The direction of time is not a relative



 Science > Physics > The direction of time is not a relative

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Nick"
Date: 23 Jun 2005 07:06:15 PM
Object: The direction of time is not a relative
Time moves forward in every direction;
and directions are curved.
.

User: "T Wake"

Title: Re: The direction of time is not a relative 24 Jun 2005 01:29:17 PM
"Nick" <macromitch@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1119571575.476666.32930@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...

Time moves forward in every direction;
and directions are curved.

Time may well move forward, yada yada yada.
More importantly Nick constantly starts new threads to avoid ones which are
going in a direction he doesn't like.
.

User: "Zigoteau"

Title: Re: The direction of time is not a relative 24 Jun 2005 03:40:40 AM
Hi, Nick,

Time moves forward in every direction;

Does this include backwards?

and directions are curved.

so that direct is indirect, and black is white, and up is down.
It's all very clear, really. There is no point in getting out of bed in
the morning.
Cheers,
Zigoteau.
.
User: "Nick"

Title: Re: The direction of time is not a relative 25 Jun 2005 08:01:30 PM
What do we say when something happens (in time)?
We say it takes place!
.
User: "T Wake"

Title: Re: The direction of time is not a relative 26 Jun 2005 05:28:45 AM
"Nick" <macromitch@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1119747690.271760.302020@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

What do we say when something happens (in time)?
We say it takes place!

So?
.



User: "Gary Eickmeier"

Title: Re: The direction of time is not a relative 23 Jun 2005 08:06:52 PM
Nick wrote:

Time moves forward in every direction;
and directions are curved.

Great.
Gary Eickmeier
.
User: "OsherD"

Title: Re: The direction of time is not a relative 23 Jun 2005 08:18:56 PM

From Osher Doctorow

The word "direction" in mathematics and physics comes from "direction
vector" which is simply a unit vector (a vector of length 1). This is
what I think Gary Eickmeier was referring to. The intuitive idea of
direction as Nick is using it would probably be closer to "space", so I
think that Nick is trying to say that time is "at" every point in space
and space is curved.
By the way, there are several reasons for using the mathematically
precise meaning of direction vector including the fact that unit
vectors are determined by their angles rather than their magnitudes
(since they all have magnitude 1). Their angles indicate where they
are pointing to, say from the origin.
Osher Doctorow
.
User: ""

Title: Re: The direction of time is not a relative 24 Jun 2005 02:17:44 PM
OsherD wrote:

From Osher Doctorow


The word "direction" in mathematics and physics comes from "direction
vector" which is simply a unit vector (a vector of length 1).

Actually it may be that time itself formed both direction and
dimension, meaning what we see as dimension may simply be an illusion.
singularity = 0d , then 1_axis = 1d then 2nd_axis =2d, then 3d...(and
supposidly arrow of time = 4d)

From math formulas and tensor philosophy then possibly:

0d = explosion at singularity
1. (explosion similar to the displacement of an engine's(or air pump)
piston (or bullet=bang) in an enclosed air/water chamber...the
displacement(action/reaction) needs to be replaced by something such as
air,water, or in space possibly what we call the void)
2. (each displacement/turbulance thus forms a void bubble at the center
of the singularity which then becomes a dielectric plate(dipole...no
such thing as monopole)separating the chamber in half(=directional
arrow of time) between intake & exhaust(tranmission & reception and
North & South))
3. (the displacement/explosion possibly then forms the dimensions and
philosphicly speaking the tensors known as the manifold of space (same
as an engine manifold with the piston at the center(singularity) of the
chamber between the manifold's exhaust and intake which in this case
curb space to recombine together at the engine's piston (singularity)).
The chamber would be of course what we call curved space.
1d = 180degree time phase of energetic explosion (same as heart beat
pulse, shift phase to nullify crests then you get null energy).
2d = sin & cos intervals of time
In math:
scale & translation for say one axis (= 1d) is:
Scaling: 2(x) or Translaton: 1x+4x
Phase calculations = 2d (or 3d) is:
Rotation (can't remember the exact formula but somewhere like):
x_rotated_by_1/6th_of_a_phase(2d) = xsin30+ycos30
y_rotated_by_1/6th_of_a_phase(2d) = xsin30-ycos30
3d rotation similar as above...
Kairo
An explosion in water forms air bubbles and likewise during the big
bang which in this case was void bubbles which formed at the center of
the bang(singularity) and formed an semi-insulating dielectric
plate(dipole) which may ethernaly be reverbating(time and it's
directional arrow perpendicular to the plate).

This is
what I think Gary Eickmeier was referring to. The intuitive idea of
direction as Nick is using it would probably be closer to "space", so I
think that Nick is trying to say that time is "at" every point in space
and space is curved.

By the way, there are several reasons for using the mathematically
precise meaning of direction vector including the fact that unit
vectors are determined by their angles rather than their magnitudes
(since they all have magnitude 1). Their angles indicate where they
are pointing to, say from the origin.

Osher Doctorow

.

User: "Nick"

Title: Re: The direction of time is not a relative 25 Jun 2005 08:02:59 PM
Then the "arrow" of time is not a
relative!
.
User: "The Ghost In The Machine"

Title: Re: The direction of time is not a relative 26 Jun 2005 12:00:09 AM
In sci.physics, Nick
<macromitch@yahoo.com>
wrote
on 25 Jun 2005 18:02:59 -0700
<1119747779.695207.148250@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>:

Then the "arrow" of time is not a
relative!

I would certainly not want to marry into the Time family.
I prefer real people.
:-P :-)
--
#191,

It's still legal to go .sigless.
.





  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Direction of electron flow relative to magnetic field and polarity
Re: Feynman becomes convinced about time travel (in the forward direction)
#26 news today of High Energy Ray from direction of Centaurus A New Book: Growing Solar-System theory via Dirac New-Radioactivity
Acceleration = direction, or (velocity-magnitude) / duration, change.
A New Direction for Liquid Crystals
Quantum Gravity 90.1: Re Which "Direction" Is Time?
How can magnetic field align a mgnetic dipole along its direction?
Math, Physics, and the direction of time
Re: Lorentz Boost in Arbitrary Direction
ENTROPY and the Direction of Time from the BIG BANG
Will everyone agree that we are not in the right direction?
Which direction is E?
change in direction of the path of light
changing a maglev train's direction
Quantum Gravity 91.0: Which Direction is "Interdisciplinary"?
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER