Berardelli
ScienceNOW Daily News
30 March 2007

Who can forget the dramatic moment, early in the original Star Wars
film, when Luke Skywalker gazed wistfully at the twin setting suns on
his home planet of Tatooine? The image was so arresting that it didn't
seem to matter how fast and loose the story played with science. After
all, two stars so close together couldn't really support a stable
planetary system, right? Well, not so fast.

Astronomers using the Spitzer Space Telescope to survey the local
galactic neighborhood have found that binary star systems produce
protoplanetary disks--the necessary precursors for planet formation--at
least as often as single stars such as our sun. But that's only half
the story. It turns out that binary systems whose stars orbit very
close together are even more likely to harbor disks--and, potentially,
planets--than single-star systems.

No surprise at all nut nice to have confirmed. More matter in the formative
cloud to make things with. Maybe that means the creatures have two brains
and four eyes. Sixteen times the number
of planets. Early inter-planetary confederacies with several planets in the
same system inhabited. 10,000 times the problems getting
along. ............ only kidding.
klm

"There appears to be no bias against
having planetary system formation in binary systems," says team leader
David Trilling of the University of Arizona in Tucson. "There could be
countless planets out there with two or more suns."

See: http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2007/330/2

.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
~ Demolition "squibs" observed far below "collapse" zone in Twin Towers~
AUSTRALIA SITUATION FAR WORSE THEN OFFICIALLY ADMITTED
How far Can A 100w Bulb be Seen in Space?
one day in a galaxy far far away...
About "Rockets not carrying fuel": how far does the shuttle deviate from its planned trajectory?
Far Object Visual Detection
How far does blood spray?
Your current Axiom bug list is far far too short to be trusted
"Near and Far Fields" Wiki project
Nikola Tesluman: His Lightning Staff & Far-Seeing Crystal Ball
evidence gathered so far that supports the Atom Totality theory and shows Big Bang to be a fake
Hitler Youth Buttons - Latin Cross patches can't be far behind...
deuterium [could be] far more abundant than previously estimated
Democrats lost FAR more than the election . . .
Are Quasars Really THAT Far Away?
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER