The Force of Dead Science



 Science > Physics > The Force of Dead Science

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 3 of 3

1

 

2

 

3

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Pentcho Valev"
Date: 04 Mar 2006 03:27:12 AM
Object: The Force of Dead Science
"You cannot kill me because I am dead" vampires often say. And the
state of death makes them much stronger than humans.
A theory deduced (or deducible) from a false premise is dead science.
All its results are false. If jugglers have somehow managed to
introduce true results, close inspection would show they are
corollaries of the negation of the false premise.
Einstein's theory of relativity was deduced from Einstein's false
second postulate stating that the speed of light is independent of the
speed of the light source or observer (principle of constancy of the
speed of light). All its results are false. True results introduced by
Einstein or other jugglers are corollaries of Newton's principle of
VARIABILITY of speed of light. Einstein's theory is dead science.
Thermodynamics was deduced from the false premise stating that heat
cannot be converted into work. All its results are false. True results
introduced by thermodynamics jugglers are incompatible with the false
premise and close inspection shows they do not belong to
thermodynamics.
The state of death makes relativity and thermodynamics strong. Up until
recently Einstein was much stronger than Newton. This is changing
however:
http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/news.asp?id=3880
Pentcho Valev
.

User: "Dirk Van de moortel"

Title: Re: The Force of Dead Science 05 Mar 2006 09:57:53 AM
"Mike" <eleatis@yahoo.gr> wrote in message news:1141573869.785298.246260@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...


Dirk Van de moortel wrote:

"Mike"
aka Eleatis
aka Undeniable
aka Bill Smith
<eleatis@yahoo.gr> wrote in message news:1141559632.134573.162730@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...


Dirk Van de moortel wrote:

"Mike"
aka Bill Smith
aka Eleatis
aka Undeniable
<eleatis@yahoo.gr> wrote in message news:1141506122.658864.209100@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...


Pentcho Valev wrote:

[snip]


http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/news.asp?id=3880

Pentcho Valev


Ha... "The results showed Newton to be the winner on all counts,
although opinion was much closer on the overall contribution to
humankind. When asked who made the bigger overall contribution to
science the public voted 61.8% for Newton and 38.2% for Einstein ..

Mass behavior confirms the golden ratio: (1+sqrt(5))/2 = 1.618.

61.8% voted for Newton. Newton is the golden ratio. The public is
right.


80% of the public votes for a god.
The public is wrong.



Hey fascist psycho, you are part of the public. Don't you ever think
you have a quality that differtentiates you from the public. Especially
givent he fact that you got no life and spend 24/7 monitoring these
threds.


When you killfile someone for good, you're not supposed to
read his messages, at least not without making a complete
imbecile of yourself:

29-Jan-2006:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/18246d2052b351eb
| You are now "plonked" for good idiot. Anyway, you contribute nothing in
| these ng's other than psychosis and stupidity. I stick with it now and
| you "stock" your merde some place else.

Short memory or brain rot?

Dirk Vdm


Hello fascist. Idiot of sci.* Million postings award winner.
hahahahahahaha

and...
1-Sep-2005:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.math/msg/1b0256e5a1ad48b0
| Gee, Cantor, Goedel, Peano and the others would be proud of you Dirt.
| Especially if they knew that besides that you also understand the
| square root.
|
| Plonk
|
| Mike
5-Feb-2005:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/986fdd22eebc33b9
| You got nothing to say, proven fact. You spend your whole misearable
| days maintaining a site where you store your impotence and psychotic
| behavior.
|
| I had enough with you schizo, a killfile will do it and then a clean of
| the Dirt you left around making pooppies all over the place.
|
| Mike
25-Sep-2004:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/e5cfae098ed3d0a1
| Hi Dirk, Are you still working on a definition of sqrt? You and Alex
| can make a nice team. He thinks there is no time so you got all the
| time in the world to think about sqrt.
|
| Plonk Dirk
|
| Mike
Severe brain rot.
Dirk Vdm
.

User: "Hexenmeister"

Title: Re: The Force of Dead Science 04 Mar 2006 05:37:52 PM
"Mike" <eleatis@yahoo.gr> wrote in message
news:1141506122.658864.209100@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...


Pentcho Valev wrote:

[snip]


http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/news.asp?id=3880

Pentcho Valev


Ha... "The results showed Newton to be the winner on all counts,
although opinion was much closer on the overall contribution to
humankind. When asked who made the bigger overall contribution to
science the public voted 61.8% for Newton and 38.2% for Einstein ..

Mass behavior confirms the golden ratio: (1+sqrt(5))/2 = 1.618.

61.8% voted for Newton. Newton is the golden ratio. The public is
right.

The publich does not know however that:

Axioms of SR:

1. Space-time is a 4-D continuum --- fails verification

2. There are globally inertial reference frames - fails verification

3. POR ( epistemological principle that fails verification)

4. Constancy of speed of light is all inertial FoR - fails verification


If the publick new that, the result would be 0% for "Dr." Al.



Mike

I'll agree with 1,2 and 4.
For 3 -- You are wrong, Mike.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Catalina/Drive.htm
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Wilson/SpinWilson.htm
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/AC/AC.htm
To be convincing, tell a half-truth.
Androcles.
.


  Page 3 of 3

1

 

2

 

3

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.1170     pg.648     pg.358     pg.197     pg.108     pg.59     pg.32     pg.17     pg.9     pg.5     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER