Science > Physics > The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Esnesqw" |
| Date: |
03 Aug 2004 09:04:58 AM |
| Object: |
The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe |
The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe
The Gravity Transformations provided at the Website and in many of these
postings lead to an interesting, and fully internally and externally
compatible, conclusion as to the way universes form. Consider the effects of
these transformations:
Force = 1
Length = 1/(1-$)
Time = (1-$)
where $ is the gravitational potential between an infinite radius and the
elevation under consideration.
These transformations show that an object contracts under the effects of
gravitation in terms of the units of measurement which exist at a
quasi-infinite radius and, as it does, the size of the matter contained therein
shrinks in proportion. Initially, the size of the object, both as measured with
the units of measurement existing at a quasi-infinite distance and those
existing within the object contracts as one would expect. When the object has
reduced its diameter to about 1/10th of its Horizon Radius, the situation
changes. As externally observed, the contraction continues to the horizon
radius, but as observed internally using "local" units of measurement the
situation is different. The contraction slows and when the internally observed
radius has reduced to four times the horizon radius (the externally observed
radius is twice the horizon radius at this point), the contraction ceases and
the object begins to expand! This expansion continues until the internally
observed radius becomes infinite as the externally observed radius falls to the
horizon radius.
During this process, the gravitational transformation for time causes the
later portion of the process to slow down, in terms of the external units of
measurement. As observed internally late in the process, the object will appear
to have originated as an intensely energetic point which rapidly expands to the
size of the primordial fireball of the "big bang" (cosmic inflation). This
fireball then expands and cools to form a universe similar to the one we know.
That Universe, as observed internally, will expand forever. As observed
externally, as it loses energy by radiation, it will contract to a size which
is incomparably smaller than a nucleon after an incredibly long period of time.
The internally observed expansion results from the fact that once the object
has contracted to its minimum internally observed size, the pressure produced
by its radiation will exceed the pressure produced by gravitation.
Cosmologists are currently suggesting that the matter in the Universe
seems to be imbedded as a "dust" in a gas composed of "dark matter" which
provides the pressure required to cause expansion. The amount of this "dark
matter" is estimated to be on the order of ten times the amount of "normal
matter" which exists. The background electromagnetic radiation of space, as
evidenced by its observed 3K to 3.5K radiation temperature shows that the
energy it represents is on that order. What seems to be overlooked is the fact
that electromagnetic radiation transports momentum and exerts a pressure as if
its component photons possessed inertial mass. (Never mind that photons are
alleged to be massless, if they look like a duck, walk like a duck, and quack
like a duck, then it is reasonable to accept that they are ducks and one must
accept that they possess inertial mass.) What is also overlooked is that
photons possess a gravitational mass which is twice their inertial mass. The
gas pressure and gravitational attraction associated with this radiation,
qualitatively at least, probably will account for much of the observed
cosmological behavior. It must also be remembered that when we look in any
direction either away from or towards the original primordial fireball, we are
looking into the past when the velocity of light, in absolute terms, was higher
than it is now.
Before you pass judgment on this posting, it is strongly suggested that
you read the material posted at http:/www.members.aol.com/einsteinhoax/hoax.htm
; /gravity.htm ; and /relcor.htm .
The source material for this posting may be found in "Gravity" (1987),
"The Einstein Hoax" (1997), and "Corrections to Residual Errors in Special
Relativity (1999) located at http://www.members.aol.com/einsteinhoax/site.htm .
EVERYTHING WHICH WE ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE
HAVE ACCEPTED AS TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST
BE MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS
REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP FROM
THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.
All Newsposts by this Website are available at
http://www.members.aol.com/postinglog/newspostings.com
Please back up any response with an E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored
on a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy
as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts,
please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you have
read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.
E-mail:-
The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 5 years.
In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE, COMPETENT, AND RELAVENT REBUTTALS OF
ANY OF THE MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by
individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without
questioning it. If anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be
objectively answered, the material at the Website will be withdrawn.
.
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe |
03 Aug 2004 10:23:50 AM |
|
|
Esnesqw wrote:
The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe
[snip 90 lines of ignorant crap]
http://www.freefarts.com/farts.html
Move cursor over blinkers to hear Retic's lecture.
Psychotic ineducable boring spammer retic (Ernest Wittke),
You see yourself this way,
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete6.jpg
The entire remainder of the planet sees you this way,
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete3.png
http://www.edu-observatory.org/cranks.html
http://www.pagetutor.com/idiot/idiot.html
http://b5.sdvc.uwyo.edu/bab5/snds/argcstpd.wav
http://w0rli.home.att.net/youare.swf
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/sunshine.jpg
http://www.you-moron.com/
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=group%3Asci.physics+author%3Awittke
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete0.jpg
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete1.png
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete2.png
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete3.png
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete4.png
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete5.jpg
http://www.apa.org/journals/psp/psp7761121.html
http://insti.physics.sunysb.edu/~siegel/quack.html
<http://www.firehead.org/~jessh/film/kubrick/Kubrick-Psycho.html>
<http://www.naturalchild.com/elliott_barker/prisons.html>
The source material for this posting may be found in "Gravity" (1987),
"The Einstein Hoax" (1997), and "Corrections to Residual Errors in Special
Relativity (1999)
[snip]
Hey, stooopid spammer Ernest Wittke - Do you want EVIDENCE? Each
of the 24 GPS satellites carries either four cesium atomic clocks
or three rubidum atomic clocks in orbit, with full relativistic
corrections being applied. NAVSTAR Block II GPS satellites
(currently being launched as replacements) have two rubidium and
two cesium atomic clocks.
<http://optoelectronics.perkinelmer.com/content/Datasheets/rfs2f.pdf>
<http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/RelWWW/tests.html>
Mathematics of gravitation
http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0111236
Geometric structure of reality
http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0307140
GR structure, especially Part 4/p. 7
<http://rattler.cameron.edu/EMIS/journals/LRG/Articles/Volume4/2001-4will/index.html>
http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0311039
<http://www.weburbia.demon.co.uk/physics/experiments.html>
Experimental constraints on General Relativity
<http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/ptti/ptti2002/paper20.pdf>
Nature 425 374 (2003)
<http://rattler.cameron.edu/EMIS/journals/LRG/Articles/Volume6/2003-1ashby/index.html>
http://www.eftaylor.com/pub/projecta.pdf
Relativity in the GPS system
http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9909014
Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 121101
falling light
<http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/relativ/airtim.html>
Hafele-Keating Experiment
http://www.hawaii.edu/suremath/SRtwinParadox.html
<http://physics.syr.edu/courses/modules/LIGHTCONE/twins.html>
Twin Paradox
Science 303(5661) 1143;1153 (2004)
http://arXiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0401086
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0312071
Deeply relativistic neutron star binaries
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0405160
Black hole evaporation
Physics Today 57(7) 40 (2004)
No aether
<http://www.npl.washington.edu/eotwash/pdf/prl83-3585.pdf>
http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0301024
Nordtvedt Effect
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0403292
http://arXiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0310723
WMAP + Sloane Digital Sky Survey
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0404175
Dark matter candidates
<http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/March01/Carroll/frames.html>
Carroll on what it all means.
Special Relativity is physics on a topologically trivial
Lorentzian
manifold with a metric whose curvature tensor is zero. This is a
perfectly diffeomorphism-invariant condition and does not require
any particular coordinate choice. It is invariant under
the full group of diffeomorphisms. The Poincare group is
the group of *isometries* of the metric in special relativity.
The Special Relativity metric is *non-dynamical* (unlike GR). It
defines the coupling *constants* of your theory. If you change
the
metric in any nontrivial way you are changing your theory. An
operation can only be called a "symmetry" of a
special-relativistic
(non-gravitational) theory if it preserves the metric, and
therefore
the symmetry of special-relativistic theories is the Poincare
group
only. General Relativity (gravitation) has a dynamic metric.
NIM A 355 537 (1995)
Physics Letters B 328 103 (1994)
Physical Review Letters 64 1697 (1990)
Physical Review Letters 39 1051 (1977)
Physical Review 135 B1071 (1964)
Physics Letters 12 260 (1964)
Europhysics Letters 56(2) 170-174 (2001)
General Relativity and Gravitation 34(9) 1371 (2002)
http://fourmilab.to/etexts/einstein/specrel/specrel.pdf
<http://www.geocities.com/physics_world/sr/ae_1905_error.htm>
<http://www.physics.gatech.edu/people/faculty/finkelstein/relativity.pdf>
Longitudinal and transverse mass
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0306076.pdf
<http://www.metaresearch.org/solar%20system/gps/absolute-gps-1meter-3.ASP>
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/gpsuser/gpsuser.pdf
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/sigspec/default.htm
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/icd200/default.htm
http://www.trimble.com/gps/index.html
http://sirius.chinalake.navy.mil/satpred/
http://www.phys.lsu.edu/mog/mog9/node9.html
http://egtphysics.net/GPS/RelGPS.htm
http://www.schriever.af.mil/gps/Current/current.oa1
http://edu-observatory.org/gps/gps_books.html
<http://www-astronomy.mps.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast162/Unit5/gps.html>
If anyone
provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be objectively answered, the
material at the Website will be withdrawn.
Right, like your head has ever been withdrawn from your ***** -
even when you *****.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
