| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Nick" |
| Date: |
26 Mar 2005 12:24:35 AM |
| Object: |
The Aether Paradigm |
"The Aether is beyond any physical concept."
Where is God?
Inside you.
The Aether is also inside you.
Mitch -- Gravity is a Continuum --
.
|
|
| User: "Nick" |
|
| Title: Re: The Aether Paradigm |
28 Mar 2005 11:00:42 PM |
|
|
Nick wrote:
"The Aether is beyond any physical concept."
Where is God?
Inside you.
The Aether is also inside you.
There is something moving over the entire universe
sustaining it.
Aether is just another name for time which is sustaining
everything in its own motion.
Mitch -- Gravity is a Continuum --
.
|
|
|
| User: "Morituri-|-Max" |
|
| Title: Re: The Aether Paradigm |
29 Mar 2005 01:55:00 AM |
|
|
"Nick" <macromitch@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1112072442.147260.54460@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Aether is just another name for time which is sustaining
everything in its own motion.
Show the math, not the diahrrea that dribbles out of your mouth.
.
|
|
|
| User: "mountain man" |
|
| Title: Re: The Aether Paradigm |
29 Mar 2005 08:13:14 AM |
|
|
"Morituri-|-Max" <newage@sendarico.net> wrote in message
news:oR72e.41458$Ux.37825@tornado.texas.rr.com...
"Nick" <macromitch@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1112072442.147260.54460@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Aether is just another name for time which is sustaining
everything in its own motion.
Show the math, not the diahrrea that dribbles out of your mouth.
physics/0309016
Title: Quantum-Foam In-Flow Theory of Gravity and the Global Positioning
System (GPS)
Authors: Reginald T. Cahill (Flinders University)
Comments: 34 pages, 1 eps figure. In-flow theory now generalised
Subj-class: General Physics
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Martin" |
|
| Title: Re: The Aether Paradigm |
26 Mar 2005 08:05:49 PM |
|
|
Nick wrote:
"The Aether is beyond any physical concept."
Where is God?
Inside you.
The Aether is also inside you.
Ahhh... So you're a Hammondonian!
-Mark Martin
.
|
|
|
| User: "Nick" |
|
| Title: Re: The Aether Paradigm |
26 Mar 2005 08:41:42 PM |
|
|
That guy Mark?
Why should I believe what he has to say?
Like I told him "How do I know what you
say is right if I don't already know it for
myself?"
Tut. Tut.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Martin" |
|
| Title: Re: The Aether Paradigm |
26 Mar 2005 09:28:35 PM |
|
|
Nick wrote:
That guy Mark?
Why should I believe what he has to say?
Like I told him "How do I know what you
say is right if I don't already know it for
myself?"
Tut. Tut.
You DON'T know if I'm right 'til you you know it yourelf. But I know
what I know, and if you say things I'm sure are incorrect, then I'm
just liable to say so, just as you do.
-Mark Martin
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "robert j. kolker" |
|
| Title: Re: The Aether Paradigm |
26 Mar 2005 06:03:13 AM |
|
|
Nick wrote:
"The Aether is beyond any physical concept."
Where is God?
Inside you.
The Aether is also inside you.
Mitch -- Gravity is a Continuum --
What aether? Where aether?
Bob Kolker
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "RP" |
|
| Title: Re: The Aether Paradigm |
26 Mar 2005 02:18:37 AM |
|
|
Nick wrote:
"The Aether is beyond any physical concept."
Where is God?
Inside you.
The Aether is also inside you.
Mitch -- Gravity is a Continuum --
Yes, both of these words are floating around inside my head, and seem
content to correspond to "Personality flaws" stored in the file marked
Synonyms_for_brain_deficit.guv, with regards to G. Hammond.
Richard Perry
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The Aether Paradigm |
26 Mar 2005 09:59:33 AM |
|
|
Nick wrote:
"The Aether is beyond any physical concept."
What does that statement mean?
Patrick
.
|
|
|
| User: "robert j. kolker" |
|
| Title: Re: The Aether Paradigm |
26 Mar 2005 11:39:34 AM |
|
|
wrote:
Nick wrote:
"The Aether is beyond any physical concept."
What does that statement mean?
He means Aether is the Spirit of God. Why not? Newton declared that
space is the sensorium of God.
Bob Kolker
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Ghost In The Machine" |
|
| Title: Re: The Aether Paradigm |
26 Mar 2005 01:00:04 PM |
|
|
In sci.physics,
<>
wrote
on 26 Mar 2005 07:59:33 -0800
<1111852773.567790.17260@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>:
Nick wrote:
"The Aether is beyond any physical concept."
What does that statement mean?
Patrick
It probably means someone's not done his homework again.
Without physical verification all the math in the world
won't do much.
SR/GR has been verified (I can't say "proven" for various
reasons) a large number of times. Aether has been
discredited, mostly by the MMX experiment but also by a
fair number of other experiments, which show the aether
as being generally unnecessary.
Is there a better theory? Good question. For now, SR/GR
is sufficient, and c'=c+v, aka emissive/ballistic theory,
need not apply.
--
#191,
It's still legal to go .sigless.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gerald L. OBarr" |
|
| Title: Re: The Aether Paradigm |
26 Mar 2005 05:51:47 PM |
|
|
The Ghost In The Machine <e...@sirius.athghost7038suus.net> wrote:
. . .
<deletes by O'Barr>
The Ghost In The Machine wrote: . . .
Aether has been discredited, mostly by the MMX experiment ....
. . . .
Gerald L. O'Barr <globarr...@yahoo.com> comments:
And is everyone going to let this go with no comments?
Thanks for not responding to this?
Gerald L. O'Barr <globarr...@yahoo.com>
+ Remove 3 dots for e-mail
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The Aether Paradigm |
26 Mar 2005 05:09:42 PM |
|
|
The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
In sci.physics,
<>
wrote
on 26 Mar 2005 07:59:33 -0800
<1111852773.567790.17260@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>:
Nick wrote:
"The Aether is beyond any physical concept."
What does that statement mean?
Patrick
It probably means someone's not done his homework again.
Without physical verification all the math in the world
won't do much.
But the only thing you can verify of a theory are its predictions. Mere
"meter readings."
Patrick
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Ghost In The Machine" |
|
| Title: Re: The Aether Paradigm |
27 Mar 2005 06:00:05 AM |
|
|
In sci.physics,
<>
wrote
on 26 Mar 2005 15:09:42 -0800
<1111878582.390688.138540@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>:
The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
In sci.physics,
<>
wrote
on 26 Mar 2005 07:59:33 -0800
<1111852773.567790.17260@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>:
Nick wrote:
"The Aether is beyond any physical concept."
What does that statement mean?
Patrick
It probably means someone's not done his homework again.
Without physical verification all the math in the world
won't do much.
But the only thing you can verify of a theory are
its predictions. Mere "meter readings."
What else should physics try to explain? And there are lots
of meters out there -- some of them attached to spacecraft
to determine how fast they go. :-)
Patrick
--
#191,
It's still legal to go .sigless.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: The Aether Paradigm |
26 Mar 2005 02:53:56 PM |
|
|
Nick wrote:
[snip crap]
FOAD
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Stowe" |
|
| Title: Re: The Aether Paradigm |
26 Mar 2005 04:39:40 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 12:53:56 -0800, Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote:
Nick wrote:
[snip crap]
FOAD
Uncle Al almost aways writes crap!
Paul Stowe
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bilge" |
|
| Title: Re: The Aether Paradigm |
27 Mar 2005 07:40:15 PM |
|
|
Paul Stowe:
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 12:53:56 -0800, Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote:
Nick wrote:
[snip crap]
FOAD
Uncle Al almost aways writes crap!
When describing crap, one has to write the word crap. So what?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Nick" |
|
| Title: Re: The Aether Paradigm |
27 Mar 2005 08:23:57 PM |
|
|
There is One God bilge.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Morituri-|-Max" |
|
| Title: Re: The Aether Paradigm |
27 Mar 2005 09:41:48 PM |
|
|
"Nick" <macromitch@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1111976637.449777.151140@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
There is One God bilge.
Whatever makes your bell tinkle... you want one god, fine.. I think I'll go
with hundreds of gods.. from Anubis to Zha'aikepht.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The Aether Paradigm |
28 Mar 2005 02:20:08 PM |
|
|
In article <42482F57.FC325D7C@hate.spam.net>, Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> writes:
Morituri-|-Max wrote:
"Nick" <macromitch@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1111976637.449777.151140@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
There is One God bilge.
Whatever makes your bell tinkle... you want one god, fine.. I think I'll go
with hundreds of gods.. from Anubis to Zha'aikepht.
Sterculius! and Mammon.
What's wrong with Dionisos and Priap?
Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool,
meron@cars.uchicago.edu | chances are he is doing just the same"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: The Aether Paradigm |
28 Mar 2005 10:22:47 AM |
|
|
Morituri-|-Max wrote:
"Nick" <macromitch@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1111976637.449777.151140@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
There is One God bilge.
Whatever makes your bell tinkle... you want one god, fine.. I think I'll go
with hundreds of gods.. from Anubis to Zha'aikepht.
Sterculius! and Mammon.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
