| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Nuttob15" |
| Date: |
15 Oct 2003 08:49:52 AM |
| Object: |
The Flaw in High Energy Physics |
The Flaw in High Energy Physics
When it comes to particle physics a question arises. High Energy
experiments have led to a plethora of short-lived high-energy products. As an
example, a proton and an anti-proton, each having a mass equivalent energy of 1
GEV are accelerated to a velocity so close to that of light so that they each
contain kinetic energy of hundreds of GEV. These particles are then induced to
collide and, in so doing, produce short lived high-energy products having
observable mass equivalent energies of hundreds of GEV. Where did the energy
they represent come from?
A:- The energy certainly wasn't in the original particles, their rest mass
indicates that their total energy was about 2 GEV.
B:- The only source of the excess energy represented by the collision
products is the kinetic energy of the impacting protons. The observed total
energy after the collision never seems to be reported as exceeding the input
energy. If the excess energy was hidden in the original protons and did not
come from their kinetic energy, then where did the kinetic energy go?
C:- Experiment indicates that electrons, and the quarks that make up
protons and neutrons have no solid structure down to the observation limit of
10^-18 meters, as indeed they cannot have. The more rest mass energy a particle
has, the smaller it is. If quarks contained smaller particles, the rest mass of
those smaller particles would be greater than the rest mass of the quark and
the proton or neutron would be more massive than it is. On the other hand, if
particles making up the quark were less massive than the quark they would also
be larger and would not fit within the nucleon.
Rather than accept the fact that these particles contain no structure,
theoreticians have resorted to Superstring Theory that asserts that reality
consists of curled higher order dimensions having a radius 20 orders of
magnitude smaller than the nucleon (a nice choice of scale since their
observation is not likely to ever be possible). At this scale level, the
combination of Quantum Theory and General Relativity is asserted to cause space
to be a frothy foam. Unfortunately physicists would rather accept such a
concept than accept the idea that there is an error in General Relativity,
after all the quasi-religious "Faith" must not be challenged. Once the error is
admitted and the necessary corrections made, the merging of the two theories
becomes obvious. The need for the activity at 10^-34 meters vanishes and space
becomes smooth.
Everything really does become much simpler when one follows the rules of
evidence in Science as well it is done in other activities and recognize that
it is necessary to consider the effects of possible changes in the size of the
units of measurement used by instruments produced by a change in reference
frame in addition to the results of those measurements. When one takes this
step an entirely different view of reality results. This view of reality is
much more straightforward and is capable of being understood by the average man
since the operation of its mechanisms are clear.
The disturbing part of the present process is that the next generation of
scientists is having their minds destroyed by being indoctrinated into the
"True Faith".
The source material for this posting may be found in "Gravity" (1987),
"The Einstein Hoax" (1997), and "Corrections to Residual Errors in Special
Relativity (1999) located at http://www.members.aol.com/einsteinhoax/site.htm .
EVERYTHING WHICH WE ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE
HAVE ACCEPTED AS TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST
BE MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS
REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP FROM
THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.
Please include any response via E-mail since the Newsgroups are not
monitored on a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same
courtesy as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our
parts, please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you
have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.
For a response send E-Mail to
The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 5 years.
In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE MATERIAL
PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by individuals who have
mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without questioning it. If anyone
provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be objectively answered, the
material at the Website will be withdrawn.
.
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: The Flaw in High Energy Physics |
15 Oct 2003 11:00:21 AM |
|
|
Nuttob15 wrote:
The Flaw in High Energy Physics
[snip]
Name one failure of the Standard Model.
Psychotic ineducable boring retic (Ernest Wittke),
http://w0rli.home.att.net/youare.swf
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/sunshine.jpg
http://www.you-moron.com/
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=group%3Asci.physics+author%3Awittke
http://www.apa.org/journals/psp/psp7761121.html
http://insti.physics.sunysb.edu/~siegel/quack.html
<http://www.firehead.org/~jessh/film/kubrick/Kubrick-Psycho.html>
<http://www.naturalchild.com/elliott_barker/prisons.html>
The source material for this posting may be found in "Gravity" (1987),
"The Einstein Hoax" (1997), and "Corrections to Residual Errors in Special
Relativity (1999)
[snip]
Hey, stooopid Ernest Wittke - Do you want EVIDENCE? Each of the 24
GPS satellites carries either four cesium atomic clocks or three
rubidum atomic clocks in orbit, with full relativistic corrections
being applied.
http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0307140
GR structure, especially Part 4/p. 7
<http://rattler.cameron.edu/EMIS/journals/LRG/Articles/Volume4/2001-4will/index.html>
Experimental constraints on General Relativity.
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0308010
Nature 425 374 (2003)
<http://rattler.cameron.edu/EMIS/journals/LRG/Articles/Volume6/2003-1ashby/index.html>
http://www.eftaylor.com/pub/projecta.pdf
Relativity in the GPS system
NIM A 355 537 (1995)
Physics Letters B 328 103 (1994)
Physical Review Letters 64 1697 (1990)
Physical Review Letters 39 1051 (1977)
Physical Review 135 B1071 (1964)
Physics Letters 12 260 (1964)
Europhysics Letters 56(2) 170-174 (2001)
General Relativity and Gravitation 34(9) 1371 (2002)
http://fourmilab.to/etexts/einstein/specrel/specrel.pdf
<http://www.geocities.com/physics_world/sr/ae_1905_error.htm>
<http://www.physics.gatech.edu/people/faculty/finkelstein/relativity.pdf>
http://users.powernet.co.uk/bearsoft/Paper6.pdf
http://users.powernet.co.uk/bearsoft/LPHrel.html
Longitudinal and transverse mass
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/gpsuser/gpsuser.pdf
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/sigspec/default.htm
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/icd200/default.htm
http://www.trimble.com/gps/index.html
http://sirius.chinalake.navy.mil/satpred/
http://www.phys.lsu.edu/mog/mog9/node9.html
http://egtphysics.net/GPS/RelGPS.htm
http://www.schriever.af.mil/gps/Current/current.oa1
http://edu-observatory.org/gps/gps_books.html
<http://www-astronomy.mps.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast162/Unit5/gps.html>
If anyone
provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be objectively answered, the
material at the Website will be withdrawn.
Right, like your head has ever been withdrawn from your ***** - even
when you *****.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
