| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Tom Potter" |
| Date: |
15 May 2007 07:48:32 AM |
| Object: |
The demographics of rudeness |
It would be interesting and useful,
if some edu research group plotted the geographical distribution
of the rudest people in the newsgroups,
so that one could correlate the locations with the demographics,
and get some idea of how race, religion, income, climate,
school systems, size of cities, etc.
affect rudeness.
"MIAMI (AP) - For the second consecutive year, rude Miami drivers have
earned the city the title of worst road rage in a survey released
Tuesday.
Other cities near the top of the rude drivers list were New York,
Boston, Los Angeles and Washington, D.C.
The most courteous drivers can be found in Portland, Ore.; Pittsburgh;
the Seattle-Tacoma area; St. Louis; and Dallas-Fort Worth.
Portland drivers were the least likely to see other motorists
tailgating on the roadways,
and St. Louis motorists were the least likely to swear at another
driver, according to the survey.
Minneapolis-St. Paul was rated the most courteous city in 2006 but
fell to No. 12 this year."
View the demographic maps at the following web site
to see how religion and demographics correlates with rudeness.
http://www.valpo.edu/geomet/geo/courses/geo200/religion.html
--
Tom Potter
*** Time Magazine Person of the Year 2006 ***
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
http://tdp1001.googlepages.com/home
http://no-turtles.com
http://www.frappr.com/tompotter
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
http://spaces.msn.com/tdp1001
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tom-potter
http://tom-potter.blogspot.com
.
|
|
| User: "Androcles" |
|
| Title: Re: The demographics of rudeness |
15 May 2007 08:20:12 AM |
|
|
"Tom Potter" <tdp1001@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1179233312.771220.97840@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
: It would be interesting and useful,
: if some edu research group plotted the geographical distribution
: of the rudest people in the newsgroups,
: so that one could correlate the locations with the demographics,
: and get some idea of how race, religion, income, climate,
: school systems, size of cities, etc.
: affect rudeness.
:
Why would it be useful, Potty, and how do you define it?
Doesn't the definition itself depend on race, religion, income, climate,
school systems, size of cities, etc.?
What's the difference between rudeness, politeness, sarcasm and
being downright insulting?
Water off a duck's back to me, but one man's meat is another man's
poison, I can take it and give it back. The only lasting grudge I have
is against Tucker who accused me of faking my daughter's death to
promote myself. If I should ever meet that tord then violence will result.
That might be useful.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Gisse" |
|
| Title: Re: The demographics of rudeness |
15 May 2007 11:06:24 PM |
|
|
On May 15, 5:48 am, Tom Potter <tdp1...@gmail.com> wrote:
It would be interesting and useful,
[...]
....if you actually posted something relevant to this newsgroup rather
than idiotic musing and whining.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tomoko Kanazawa" |
|
| Title: Re: The demographics of rudeness |
17 May 2007 09:45:55 PM |
|
|
It would be interesting and useful,
The question is not so simple as which region is most rude.
I would plot x,y,z as rude, stupid and hostile.
The regions which are most hostile in the US are clearly New York and Texas.
The most rude you will find in regions surrounding those vicinities.
Stupidity, however, is more like lightning. It can strike anywhere at any
time.
From my experience, I think that rudeness has been so refined in some
places, it has even been elevated to a to a level somewhere between science
and religion. I'm thinking Oklahoma.
I also think that there is an ontological progression at work here.
Stupidity can strike anywhere at anytime. If it becomes chronic then
rudeness sets in. In the most acute cases, we find hostility.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ben newsam" |
|
| Title: Re: The demographics of rudeness |
18 May 2007 08:15:45 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 17 May 2007 21:45:55 -0500, "Tomoko Kanazawa"
<T.Kanazawa@eodomo.gsfc.nasa.gov> wrote:
I also think that there is an ontological progression at work here.
Stupidity can strike anywhere at anytime. If it becomes chronic then
rudeness sets in. In the most acute cases, we find hostility.
Ontological. I hate that word. Almost nobody knows what it really
means, and academics seemingly use it as a random adjective when they
can't think of anything else.
My dictionary (NSOED) gives the following for "Ontological":
"Of or pertaining to ontology; metaphysical."
and "ontological argument: for the objective existence of God from the
idea or essence of God."
Under "Ontology" it gives "The science or study of being; that part of
metaphysics which relates to the nature or essence of being or
existence."
Can anyone explain to me how the word can be used to describe a
"progression" as in the paragraph quoted above?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tomoko Kanazawa" |
|
| Title: Re: The demographics of rudeness |
27 May 2007 08:47:13 PM |
|
|
I also think that there is an ontological progression at work here.
Stupidity can strike anywhere at anytime. If it becomes chronic then
rudeness sets in. In the most acute cases, we find hostility.
Ontological. I hate that word. Almost nobody knows what it really
means, and academics seemingly use it as a random adjective when they
can't think of anything else.
My dictionary (NSOED) gives the following for "Ontological":
"Of or pertaining to ontology; metaphysical."
and "ontological argument: for the objective existence of God from the
idea or essence of God."
Under "Ontology" it gives "The science or study of being; that part of
metaphysics which relates to the nature or essence of being or
existence."
Can anyone explain to me how the word can be used to describe a
"progression" as in the paragraph quoted above?
I just tossed that in, I did'nt even really know what it meant until you
posted that definition. I've decided to stop making absolute sense, just to
go for an approximation and say the heck with it. I've used the words
paradigm and eclectic so much that I dont have much choice but to branch out
a bit.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "tj Frazir" |
|
| Title: Re: The demographics of rudeness |
18 May 2007 01:54:15 PM |
|
|
narcisem is confused with rude.
" the dont spank kids grew up wile told they are specal " you cant tell
the morons anything and they want a NICE boss .
The NICE kids grew up RUDE and narsic
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Double-A" |
|
| Title: Re: The demographics of rudeness |
15 May 2007 08:10:48 AM |
|
|
On May 15, 5:48 am, Tom Potter <tdp1...@gmail.com> wrote:
It would be interesting and useful,
if some edu research group plotted the geographical distribution
of the rudest people in the newsgroups,
so that one could correlate the locations with the demographics,
and get some idea of how race, religion, income, climate,
school systems, size of cities, etc.
affect rudeness.
"MIAMI (AP) - For the second consecutive year, rude Miami drivers have
earned the city the title of worst road rage in a survey released
Tuesday.
Other cities near the top of the rude drivers list were New York,
Boston, Los Angeles and Washington, D.C.
The most courteous drivers can be found in Portland, Ore.; Pittsburgh;
the Seattle-Tacoma area; St. Louis; and Dallas-Fort Worth.
Portland drivers were the least likely to see other motorists
tailgating on the roadways,
and St. Louis motorists were the least likely to swear at another
driver, according to the survey.
Minneapolis-St. Paul was rated the most courteous city in 2006 but
fell to No. 12 this year."
View the demographic maps at the following web site
to see how religion and demographics correlates with rudeness.
http://www.valpo.edu/geomet/geo/courses/geo200/religion.html
--
Tom Potter
*** Time Magazine Person of the Year 2006 ***http://home.earthlink.net/~tdphttp://tdp1001.googlepages.com/homehttp://no-turtles.comhttp://www.frappr.com/tompotterhttp://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001http://spaces.msn.com/tdp1001http://www.flickr.com/photos/tom-potterhttp://tom-potter.blogspot.com
Here in the Northwest people don't mouth off as mouth, because in
rebuttal, people are more likely to speak with their fists!
Double-A
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The_Man" |
|
| Title: Re: The demographics of rudeness |
15 May 2007 11:33:36 AM |
|
|
On May 15, 8:48 am, Tom Potter <tdp1...@gmail.com> wrote:
It would be interesting and useful,
if some edu research group plotted the geographical distribution
of the rudest people in the newsgroups,
so that one could correlate the locations with the demographics,
and get some idea of how race, religion, income, climate,
school systems, size of cities, etc.
affect rudeness.
The Nazis, for example, were quite genial. Hitler was a vegetarian,
who didn't smoke or drink alcohol. He loved animals and children. His
misunderstood symbol, the swastika, was just "a plus sign doing
cartwheels". He was especially "nice" to Jewish and Romany kids, but
his "benevolence" also extended to Polish, Russian, Czech, Slovak,
French, Dutch, English, and Serb children, too.
(Note sarcasm!)
"MIAMI (AP) - For the second consecutive year, rude Miami drivers have
earned the city the title of worst road rage in a survey released
Tuesday.
Other cities near the top of the rude drivers list were New York,
Boston, Los Angeles and Washington, D.C.
Of course, these are the most populated cicites in the country. Big
whoop.
The most courteous drivers can be found in Portland, Ore.; Pittsburgh;
the Seattle-Tacoma area; St. Louis; and Dallas-Fort Worth.
Portland drivers were the least likely to see other motorists
tailgating on the roadways,
and St. Louis motorists were the least likely to swear at another
driver, according to the survey.
Minneapolis-St. Paul was rated the most courteous city in 2006 but
fell to No. 12 this year."
So apparently the "demographics" of St. Paul changed drastically in a
single year....
View the demographic maps at the following web site
to see how religion and demographics correlates with rudeness.
So you an see that "those" people are the problem, as always!
http://www.valpo.edu/geomet/geo/courses/geo200/religion.html
--
Tom "Potty Mouth" Potter
*** Time Magazine Bigot of the Year 2006 ***http://home.earthlink.net/~tdphttp://tdp1001.googlepages.com/homehttp://no-turtles.comhttp://www.frappr.com/tompotterhttp://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001http://spaces.msn.com/tdp1001http://www.flickr.com/photos/tom-potterhttp://tom-potter.blogspot.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: The demographics of rudeness |
15 May 2007 11:02:43 AM |
|
|
Tom Potter wrote:
It would be interesting and useful,
if some edu research group plotted the geographical distribution
of the rudest people in the newsgroups,
Try to be less rude, Potter. Some people speak with their shotguns.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Potter" |
|
| Title: Re: The demographics of rudeness |
15 May 2007 10:09:41 PM |
|
|
On May 15, 7:02 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
Tom Potterwrote:
It would be interesting and useful,
if some edu research group plotted the geographical distribution
of the rudest people in the newsgroups,
Try to be less rude, Potter. Some people speak with their shotguns.
Sam makes a good point when he points out
that rude people frequently turn to threats and violence
when their rudeness is challenged.
Hopefully Sam will post his views on how
rational, intelligent, civilized, moral folks
should deal with the rude people in the newsgroups,
who attack messengers with words,
and personal attack web pages and awards,
rather than address messages.
Sam, how would you deal with rude people like
Moortel, Erich Max Francis, Puddleduck, T Wake, The_Man,
Art Deco, etc.?
Would you shoot them?
I just saw a segment on CNN today
about people standing by as helpless folks
were being beaten, raped, and murdered.
Should rudesness and violence be exposed and challenged,
or should folks ignore rudeness, threats and violence?
Tom Potter
*** Time Magazine Person of the Year 2006 ***
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
http://tdp1001.googlepages.com/home
http://no-turtles.com
http://www.frappr.com/tompotter
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
http://spaces.msn.com/tdp1001
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tom-potter
http://tom-potter.blogspot.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dirk Van de moortel" |
|
| Title: Re: The demographics of rudeness |
16 May 2007 12:39:55 PM |
|
|
"Tom Potter" <tdp1001@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1179284981.535325.97070@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On May 15, 7:02 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
Tom Potterwrote:
It would be interesting and useful,
if some edu research group plotted the geographical distribution
of the rudest people in the newsgroups,
Try to be less rude, Potter. Some people speak with their shotguns.
Sam makes a good point when he points out
that rude people frequently turn to threats and violence
when their rudeness is challenged.
Hopefully Sam will post his views on how
rational, intelligent, civilized, moral folks
should deal with the rude people in the newsgroups,
who attack messengers with words,
and personal attack web pages and awards,
rather than address messages.
Sam, how would you deal with rude people like
Moortel, Erich Max Francis, Puddleduck, T Wake, The_Man,
Art Deco, etc.?
Would you shoot them?
I just saw a segment on CNN today
about people standing by as helpless folks
were being beaten, raped, and murdered.
Should rudesness and violence be exposed and challenged,
or should folks ignore rudeness, threats and violence?
What you think should be done, is de-facto, of no importance.
Folks will always ignore rudeness, threats and violence when
it is directed at inferior life forms. No one cares, you see.
Being an inferior life form yourself, you obviously have a
problem with that. But who cares?
Dirk Vdm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Potter" |
|
| Title: Re: The demographics of rudeness |
17 May 2007 12:02:02 AM |
|
|
On May 16, 8:39 pm, "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoor...@ThankS-NO-
SperM.hotmail.com> wrote:
"Tom Potter" <tdp1...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:1179284981.535325.97070@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On May 15, 7:02 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
Tom Potterwrote:
It would be interesting and useful,
if some edu research group plotted the geographical distribution
of the rudest people in the newsgroups,
Try to be less rude, Potter. Some people speak with their shotguns.
Sam makes a good point when he points out
that rude people frequently turn to threats and violence
when their rudeness is challenged.
Hopefully Sam will post his views on how
rational, intelligent, civilized, moral folks
should deal with the rude people in the newsgroups,
who attack messengers with words,
and personal attack web pages and awards,
rather than address messages.
Sam, how would you deal with rude people like
Moortel, Erich Max Francis, Puddleduck, T Wake, The_Man,
Art Deco, etc.?
Would you shoot them?
I just saw a segment on CNN today
about people standing by as helpless folks
were being beaten, raped, and murdered.
Should rudesness and violence be exposed and challenged,
or should folks ignore rudeness, threats and violence?
What you think should be done, is de-facto, of no importance.
Folks will always ignore rudeness, threats and violence when
it is directed at inferior life forms. No one cares, you see.
Being an inferior life form yourself, you obviously have a
problem with that. But who cares?
Dirk Vdm- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I was shocked to see that moortel
thinks that it is fitting and proper
to threaten, be rude and violent to,
babies, digs, cats, and
anything one thinks he is is superior to in power.
This is the kind of thinking that brought us Iraq, etc...
--
Tom Potter
*** Time Magazine Person of the Year 2006 ***
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
http://tdp1001.googlepages.com/home
http://no-turtles.com
http://www.frappr.com/tompotter
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
http://spaces.msn.com/tdp1001
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tom-potter
http://tom-potter.blogspot.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dirk Van de moortel" |
|
| Title: Re: The demographics of rudeness |
17 May 2007 03:23:38 AM |
|
|
"Tom Potter" <tdp1001@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1179378122.532042.293890@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
On May 16, 8:39 pm, "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoor...@ThankS-NO-
SperM.hotmail.com> wrote:
"Tom Potter" <tdp1...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:1179284981.535325.97070@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On May 15, 7:02 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
Tom Potterwrote:
It would be interesting and useful,
if some edu research group plotted the geographical distribution
of the rudest people in the newsgroups,
Try to be less rude, Potter. Some people speak with their shotguns.
Sam makes a good point when he points out
that rude people frequently turn to threats and violence
when their rudeness is challenged.
Hopefully Sam will post his views on how
rational, intelligent, civilized, moral folks
should deal with the rude people in the newsgroups,
who attack messengers with words,
and personal attack web pages and awards,
rather than address messages.
Sam, how would you deal with rude people like
Moortel, Erich Max Francis, Puddleduck, T Wake, The_Man,
Art Deco, etc.?
Would you shoot them?
I just saw a segment on CNN today
about people standing by as helpless folks
were being beaten, raped, and murdered.
Should rudesness and violence be exposed and challenged,
or should folks ignore rudeness, threats and violence?
What you think should be done, is de-facto, of no importance.
Folks will always ignore rudeness, threats and violence when
it is directed at inferior life forms. No one cares, you see.
Being an inferior life form yourself, you obviously have a
problem with that. But who cares?
Dirk Vdm- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I was shocked to see that moortel
thinks that it is fitting and proper
to threaten, be rude and violent to,
babies, digs, cats, and
anything one thinks he is is superior to in power.
There is no need to be shocked.
Rest assured, I would never even hurt a fly.
In my view the category of lower life forms
starts with bacteria.
Dirk Vdm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Potter" |
|
| Title: Re: The demographics of rudeness |
20 May 2007 10:31:16 AM |
|
|
On May 17, 11:23 am, "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoor...@ThankS-NO-
SperM.hotmail.com> wrote:
"Tom Potter" <tdp1...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:1179378122.532042.293890@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
On May 16, 8:39 pm, "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoor...@ThankS-NO-
SperM.hotmail.com> wrote:
"Tom Potter" <tdp1...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:1179284981.535325.97070@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On May 15, 7:02 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
Tom Potterwrote:
It would be interesting and useful,
if some edu research group plotted the geographical distribution
of the rudest people in the newsgroups,
Try to be less rude, Potter. Some people speak with their shotguns.
Sam makes a good point when he points out
that rude people frequently turn to threats and violence
when their rudeness is challenged.
Hopefully Sam will post his views on how
rational, intelligent, civilized, moral folks
should deal with the rude people in the newsgroups,
who attack messengers with words,
and personal attack web pages and awards,
rather than address messages.
Sam, how would you deal with rude people like
Moortel, Erich Max Francis, Puddleduck, T Wake, The_Man,
Art Deco, etc.?
Would you shoot them?
I just saw a segment on CNN today
about people standing by as helpless folks
were being beaten, raped, and murdered.
Should rudesness and violence be exposed and challenged,
or should folks ignore rudeness, threats and violence?
What you think should be done, is de-facto, of no importance.
Folks will always ignore rudeness, threats and violence when
it is directed at inferior life forms. No one cares, you see.
Being an inferior life form yourself, you obviously have a
problem with that. But who cares?
Dirk Vdm- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I was shocked to see that moortel
thinks that it is fitting and proper
to threaten, be rude and violent to,
babies, digs, cats, and
anything one thinks he is is superior to in power.
There is no need to be shocked.
Rest assured, I would never even hurt a fly.
In my view the category of lower life forms
starts with bacteria.
It is intereesting to see that Dork moortel
thinks that he is superior to bacteria and viruses.
I, for one, would like to see Dork
go one on one against AIDS and botulism,
and see which is "superior"
--
Tom Potter
*** Time Magazine Person of the Year 2006 ***
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
http://tdp1001.googlepages.com/home
http://no-turtles.com
http://www.frappr.com/tompotter
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
http://spaces.msn.com/tdp1001
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tom-potter
http://tom-potter.blogspot.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "The_Man" |
|
| Title: Re: The demographics of rudeness |
20 May 2007 11:10:35 AM |
|
|
On May 20, 11:31 am, Tom Potter <tdp1...@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 17, 11:23 am, "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoor...@ThankS-NO-
SperM.hotmail.com> wrote:
"Tom Potter" <tdp1...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:1179378122.532042.293890@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
On May 16, 8:39 pm, "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoor...@ThankS-NO-
SperM.hotmail.com> wrote:
"Tom Potter" <tdp1...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:1179284981.535325.97070@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On May 15, 7:02 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
Tom Potterwrote:
It would be interesting and useful,
if some edu research group plotted the geographical distribution
of the rudest people in the newsgroups,
Try to be less rude, Potter. Some people speak with their shotguns.
Sam makes a good point when he points out
that rude people frequently turn to threats and violence
when their rudeness is challenged.
Hopefully Sam will post his views on how
rational, intelligent, civilized, moral folks
should deal with the rude people in the newsgroups,
who attack messengers with words,
and personal attack web pages and awards,
rather than address messages.
Sam, how would you deal with rude people like
Moortel, Erich Max Francis, Puddleduck, T Wake, The_Man,
Art Deco, etc.?
Would you shoot them?
I just saw a segment on CNN today
about people standing by as helpless folks
were being beaten, raped, and murdered.
Should rudesness and violence be exposed and challenged,
or should folks ignore rudeness, threats and violence?
What you think should be done, is de-facto, of no importance.
Folks will always ignore rudeness, threats and violence when
it is directed at inferior life forms. No one cares, you see.
Being an inferior life form yourself, you obviously have a
problem with that. But who cares?
Dirk Vdm- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I was shocked to see that moortel
thinks that it is fitting and proper
to threaten, be rude and violent to,
babies, digs, cats, and
anything one thinks he is is superior to in power.
There is no need to be shocked.
Rest assured, I would never even hurt a fly.
In my view the category of lower life forms
starts with bacteria.
It is intereesting to see that Dork moortel
thinks that he is superior to bacteria and viruses.
I, for one, would like to see Dork
go one on one against AIDS and botulism,
and see which is "superior"
Cool - now you'll prove you are as ignorant about biology as history
and physics! Tom, you are triple-threat - can't do physics, history OR
biology (or chemistry, for that matter)
--
Tom Potter
*** Time Magazine Person of the Year 2006 ***http://home.earthlink.net/~tdphttp://tdp1001.googlepages.com/homehttp://no-turtles.comhttp://www.frappr.com/tompotterhttp://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001http://spaces.msn.com/tdp1001http://www.flickr.com/photos/tom-potterhttp://tom-potter.blogspot.com- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Potter" |
|
| Title: Re: The demographics of rudeness |
24 May 2007 07:55:23 AM |
|
|
"The_Man" <me_so_horneeeee@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1179677435.577754.121560@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
Cool - now you'll prove you are as ignorant about biology as history
and physics! Tom, you are triple-threat - can't do physics, history OR
biology (or chemistry, for that matter)
It is sad to see that my post,
which is listed below upset
"The_Man" <me_so_horneeeee@yahoo.com>
so much, that he follows me around,
deletes my posts,
and makes rude, crude, stupid, open loop comments.
Hopefully, "The_Man" will join the human race,
and address messages in a rational, intelligent, MORAL way,
rather than "Mel Gibson" and "Jimmy Carter" messengers.
"It is interesting to see that the world is beginning to wise up
to the agenda and methods of the War-for-Profit Gang,
and folks are beginning to see War-for-Profit Instigators
like Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Perle
for what they are,
members of a greedy, immoral, racist, bigoted, criminal gang.
As can be seen by recent news reports,
Wolfowitz lost his cushy, power job at the World Bank
because he was "fighting poverty" by making sure that
he and his girl friend enjoyed the good life,
at the expense of the poor folks on the planet.
It is also encouraging to see that
the War-for-Profit Gang Holocaust scam
did not work on Elizabeth Taylor,
and she was able to keep the Van Gogh painting,
that she bought in 1963 from a Jew, Alfred Wolf.
Most of the Holocaust scams involve attacks
on lightly defended assets, and on taking advantage of
gaps in ownership audit trials that occur naturally,
particularly in times of war.
When the War-for-Profit Gang was
instigating the Class Wars of the 1900's,
most nations yielded to the instigators
in order to avoid too much conflict in society,
but the German people, who are probably
the most intelligent, most moral, most productive folks on the planet,
recognized that a greedy, power-mad. immoral gang
was instigating the Class Wars for power and riches,
and they took an aggressive stand against the Class War Instigators.
The German economy boomed,
while the economies of America and England,
who catered to the Class War Instigators,
collapsed into deep depressions
As the German people applied pressure to the
Class War Terrorists and their Supporters,
to shape up or ship out,
many of the Terrorists and their Supporters,
sold some of their belongings, migrated to other nations.
and used their media presence,
and their lobbies to buy politicians,
and manipulate the masses to get America and England,
to join with Russia, which was controlled by the Class Wars
Instigators,
to wage war on the German people.
The Gang not only profited from war profiteering,
but after Germany was defeated,
they rushed in and raped Germany,
and they continued to rape the German people
by demanding billions of dollars in reparations,
and then they raped again by claiming that the
assets they sold were actually stolen from them,
and like the Elizabeth Taylor case,
they tried (And usually succeeded.)
to profit three times,
first by the original sale (Jew #1),
then by channeling items through another Jew (Jew #2),
and then by using bought politicians to
pass friendly laws, and using friendly courts (Frequently Jew #n)
to make present day owners (Goyim #1) of the most valuable items
(Where a good ownership audit trail did not exist.)
turn over the items to the families of Jew #1 (Jew #3).
It is interesting to see that the War-for-Profit Gang used the same
scam in America that they used in Germany,
in instigating and profiting from the Urban Rebellion
in America during the 1960's.
In the 1960's, the War-for-Profit Gang
instigated conflict between American Blacks and Whites,
encouraged Blacks to riot and make demands on society,
and began profiting from what was called "Blockbusting".
When Blacks began moving into Jewish neighborhoods,
and began rioting, many Jews burned their
own businesses and houses in order to collect insurance,
and they moved on into other neighborhoods.
Poor, honest Goyim would never think about
torching their homes and moving out,
so they stayed while their neighborhood
turned into a slum, and their home lost all its' value.
The Jews profited from insurance,
from buying suburban homes on the cheap,
before the mass movement to the suburbs,
and from selling suburban property at inflated prices
to the folks who moved out of the slums later.
During their mass migration out of Germany,
on November 9, 1938 Jews staged a massive scam
known as Kristallnacht or "The Night of Broken Glass",
where thousands of Jews torched their own businesses
and tried to make massive insurance claims on the torching.
The German people were wise to this scam,
and the state confiscated the insurance money,
and used it to repair the damage.
Visit this web site to see a million dollar synagogue burning.
http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/timeline/knacht.htm
Note how this Holocaust scam site rationalizes a Jewish Terrorist
murder of
a German by stating that it was "in retaliation for the poor treatment
his father and
his family suffered at the hands of the Nazis in Germany.",
and note how the web site puts a spin
on the fact that the Terrorist's family and over 15,000 other Jews
from Poland (Agitators and terrorists) were expelled from Germany.
Now if the Jew had become a human bomber
"in retaliation for the poor treatment his father and his family
suffered at the hands of the <anyone.>",
I could sympathize with him and his family.
It is interesting to see that only a few weeks before 911,
a Jew, Larry Silverstein put up only $14 million of his own money,
to rent the World Trade Center,
and he collected nearly $5 billion in insurance money.
Note that as Silverstein only has to pay the City of New York
about $0.032 billion per year rental, and that can be easily covered
with just the interest on the $5 billion.
I predict that most of the "$5 billion in insurance money.",
will fade away, and that the citizens of New York will
not see much of the insurance proceeds used to restore the
property as it was.
It is amazing the Jews have been using the same scam for
over 3000 years and Goyim are just beginning to catch on.
It will be interesting to see what transpires
when Muslim Americans begin to sue Israel and Jews
in American courts for stealing their property,
and forcing them to sell property and assets cheaply."
--
Tom Potter
*** Time Magazine Person of the Year 2006 ***
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
http://tdp1001.googlepages.com/home
http://no-turtles.com
http://www.frappr.com/tompotter
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
http://spaces.msn.com/tdp1001
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tom-potter
http://tom-potter.blogspot.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "PD" |
|
| Title: Re: The demographics of rudeness |
17 May 2007 11:16:51 AM |
|
|
On May 17, 12:02 am, Tom Potter <tdp1...@gmail.com> wrote:
I was shocked to see that moortel
thinks that it is fitting and proper
to threaten, be rude and violent to,
babies, digs, cats, and
anything one thinks he is is superior to in power.
This is the kind of thinking that brought us Iraq, etc...
I am shocked to see that Tom Potter thinks it is fitting and proper to
be rude to, and threaten, scientists who
work in fundamental research (such as general relativity) that does
not meet his criteria for short-term
pay-off.
This is the kind of thinking that brought the Inquisition, put Galileo
in house arrest for the rest of his days,
resulted in the excommunication of Copernicus, compelled Newton to
hide his work for decades following
the castigation he received for his theory of light, caused the Scopes
trial, and shut down the Supercollider project.
PD
PD
.
|
|
|
| User: "Androcles" |
|
| Title: Re: The demographics of rudeness |
17 May 2007 11:38:09 AM |
|
|
"PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1179418611.417917.243730@u30g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
: On May 17, 12:02 am, Tom Potter <tdp1...@gmail.com> wrote:
: >
: > I was shocked to see that moortel
: > thinks that it is fitting and proper
: > to threaten, be rude and violent to,
: > babies, digs, cats, and
: > anything one thinks he is is superior to in power.
: >
: > This is the kind of thinking that brought us Iraq, etc...
: >
:
: I am shocked to see that Tom Potter thinks it is fitting and proper to
: be rude to, and threaten, scientists who
: work in fundamental research (such as general relativity)
HAHAHA!
Easily shocked, aren't you?
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Ghost In The Machine" |
|
| Title: Re: The demographics of rudeness |
19 May 2007 08:00:28 PM |
|
|
In sci.physics, Androcles
<Engineer@hogwarts.physics>
wrote
on Thu, 17 May 2007 16:38:09 GMT
<Rx%2i.23471$Ug.21951@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk>:
"PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1179418611.417917.243730@u30g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
: On May 17, 12:02 am, Tom Potter <tdp1...@gmail.com> wrote:
: >
: > I was shocked to see that moortel
: > thinks that it is fitting and proper
: > to threaten, be rude and violent to,
: > babies, digs, cats, and
: > anything one thinks he is is superior to in power.
: >
: > This is the kind of thinking that brought us Iraq, etc...
: >
:
: I am shocked to see that Tom Potter thinks it is fitting and proper to
: be rude to, and threaten, scientists who
: work in fundamental research (such as general relativity)
HAHAHA!
Easily shocked, aren't you?
Dry climate, rubber-soled shoes, metal doorknob, a bit of
shuffling, and voila -- you're shocked.
Either that, or watch what Paris Hilton did the other week.
Take your pick.
--
#191,
/dev/signature: Not a text file
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Androcles" |
|
| Title: Re: The demographics of rudeness |
20 May 2007 01:25:25 AM |
|
|
"The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@sirius.tg00suus7038.net> wrote in message
news:c6j4i4-3fh.ln1@sirius.tg00suus7038.net...
: In sci.physics, Androcles
: <Engineer@hogwarts.physics>
: wrote
: on Thu, 17 May 2007 16:38:09 GMT
: <Rx%2i.23471$Ug.21951@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk>:
: >
: > "PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote in message
: > news:1179418611.417917.243730@u30g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
: >: On May 17, 12:02 am, Tom Potter <tdp1...@gmail.com> wrote:
: >: >
: >: > I was shocked to see that moortel
: >: > thinks that it is fitting and proper
: >: > to threaten, be rude and violent to,
: >: > babies, digs, cats, and
: >: > anything one thinks he is is superior to in power.
: >: >
: >: > This is the kind of thinking that brought us Iraq, etc...
: >: >
: >:
: >: I am shocked to see that Tom Potter thinks it is fitting and proper to
: >: be rude to, and threaten, scientists who
: >: work in fundamental research (such as general relativity)
: >
: > HAHAHA!
: >
: > Easily shocked, aren't you?
: >
:
: Dry climate, rubber-soled shoes, metal doorknob, a bit of
: shuffling, and voila -- you're shocked.
It's much easier than that. Tom Potter thinking is enough to shock Phuckwit
Duck, which is understandable since PD is incapable of thinking.
[snip -- or as Uncle Stooopid says, snop; the local village idiot says anip]
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "The_Man" |
|
| Title: Re: The demographics of rudeness |
17 May 2007 09:10:20 AM |
|
|
On May 17, 1:02 am, Tom Potter <tdp1...@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 16, 8:39 pm, "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoor...@ThankS-NO-
SperM.hotmail.com> wrote:
"Tom Potter" <tdp1...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:1179284981.535325.97070@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On May 15, 7:02 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
Tom Potterwrote:
It would be interesting and useful,
if some edu research group plotted the geographical distribution
of the rudest people in the newsgroups,
Try to be less rude, Potter. Some people speak with their shotguns.
Sam makes a good point when he points out
that rude people frequently turn to threats and violence
when their rudeness is challenged.
Hopefully Sam will post his views on how
rational, intelligent, civilized, moral folks
should deal with the rude people in the newsgroups,
who attack messengers with words,
and personal attack web pages and awards,
rather than address messages.
Sam, how would you deal with rude people like
Moortel, Erich Max Francis, Puddleduck, T Wake, The_Man,
Art Deco, etc.?
Would you shoot them?
I just saw a segment on CNN today
about people standing by as helpless folks
were being beaten, raped, and murdered.
Should rudesness and violence be exposed and challenged,
or should folks ignore rudeness, threats and violence?
What you think should be done, is de-facto, of no importance.
Folks will always ignore rudeness, threats and violence when
it is directed at inferior life forms. No one cares, you see.
Being an inferior life form yourself, you obviously have a
problem with that. But who cares?
Dirk Vdm- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I was shocked
Shocked! Shocked!
to see that moortel
thinks that it is fitting and proper
to threaten, be rude and violent to,
stupid people like you?
babies,
Do babies even NOTICE if someone is "Rude" to them?
The only baby likely to be offended by a Usenet post to sci.physics
is .... Tom Potter.
Boo-hoo! Waaaaaaaaaaaa!
Do you need your diaper changed?
digs, cats,
Cats are evil - they deserve whatever they get.
and
anything one thinks he is is superior to in power.
We don't THINK we are superior to you - we KNOW. If we weren't, we
couldn't live with ourselves.
This is the kind of thinking that brought us Iraq, etc...
SR? GR? QM?
If you don't like the tone here, leave. It's a free country; oh, *****,
I forgot - China ISN'T a free country.
You keep getting *****-slapped here because of you total ignorance.
Instead of whining about your (well-deserved) mistreatment, you could
go and LEARN something.
--
Tom "Boo hoo" Potter
*** Time Magazine Big Fucking Baby of the Year 2006 ***http://home.earthlink.net/~tdphttp://tdp1001.googlepages.com/homehttp://no-turtles.comhttp://www.frappr.com/tompotterhttp://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001http://spaces.msn.com/tdp1001http://www.flickr.com/photos/tom-potterhttp://tom-potter.blogspot.com- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Gisse" |
|
| Title: Re: The demographics of rudeness |
16 May 2007 04:54:02 PM |
|
|
On May 15, 8:09 pm, Tom Potter <tdp1...@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
If you don't like it, leave. Nobody wants you here anyway.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "tj Frazir" |
|
| Title: Re: The demographics of rudeness |
17 May 2007 07:34:20 PM |
|
|
searage . "get yer fuckin boat out of my fucking way meathead "
Its NOT who you are BUT How many morons get in the way how offten .
Ill smile the first 50 fuckin times but after that Im hanging myself
with the horn rope after I run 33000 tons over some dumbfuck .
" this btitch is so slow it takes her an hour and 1/2 to watch 60
minutes.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
