THE USENET STALKERAZZI



 Science > Physics > THE USENET STALKERAZZI

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  1   |  0


  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "George Hammond"
Date: 08 Feb 2007 09:56:28 PM
Object: THE USENET STALKERAZZI
==========NOTE:=======================
The following list has been culled from
off-topic, ad hominem, abusive messages
posted to Hammond's discussion of the
world's first scientific proof of God.
These people are considered by the
author to be a representative part of
THE USENET STALKERAZZI
people who use the internet for the
purposes of stalking and/or harassing
prominent scientists and intellectuals.
=====================================
STALKERAZZI killfile list:
TMG

Wake

ZenIsWhen here'slook...@youkid.com
Schornak

Stew Dean

Tom Capizzi

Dan Skunk

Toupin

Dudley

Mark Martin

Midjis

Cris Isham (sock puppet)
JohnM

Don Freeman

hanson

Cardinal Chunder

Michael Gray

Nosterill

Clive

Steve Ralph

Androcoles

Demosthenes

Zagan n...@jamesdunavant.comNOSPAM
Schoenfeld

A.Real

cirejcon

Murf

Loudermilk

ben

Jim Black

TomGee

Ken S. Tucker

Bilge

paranormal

Helmut Wabnig EmailAddress
Uncle Al

Bud

softrat

Peter Bowditch

chrisv chr...@nospam.invalid
John Baker

Bob Cain

Burgerman

francoistremblay

John Schutkeker

donstockbauer

Ian Smith

Dave

Turtoni turtoni@alt.philosophy
Brian Fletcher

Wizard of Odd

Not Martin Stone

??R.L.Measures

Roger Johansson"

Agent Smith

platopes

Jean-Paul Turcaud

Art Deco art_d...@127.0.0.1
Aratzio

odin

Woodchuck Bill

turtoni

Kadaitcha Man nos...@*****-off-and-die.com
Real Vote Ranger

raving.loonie

PJR

nightbat

Double-A

Fred Hall

Daedalus

John Henry

tinplated

J. Horta

Michael Baldwin Bruce

Mahatana ***** nos...@invalid.invalid
Kain Hifford kain.hiff...@rec.activism....
john_ramsden

jambaugh

The Ghost In The Machine

graham

euroxpoo

bartoszszczesny

xxein

±

Jeff_Rel

Nick

zzbunker

Pyriform

cl

Black Knight

ah

AcesLucky

sm00101010

Tim

ۥR.L.Measures

Bret Cahill

Desertphile

Robibnikoff"

quibbler

Sanity's little helper

Mani Deli

Christopher A. Lee

Pittsburgh Go@Steelers.com!
Bob Cain

Loki Loki

SleepyHeed

Cujo DeSockpuppet

explainer

Peter J Ross

Daedalus

Lizz Holmans

Lorrill Buyens

a_friend

Gary Eickmeier

goozlefotz

J notanymore
Josef Matz

JanPB

Hexenmeister

Kadaitcha Man <delete>
anonymous

Angle

Matt Giwer

Eric Gisse

Darkwing theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com
don stockbauer

Roy L. Fuchs

riplin

Sanity's Little Helper

David A. Smith N: dlzc1 D:cox T:net@nospam.com
Sean

Immortalist

Don H

Coin

CrankHater

user13

Errol

fadeToblack

Strife767

gigo448

Michael

Jens Tingleff

Sue

foolsrushin

opamp

navi-gater

Kaskir

Rat-zinger

jcon

Wordsmith

Roger Johansson

Errol


francoistremblay

kevirwin

rAgAv

Ronald 'More-More' Moshki

Tom McDonald

Sven Hesse

Dave

Samuel W. Heywood

Kevin S. Wilson

Otto Bahn

David DeLaney

Glenn Knickerbocker

Chris McGonnell

Dr. HotSalt

dogsnus

Android Cat

The Sorcerer Headmaster@hogwarts.physics
Ferrous Patella

tadchem

cactus

thorazineshuffle

Cameron

Phineas T PuddleDuck phineaspuddleduck@googlemail.com_NOSPAM
Android Cat

Tim Chmielewski

Paula

Matthew L. Martin

Dan Krueger

Wiblur the Once

Pastor Kutchie

Mark K. Bilbo alt-atheism@org.webmaster
Olrik

foolsrushin

Bretts the Baptist

The Rev Dr Hugh Jarse

TeaLady (Mari C.)

Albert van der Horst

ctyguy

Crank Hunter

Mark Edwards

Bretts the Baptist

Chris McGonnell

BusyGuy

Mr Baggins

Brian Fletcher

xxein

Bill Snyder

Masked Avenger

Randy Poe

GeekBoy

Sven Hesse

Marcus Denning

Gordon

jtem01

Bill Habr

Dan Fox

Sorcerer Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_a
visual word

G. L. Bradford

Ronald 'More-More' Moshki

Marco Licetti

Roy Schestowitz

N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) N: dlzc1 D:cox T:net@nospam.com
John Baker

PEER

Enkidu

Ben newsam

Wanker

Aaron

bob600

The Kat

puppet_sock

Richard Tobin

j

BruceS

Brian Gaff

chiron613

PD

Bill M

Tim

Lester Mosley

marika

Pangur Ban Pangur-Ban$@worldnet.att.net
John Blake

madMental

Randy

karandash

Ahmed Ouahi

Robibnikoff

J. Horta

Researcher

Pastor Kutchie

panamfloyd

darwinist

Al Klein rukbat@pern.invalid
...andnothingbut.. thetruth@sohelpm

Prai Jei

Norman Bates

Adam Funk

Robert Weldon

Yang, AthD (h.c) eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com
Rocket Scientist

Mucho Grande

d4

Pastor Kutchie

Leo Pardin

Paul Bunion

Autymn D. C.

n3v3r-0n-5und4y

Demon Lord of Confusion verwarring@verwirren.confused
The Demon Prince of Absurdity

========================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
========================================
.

User: "Clive - Selectron"

Title: Re: THE USENET STALKERAZZI 09 Feb 2007 07:27:57 AM
"George Hammond" <Nowhere1@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:mfqns2h4irbtr15k78rft6dvamq24duv1t@4ax.com...

==========NOTE:=======================
The following list has been culled from
off-topic, ad hominem, abusive messages
posted to Hammond's discussion of the
world's first scientific proof of God.
These people are considered by the
author to be a representative part of

THE USENET STALKERAZZI

people who use the internet for the
purposes of stalking and/or harassing
prominent scientists and intellectuals.

I don't see what your problem is as you
don't fit in either category...prominent or not.
BIG target tho.
You also have way too much time on your hands.
Please seek help.
Clive...proud to be on yer bastards list
.

User: "T Wake"

Title: Re: THE USENET STALKERAZZI 08 Feb 2007 10:41:47 PM
"George Hammond" <Nowhere1@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:mfqns2h4irbtr15k78rft6dvamq24duv1t@4ax.com...

==========NOTE:=======================
The following list has been culled from
off-topic, ad hominem, abusive messages
posted to Hammond's discussion of the
world's first scientific proof of God.
These people are considered by the
author to be a representative part of

THE USENET STALKERAZZI

people who use the internet for the
purposes of stalking and/or harassing
prominent scientists and intellectuals.
=====================================

STALKERAZZI killfile list:


TMG


Wake

George, what on Earth do I have to do to get promoted?
Is this no longer your imaginary killfile list?
.

User: "ZenIsWhen"

Title: Re: THE USENET STALKERAZZI 15 Feb 2007 10:49:22 AM
"George Hammond" <Nowhere1@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:mfqns2h4irbtr15k78rft6dvamq24duv1t@4ax.com...

==========NOTE:=======================
The following list has been culled from
off-topic, ad hominem, abusive messages
posted to Hammond's discussion of the
world's first scientific proof of God.
These people are considered by the
author to be a representative part of

THE USENET STALKERAZZI

people who use the internet for the
purposes of stalking and/or harassing
prominent scientists and intellectuals.
=====================================

STALKERAZZI killfile list:

AKA - the MANY peoplel that know that George is just an insane egomaniac.
.

User: "Enkidu"

Title: Re: THE USENET STALKERAZZI 10 Feb 2007 08:10:22 AM
George Hammond <Nowhere1@notspam.org> wrote in
news:mfqns2h4irbtr15k78rft6dvamq24duv1t@4ax.com:


STALKERAZZI killfile list:

You really ought to alphabetize that list, George.
--
Enkidu AA#2165
http://www.thoughts.leaddogs.org/
EAC Chaplain and ordained minister,
ULC, Modesto, CA
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
-- Carl Sagan
.

User: "Peter Bowditch"

Title: Re: THE USENET STALKERAZZI 08 Feb 2007 11:18:42 PM
George Hammond <Nowhere1@notspam.org> wrote:

==========NOTE:=======================
The following list has been culled from
off-topic, ad hominem, abusive messages
posted to Hammond's discussion of the
world's first scientific proof of God.
These people are considered by the
author to be a representative part of

THE USENET STALKERAZZI

people who use the internet for the
purposes of stalking and/or harassing
prominent scientists and intellectuals.
=====================================

STALKERAZZI killfile list:

Looks to me like the invitation list for a great party.



TMG


Wake

ZenIsWhen here'slook...@youkid.com
Schornak

Stew Dean

Tom Capizzi

Dan Skunk

Toupin

Dudley

Mark Martin

Midjis

Cris Isham (sock puppet)
JohnM

Don Freeman

hanson

Cardinal Chunder

Michael Gray

Nosterill

Clive

Steve Ralph

Androcoles

Demosthenes

Zagan n...@jamesdunavant.comNOSPAM
Schoenfeld

A.Real

cirejcon

Murf

Loudermilk

ben

Jim Black

TomGee

Ken S. Tucker

Bilge

paranormal

Helmut Wabnig EmailAddress
Uncle Al

Bud

softrat

Peter Bowditch

chrisv chr...@nospam.invalid
John Baker

Bob Cain

Burgerman

francoistremblay

John Schutkeker

donstockbauer

Ian Smith

Dave

Turtoni turtoni@alt.philosophy
Brian Fletcher

Wizard of Odd

Not Martin Stone

??R.L.Measures

Roger Johansson"

Agent Smith

platopes

Jean-Paul Turcaud

Art Deco art_d...@127.0.0.1
Aratzio

odin

Woodchuck Bill

turtoni

Kadaitcha Man nos...@*****-off-and-die.com
Real Vote Ranger

raving.loonie

PJR

nightbat

Double-A

Fred Hall

Daedalus

John Henry

tinplated

J. Horta

Michael Baldwin Bruce

Mahatana ***** nos...@invalid.invalid
Kain Hifford kain.hiff...@rec.activism....
john_ramsden

jambaugh

The Ghost In The Machine

graham

euroxpoo

bartoszszczesny

xxein

±

Jeff_Rel

Nick

zzbunker

Pyriform

cl

Black Knight

ah

AcesLucky

sm00101010

Tim

ۥR.L.Measures

Bret Cahill

Desertphile

Robibnikoff"

quibbler

Sanity's little helper

Mani Deli

Christopher A. Lee

Pittsburgh Go@Steelers.com!
Bob Cain

Loki Loki

SleepyHeed

Cujo DeSockpuppet

explainer

Peter J Ross

Daedalus

Lizz Holmans

Lorrill Buyens

a_friend

Gary Eickmeier

goozlefotz

J notanymore
Josef Matz

JanPB

Hexenmeister

Kadaitcha Man <delete>
anonymous

Angle

Matt Giwer

Eric Gisse

Darkwing theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com
don stockbauer

Roy L. Fuchs

riplin

Sanity's Little Helper

David A. Smith N: dlzc1 D:cox T:net@nospam.com
Sean

Immortalist

Don H

Coin

CrankHater

user13

Errol

fadeToblack

Strife767

gigo448

Michael

Jens Tingleff

Sue

foolsrushin

opamp

navi-gater

Kaskir

Rat-zinger

jcon

Wordsmith

Roger Johansson

Errol


francoistremblay

kevirwin

rAgAv

Ronald 'More-More' Moshki

Tom McDonald

Sven Hesse

Dave

Samuel W. Heywood

Kevin S. Wilson

Otto Bahn

David DeLaney

Glenn Knickerbocker

Chris McGonnell

Dr. HotSalt

dogsnus

Android Cat

The Sorcerer Headmaster@hogwarts.physics
Ferrous Patella

tadchem

cactus

thorazineshuffle

Cameron

Phineas T PuddleDuck phineaspuddleduck@googlemail.com_NOSPAM
Android Cat

Tim Chmielewski

Paula

Matthew L. Martin

Dan Krueger

Wiblur the Once

Pastor Kutchie

Mark K. Bilbo alt-atheism@org.webmaster
Olrik

foolsrushin

Bretts the Baptist

The Rev Dr Hugh Jarse

TeaLady (Mari C.)

Albert van der Horst

ctyguy

Crank Hunter

Mark Edwards

Bretts the Baptist

Chris McGonnell

BusyGuy

Mr Baggins

Brian Fletcher

xxein

Bill Snyder

Masked Avenger

Randy Poe

GeekBoy

Sven Hesse

Marcus Denning

Gordon

jtem01

Bill Habr

Dan Fox

Sorcerer Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_a
visual word

G. L. Bradford

Ronald 'More-More' Moshki

Marco Licetti

Roy Schestowitz

N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) N: dlzc1 D:cox T:net@nospam.com
John Baker

PEER

Enkidu

Ben newsam

Wanker

Aaron

bob600

The Kat

puppet_sock

Richard Tobin

j

BruceS

Brian Gaff

chiron613

PD

Bill M

Tim

Lester Mosley

marika

Pangur Ban Pangur-Ban$@worldnet.att.net
John Blake

madMental

Randy

karandash

Ahmed Ouahi

Robibnikoff

J. Horta

Researcher

Pastor Kutchie

panamfloyd

darwinist

Al Klein rukbat@pern.invalid
..andnothingbut.. thetruth@sohelpm

Prai Jei

Norman Bates

Adam Funk

Robert Weldon

Yang, AthD (h.c) eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com
Rocket Scientist

Mucho Grande

d4

Pastor Kutchie

Leo Pardin

Paul Bunion

Autymn D. C.

n3v3r-0n-5und4y

Demon Lord of Confusion verwarring@verwirren.confused
The Demon Prince of Absurdity



========================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
========================================

--
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
.

User: "Cardinal Chunder"

Title: Re: THE USENET STALKERAZZI 09 Feb 2007 03:48:14 AM
George Hammond wrote:

==========NOTE:=======================
The following list has been culled from
off-topic, ad hominem, abusive messages

Blah blah
I see your definition of "stalker" is anybody who responds to you in a
PUBLIC FORUM and points out the obvious inconsistencies in your work or
claims. Which just about describes anyone who even bothers to respond.
Yet there you are still bleating about your proof when there is a book
to be written. Surely you should be busying yourself writing your book
rather than whining about people you don't like on Usenet.
--
"Hello. I'm Leonard Nimoy. The following tale of alien encounters is
true. And by true, I mean false. It's all lies. But they're entertaining
lies. And in the end, isn't that the real truth? The answer is: No."
.
User: "Don Stockbauer"

Title: Re: THE USENET STALKERAZZI 09 Feb 2007 05:29:14 AM

"Hello. I'm Epimenides. The following tale of alien encounters is
true. And by true, I mean false. It's all lies. But they're entertaining
lies. And in the end, isn't that the real truth? The answer is: No."

No. The answer's "Yes".
.


User: "JJ"

Title: Re: THE USENET STALKERAZZI 12 Feb 2007 09:14:32 AM
George Hammond wrote:

==========NOTE:=======================
The following list has been culled from
off-topic, ad hominem, abusive messages
posted to Hammond's discussion of the
world's first scientific proof of God.
These people are considered by the
author to be a representative part of

One cannot be a martyr without a list of enemies.
.

User: "Eric Gisse"

Title: Re: THE USENET STALKERAZZI 08 Feb 2007 10:51:44 PM
On Feb 8, 6:56 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.org> wrote:
[...]
Why aren't you posting this to your own newsgroup, [Hammond] ?
.
User: ""

Title: Re: THE USENET STALKERAZZI 08 Feb 2007 11:00:10 PM
On Feb 9, 5:51 am, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Feb 8, 6:56 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.org> wrote:

[...]

Why aren't you posting this to your own newsgroup, [Hammond] ?

Because you are an idiot. Isn't that obvious?

I saw perpetual motion, and knew you were an idiot. Then I saw
magnets, and I figured out what kind of an idiot.

.
User: "T Wake"

Title: Re: THE USENET STALKERAZZI 09 Feb 2007 02:00:16 AM
<gdewilde@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1170997210.538337.121660@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

On Feb 9, 5:51 am, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Feb 8, 6:56 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.org> wrote:

[...]

Why aren't you posting this to your own newsgroup, [Hammond] ?


Because you are an idiot. Isn't that obvious?

I saw perpetual motion, and knew you were an idiot. Then I saw
magnets, and I figured out what kind of an idiot.



.

User: "T Wake"

Title: Re: THE USENET STALKERAZZI 09 Feb 2007 02:00:36 AM
<gdewilde@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1170997210.538337.121660@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

On Feb 9, 5:51 am, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Feb 8, 6:56 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.org> wrote:

[...]

Why aren't you posting this to your own newsgroup, [Hammond] ?


Because you are an idiot. Isn't that obvious?

I saw perpetual motion, and knew you were an idiot. Then I saw
magnets, and I figured out what kind of an idiot.


Aww, look. Eric has a new stalker.
.

User: "Eric Gisse"

Title: Re: THE USENET STALKERAZZI 08 Feb 2007 11:04:39 PM
On Feb 8, 8:00 pm, "gdewi...@gmail.com" <gdewi...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Feb 9, 5:51 am, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Feb 8, 6:56 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.org> wrote:


[...]


Why aren't you posting this to your own newsgroup, [Hammond] ?


Because you are an idiot. Isn't that obvious?

So where is your perpetual motion machine, hm?


I saw perpetual motion, and knew you were an idiot. Then I saw
magnets, and I figured out what kind of an idiot.

.
User: ""

Title: Re: THE USENET STALKERAZZI 08 Feb 2007 11:07:13 PM
On Feb 9, 6:04 am, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Feb 8, 8:00 pm, "gdewi...@gmail.com" <gdewi...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Feb 9, 5:51 am, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote:


On Feb 8, 6:56 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.org> wrote:


[...]


Why aren't you posting this to your own newsgroup, [Hammond] ?


Because you are an idiot. Isn't that obvious?


So where is your perpetual motion machine, hm?



I saw perpetual motion, and knew you were an idiot. Then I saw
magnets, and I figured out what kind of an idiot.

Lets just say that I prefer to be the overunity idiot.
You can play the stalker idiot.
This obviously makes me the better person here.
Clearly!
.




User: "JanPB"

Title: Re: THE USENET STALKERAZZI 10 Feb 2007 11:59:04 AM
On Feb 8, 7:56 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.org> wrote:

==========NOTE:=======================
The following list has been culled from
off-topic, ad hominem, abusive messages
posted to Hammond's discussion of the
world's first scientific proof of God.
These people are considered by the
author to be a representative part of

THE USENET STALKERAZZI

people who use the internet for the
purposes of stalking and/or harassing
prominent scientists and intellectuals.
=====================================

These are merely people who disagree with you. Nothing more sinister
than that (besides the usual Usenet over the top form of expression).
You've made a series of claims which are ridiculous and obviously
false. It is only natural that many people will object as such claims
are very easy to refute (easy topics always generate longest threads).
--
Jan Bielawski
.
User: "George Hammond"

Title: Re: THE USENET STALKERAZZI 10 Feb 2007 05:23:28 PM
On 10 Feb 2007 09:59:04 -0800, "JanPB" <filmart@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Feb 8, 7:56 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.org> wrote:

==========NOTE:=======================
The following list has been culled from
off-topic, ad hominem, abusive messages
posted to Hammond's discussion of the
world's first scientific proof of God.
These people are considered by the
author to be a representative part of

THE USENET STALKERAZZI

people who use the internet for the
purposes of stalking and/or harassing
prominent scientists and intellectuals.
=====================================


You've made a series of claims which are ridiculous and obviously
false.

[Hammond]
I'd like to see you prove that Stalkerazzi scum.
Lets see you disprove
J U S T O N E S T A T E M E N T
contained in the (peer-published) proof of God posted at:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/Hammond5s1.html
You're just a scum Stalkerazzi.
========================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
========================================
.
User: "T Wake"

Title: Re: THE USENET STALKERAZZI 10 Feb 2007 05:35:07 PM
"George Hammond" <Nowhere1@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:9ikss21uoen2eb6k4765nj5k63n1ofksrv@4ax.com...

On 10 Feb 2007 09:59:04 -0800, "JanPB" <filmart@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Feb 8, 7:56 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.org> wrote:

==========NOTE:=======================
The following list has been culled from
off-topic, ad hominem, abusive messages
posted to Hammond's discussion of the
world's first scientific proof of God.
These people are considered by the
author to be a representative part of

THE USENET STALKERAZZI

people who use the internet for the
purposes of stalking and/or harassing
prominent scientists and intellectuals.
=====================================



You've made a series of claims which are ridiculous and obviously
false.


[Hammond]
I'd like to see you prove that Stalkerazzi scum.

Oh, george, you and your logical fallacies.
.

User: "JanPB"

Title: Re: THE USENET STALKERAZZI 10 Feb 2007 08:12:09 PM
On Feb 10, 3:23 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.org> wrote:

On 10 Feb 2007 09:59:04 -0800, "JanPB" <film...@gmail.com>
wrote:



On Feb 8, 7:56 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.org> wrote:

==========NOTE:=======================
The following list has been culled from
off-topic, ad hominem, abusive messages
posted to Hammond's discussion of the
world's first scientific proof of God.
These people are considered by the
author to be a representative part of


THE USENET STALKERAZZI


people who use the internet for the
purposes of stalking and/or harassing
prominent scientists and intellectuals.
=====================================


You've made a series of claims which are ridiculous and obviously
false.


[Hammond]
I'd like to see you prove that Stalkerazzi scum.

Lets see you disprove
J U S T O N E S T A T E M E N T
contained in the (peer-published) proof of God posted at:

As I said earlier, it is up to the person making claims to back them
up. Your predicament is that the claims you make are IN PRINCIPLE not
amenable to the scientific method.
--
Jan Bielawski
.
User: "George Hammond"

Title: Re: THE USENET STALKERAZZI 10 Feb 2007 08:39:36 PM
On 10 Feb 2007 18:12:09 -0800, "JanPB" <filmart@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Feb 10, 3:23 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.org> wrote:

On 10 Feb 2007 09:59:04 -0800, "JanPB" <film...@gmail.com>
wrote:



On Feb 8, 7:56 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.org> wrote:

==========NOTE:=======================
The following list has been culled from
off-topic, ad hominem, abusive messages
posted to Hammond's discussion of the
world's first scientific proof of God.
These people are considered by the
author to be a representative part of


THE USENET STALKERAZZI


people who use the internet for the
purposes of stalking and/or harassing
prominent scientists and intellectuals.
=====================================


You've made a series of claims which are ridiculous and obviously
false.


[Hammond]
I'd like to see you prove that Stalkerazzi scum.

Lets see you disprove
J U S T O N E S T A T E M E N T
contained in the (peer-published) proof of God posted at:


As I said earlier, it is up to the person making claims to back them
up.

[Hammond]
What claims... you're too stupid to even know what claims
I've made.

Your predicament is that the claims you make are IN PRINCIPLE not
amenable to the scientific method.

[Hammond]
You're predicament is you don't even know WHAT CLAIMS you're
talking about because you're too uneducated to even READ the
theory.
Psychophantic Stalkerazzi imbecile.
========================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
========================================
.
User: "ZenIsWhen"

Title: Re: THE USENET STALKERAZZI 15 Feb 2007 10:58:15 AM
"George Hammond" <Nowhere1@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:080ts2tcqe4ljuqitrlscpk2qi12a3drdm@4ax.com...

On 10 Feb 2007 18:12:09 -0800, "JanPB" <filmart@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Feb 10, 3:23 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.org> wrote:

On 10 Feb 2007 09:59:04 -0800, "JanPB" <film...@gmail.com>
wrote:



On Feb 8, 7:56 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.org> wrote:

==========NOTE:=======================
The following list has been culled from
off-topic, ad hominem, abusive messages
posted to Hammond's discussion of the
world's first scientific proof of God.
These people are considered by the
author to be a representative part of


THE USENET STALKERAZZI


people who use the internet for the
purposes of stalking and/or harassing
prominent scientists and intellectuals.
=====================================


You've made a series of claims which are ridiculous and obviously
false.


[Hammond]
I'd like to see you prove that Stalkerazzi scum.

Lets see you disprove
J U S T O N E S T A T E M E N T
contained in the (peer-published) proof of God posted at:


As I said earlier, it is up to the person making claims to back them
up.


[Hammond]
What claims... you're too stupid to even know what claims
I've made.


Your predicament is that the claims you make are IN PRINCIPLE not
amenable to the scientific method.


[Hammond]
You're predicament is you don't even know WHAT CLAIMS you're
talking about because you're too uneducated to even READ the
theory.

Psychophantic Stalkerazzi imbecile.

IOW - you HAVE no support for ANY of your claims.
That's why you completely ignore the premis that YOU must support YOUR
claims, and not demand others rebut them.
*******************
Either way .....
The foundation ..... mankind has grown, in size, over the centuries.
A known fact.
CLAIM ..... it means that mankind has never been "fully grown".
Mankind has ALWAYS been fully grown.
They were not "partial" human beings.
The facts, IN NO WAY support the claim!
.
User: "Bob Casanova"

Title: Re: THE USENET STALKERAZZI 15 Feb 2007 02:49:25 PM
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:58:15 GMT, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by "ZenIsWhen"
<onesmallstep@verizon.net>:

"George Hammond" <Nowhere1@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:080ts2tcqe4ljuqitrlscpk2qi12a3drdm@4ax.com...

On 10 Feb 2007 18:12:09 -0800, "JanPB" <filmart@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Feb 10, 3:23 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.org> wrote:

On 10 Feb 2007 09:59:04 -0800, "JanPB" <film...@gmail.com>
wrote:

<snip>

You've made a series of claims which are ridiculous and obviously
false.

[Hammond]
I'd like to see you prove that Stalkerazzi scum.

Lets see you disprove
J U S T O N E S T A T E M E N T
contained in the (peer-published) proof of God posted at:

As I said earlier, it is up to the person making claims to back them
up.

[Hammond]
What claims... you're too stupid to even know what claims
I've made.

Your predicament is that the claims you make are IN PRINCIPLE not
amenable to the scientific method.

[Hammond]
You're predicament is you don't even know WHAT CLAIMS you're
talking about because you're too uneducated to even READ the
theory.

Psychophantic Stalkerazzi imbecile.

IOW - you HAVE no support for ANY of your claims.
That's why you completely ignore the premis that YOU must support YOUR
claims, and not demand others rebut them.

*******************
Either way .....
The foundation ..... mankind has grown, in size, over the centuries.
A known fact.

CLAIM ..... it means that mankind has never been "fully grown".

Mankind has ALWAYS been fully grown.
They were not "partial" human beings.

The facts, IN NO WAY support the claim!

You're pissing into the wind; egomaniacs *never* admit to
error of any sort.
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
.






User: "Bill Snyder"

Title: Re: THE USENET STALKERAZZI 08 Feb 2007 11:26:23 PM
On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 03:56:28 GMT, George Hammond
<Nowhere1@notspam.org> wrote:

==========NOTE:=======================
The following list has been culled from
off-topic, ad hominem, abusive messages
posted to Hammond's discussion of the
world's first scientific proof of God.
These people are considered by the
author to be a representative part of

THE USENET STALKERAZZI

people who use the internet for the
purposes of stalking and/or harassing
prominent scientists and intellectuals.

Do you actually know any prominent scientists or intellectuals? If
so, do they admit to knowing you?
--
Bill Snyder [This space unintentionally left blank.]
.
User: ""

Title: Re: THE USENET STALKERAZZI 09 Feb 2007 12:00:10 AM
On Feb 9, 6:26 am, Bill Snyder <bsny...@airmail.net> wrote:

On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 03:56:28 GMT, George Hammond

<Nowhe...@notspam.org> wrote:

==========NOTE:=======================
The following list has been culled from
off-topic, ad hominem, abusive messages
posted to Hammond's discussion of the
world's first scientific proof of God.
These people are considered by the
author to be a representative part of


THE USENET STALKERAZZI


people who use the internet for the
purposes of stalking and/or harassing
prominent scientists and intellectuals.


Do you actually know any prominent scientists or intellectuals? If
so, do they admit to knowing you?

--
Bill Snyder [This space unintentionally left blank.]

poor bill also got exposed. lol
On Feb 9, 5:59 am, Bill Snyder <bsny...@airmail.net> wrote:

On 8 Feb 2007 20:53:36 -0800, "gdewi...@gmail.com"

<gdewi...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Feb 9, 5:29 am, Bill Snyder <bsny...@airmail.net> wrote:

On 8 Feb 2007 17:04:43 -0800, "gdewi...@gmail.com"


<gdewi...@gmail.com> wrote:

Point me at the exact point where the theory is wrong.


you really do have to accept my theory if you cant disprove it.


That's how things work.


Wrong, fucktard.


Such bad language. I didn't read the rest, hope you don't mind.


Mommy got mad and refused to read those bad words to you, did she?

--
Bill Snyder [This space unintentionally left blank.]

what is a fucktard anyway?
.
User: "T Wake"

Title: Re: THE USENET STALKERAZZI 09 Feb 2007 02:02:00 AM
<gdewilde@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1171000810.054248.157680@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com...


poor bill also got exposed. lol

Are you cheating on Eric now? Shame on you.
.
User: ""

Title: Re: THE USENET STALKERAZZI 09 Feb 2007 04:08:21 AM
On Feb 9, 9:02 am, "T Wake" <usenet.es...@gishpuppy.com> wrote:

<gdewi...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:1171000810.054248.157680@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com...

poor bill also got exposed. lol


Are you cheating on Eric now? Shame on you.

Nah, both idiots wrote a review about the author of a website they
didn't even bother to look at.
http://gabydewilde.googlepages.com/magnetmotor
The painful reality of perpetual motion sure makes em scream like half
eaten babies.
You just got to love their whining.
booo-hooo hahahahaha
back to the xbox kids!
.
User: "T Wake"

Title: Re: THE USENET STALKERAZZI 09 Feb 2007 08:37:13 AM
<gdewilde@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1171015701.029059.155070@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

On Feb 9, 9:02 am, "T Wake" <usenet.es...@gishpuppy.com> wrote:

<gdewi...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:1171000810.054248.157680@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com...

poor bill also got exposed. lol


Are you cheating on Eric now? Shame on you.


Nah, both idiots wrote a review about the author of a website they
didn't even bother to look at.

http://gabydewilde.googlepages.com/magnetmotor

The painful reality of perpetual motion sure makes em scream like half
eaten babies.

So you have created perpetual motion device. Excellent. Good for you.
Damn those laws of thermodynamics.

You just got to love their whining.

booo-hooo hahahahaha

back to the xbox kids!

Yeah, so now you have your "perpetual motion device" why don't you spend
less time in the newsgroups and more time providing free energy for the
planet.
.
User: "Ben Newsam"

Title: Re: THE USENET STALKERAZZI 09 Feb 2007 09:21:45 AM
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 14:37:13 -0000, "T Wake"
<usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> wrote:

Yeah, so now you have your "perpetual motion device" why don't you spend
less time in the newsgroups and more time providing free energy for the
planet.

Oh, it won't be free, he'll be charging us billions for the privilege
of using his invention.
.
User: "T Wake"

Title: Re: THE USENET STALKERAZZI 09 Feb 2007 10:37:08 AM
"Ben Newsam" <ben.newsam@ukonline.co.uk> wrote in message
news:ra4ps21bkrec94aqnbi5t93lm3ohk5ojok@4ax.com...

On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 14:37:13 -0000, "T Wake"
<usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> wrote:

Yeah, so now you have your "perpetual motion device" why don't you spend
less time in the newsgroups and more time providing free energy for the
planet.


Oh, it won't be free, he'll be charging us billions for the privilege
of using his invention.

Very true.
.
User: "Bill Snyder"

Title: Re: THE USENET STALKERAZZI 09 Feb 2007 10:40:12 AM
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 16:37:08 -0000, "T Wake"
<usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> wrote:


"Ben Newsam" <ben.newsam@ukonline.co.uk> wrote in message
news:ra4ps21bkrec94aqnbi5t93lm3ohk5ojok@4ax.com...

On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 14:37:13 -0000, "T Wake"
<usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> wrote:

Yeah, so now you have your "perpetual motion device" why don't you spend
less time in the newsgroups and more time providing free energy for the
planet.


Oh, it won't be free, he'll be charging us billions for the privilege
of using his invention.


Very true.

Maybe Jeff_Relf could market it for him, after he posts the required
security deposit, of course.
--
Bill Snyder [This space unintentionally left blank.]
.


User: ""

Title: Re: THE USENET STALKERAZZI 10 Feb 2007 08:49:11 PM
On Feb 9, 4:21 pm, Ben Newsam <ben.new...@ukonline.co.uk> wrote:

On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 14:37:13 -0000, "T Wake"

<usenet.es...@gishpuppy.com> wrote:

Yeah, so now you have your "perpetual motion device" why don't you spend
less time in the newsgroups and more time providing free energy for the
planet.


Oh, it won't be free, he'll be charging us billions for the privilege
of using his invention.

Not at all,
I give it away for free.
Holy macaroni!
Damn what a nice guy I am?
If you would replace the primary magnets with a coil and in stead of
pointing it at the rest of the apparatus wind the coil around the
secondary setup you would have created the Joseph Muller device. This
in fact is 2 times as efficient as mine is with a single primary disk
but mine has the option to insert more primary disks and is 100% magno-
mechanical.
here is the link again:
http://gabydewilde.googlepages.com/magnetmotor
.








  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 


Related Articles