| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
21 Apr 2006 12:21:31 PM |
| Object: |
The Horizon |
The horizon is the line between God, and our reality on earth. It is
easy to notice and very real. When you look out of your window what
your observing is not as defined and not as real as what is right in
front of you now. You can observe and measure things that are close to
you with greater precision than things that are farther away. And
obviously the farther away something is the worse the precision will
become so things will naturally become less defined and more like
possibilities. Eventually thousands of light years away from us things
cease to be realities at all and exist as a superposition of every
possibility conceivable. From a simple observer at that point things
would feel defined and very real, and we would be possibilities to
them. This is what is meant by the relativity of space.
You can believe in concrete objectivism because without observers
present things aren't ever real, but you can notice the effects of
waves of possibilities from this principle of relativity. The dark
matter that causes the anomalies we find in astronomy could actually be
ordinary matter that has simply become a superposition of
possibilities. I've been running experiments to try to prove this
theory and have some interesting results.
My video camera is capable of filming events that happen at a distance,
and clearly shows this kind of relativity. By connecting the camera
into a feedback loop on the television, so it is recording itself
anything else I mix in or tape simultaneously with the camera will
behave in a chaotic way and seems to only exist as a possibility. I
believe this is because of the distance. When you film anything in a
feedback loop it gets sucked into a infinite loop, like you would see
when two mirrors face each other. This eventually causes what your
filming to lose its definition.
Another experiment, which is more impressive is to film a clock from a
distance. Then when you play the video back and synchronize the same
clock to the video, the distance can cause the time to behave as if
there are two different clocks running which don't keep good time. By
taking one clock away from the television, and bringing them back
together once the video has run the times they show will be different
than if you left the clock next to the VCR. You can see this effect
amplified by recording the television while it is playing the video of
the clock. The more you re-record the video, the greater the chance of
the clock keeping bad time.
I'll keep working on these experiments and get back to you with my
results.
.
|
|
| User: "Toshi ikutsu?" |
|
| Title: Re: The Horizon |
21 Apr 2006 02:08:26 PM |
|
|
<CoreyWhite@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1145640091.512643.260340@t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
The horizon is the line between God, and our reality on earth.
Bull, it is that line on the horizon.
It is
easy to notice and very real. When you look out of your window what
your observing is not as defined and not as real as what is right in
front of you now.
Take your meds quickly.
You can observe and measure things that are close to
you with greater precision than things that are farther away. And
obviously the farther away something is the worse the precision will
become so things will naturally become less defined and more like
possibilities. Eventually thousands of light years away from us things
cease to be realities at all and exist as a superposition of every
possibility conceivable.
Bull, how are you ever going to prove that? Nobody can ever find out.
From a simple observer at that point things
would feel defined and very real, and we would be possibilities to
them. This is what is meant by the relativity of space.
you mean the "relativity of my space.com"
You can believe in concrete objectivism because without observers
present things aren't ever real, but you can notice the effects of
waves of possibilities from this principle of relativity. The dark
matter that causes the anomalies we find in astronomy could actually be
ordinary matter that has simply become a superposition of
possibilities. I've been running experiments to try to prove this
theory and have some interesting results.
you found some dark matter? What does it look like?
My video camera is capable of filming events that happen at a distance,
and clearly shows this kind of relativity. By connecting the camera
into a feedback loop on the television, so it is recording itself
anything else I mix in or tape simultaneously with the camera will
behave in a chaotic way and seems to only exist as a possibility. I
believe this is because of the distance. When you film anything in a
feedback loop it gets sucked into a infinite loop, like you would see
when two mirrors face each other. This eventually causes what your
filming to lose its definition.
video feedback, 1960's stuff.
Another experiment, which is more impressive is to film a clock from a
distance. Then when you play the video back and synchronize the same
clock to the video, the distance can cause the time to behave as if
there are two different clocks running which don't keep good time. By
taking one clock away from the television, and bringing them back
together once the video has run the times they show will be different
than if you left the clock next to the VCR. You can see this effect
amplified by recording the television while it is playing the video of
the clock. The more you re-record the video, the greater the chance of
the clock keeping bad time.
I'll keep working on these experiments and get back to you with my
results.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: I Changed A Constant |
21 Apr 2006 09:53:58 PM |
|
|
Cosmologists claim to have found evidence that yet another fundamental
constant of nature, called mu, may have changed over the last 12
billion years. If confirmed, the result could force some physicists to
radically rethink their theories. It would also provide support for
string theory, which predicts extra spatial dimensions.
This is not the first time fundamental constants have been accused of
changing over the lifetime of the universe. Most famously, there was
controversy over the fine structure constant, alpha (α), which
governs how light and electrons interact. Some physicists claimed it is
changing while others said it was not (see "Speed of light may have
changed recently").
The ratio of a proton?s mass to that of an electron, known as mu, is
among the most mysterious of constants. There is no explanation for why
the proton?s mass should be 1836 times that of the electron.
The constant governs the strong nuclear force, which holds protons and
neutrons together in atomic nuclei, and is also responsible for binding
the quarks ? the building blocks which make up protons ? neutrons and
most other fundamental particles.
Distant quasars
Researchers at the Free University in Amsterdam in the Netherlands and
the European Southern Observatory in Chile discovered the variation in
mu. They did it by comparing the spectrum of molecular hydrogen gas in
the laboratory to what it was in quasars 12 billion light years away.
The spectrum depends on the relative masses of protons and electrons in
the molecule.
?This claimed result is very interesting if true,? says Thibault Damour
at the Institute of Advanced Scientific Studies (IHES) in
Bures-sur-Yvette in France, who co-authored a 1996 paper that found no
change in the fine structure constant, alpha.
Any change in mu, would support theories that posit extra dimensions.
As these dimensions evolve, in a manner similar to our expanding 3D
universe, the so-called constants would vary over both space and time.
Or it may be that we still do not fully understand the proton: it may
itself evolve through the universe?s lifetime, leading to the observed
variation.
?Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and this evidence
does not exist yet,? says Victor Flambaum at the University of New
South Wales, Australia. ?This result must be confirmed by other groups
before a revolution in cosmology is needed.?
Journal reference: Physical Review Letters (vol 96, p 151101)
-
Thus, my theory is proven!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Toshi ikutsu?" |
|
| Title: Re: I Changed A Constant |
21 Apr 2006 10:28:00 PM |
|
|
<CoreyWhite@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1145674438.456472.17300@t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Cosmologists claim to have found evidence that yet another fundamental
constant of nature, called mu, may have changed over the last 12
billion years.
Who was around 12 billion years ago to measure it ?
If confirmed, the result could force some physicists to
radically rethink their theories. It would also provide support for
string theory, which predicts extra spatial dimensions.
too much spin out of an unverifiable change
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: I Changed A Constant |
22 Apr 2006 10:46:23 AM |
|
|
The reason they say it was different 12 billion years ago, is because
it takes that long from light to travel from the quasar they measured
the constant with and compared it to the labratorys measurments. It is
entirely possible that mu is changing because of the distance as well
as the time, and this suggests that alternate realities exist over both
space and time, just like I have been telling everyone.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "T Wake" |
|
| Title: Re: I Changed A Constant |
22 Apr 2006 03:36:03 AM |
|
|
In <1145674438.456472.17300@t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>, sent to
sci.physics on Saturday 22 April 2006 03:53,
() had a brainstorm and wrote:
Thus, my theory is proven!
Far from it.
--
T Wake
Usenet.es7 at gishpuppy.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: I Changed A Constant |
22 Apr 2006 10:43:56 AM |
|
|
I hate you T Wake.
.
|
|
|
| User: "T Wake" |
|
| Title: Re: I Changed A Constant |
22 Apr 2006 11:12:08 AM |
|
|
<CoreyWhite@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1145720636.769817.164600@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
I hate you T Wake.
I know, but it is ok. Everyone has to go through puberty. You will get over
it soon enough.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: I Changed A Constant |
22 Apr 2006 11:16:07 AM |
|
|
Don't make me start working black magick on you... You will be covored
in boils and scabs before long. You can call that puberty if you want.
.
|
|
|
| User: "T Wake" |
|
| Title: Re: I Changed A Constant |
22 Apr 2006 11:26:05 AM |
|
|
<CoreyWhite@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1145722567.343592.162860@t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Don't make me start working black magick on you... You will be covored
in boils and scabs before long. You can call that puberty if you want.
Well, I am now scared. Does this count, legally, as a threat?
By the way, find some where else to express your hormonal angst.
--
For Google Groups users this may be important
http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: I Changed A Constant |
22 Apr 2006 11:50:01 AM |
|
|
Police only respond to threats when a crime has been comitted, or if
you are someone really important like the president. Besides I have
freedom of religion and freedom of speech, even if I am working black
magick on Bush they can't do anything unless they suspect me of
plotting an actual crime.
T Wake wrote:
<CoreyWhite@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1145722567.343592.162860@t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Don't make me start working black magick on you... You will be covored
in boils and scabs before long. You can call that puberty if you want.
Well, I am now scared. Does this count, legally, as a threat?
By the way, find some where else to express your hormonal angst.
--
For Google Groups users this may be important
http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "T Wake" |
|
| Title: Re: I Changed A Constant |
22 Apr 2006 01:09:30 PM |
|
|
<CoreyWhite@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1145724601.246495.90480@t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Police only respond to threats when a crime has been comitted, or if
you are someone really important like the president. Besides I have
freedom of religion and freedom of speech, even if I am working black
magick on Bush they can't do anything unless they suspect me of
plotting an actual crime.
I never mentioned anything about the police, this is just your paranoia
kicking in.
As an aside, freedom of religion / speech is a minefield area. For example
libel/slander are not protected by those freedoms, and in a similar manner
they do not allow you to make some one else live in fear.
As it stands, you are a somewhat obnoxious child so I am not actually
frightened by anything you say. Your black magic works as well as your
physics does...
Bet you are really looking forward to your school holidays, aren't you?
--
For Google Groups users this may be important
http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: I Changed A Constant |
22 Apr 2006 05:59:32 PM |
|
|
You are asking for it now.
T Wake wrote:
<CoreyWhite@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1145724601.246495.90480@t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Police only respond to threats when a crime has been comitted, or if
you are someone really important like the president. Besides I have
freedom of religion and freedom of speech, even if I am working black
magick on Bush they can't do anything unless they suspect me of
plotting an actual crime.
I never mentioned anything about the police, this is just your paranoia
kicking in.
As an aside, freedom of religion / speech is a minefield area. For example
libel/slander are not protected by those freedoms, and in a similar manner
they do not allow you to make some one else live in fear.
As it stands, you are a somewhat obnoxious child so I am not actually
frightened by anything you say. Your black magic works as well as your
physics does...
Bet you are really looking forward to your school holidays, aren't you?
--
For Google Groups users this may be important
http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "T Wake" |
|
| Title: Re: I Changed A Constant |
28 Apr 2006 04:34:00 PM |
|
|
<CoreyWhite@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1145746772.756975.122200@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
You are asking for it now.
Asking for what?
Oh yeah, I forgot you can only post a weekends when your parents/care
assistant lets you.....
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Hobba" |
|
| Title: Re: The Horizon |
21 Apr 2006 08:42:49 PM |
|
|
<CoreyWhite@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1145640091.512643.260340@t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
The horizon is the line between God, and our reality on earth. It is
easy to notice and very real. When you look out of your window what
your observing is not as defined and not as real as what is right in
front of you now. You can observe and measure things that are close to
you with greater precision than things that are farther away. And
obviously the farther away something is the worse the precision will
become so things will naturally become less defined and more like
possibilities. Eventually thousands of light years away from us things
cease to be realities at all and exist as a superposition of every
possibility conceivable. From a simple observer at that point things
would feel defined and very real, and we would be possibilities to
them. This is what is meant by the relativity of space.
You can believe in concrete objectivism because without observers
present things aren't ever real, but you can notice the effects of
waves of possibilities from this principle of relativity.
The principle of relativity has nothing to do with waves of probabilities.
Learn the basics then repost or better still stick to a philosophy form -
maybe they will be better able to put up with your obvious rubbish.
Rest of buzzwords jumbled together in meaningless ways by this documented
troll mercifully snipped.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.magick/msg/c7b39607eb0c30b5
Bill
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Hobba" |
|
| Title: Re: The Horizon |
21 Apr 2006 08:33:36 PM |
|
|
<CoreyWhite@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1145640091.512643.260340@t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
The horizon is the line between God, and our reality on earth. It is
easy to notice and very real. When you look out of your window what
your observing is not as defined and not as real as what is right in
front of you now. You can observe and measure things that are close to
you with greater precision than things that are farther away. And
obviously the farther away something is the worse the precision will
become so things will naturally become less defined and more like
possibilities. Eventually thousands of light years away from us things
cease to be realities at all and exist as a superposition of every
possibility conceivable. From a simple observer at that point things
would feel defined and very real, and we would be possibilities to
them. This is what is meant by the relativity of space.
You can believe in concrete objectivism because without observers
present things aren't ever real, but you can notice the effects of
waves of possibilities from this principle of relativity. The dark
matter that causes the anomalies we find in astronomy could actually be
ordinary matter that has simply become a superposition of
possibilities. I've been running experiments to try to prove this
theory and have some interesting results.
My video camera is capable of filming events that happen at a distance,
and clearly shows this kind of relativity. By connecting the camera
into a feedback loop on the television, so it is recording itself
anything else I mix in or tape simultaneously with the camera will
behave in a chaotic way and seems to only exist as a possibility. I
believe this is because of the distance. When you film anything in a
feedback loop it gets sucked into a infinite loop, like you would see
when two mirrors face each other. This eventually causes what your
filming to lose its definition.
Another experiment, which is more impressive is to film a clock from a
distance. Then when you play the video back and synchronize the same
clock to the video, the distance can cause the time to behave as if
there are two different clocks running which don't keep good time. By
taking one clock away from the television, and bringing them back
together once the video has run the times they show will be different
than if you left the clock next to the VCR. You can see this effect
amplified by recording the television while it is playing the video of
the clock. The more you re-record the video, the greater the chance of
the clock keeping bad time.
I'll keep working on these experiments and get back to you with my
results.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The Horizon |
22 Apr 2006 02:10:00 AM |
|
|
wrote:
The horizon is the line between God, and our reality on earth.
There are 16 eastern horizons at this epoch. The whole matter has been
studied by scientific astrology. The popular 12 signs are of course
sheer superstition.
http://www.lulu.com/astrology
It is
easy to notice and very real. When you look out of your window what
your observing is not as defined and not as real as what is right in
front of you now. You can observe and measure things that are close to
you with greater precision than things that are farther away. And
obviously the farther away something is the worse the precision will
become so things will naturally become less defined and more like
possibilities. Eventually thousands of light years away from us things
cease to be realities at all and exist as a superposition of every
possibility conceivable. From a simple observer at that point things
would feel defined and very real, and we would be possibilities to
them. This is what is meant by the relativity of space.
You can believe in concrete objectivism because without observers
present things aren't ever real, but you can notice the effects of
waves of possibilities from this principle of relativity. The dark
matter that causes the anomalies we find in astronomy could actually be
ordinary matter that has simply become a superposition of
possibilities. I've been running experiments to try to prove this
theory and have some interesting results.
My video camera is capable of filming events that happen at a distance,
and clearly shows this kind of relativity. By connecting the camera
into a feedback loop on the television, so it is recording itself
anything else I mix in or tape simultaneously with the camera will
behave in a chaotic way and seems to only exist as a possibility. I
believe this is because of the distance. When you film anything in a
feedback loop it gets sucked into a infinite loop, like you would see
when two mirrors face each other. This eventually causes what your
filming to lose its definition.
Another experiment, which is more impressive is to film a clock from a
distance. Then when you play the video back and synchronize the same
clock to the video, the distance can cause the time to behave as if
there are two different clocks running which don't keep good time. By
taking one clock away from the television, and bringing them back
together once the video has run the times they show will be different
than if you left the clock next to the VCR. You can see this effect
amplified by recording the television while it is playing the video of
the clock. The more you re-record the video, the greater the chance of
the clock keeping bad time.
I'll keep working on these experiments and get back to you with my
results.
.
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|