| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Y" |
| Date: |
03 May 2007 02:30:08 PM |
| Object: |
Testament to my Non-Arrogance. Golden Mean Time. |
I have suggested that a 'passage' of time does not exist.
If I see an experiment, where a radioactive element is portioned into
two where one is placed into a higher frame of inertia...
I will submit to my claim if there is a difference in the rate of
radio-active decay between one of the elements and restate that time
exists.
1. There is only ONE clock in the same room.
2. There are two portions of the same element as provided by nature.
3. All experiments are conducted under the strictest measures.
Furthermore, I will present to you with these experiments . . .
THE GOLDEN MEAN FOR TIME.
HOWEVER, ,
I will still only agree that the observations required of this
experiment existed in the expression of distance,
as well as the other things like volume and mass, 'rates' of decay,
velocity(ref: to Earth-clock), energy, momentum and inertia.
The reason I am suggesting the experiment is because I believe that a
clock might not be a strict experiment because of the possibility of
it causing separate energy transfer microcosms, which may have
disrupted the results in previous time dilation tests.
We all agree that uranium is NOT a model and that a clock is right ?
Here are the links to all that is placed by me on usenet. You will
need to read the posts placed in the relativity forum to understand my
position.
http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?enc_user=Gby1QBQAAACCrhtwZXeInl9GPRV-KexCOPANdqfI6prRsqjc7uCt1A
-y
.
|
|
| User: "Phineas T Puddleduck" |
|
| Title: Re: Testament to my Non-Arrogance. Golden Mean Time. |
03 May 2007 02:42:37 PM |
|
|
In article <1178220608.767736.110270@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> wrote:
We all agree that uranium is NOT a model and that a clock is right ?
Here are the links to all that is placed by me on usenet. You will
need to read the posts placed in the relativity forum to understand my
position.
Another loon
--
Sacred keeper of the Hollow Sphere, and the space within the Coffee Boy
singularity.
COOSN-174-07-82116: alt.astronomy's favourite poster (from a survey taken
of the saucerhead high command).
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Gisse" |
|
| Title: Re: Testament to my Non-Arrogance. Golden Mean Time. |
03 May 2007 02:54:11 PM |
|
|
On May 3, 12:30 pm, Y <yanar...@hotmail.com> wrote:
[...]
What makes you think we are interested in your medication-induced
drivel, nutter?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Y" |
|
| Title: Re: Testament to my Non-Arrogance. Golden Mean Time. |
03 May 2007 03:32:01 PM |
|
|
How can you be so sure of that if the result of the experiment is not
placed ? Will you apologise for your comment if the result is
placed ?
If the result is placed, I owe you an apology for wasting your 'time'.
-y
On May 4, 5:54 am, Eric Gisse <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 3, 12:30 pm, Y <yanar...@hotmail.com> wrote:
[...]
What makes you think we are interested in your medication-induced
drivel, nutter?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Phineas T Puddleduck" |
|
| Title: Re: Testament to my Non-Arrogance. Golden Mean Time. |
03 May 2007 03:44:14 PM |
|
|
In article <1178224321.354672.62530@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> wrote:
How can you be so sure of that if the result of the experiment is not
placed ? Will you apologise for your comment if the result is
placed ?
If the result is placed, I owe you an apology for wasting your 'time'.
Considering your lack of understanding on relativity, we won't hold our breath.
--
Sacred keeper of the Hollow Sphere, and the space within the Coffee Boy
singularity.
COOSN-174-07-82116: alt.astronomy's favourite poster (from a survey taken
of the saucerhead high command).
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Gisse" |
|
| Title: Re: Testament to my Non-Arrogance. Golden Mean Time. |
03 May 2007 09:23:04 PM |
|
|
On May 3, 1:32 pm, Y <yanar...@hotmail.com> wrote:
How can you be so sure of that if the result of the experiment is not
placed ? Will you apologise for your comment if the result is
placed ?
...because you are a top-posting idiot with not the faintest
understanding of physics.
[...]
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
