Science > Physics > Ten rocket loads could supply all the energy needs of humankind for a year
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Habshi" |
| Date: |
13 Jul 2004 05:19:56 PM |
| Object: |
Ten rocket loads could supply all the energy needs of humankind for a year |
Apologies for the repeat post , I couldnt see my article as my
internet connection speed has decreased about a million fold .
As for Jim , he should keep his cool . My articles generate a
lot of interest and interesting comments and a lot of physics
explained eg 3ppm of sea water being uranium .
Wouldnt it be better to dig up the sea floor as the uranium
would have fallen and concentrated there much like the manganese
nodules. Btw I am no dumbo in physics , got a grade A in my A level
physics which is a lot tougher than university courses in USA.
.
|
|
| User: "Robin Hull" |
|
| Title: Re: Ten rocket loads could supply all the energy needs of humankind for a year |
14 Jul 2004 05:41:51 AM |
|
|
(Habshi) wrote in message news:<40f43f0c.203883@news.clara.net>...
Apologies for the repeat post , I couldnt see my article as my
internet connection speed has decreased about a million fold .
As for Jim , he should keep his cool . My articles generate a
lot of interest and interesting comments and a lot of physics
explained eg 3ppm of sea water being uranium .
Wouldnt it be better to dig up the sea floor as the uranium
would have fallen and concentrated there much like the manganese
nodules. Btw I am no dumbo in physics , got a grade A in my A level
physics which is a lot tougher than university courses in USA.
A level? That sounds British!
A levels only have one purpose. They are a ticket to the start of a
university course. If you are suggesting that US physics courses are
that inferior to the UK variety then you are on very shaky ground, and
I speak as a Brit.
The US didn't achieve its technological standing by teaching degree
courses to below UK sixth form level!
Robin.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Harry Conover" |
|
| Title: Re: Ten rocket loads could supply all the energy needs of humankind for a year |
14 Jul 2004 10:36:59 AM |
|
|
(Habshi) wrote in message news:<40f43f0c.203883@news.clara.net>...
Apologies for the repeat post , I couldnt see my article as my
internet connection speed has decreased about a million fold .
As for Jim , he should keep his cool . My articles generate a
lot of interest and interesting comments and a lot of physics
explained eg 3ppm of sea water being uranium .
Wouldnt it be better to dig up the sea floor as the uranium
would have fallen and concentrated there much like the manganese
nodules. Btw I am no dumbo in physics , got a grade A in my A level
physics which is a lot tougher than university courses in USA.
ROFL!
Harry C.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Parallax" |
|
| Title: Re: Ten rocket loads could supply all the energy needs of humankind for a year |
14 Jul 2004 04:54:55 PM |
|
|
(Harry Conover) wrote in message news:<7ce4e226.0407140736.56477bef@posting.google.com>...
habshi@anony.com (Habshi) wrote in message news:<40f43f0c.203883@news.clara.net>...
Apologies for the repeat post , I couldnt see my article as my
internet connection speed has decreased about a million fold .
As for Jim , he should keep his cool . My articles generate a
lot of interest and interesting comments and a lot of physics
explained eg 3ppm of sea water being uranium .
Wouldnt it be better to dig up the sea floor as the uranium
would have fallen and concentrated there much like the manganese
nodules. Btw I am no dumbo in physics , got a grade A in my A level
physics which is a lot tougher than university courses in USA.
ROFL!
Harry C.
I was not aware that fusion had achieved "break even". If it has,
habshi should post some info.
Furthermore, the density of He3 on the moons regolith is fairly low
and would require effectively stripmining enormous areas of the moon
for it.
Would the density of He3 be greater on Mercury?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: Ten rocket loads could supply all the energy needs of humankind fora year |
13 Jul 2004 06:00:10 PM |
|
|
Habshi wrote:
Apologies for the repeat post ,
[snip]
Commit suicide in compensation, idiot wog.
http://www.apa.org/journals/psp/psp7761121.html
http://insti.physics.sunysb.edu/~siegel/quack.html
<http://www.firehead.org/~jessh/film/kubrick/Kubrick-Psycho.html>
<http://www.naturalchild.com/elliott_barker/prisons.html>
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
