| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Jack Sarfatti" |
| Date: |
14 Feb 2004 06:05:48 PM |
| Object: |
Tea with Sarfatti |
Tea with Sarfatti at Kensington Palace Gardens
TS"As I recall, our discussion got around this difficulty in your model
by making dark matter things to be like bon-bons, with a w = -1 interior
and a surface coating of w = 0 stuff, so that your dark matter could act
cosmologically like w = 0."
Yes, exactly what I just said. Was that not your idea originally, or was
it mine?
TS: "Therefore, it seems to me to be misleading for you to say that DM
has w = -1 unless you go on to qualify the statement by saying that your
DM lives as bon-bon bits with outer coatings of w = 0 stuff"
Aha! I see. No your bon bon analogy is not needed at all. So the idea
was mine after all. I did not look closely enough at your wording! I
don’t need no w = 0 layer at the surface of the w = -1 glob. I don’t
need no damn bon bons! Who ordered that? Not me. Take it back, it ain’t
kosher. There is a fly in that soup. The proper distinction is
interior w = -1 mimics w = 0 when observed at a distance with light
signals or gravity waves or neutrinos or anything since gravity is
universal.
.
|
|
| User: "Secret Asian Man" |
|
| Title: Re: Tea with Sarfatti |
14 Feb 2004 10:32:39 PM |
|
|
"Jack Sarfatti" <sarfatti@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:wJyXb.23819$wL3.14123@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com...
Tea with Sarfatti at Kensington Palace Gardens
TS"As I recall, our discussion got around this difficulty in your model
by making dark matter things to be like bon-bons, with a w = -1 interior
and a surface coating of w = 0 stuff, so that your dark matter could act
cosmologically like w = 0."
Yes, exactly what I just said. Was that not your idea originally, or was
it mine?
TS: "Therefore, it seems to me to be misleading for you to say that DM
has w = -1 unless you go on to qualify the statement by saying that your
DM lives as bon-bon bits with outer coatings of w = 0 stuff"
Aha! I see. No your bon bon analogy is not needed at all. So the idea
was mine after all. I did not look closely enough at your wording! I
don’t need no w = 0 layer at the surface of the w = -1 glob. I don’t
need no damn bon bons! Who ordered that? Not me. Take it back, it ain’t
kosher. There is a fly in that soup.
Looks more like a hot, steaming bowl full of ***** to me, Jack. Better
ask the waiter to take it back to the kitchen before it stinks up the
restaurant.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "EjP" |
|
| Title: Re: Tea with Sarfatti |
15 Feb 2004 11:17:01 AM |
|
|
Jack Sarfatti wrote:
Tea with Sarfatti at Kensington Palace Gardens
TS"As I recall, our discussion got around this difficulty in your model
by making dark matter things to be like bon-bons, with a w = -1 interior
and a surface coating of w = 0 stuff, so that your dark matter could act
cosmologically like w = 0."
Yes, exactly what I just said. Was that not your idea originally, or was
it mine?
TS: "Therefore, it seems to me to be misleading for you to say that DM
has w = -1 unless you go on to qualify the statement by saying that your
DM lives as bon-bon bits with outer coatings of w = 0 stuff"
Aha! I see. No your bon bon analogy is not needed at all. So the idea
was mine after all. I did not look closely enough at your wording! I
don’t need no w = 0 layer at the surface of the w = -1 glob. I don’t
need no damn bon bons! Who ordered that? Not me. Take it back, it ain’t
kosher. There is a fly in that soup. The proper distinction is
interior w = -1 mimics w = 0 when observed at a distance with light
signals or gravity waves or neutrinos or anything since gravity is
universal.
So Sarfatti has graduated from having conversations with himself
to having tea with himself, I see.
-E
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gib Bogle" |
|
| Title: Re: Tea with Sarfatti |
15 Feb 2004 03:34:24 PM |
|
|
EjP wrote:
Jack Sarfatti wrote:
Tea with Sarfatti at Kensington Palace Gardens
So Sarfatti has graduated from having conversations with himself
to having tea with himself, I see.
Chatting himself up, as a prelude to going home and having sex with himself.
Gib
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Wilkins" |
|
| Title: Re: Tea with Sarfatti |
15 Feb 2004 05:31:34 PM |
|
|
Gib Bogle <bogle@too.much.spam.ihug.co.nz> wrote:
EjP wrote:
Jack Sarfatti wrote:
Tea with Sarfatti at Kensington Palace Gardens
So Sarfatti has graduated from having conversations with himself
to having tea with himself, I see.
Chatting himself up, as a prelude to going home and having sex with himself.
Isn't he worried about rejection?
--
John Wilkins
john_SPAM@wilkins.id.au http://wilkins.id.au
"Men mark it when they hit, but do not mark it when they miss"
- Francis Bacon
.
|
|
|
| User: "EjP" |
|
| Title: Re: Tea with Sarfatti |
16 Feb 2004 11:01:21 AM |
|
|
John Wilkins wrote:
Gib Bogle <bogle@too.much.spam.ihug.co.nz> wrote:
EjP wrote:
Jack Sarfatti wrote:
Tea with Sarfatti at Kensington Palace Gardens
So Sarfatti has graduated from having conversations with himself
to having tea with himself, I see.
Chatting himself up, as a prelude to going home and having sex with himself.
Isn't he worried about rejection?
I don't think there's any worry about that. He's his own biggest fan.
-E
.
|
|
|
| User: "Garrison Hilliard" |
|
| Title: Re: Tea with Sarfatti |
23 Feb 2004 03:36:38 PM |
|
|
EjP <nospam@hackers.are.bad> wrote in message news:<c0qstk$bop$1@info4.fnal.gov>...
Isn't he worried about rejection?
I don't think there's any worry about that. He's his own biggest fan.
He's his only fan.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
