In article <1144918783.675222.192060@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
"Pentcho Valev" <pvalev@yahoo.com> wrote:
After 100 years of fierce worshipping the journal Nature changed its
attitude:
http://definefuture.buildtolearn.net/indetail.php?type=a&id=225
However the tests offered by Einstein's hypnotists create the
impression that only small details could be wrong whereas Einstein's
theory as a whole is correct. This cannot be true:
All the evidence says it is.
Einstein's theory is
based on the false postulate of constancy of the speed of light
Idiot alert!
and,
since the theory is DEDUCTIVE, it is ENTIRELY false.
Double-idiot alert!
Einstein was quite
clear about that - see Chapter 4 in Bryan Wallace's "The Farce of
Physics":
http://www.ekkehard-friebe.de/wallace.htm :
Albert Einstein :
"If the speed of light is the least bit affected by the speed of the
light source, then my whole theory of relativity and theory of gravity
is false."
So? If atoms don't exist, atomic theory is wrong.
Here is perhaps the easiest test that disproves relativity. When the
top of the tower emits light, the receiver on the ground receives this
light with a frequency
(1+phi/c^2)Fo = (c+v)/KLo
Yes, the wavelength changes.
where Fo and Lo are the initial frequency and wavelength respectively
and c+v is the speed of the light as measured by the receiver
(c=300000km/s). The couple
(1) v > 0 ; K = 1
acts like the face of Medusa the Gorgon: on seeing it Einsteinians get
petrified and remain so until the danger is over. The couple
(2) v = 0 ; K = 1/(1+phi/c^2)
also acts like the face of Medusa the Gorgon: even Einstein's zombies
feel that this value of K is too idiotic.
Clearly (1) is the correct answer: it disproves relativity.
Clearly you are either a fool or an idiot.
Pentcho Valev
.