Testing Times for Einstein's Theory



 Science > Physics > Testing Times for Einstein's Theory

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Pentcho Valev"
Date: 13 Apr 2006 03:59:43 AM
Object: Testing Times for Einstein's Theory
After 100 years of fierce worshipping the journal Nature changed its
attitude:
http://definefuture.buildtolearn.net/indetail.php?type=a&id=225
However the tests offered by Einstein's hypnotists create the
impression that only small details could be wrong whereas Einstein's
theory as a whole is correct. This cannot be true: Einstein's theory is
based on the false postulate of constancy of the speed of light and,
since the theory is DEDUCTIVE, it is ENTIRELY false. Einstein was quite
clear about that - see Chapter 4 in Bryan Wallace's "The Farce of
Physics":
http://www.ekkehard-friebe.de/wallace.htm :
Albert Einstein :
"If the speed of light is the least bit affected by the speed of the
light source, then my whole theory of relativity and theory of gravity
is false."
Here is perhaps the easiest test that disproves relativity. When the
top of the tower emits light, the receiver on the ground receives this
light with a frequency
(1+phi/c^2)Fo = (c+v)/KLo
where Fo and Lo are the initial frequency and wavelength respectively
and c+v is the speed of the light as measured by the receiver
(c=300000km/s). The couple
(1) v > 0 ; K = 1
acts like the face of Medusa the Gorgon: on seeing it Einsteinians get
petrified and remain so until the danger is over. The couple
(2) v = 0 ; K = 1/(1+phi/c^2)
also acts like the face of Medusa the Gorgon: even Einstein's zombies
feel that this value of K is too idiotic.
Clearly (1) is the correct answer: it disproves relativity.
Pentcho Valev
.

User: "Lloyd Parker"

Title: Re: Testing Times for Einstein's Theory 13 Apr 2006 04:22:37 AM
In article <1144918783.675222.192060@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
"Pentcho Valev" <pvalev@yahoo.com> wrote:

After 100 years of fierce worshipping the journal Nature changed its
attitude:

http://definefuture.buildtolearn.net/indetail.php?type=a&id=225

However the tests offered by Einstein's hypnotists create the
impression that only small details could be wrong whereas Einstein's
theory as a whole is correct. This cannot be true:

All the evidence says it is.

Einstein's theory is
based on the false postulate of constancy of the speed of light

Idiot alert!

and,
since the theory is DEDUCTIVE, it is ENTIRELY false.

Double-idiot alert!

Einstein was quite
clear about that - see Chapter 4 in Bryan Wallace's "The Farce of
Physics":

http://www.ekkehard-friebe.de/wallace.htm :

Albert Einstein :

"If the speed of light is the least bit affected by the speed of the
light source, then my whole theory of relativity and theory of gravity
is false."

So? If atoms don't exist, atomic theory is wrong.

Here is perhaps the easiest test that disproves relativity. When the
top of the tower emits light, the receiver on the ground receives this
light with a frequency

(1+phi/c^2)Fo = (c+v)/KLo

Yes, the wavelength changes.


where Fo and Lo are the initial frequency and wavelength respectively
and c+v is the speed of the light as measured by the receiver
(c=300000km/s). The couple

(1) v > 0 ; K = 1

acts like the face of Medusa the Gorgon: on seeing it Einsteinians get
petrified and remain so until the danger is over. The couple

(2) v = 0 ; K = 1/(1+phi/c^2)

also acts like the face of Medusa the Gorgon: even Einstein's zombies
feel that this value of K is too idiotic.

Clearly (1) is the correct answer: it disproves relativity.

Clearly you are either a fool or an idiot.


Pentcho Valev

.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
WHY EINSTEIN ABANDONED THE EMISSION THEORY
Poking at Einstein's theory because it is central to 21st-centuryphysics
What Was The Main Difficulty Einstein Faced When He Tried To Unify GR With Particle Theory?
EINSTEIN ABOUT STRING THEORY
Einstein's unified field theory
On the meaning of Einstein's General Theory of Relativity of Gravitation
VALIDITY OF EINSTEIN'S THEORY
Lamb shift ZPF cutoff and foundations of Einstein's theory of gravity
Moving Dimensions Theory Explains Away Einstein's Block Universe, Accounts for Action At A Distance, Unifies GR & SR With QM, and Renders String Theory Unnecessary http://physicsmathforums.com
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 66.0: Holes As Tearing Generate Mass in PI and Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Theory
Extending Einstein's Gravity Theory to Metric Engineering
HOW EINSTEIN STARTED THE ROT AND STRING THEORY AND MOTL
Moving Dimensions Theory--Not String Theory--Satisfies Einstein's Requirements for a Physical Theory
Einstein's Theory of Relativity as Inconsistency
Debunked by Proof: Einstein's Relativity Theory Is Wrong! - PROOF #1
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER