| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Jeff Relf" |
| Date: |
20 Sep 2004 09:12:53 AM |
| Object: |
The 10 most popular people in Sci.Physics. |
Here are the 10 most popular people in Sci.Physics,
ranked by the replies they have received
( the number on left ).
In compiling these statistics,
absolutely no one was excluded for any reason.
But people using multiple servers or newsreaders
have multiple entries.
Each person's list of titles includes their most recent post,
followed by up to 9 of their titles
that didn't start with " Re ".
The last 2,000 messages, ~ 5 days, were used
as of 7:09 AM today, Monday, Seattle time.
86 Bjoern Feuerbacher, Uni-Heidelberg.DE, Mozilla/5.0
Re: what's the matter?
47 God in a Box, Alt.NET, Xnews/5.04.25
Re: The Best Pro-757 Argument Ever
Dave Monroe - Usenet Tough Guy
757: Squawk! Squawk! Squawk!
The Best Pro-757 Argument Ever
Would you morons keep this ***** out of sci.physics?
Magic 757 Dust
Bush Behind 9/11 - Proof - Bob Dole's Ex Chief of Staff
Spnak was Re: Lensman Caught Lying Again
Three People Agree: A 757 Definitely Hit The Pentagon
Any legitimate physics expert has better things to do th
44 Nth Complexity, Superfeed.NET, newsSync
re:Relativity is a nonmathematical nontheory
Relativity is a nonmathematical nontheory
Laughing Out Loud!!
No Verbal Diarrhea, Please!
This Might Be Too Hard For You ...
Einstein wins 3 more crackpot points
They emit photons? How ridiculous!
answer _THIS_, relativists
Destroying Relativity
41 Jeff Relf, Uni-Berlin.DE, X
The evolution of languages.
Win XP is far more serious.
Win XP is thee True standard.
Bailo's idealism knows no bounds.
Get real.
I don't have the patience.
Following the U.S.'s lead.
X.CPP, my hand-rolled newsreader.
The desktop of your average bureaucrat.
Gisse's newsreader configuration problems.
29 Ken S. Tucker, Google.COM,
Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relati
GR assumptions and Schwarz. solution problem (kst)
29 Henri Wilson, 93KQ Net.AU, Forte Free
Re: GPS versus source dependency / ballistic theory
26 Mike, Google.COM,
Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relati
26 Benign Vanilla, Uni-Berlin.DE,
Re: FBI Confiscated Unreleased Pentagon Footage
25 Sam Wormley, 93KQ Att.NET, Mozilla/5.0
Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed
Sunlight Speckle
Extreme Impersonations: Frigid atomic clouds mimic . . .
Antenna to catch visible light
What's New by Bob Park -- Friday, September 17, 2004
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 701 September 17, 2004 by
Microscope focuses on sub-Angstrom scales
Microscope focuses on sub-Angstrom scales
nanometre-sized electromechanical resonator capable of d
Scientists in the US have witnessed the production of me
25 Y.Porat, Google.COM,
Re: forced vibration question
.
|
|
| User: "Captain Culture" |
|
| Title: Re: The 10 most popular people in Sci.Physics. |
21 Sep 2004 12:56:25 AM |
|
|
Hi Jeff Relf!
You is still a fucking idiots!
"Jeff Relf" <Usenet_2_@JeffRelf.Cotse.NET> wrote in message
news:_Jeff_Relf_2004_Sep_20_P7mu@Cotse.NET...
Here are the 10 most popular people in Sci.Physics,
ranked by the replies they have received
( the number on left ).
In compiling these statistics,
absolutely no one was excluded for any reason.
But people using multiple servers or newsreaders
have multiple entries.
Each person's list of titles includes their most recent post,
followed by up to 9 of their titles
that didn't start with " Re ".
The last 2,000 messages, ~ 5 days, were used
as of 7:09 AM today, Monday, Seattle time.
86 Bjoern Feuerbacher, Uni-Heidelberg.DE, Mozilla/5.0
Re: what's the matter?
47 God in a Box, Alt.NET, Xnews/5.04.25
Re: The Best Pro-757 Argument Ever
Dave Monroe - Usenet Tough Guy
757: Squawk! Squawk! Squawk!
The Best Pro-757 Argument Ever
Would you morons keep this ***** out of sci.physics?
Magic 757 Dust
Bush Behind 9/11 - Proof - Bob Dole's Ex Chief of Staff
Spnak was Re: Lensman Caught Lying Again
Three People Agree: A 757 Definitely Hit The Pentagon
Any legitimate physics expert has better things to do th
44 Nth Complexity, Superfeed.NET, newsSync
re:Relativity is a nonmathematical nontheory
Relativity is a nonmathematical nontheory
Laughing Out Loud!!
No Verbal Diarrhea, Please!
This Might Be Too Hard For You ...
Einstein wins 3 more crackpot points
They emit photons? How ridiculous!
answer _THIS_, relativists
Destroying Relativity
41 Jeff Relf, Uni-Berlin.DE, X
The evolution of languages.
Win XP is far more serious.
Win XP is thee True standard.
Bailo's idealism knows no bounds.
Get real.
I don't have the patience.
Following the U.S.'s lead.
X.CPP, my hand-rolled newsreader.
The desktop of your average bureaucrat.
Gisse's newsreader configuration problems.
29 Ken S. Tucker, Google.COM,
Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relati
GR assumptions and Schwarz. solution problem (kst)
29 Henri Wilson, 93KQ Net.AU, Forte Free
Re: GPS versus source dependency / ballistic theory
26 Mike, Google.COM,
Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relati
26 Benign Vanilla, Uni-Berlin.DE,
Re: FBI Confiscated Unreleased Pentagon Footage
25 Sam Wormley, 93KQ Att.NET, Mozilla/5.0
Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed
Sunlight Speckle
Extreme Impersonations: Frigid atomic clouds mimic . . .
Antenna to catch visible light
What's New by Bob Park -- Friday, September 17, 2004
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 701 September 17, 2004 by
Microscope focuses on sub-Angstrom scales
Microscope focuses on sub-Angstrom scales
nanometre-sized electromechanical resonator capable of d
Scientists in the US have witnessed the production of me
25 Y.Porat, Google.COM,
Re: forced vibration question
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Morituri-Max" |
|
| Title: Re: The 10 most popular people in Sci.Physics. |
22 Sep 2004 05:42:30 AM |
|
|
Jeff Relf wrote:
Here are the 10 most popular people in Sci.Physics,
ranked by the replies they have received
( the number on left ).
In compiling these statistics,
absolutely no one was excluded for any reason.
You also seem to have a unique defintion of what makes someone popular.. since
these are merely posts by said people and not demands by others requesting they
post, then it follows that your "data" has no relation between popularity and
volume of post.
.
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|