"Golden Boar" <goldenboar@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158532083.838319.14280@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
|
| Sorcerer wrote:
| > "Golden Boar" <goldenboar@hotmail.com> wrote in message
| > news:1158521430.707868.42500@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
| > |
| > | Sorcerer wrote:
| > | > "Golden Boar" <goldenboar@hotmail.com> wrote in message
| > | > news:1158510874.324362.136990@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
| > | > |
| > | > | Sorcerer wrote:
| > | > | > "Golden Boar" <goldenboar@hotmail.com> wrote in message
| > | > | > news:1158505324.189949.131910@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
| > | > | > |
| > | > | > | Sorcerer wrote:
| > | > | > | > "Golden Boar" <goldenboar@hotmail.com> wrote in message
| > | > | > | > news:1158502048.539337.147640@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
| > | > | > | > |
| > | > | > | > | Sorcerer wrote:
| > | > | > | > | > "Golden Boar" <goldenboar@hotmail.com> wrote in message
| > | > | > | > | >
| > news:1158457834.963639.281040@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
| > | > | > | > | > |
| > | > | > | > | > | Sorcerer wrote:
| > | > | > | > | > | > "Golden Boar" <goldenboar@hotmail.com> wrote in
message
| > | > | > | > | > | >
| > | > news:1158431585.201046.275940@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
| > | > | > | > | > | > | Vergon belives that a photon has mass.
| > | > | > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | > | > | > I know he does, Brass Boor, he's a protestant
relativist
| > as
| > | > | > | > | > | > you are a catholic relativist. Same god, different
| > flavour.
| > | > | > | > | > | > He's a moron, just like you.
| > | > | > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | > | > | > A photon is an energy transfer across space.
| > | > | > | > | > | >
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/spin.gif
| > | > | > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | > | > | > He believes this because the
| > | > | > | > | > | > | upper limit on photon mass from experimental
evidence
| > is
| > | > about
| > | > | > 1 *
| > | > | > | > | > | > | 10-54 kg.
| > | > | > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | > | > | > That's ok, that's his faith. You are not going to
| > convert
| > | > faith
| > | > | > with
| > | > | > | > | > logic.
| > | > | > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | > | > | > |
| > | > | > | > | > | > | He thinks that the upper limit on photon mass is
the
| > | > smallest
| > | > | > mass
| > | > | > | > | > | > | detected, whereas any sane person would say it
means
| > that
| > | > a
| > | > | > photon
| > | > | > | > | > | > | could not have a mass greater than it's upper
limit
| > | > | > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | > | > | > Let's not bring sanity into it, you're as insane as
he
| > is.
| > | > | > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | > | > | > |
| > | > | > | > | > | > | This being the case, he then uses the equation m =
h.f
| > /
| > | > c^2
| > | > | > and
| > | > | > | > | > thinks
| > | > | > | > | > | > | thats this is the mass of the photon.
| > | > | > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | > | > | > A lb of apples costs 35c. Therefore apples are
money,
| > money
| > | > | > grows on
| > | > | > | > | > trees.
| > | > | > | > | > | > c is bollocks anyway, all velocities are relative.
| > | > | > | > | > | > How fast does the changing magnetic field travel to
the
| > | > compass
| > | > | > | > needle?
| > | > | > | > | > | > If the compass needle is moving relative to the
magnet,
| > | > what
| > | > | > | > happens
| > | > | > | > | > | > to it's rate of turn?
| > | > | > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | > | > | > |
| > | > | > | > | > | > | He believes that the minimum frequency which a
photon
| > can
| > | > have
| > | > | > is
| > | > | > | > 1
| > | > | > | > | > Hz,
| > | > | > | > | > | > | which makes h.f / c^2 greater than the upper limit
on
| > | > photon
| > | > | > mass,
| > | > | > | > and
| > | > | > | > | > | > | thereby proves that the photon has a mass of h.f /
| > c^2.
| > | > | > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | > | > | > That's ok, there are lots of religions, they can't
all
| > be
| > | > right.
| > | > | > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | > | > | > | Any sane person
| > | > | > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | > | > | > You are not sane, you are as stupid as he is. You
| > believe in
| > | > | > that
| > | > | > | > | > | > crappy c idea.
| > | > | > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | > | > | > would realise that for an infinte number of values
for
| > | > | > | > | > | > | f, h.f / c^2 is greater than the upper limit on
photon
| > | > mass,
| > | > | > and
| > | > | > | > since
| > | > | > | > | > | > | the upper limit is the largest value which could
be
| > | > associated
| > | > | > | > with
| > | > | > | > | > the
| > | > | > | > | > | > | photon mass, then h.f / c^2 cannot possibly give
the
| > mass
| > | > of
| > | > | > the
| > | > | > | > | > | > | photon.
| > | > | > | > | > | > |
| > | > | > | > | > | > | This is even crazier than his insistance that
Planck's
| > | > | > constant is
| > | > | > | > | > | > | massive.
| > | > | > | > | > | > |
| > | > | > | > | > | > Ok, so you are both crazy.. who gives a *****?
| > | > | > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | > | > | > Androcles
| > | > | > | > | > |
| > | > | > | > | > | If we have two points, A and B, and the distance
between
| > those
| > | > 2
| > | > | > | > points
| > | > | > | > | > | in 10 meters, then according to Androcles, if you move
| > from
| > | > point
| > | > | > A to
| > | > | > | > | > | point B then back to point A, the length of the path
you
| > have
| > | > | > | > travelled
| > | > | > | > | > | is 0 meters, which means you didn't actually move.
| > | > | > | > | > | To sane people, the length of the path you have
travelled
| > is
| > | > 20
| > | > | > | > meters.
| > | > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | > | > If we have two points, A and B, and the distance between
| > those 2
| > | > | > points
| > | > | > | > | > is x meters, then according to Einstein, if LIGHT moves
from
| > | > point A
| > | > | > to
| > | > | > | > | > point A, the duration of the path it had travelled is 0
| > | > seconds,
| > | > | > which
| > | > | > | > | > means its clock stopped; "the velocity of light in our
| > theory
| > | > plays
| > | > | > the
| > | > | > | > | > part of an infinitely great velocity".
| > | > | > | > | > To sane people, the time duration of the path light has
| > taken is
| > | > t
| > | > | > =
| > | > | > | > x/c,
| > | > | > | > | > a constant velocity doesn't reverse.
| > | > | > | > | > NOTE... "CONSTANT" velocity.
| > | > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | > | > To sane people, in a coordinate system the light travels
x-x
| > in
| > | > time
| > | > | > | > | > t'_A - t_A = 0/0
| > | > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | > | > Brass Boor is not sane, he goes back home before he gets
to
| > the
| > | > | > store
| > | > | > | > | > to wind his old 1905 half-Hunter because it stopped.
| > | > | > | > | > http://www.stanleylondon.com/dalveyhalfhuntertop.jpg
| > | > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | > | > Androcles
| > | > | > | > |
| > | > | > | > | The length of the path is 20 meters. TRUE or FALSE?
| > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | > Constant velocities reverse direction. TRUE or FALSE?
| > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | > Androcles
| > | > | > | > |
| > | > | > |
| > | > | > | Constant velocities reverse direction. FALSE
| > | > | >
| > | > | > Ok. Maybe you are not insane.
| > | > | >
| > | > | >
| > | > | > |
| > | > | > | If we have two points, A and B, and the distance between those
2
| > | > points
| > | > | > | is 10 meters, then if you move from point A to point B then
back
| > to
| > | > | > | point A, the length of the path you have travelled is 20
meters.
| > TRUE
| > | > | > | or FALSE?
| > | > | >
| > | > | > Hmm... let me think this through...
| > | > | >
| > | > | > A constant velocity does not reverse. A reverse c is a -c.
| > | > |
| > | > | I didn't mention anything constant velocity.
| > | >
| > | > Hey, insane *****, your tin god Einstein said it.
| > | > How embarrassing for you.
| >
| >
| > NO ANSWER, insane fuckwit?
|
| He's not my God.
|
| >
| > | >
| > | > |
| > | > | >
| > | > | > We either have:
| > | > | > A) Light has travelled 10 meters with a velocity c = 10/t plus
10
| > | > meters
| > | > | > with velocity -c =10/-t for a total of t-t = 0 seconds, 20
metres in
| > | > zero
| > | > | > time,
| > | > | > OR
| > | > | >
| > | > | > B) Light has travelled 10 meters with a velocity c = 10/t
and -10
| > meters
| > | > | > with velocity -c = -10/t for a total of 10-10 = 0 metres, in
time
| > 2t.
| > | > |
| > | > | I didn't mention light or velocity.
| > | >
| > | > Hey, insane *****, your tin god Einstein said it.
| > | > How embarrassing for you.
| > | >
| > | >
| > | > I said if *YOU* travel from A to B
| > | > | to A.
| > | >
| > | > We are not discussing me, moron. We are discussing your insanity
| > | > and Einstein's insanity.
| > | >
| > | > |
| > | > | The length of the path from A to B is x.
| > | >
| > | > Yes....
| > | >
| > | > | The length of the path from B to A is x.
| > | >
| > | > Nope. it is -x.
| > | >
| > | > Failed "take away" classes when you were a child, didn't you?
| > | > Were you playing truant or just too dumb?
| > | >
| > | > | The length of the path from A to B to A is 2x. TRUE or FASLE?
| > | >
| > | > Fazell, of course.You are getting silly now.
| > | >
| > | > | If x = 10, then 2x = 20. TRUE or FASLE?
| > | >
| > | > Not fazell, so must be true. Is dyslexia part of your insanity?
| >
| > NO ANSWER, insane fuckwit?
|
| LOL.
|
| >
| > | >
| > | >
| > | > | >
| > | > | > A is true if time runs backwards, otherwise false.
| > | > | >
| > | > | >
| > | > | > What were you saying about Virgin's sanity? Check your own.
| > | > | > Did Einstein lead you up the garden path with his thoughtless
| > | > | > experiment?
| > | > | > c = 0/0.
| > | > |
| > | > | The question I'm asking has nothing to with Einstein.
| > | >
| > | > Ok, what is you want to know that I have not already told you?
| > | > Failed "take away" classes when you were a child, didn't you?
| > | > Were you playing truant or just too dumb?
| > | >
| > | >
| > | > | >
| > | > | > Answer to your question below:
| > | >
| > | > | > Being sane myself, the answer to your question is B, FALSE.
| > | > | > Androcles.
| > | > |
| > | > | Only if you redefine 'sane' to mean 'insane'.
| > | >
| > | > Failed "take away" classes when you were a child, didn't you?
| > | > Were you playing truant or just too dumb?
| > | > Either way you are incredibly stupid and boring. Maybe you
| > | > think time runs backwards. If it does you can back
| > | > to "take away" class.
| > | > Androcles.
| > |
| > | Forget all about Einstein for a moment, I know that it's difficult for
| > | you, but just try.
| >
| > Ok. Let's talk about the weather.
| >
| > |
| > | The distance between 2 points, A(x1, y1, z1) and B(x2, y2, z2), is:
| > |
| > | AB = sqrt([x2 - x1]^2 + [y2 - y1]^2 + [z2 -z1]^2)
| >
| > x = +/- sqrt(x^2)
| >
| > You failed sqrt() class, insane moron. Was that truancy too?
|
| LOL. Sice you are retasrded you probably has classes devoted to
| teaching you "take away" and "sqrt()". Since I am not reatrded, I had
| no such classes to fail.

"Sice" you skipped English and Math classes to go to Clown school
and learn "LOL" you are not "retasrded".
I'd be embarrassed if I made that many goofs in a three line paragraph,
insane retard.


|
| >
| > Honestly, you are attempting to win an argument which
| > is futile, you do not have any knowledge of mathematics.
|
| Yes it is well known that the insane are unreasonable, so I do not
| expect you to listen to reason. I just like making dun of your
| stupidity.

The "dun" is all mine, insane "retasrd". Yellow pages let
your fingers to do walking, did they?


|
| >
| >
| >
| > |
| > | If we assume that point A and point B are both positioned on the
| > | x-axis, then we get,
| > |
| > | AB = sqrt([x2 - x1]^2)
| > | BA = sqrt([x1 - x2]^2)
| >
| > x = [-b +/- sqrt(b^2-4ac)]/2a.
| >
| > http://tinyurl.com/zgogt
| >
| > Kiddy stuff. SANE kiddy stuff.
|
| What's the quadratic formula got to with measuring the ditance between
| 2 points in Euclidean geometry?


I have no idea what "ditance" is. Some sort of modern dance,
perhaps? Why not sleep on it?



|
| >
| >
| > |
| > | If x1 = 0 and x2 = 10, then we get,
| > |
| > | AB = sqrt([x2 - x1]^2)
| > | AB = sqrt([10 - 0]^2)
| > | AB = sqrt([10]^2)
| > | AB = sqrt(100)
| > | AB = 10
| > |
| > | BA = sqrt([x1 - x2]^2)
| > | BA = sqrt([0 - 10]^2)
| > | BA = sqrt([-10]^2)
| > | BA = sqrt(100)
| > | BA = 10
| > |
| > | Therefore AB = BA.
| >
| > AB = +/- sqrt([x2 - x1]^2)
| >
| > BA = -/+ sqrt([x1 - x2]^2)
| >
| > Therefore ABA = 0.
| > You failed "take away" class and you failed sqrt() class.
| > Repeat second grade.
|
| LOL. Sice you are retasrded you probably has classes devoted to
| teaching you "take away" and "sqrt()". Since I am not reatrded, I had
| no such classes to fail.

Plastic boor repeats his own errors. Sleep it off. You'll
have a headache in the morning.


|
| >
| >
| >
| > |
| > | The length of the path ABA is given by, AB + BA, and since AB=BA, then
| > | ABA = 2AB.
| >
| > ABA = 0.
| > You failed "take away" class and you failed sqrt() class.
| > Repeat second grade.
|
| LOL. Sice you are retasrded you probably has classes devoted to
| teaching you "take away" and "sqrt()". Since I am not reatrded, I had
| no such classes to fail.
|
| >
| > |
| > | We will now check this using x1 = 0 and x2 = 10.
| > |
| > | ABA = 2AB
| > | ABA = 2 * 10
| > | ABA = 20
| >
| > This is why you are a Polypropylene Boor, totally artificial, convincing
| > only yourself. <yawn>
| >
| > Rest of post ignored.
| > Androcles.
|
| Ignored because you cant answer, without making yourself seem even more
| stupid, if that is possible.
|
| >
| >
| > |
| > | ABA = sqrt([x2 - x1]^2) + sqrt([x1 - x2]^2)
| > | ABA = sqrt([10 - 0]^2) + sqrt([0 - 10]^2)
| > | ABA = sqrt(10^2) + sqrt(-10^2)
| > | ABA = sqrt(10^2) + sqrt(-10^2)
| > | ABA = sqrt(100) + sqrt(100)
| > | ABA = 10 + 10
| > | ABA = 20
| > |
| > | Therefore, ABA = 2AB.
| > |
| > | When something travels along this path it leaves A at time t_A and
| > | arrives back at A at time t_A', so the duration of travel is,
| > |
| > | t_ABA = t_A' - t_A.
| > |
| > | The average velocity of something travelling path ABA is then given
by,
| > |
| > | v = ABA / t_ABA
| > | v = 2AB / (t_A' - t_A)
| > |
|
| Given Euclidean geometry and Cartesian co-ordiantes, how do *YOU*
| calculate the following:
|
| the distance from point A to point B,

B - A

| the distance from point B to point A.
|
A - B
Sleep it off.
Androcles