| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Lanoitaner" |
| Date: |
07 Feb 2004 12:39:42 PM |
| Object: |
The Creation of a Universe |
The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe
The Gravity Transformations provided at the Website and in many of these
postings lead to an interesting, and fully internally and externally
compatible, conclusion as to the way universes form. Consider the effects of
these transformations:
Force = 1
Length = 1/(1-$)
Time = (1-$)
where $ is the gravitational potential between an infinite radius and the
elevation under consideration.
These transformations show that an object contracts under the effects of
gravitation in terms of the units of measurement which exist at a
quasi-infinite radius and, as it does, the size of the matter contained therein
shrinks in proportion. Initially, the size of the object, both as measured with
the units of measurement existing at a quasi-infinite distance and those
existing within the object contracts as one would expect. When the object has
reduced its diameter to about 1/10th of its Horizon Radius, the situation
changes. As externally observed, the contraction continues to the horizon
radius, but as observed internally using "local" units of measurement the
situation is different. The contraction slows and when the internally observed
radius has reduced to four times the horizon radius (the externally observed
radius is twice the horizon radius at this point), the contraction ceases and
the object begins to expand! This expansion continues until the internally
observed radius becomes infinite as the externally observed radius falls to the
horizon radius.
During this process, the gravitational transformation for time causes the
later portion of the process to slow down, in terms of the external units of
measurement. As observed internally late in the process, the object will appear
to have originated as an intensely energetic point which rapidly expands to the
size of the primordial fireball of the "big bang" (cosmic inflation). This
fireball then expands and cools to form a universe similar to the one we know.
That Universe, as observed internally, will expand forever. As observed
externally, as it loses energy by radiation, it will contract to a size which
is incomparably smaller than a nucleon after an incredibly long period of time.
The internally observed expansion results from the fact that once the object
has contracted to its minimum internally observed size, the pressure produced
by its radiation will exceed the pressure produced by gravitation.
Cosmologists are currently suggesting that the matter in the Universe
seems to be imbedded as a "dust" in a gas composed of "dark matter" which
provides the pressure required to cause expansion. The amount of this "dark
matter" is estimated to be on the order of ten times the amount of "normal
matter" which exists. The background electromagnetic radiation of space, as
evidenced by its observed 3K to 3.5K radiation temperature shows that the
energy it represents is on that order. What seems to be overlooked is the fact
that electromagnetic radiation transports momentum and exerts a pressure as if
its component photons possessed inertial mass. (Never mind that photons are
alleged to be massless, if they look like a duck, walk like a duck, and quack
like a duck, then it is reasonable to accept that they are ducks and one must
accept that they possess inertial mass.) What is also overlooked is that
photons possess a gravitational mass which is twice their inertial mass. The
gas pressure and gravitational attraction associated with this radiation,
qualitatively at least, probably will account for much of the observed
cosmological behavior. It must also be remembered that when we look in any
direction either away from or towards the original primordial fireball, we are
looking into the past when the velocity of light, in absolute terms, was higher
than it is now.
Before you pass judgment on this posting, it is strongly suggested that
you read the material posted at http:/www.members.aol.com/einsteinhoax/hoax.htm
; /gravity.htm ; and /relcor.htm .
The source material for this posting may be found in "Gravity" (1987),
"The Einstein Hoax" (1997), and "Corrections to Residual Errors in Special
Relativity (1999) located at http://www.members.aol.com/einsteinhoax/site.htm .
EVERYTHING WHICH WE ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE
HAVE ACCEPTED AS TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST
BE MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS
REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP FROM
THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.
Please back up any response with an E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored
on a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy
as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts,
please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you have
read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.
E-mail:-
The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 5 years.
In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE, COMPETENT, AND RELAVENT REBUTTALS OF
ANY OF THE MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by
individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without
questioning it. If anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be
objectively answered, the material at the Website will be withdrawn.
.
|
|
| User: "Franz Heymann" |
|
| Title: Re: The Creation of a Universe |
07 Feb 2004 04:25:42 PM |
|
|
"Lanoitaner" <lanoitaner@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040207133942.04510.00001625@mb-m10.aol.com...
Retiche, you have forgoten to take your medication again.
Franz
.
|
|
|
| User: "G=EMC^2 Glazier" |
|
| Title: Re: The Creation of a Universe |
07 Feb 2004 04:53:33 PM |
|
|
For nature the creation of the universe comes to be a lot easier than
creating an atom. For once an hydrogen atom is created its down hill all
the way(gravity) Bert
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: The Creation of a Universe |
07 Feb 2004 02:05:11 PM |
|
|
Lanoitaner wrote:
The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe
Observational and Experimental Evidence Bearing on General Relativity
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/RelWWW/tests.html
General Relativity Tutorial
John Baez
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/gr/gr.html
Relativity on the World Wide Web
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/relativity.html
General Relativity and Cosmology FAQs
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/
Developments in General Relativity: Black Hole Singularity and Beyond
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0304052
Improved Test of General Relativity with Radio Doppler Data from the Cassini Spacecraft
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0308010
What is the experimental basis of Special Relativity?
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/experiments.html
Physics is an experimental science, and as such the experimental basis for
any physical theory is extremely important. The relationship between
theory and experiments in modern science is a multi-edged sword:
1.It is required that the theory not be refuted by any experiment within
the theory's domain of applicability.
2.It is expected that the theory be confirmed by a number of
experiments which cover a significant fraction of the theory's
domain of applicability.
3.It is expected that the theory be confirmed by a number of
experiments which examine a significant fraction of the theory's
predictions.
Special Relativity (SR) meets all of these requirements and expectations.
There are literally hundreds of experiments which have tested SR, with
an enormous range and diversity, and the agreement between theory and
experiment is excellent. There is a lot of redundancy in these experimental
tests. There are also a lot of indirect tests of SR which are not included
here. This list of experiments is by no means complete!
Other than their sheer numbers, the most striking thing about these
experimental tests of SR is their remarkable breadth and diversity. An
important aspect of SR is its universality - it applies to all known physical
phenomena and not just to the electromagnetic phenomena it was
originally invented to explain. In these experiments you will find tests
using electromagnetic and nuclear measurements (including both strong
and weak interactions); gravitational tests are the province of General
Relativity, and are not considered here, see Experimental Tests of GR.
There are several useful surveys of the experimental basis of SR:
Y.Z.Zhang, Special Relativity and its Experimental Foundations,
World Scientific (1997).
G.Holton, "Resource Letter SRT-1 on Special Relativity Theory",
Am. J. Phys., 30 (1962), p462.
D.I.Blotkhintsev, "Basis for Special Relativity Theory Provided by
Experiments in High Energy Physics", Sov. Phys. Uspekhi, 9 (1966),
p405.
Newman et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 no. 21 (1978), p1355.
Zhang's book is especially comprehensive.
Textbooks which have good summaries of the experimental basis of
relativity are:
M.Born, Einstein's theory of Relativity.
Bergmann, Introduction to the Theory of Relativity.
Moller, The Theory of Relativity.
M. von Laue, Die relativitätstheorie (in German).
Crank Information
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=group%3Asci.physics+author%3AGRAVITYMECHANIC
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=group%3Asci.physics+author%3AGRAVITYMECHANIC2
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22smart1234%22+site%3Awww.crank.net
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=group%3Asci.physics+author%3Areticher
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=group%3Asci.physics+author%3Areticher1
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: The Creation of a Universe |
07 Feb 2004 04:39:32 PM |
|
|
Lanoitaner wrote:
The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe
{snip ravings of an imbecile]
Psychotic ineducable boring spammer retic (Ernest Wittke),
You see yourself this way,
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete6.jpg
The entire remainder of the planet sees you this way,
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete3.png
http://b5.sdvc.uwyo.edu/bab5/snds/argcstpd.wav
http://w0rli.home.att.net/youare.swf
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/sunshine.jpg
http://www.you-moron.com/
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=group%3Asci.physics+author%3Awittke
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete0.jpg
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete1.png
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete2.png
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete3.png
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete4.png
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete5.jpg
http://www.apa.org/journals/psp/psp7761121.html
http://insti.physics.sunysb.edu/~siegel/quack.html
<http://www.firehead.org/~jessh/film/kubrick/Kubrick-Psycho.html>
<http://www.naturalchild.com/elliott_barker/prisons.html>
The source material for this posting may be found in "Gravity" (1987),
"The Einstein Hoax" (1997), and "Corrections to Residual Errors in Special
Relativity (1999)
[snip]
Hey, stooopid spammer Ernest Wittke - Do you want EVIDENCE? Each of
the 24 GPS satellites carries either four cesium atomic clocks or
three rubidum atomic clocks in orbit, with full relativistic
corrections being applied.
http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0307140
GR structure, especially Part 4/p. 7
<http://rattler.cameron.edu/EMIS/journals/LRG/Articles/Volume4/2001-4will/index.html>
Experimental constraints on General Relativity.
<http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/ptti/ptti2002/paper20.pdf>
Nature 425 374 (2003)
<http://rattler.cameron.edu/EMIS/journals/LRG/Articles/Volume6/2003-1ashby/index.html>
http://www.eftaylor.com/pub/projecta.pdf
Relativity in the GPS system
http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9909014
falling light
http://www.hawaii.edu/suremath/SRtwinParadox.html
<http://physics.syr.edu/courses/modules/LIGHTCONE/twins.html>
Twin Paradox
http://arXiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0401086
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0312071
Deeply relativistic neutron star binaries
http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0301024
Nordtvedt Effect
Special Relativity is physics on a topologically trivial Lorentzian
manifold with a metric whose curvature tensor is zero. This is a
perfectly diffeomorphism-invariant condition and does not require
any particular coordinate choice. It is invariant under
the full group of diffeomorphisms. The Poincare group is
the group of *isometries* of the metric in special relativity.
The Special Relativity metric is *non-dynamical* (unlike GR). It
defines the coupling *constants* of your theory. If you change the
metric in any nontrivial way you are changing your theory. An
operation can only be called a "symmetry" of a special-relativistic
(non-gravitational) theory if it preserves the metric, and therefore
the symmetry of special-relativistic theories is the Poincare group
only. General Relativity (gravitation) has a dynamic metric.
NIM A 355 537 (1995)
Physics Letters B 328 103 (1994)
Physical Review Letters 64 1697 (1990)
Physical Review Letters 39 1051 (1977)
Physical Review 135 B1071 (1964)
Physics Letters 12 260 (1964)
Europhysics Letters 56(2) 170-174 (2001)
General Relativity and Gravitation 34(9) 1371 (2002)
http://fourmilab.to/etexts/einstein/specrel/specrel.pdf
<http://www.geocities.com/physics_world/sr/ae_1905_error.htm>
<http://www.physics.gatech.edu/people/faculty/finkelstein/relativity.pdf>
http://users.powernet.co.uk/bearsoft/Paper6.pdf
http://users.powernet.co.uk/bearsoft/LPHrel.html
Longitudinal and transverse mass
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/gpsuser/gpsuser.pdf
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/sigspec/default.htm
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/icd200/default.htm
http://www.trimble.com/gps/index.html
http://sirius.chinalake.navy.mil/satpred/
http://www.phys.lsu.edu/mog/mog9/node9.html
http://egtphysics.net/GPS/RelGPS.htm
http://www.schriever.af.mil/gps/Current/current.oa1
http://edu-observatory.org/gps/gps_books.html
<http://www-astronomy.mps.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast162/Unit5/gps.html>
If anyone
provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be objectively answered, the
material at the Website will be withdrawn.
Right, like your head has ever been withdrawn from your ***** - even
when you *****.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
