The defect of method in Micelson_Morley experiment



 Science > Physics > The defect of method in Micelson_Morley experiment

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Eugeniusz"
Date: 16 Sep 2006 03:50:04 PM
Object: The defect of method in Micelson_Morley experiment
The Michelson -Morley experiment consists of
the two parts:
a/ recording of position of the interferential lines
on scale of telescope of moving interferometer
b/ recording of position of the interferehtial lines
on scale of telescope of moving interferometer
after revolving all interferometer by 90 degree
Expected different,alter position of interferntial line on scale of
telescope.
The shifts of interferential line did not be here.
The difference of length of appropriate light path
in part"a" is equal of difference of length of appropriate light path in
part"b".
The light paths in part "a" are symmetrical to the
light paths in part "b"
The revolving of all interferometer by 90 degree
during experiment ,spoil expected result.
Wellcome
Eugeniusz Warenda , W-w 2006/o9/14/
sci.physics
.

User: "Panties On Head"

Title: Re: The defect of method in Micelson_Morley experiment 16 Sep 2006 08:15:20 PM
What about the the defect of assumptions in Micelson_Morley experiment ?
They looked for an aether which was considered as being distinct from the
dimension in which it would exist. The aether was considered to be something
like energy - embedded in space, or floating in space, but not really
composed of it.
That was the big misstep, it's hogwash, if Einstein were alive today he'd
agree with me, and the aether does indeed exist in this sense, it is quite
simply LxLxLxT.
Spacetime itself is the aether. All energy is merely waveforms in
dimensional fabrik.
Einstein would agree with me.
"Eugeniusz" <lala@magma-net.pl> wrote in message
news:eehng6$h1u$1@opal.futuro.pl...

The Michelson -Morley experiment consists of
the two parts:
a/ recording of position of the interferential lines
on scale of telescope of moving interferometer
b/ recording of position of the interferehtial lines
on scale of telescope of moving interferometer
after revolving all interferometer by 90 degree
Expected different,alter position of interferntial line on scale of
telescope.
The shifts of interferential line did not be here.
The difference of length of appropriate light path
in part"a" is equal of difference of length of appropriate light path in
part"b".
The light paths in part "a" are symmetrical to the
light paths in part "b"
The revolving of all interferometer by 90 degree
during experiment ,spoil expected result.
Wellcome
Eugeniusz Warenda , W-w 2006/o9/14/
sci.physics


.
User: "Sorcerer"

Title: Re: The defect of method in Micelson_Morley experiment 16 Sep 2006 09:39:37 PM
"Panties On Head" <No@No.No> wrote in message
news:Q_ednQCXUoPtOJHYnZ2dnUVZ_uydnZ2d@comcast.com...
| What about the the defect of assumptions in Micelson_Morley experiment ?
|
| They looked for an aether which was considered as being distinct from the
| dimension in which it would exist. The aether was considered to be
something
| like energy - embedded in space, or floating in space, but not really
| composed of it.
|
| That was the big misstep, it's hogwash, if Einstein were alive today he'd
| agree with me, and the aether does indeed exist in this sense, it is quite
| simply LxLxLxT.
|
| Spacetime itself is the aether. All energy is merely waveforms in
| dimensional fabrik.
|
| Einstein would agree with me.
Yeah, he'd look good with Panties on his Head.
Androcles.
.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
The Scientific Method THESIS - ANTITHESIS - EXPERIMENT
Re: Energy of ice to water phase transition. Does method matter?
=?UTF-8?B?bW9pcsOp?= method to viualize deformations
What guarantee do we have of scientific method?
Research and Development 100 Award for A New Method that Simplifies Protein Production
Dedanoe's Method of Reductive Modulo for Prime Testis
Best method for generating thermal neutrons?
Laue Method: X-ray go through self-coherent or not?
how to use finite difference time domain method?
A New Method for Calculating Timedifferencefactors in Gravity Fields - Unification and TOE here I'm coming! :-)
particle motion numerical method
leverian method of approximations
possible to use Generalized Method of Moments for this problem?
sponging method - dedanoe's di/pro-gressive error maker based on his imbalance thesis
Update: Galileo's method was g/2=s/t^2; Newton's was g=(vt-vi)/t
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER