| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Mitchell" |
| Date: |
01 Aug 2004 08:40:49 PM |
| Object: |
The Massless Space-time Before Matter's Creation |
The universe starts as a massless singularity which expands into
a bubble where matter is created spread apart.
The gravity of a "mass" singularity would prevent any mass expansion.
Space-time could expand from a point but it couldn't spread out a
matter singularity along with it.
And about what it takes to create matter:
It is the increasing pressure of a moving massless space-time that
makes matter. Mass is born out of an original accelerating space-time.
The Unified Field is space-time and matter. The massless space-time
before matter is not yet the Unified Field.
When the super pressure of an accelerating space-time creates matter
the Unified Field is then formed.
Mitch Raemsch
-- Light Falls --
-- And is Pushed --
.
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: The Massless Space-time Before Matter's Creation |
01 Aug 2004 10:09:03 PM |
|
|
Mitchell wrote:
The universe starts as a massless singularity which expands into
a bubble where matter is created spread apart.
Singularity?
The Big Bang Model is a broadly accepted theory for the
origin and evolution of our universe. It postulates that 12 to
14 billion years ago, the portion of the universe we can see
today was only a few millimeters across. It has since
expanded from this hot dense state into the vast and much
cooler cosmos we currently inhabit. We can see remnants of
this hot dense matter as the now very cold cosmic
microwave background radiation which still pervades the
universe and is visible to microwave detectors as a uniform
glow across the entire sky.
About the early universe see:
Read Ned Wright's Cosmology Tutorial
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html
WMAP: Foundations of the Big Bang theory
http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni.html
WMAP: Tests of Big Bang Cosmology
http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101bbtest.html
Astronomy
http://edu-observatory.org/eo/mcc.html
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: The Massless Space-time Before Matter's Creation |
01 Aug 2004 09:32:07 PM |
|
|
Mitchell wrote:
The universe starts as a massless singularity which expands into
a bubble where matter is created spread apart.
Christ-besotted idiot. Do you know why the Romans rubbed your
Christ's face with a sponge soaked in vinegar? It was Roman
toilet paper.
<http://www.poopreport.com/Techniques/Content/Wiping/wipingbc.html>
Half way down.
-- Light Falls --
-- And is Pushed --
-- Up Your Stooopid ***** --
Here, have a look,
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/sunshine.jpg
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "MorituriMax" |
|
| Title: Re: The Massless Space-time Before Matter's Creation |
02 Aug 2004 01:00:35 AM |
|
|
Mitchell wrote:
The universe starts as a massless singularity which expands into
a bubble where matter is created spread apart.
Ahhh, which explains why there is no CMBR since matter started spread out
already..
...oh wait.... there *is* a CMBR... go figure, Mitchell taliban wannabe is wrong
here too..
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Marcus Wellpoth" |
|
| Title: Re: The Massless Space-time Before Matter's Creation |
02 Aug 2004 03:20:51 AM |
|
|
Mitchell wrote:
The universe starts as a massless singularity which expands into
a bubble where matter is created spread apart.
The gravity of a "mass" singularity would prevent any mass expansion.
Space-time could expand from a point but it couldn't spread out a
matter singularity along with it.
And about what it takes to create matter:
It is the increasing pressure of a moving massless space-time that
makes matter. Mass is born out of an original accelerating space-time.
The Unified Field is space-time and matter. The massless space-time
before matter is not yet the Unified Field.
When the super pressure of an accelerating space-time creates matter
the Unified Field is then formed.
Mitch Raemsch
-- Light Falls --
-- And is Pushed --
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newest fad is that there aren't any singularities. See Hawkings speech at
GR17. Or what might fit your level of expertise more Scientific American of
last month. And light doesn't fall it follows a null geodesic.
mw
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mitchell" |
|
| Title: Re: The Massless Space-time Before Matter's Creation |
06 Aug 2004 05:42:17 PM |
|
|
Marcus Wellpoth <wellpoth@gmx.de> wrote in message news:<410df967$0$7303$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net>...
Mitchell wrote:
The universe starts as a massless singularity which expands into
a bubble where matter is created spread apart.
The gravity of a "mass" singularity would prevent any mass expansion.
Space-time could expand from a point but it couldn't spread out a
matter singularity along with it.
And about what it takes to create matter:
It is the increasing pressure of a moving massless space-time that
makes matter. Mass is born out of an original accelerating space-time.
The Unified Field is space-time and matter. The massless space-time
before matter is not yet the Unified Field.
When the super pressure of an accelerating space-time creates matter
the Unified Field is then formed.
Mitch Raemsch
-- Light Falls --
-- And is Pushed --
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newest fad is that there aren't any singularities. See Hawkings speech at
GR17. Or what might fit your level of expertise more Scientific American of
last month. And light doesn't fall it follows a null geodesic.
mw
It falls Markus. Whether you like it or not.
It follows a curved geodesic.
Hwking has said that the singularities of GR predict its failure.
But I don't see him standing up for the obvious if this is true.
There are no singularities because you can't have mass without
time. The end of space-time is the end of everything(else).
The first physicists saw this clearly. When they solved the
equations for black holes they saw matter literally dropping
out of the universe.
Hawking dropped the ball. He can't have it both ways.
He is self contrdictory because he works with a proclaimed failure of
physics and doesn't care. He is just covering his butt.
It is obvious that if singularities are wrong then gravity's
strength must be finite and limited.
Mitch Raemsch
-- Light Falls Everywhere --
.
|
|
|
| User: "MorituriMax" |
|
| Title: Re: The Massless Space-time Before Matter's Creation |
07 Aug 2004 12:50:06 AM |
|
|
Mitchell wrote:
Hawking dropped the ball. He can't have it both ways.
He is self contrdictory because he works with a proclaimed failure of
physics and doesn't care. He is just covering his butt.
It's amazing that you, someone who can't even understand basic high school
physics have the nerve to try and say that one of the pre-eminent minds of this
century "dropped the ball."
Little michell when you have graduated anything more complicated than opening a
textbook and understanding what you read, then, maybe, you can even begin to
question people who actually understand black holes and universes..
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Marcus Wellpoth" |
|
| Title: Re: The Massless Space-time Before Matter's Creation |
06 Aug 2004 07:12:08 PM |
|
|
Mitchell wrote:
Marcus Wellpoth <wellpoth@gmx.de> wrote in message
news:<410df967$0$7303$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net>...
Mitchell wrote:
The universe starts as a massless singularity which expands into
a bubble where matter is created spread apart.
The gravity of a "mass" singularity would prevent any mass expansion.
Space-time could expand from a point but it couldn't spread out a
matter singularity along with it.
And about what it takes to create matter:
It is the increasing pressure of a moving massless space-time that
makes matter. Mass is born out of an original accelerating space-time.
The Unified Field is space-time and matter. The massless space-time
before matter is not yet the Unified Field.
When the super pressure of an accelerating space-time creates matter
the Unified Field is then formed.
Mitch Raemsch
-- Light Falls --
-- And is Pushed --
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newest fad is that there aren't any singularities. See Hawkings speech at
GR17. Or what might fit your level of expertise more Scientific American
of last month. And light doesn't fall it follows a null geodesic.
mw
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It falls Markus. Whether you like it or not.
It follows a curved geodesic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A geodesic is the shortest path between to 2 in a curved space.
I won't discuss this topic with you any farther until you can demonstrate me
that you know what
a) a metric tensor is
b) what a equation of motion is
c) what the christoffel symbol is
d) why you can't treat a bosons like a fermiosn in the relativistic equation
of motion
e) what a lagrange is
f) what a hamilton is
[snip crap]
mw
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mitchell" |
|
| Title: Re: The Massless Space-time Before Matter's Creation |
07 Aug 2004 01:59:49 AM |
|
|
Marcus Wellpoth <wellpoth@gmx.de> wrote in message news:<41141e5b$0$28849$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net>...
Mitchell wrote:
Marcus Wellpoth <wellpoth@gmx.de> wrote in message
news:<410df967$0$7303$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net>...
Mitchell wrote:
The universe starts as a massless singularity which expands into
a bubble where matter is created spread apart.
The gravity of a "mass" singularity would prevent any mass expansion.
Space-time could expand from a point but it couldn't spread out a
matter singularity along with it.
And about what it takes to create matter:
It is the increasing pressure of a moving massless space-time that
makes matter. Mass is born out of an original accelerating space-time.
The Unified Field is space-time and matter. The massless space-time
before matter is not yet the Unified Field.
When the super pressure of an accelerating space-time creates matter
the Unified Field is then formed.
Mitch Raemsch
-- Light Falls --
-- And is Pushed --
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newest fad is that there aren't any singularities. See Hawkings speech at
GR17. Or what might fit your level of expertise more Scientific American
of last month. And light doesn't fall it follows a null geodesic.
mw
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It falls Markus. Whether you like it or not.
It follows a curved geodesic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A geodesic is the shortest path between to 2 in a curved space.
I won't discuss this topic with you any farther until you can demonstrate me
that you know what
a) a metric tensor is
b) what a equation of motion is
c) what the christoffel symbol is
d) why you can't treat a bosons like a fermiosn in the relativistic equation
of motion
e) what a lagrange is
f) what a hamilton is
[snip crap]
mw
Go smoke a joint Markus. Show me that light doesn't fall and
I'll show you it does.
Mitch Raemsch
-- Light Falls --
-- Light Accelerates --
.
|
|
|
| User: "Morituri-Max" |
|
| Title: Re: The Massless Space-time Before Matter's Creation |
07 Aug 2004 01:28:04 PM |
|
|
Mitchell wrote:
I won't discuss this topic with you any farther until you can demonstrate me
that you know what
a) a metric tensor is
b) what a equation of motion is
c) what the christoffel symbol is
d) why you can't treat a bosons like a fermiosn in the relativistic equation
of motion
e) what a lagrange is
f) what a hamilton is
[snip crap]
mw
Go smoke a joint Markus. Show me that light doesn't fall and
Yep, I figured this was how he'd weasel out of it.. he keeps telling people to
show him stuff, but when they ask him to click a link or show some math work, he
gets lazy..
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kirk Gregory Czuhai" |
|
| Title: @@@@@ Re: The Massless Space-time Before Matter's Creation |
10 Aug 2004 09:16:35 PM |
|
|
Re: The Massless Space-time Before Matter's Creation
Dear Folks,
I, Kirk Gregory Czuhai, will give
$google dollars to ANYONE
who will PROVE
that > Mitch Raemsch
IS WRONG !!!!
--
*** New International SPAM email
Blocking FREE web based SERVICE:
http://www.altelco.net/~lovekgc/kgcLOVE.htm
My Very Beautiful Poetry at
http://www.altelco.net/~lovekgc/Awarm.doc
http://www.altelco.net/~lovekgc/kgcpoetry.doc
peace and love,
(kirk) kirk gregory czuhai
http://www.altelco.net/~churches/BlueRoses.htm
do SEE AT LEAST!!! --->
http://www.altelco.net/~lovekgc/algebrahelp.htm
just to aid Alan Green Span, Practice Tree Conservation!
FREE BEER -->
http://www.altelco.net/~lovekgc/beer.htm
"Mitchell" <macromitch@internetCDS.com> wrote in message
news:9c3da975.0408061442.4943247c@posting.google.com...
Marcus Wellpoth <wellpoth@gmx.de> wrote in message
news:<410df967$0$7303$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net>...
Mitchell wrote:
The universe starts as a massless singularity which expands into
a bubble where matter is created spread apart.
The gravity of a "mass" singularity would prevent any mass expansion.
Space-time could expand from a point but it couldn't spread out a
matter singularity along with it.
And about what it takes to create matter:
It is the increasing pressure of a moving massless space-time that
makes matter. Mass is born out of an original accelerating space-time.
The Unified Field is space-time and matter. The massless space-time
before matter is not yet the Unified Field.
When the super pressure of an accelerating space-time creates matter
the Unified Field is then formed.
Mitch Raemsch
-- Light Falls --
-- And is Pushed --
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
Newest fad is that there aren't any singularities. See Hawkings speech
at
GR17. Or what might fit your level of expertise more Scientific American
of
last month. And light doesn't fall it follows a null geodesic.
mw
It falls Markus. Whether you like it or not.
It follows a curved geodesic.
Hwking has said that the singularities of GR predict its failure.
But I don't see him standing up for the obvious if this is true.
There are no singularities because you can't have mass without
time. The end of space-time is the end of everything(else).
The first physicists saw this clearly. When they solved the
equations for black holes they saw matter literally dropping
out of the universe.
Hawking dropped the ball. He can't have it both ways.
He is self contrdictory because he works with a proclaimed failure of
physics and doesn't care. He is just covering his butt.
It is obvious that if singularities are wrong then gravity's
strength must be finite and limited.
Mitch Raemsch
-- Light Falls Everywhere --
.
|
|
|
| User: "Androcles" |
|
| Title: Re: @@@@@ Re: The Massless Space-time Before Matter's Creation |
11 Aug 2004 06:12:20 AM |
|
|
"Kirk Gregory Czuhai" <lovekgc@altelco.net> wrote in message
news:41198c7c$1_2@Usenet.com...
| Re: The Massless Space-time Before Matter's Creation
|
| Dear Folks,
|
| I, Kirk Gregory Czuhai, will give
| $google dollars to ANYONE
| who will PROVE
| that > Mitch Raemsch
| IS WRONG !!!!
Ah, phooey.
1) You do not have $google to give.
2) I'm Androcles, so I'm not ANYONE and would be excluded. I don't think
ANYONE ever posted to anything here, but I might be wrong. I do believe I
saw a post from NO ONE, but since NO ONE is not ANYONE, that doesn't count.
Besides, NO ONE has $google, and as far as I know is THE ONLY ONE that has,
so NO ONE must be using a pesudonym for THE ONLY ONE (unless you are NO ONE
using the pseudonym "Kirk Gregory Czuhai", in which case you are NO ONE.
3) I'll give all I own to anyone that can prove bright green flying
elephants do not lay eggs. I know they do, I said so and that proves it.
Therefore Mitchell cannot be proven wrong, even if what he is talking about
doesn't exist.
Androcles
| --
| *** New International SPAM email
| Blocking FREE web based SERVICE:
|
| http://www.altelco.net/~lovekgc/kgcLOVE.htm
|
| My Very Beautiful Poetry at
|
| http://www.altelco.net/~lovekgc/Awarm.doc
|
| http://www.altelco.net/~lovekgc/kgcpoetry.doc
|
| peace and love,
|
| (kirk) kirk gregory czuhai
|
| http://www.altelco.net/~churches/BlueRoses.htm
|
| do SEE AT LEAST!!! --->
|
| http://www.altelco.net/~lovekgc/algebrahelp.htm
|
| just to aid Alan Green Span, Practice Tree Conservation!
|
| FREE BEER -->
|
| http://www.altelco.net/~lovekgc/beer.htm
|
|
| "Mitchell" <macromitch@internetCDS.com> wrote in message
| news:9c3da975.0408061442.4943247c@posting.google.com...
| > Marcus Wellpoth <wellpoth@gmx.de> wrote in message
| news:<410df967$0$7303$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net>...
| > > Mitchell wrote:
| > >
| > > > The universe starts as a massless singularity which expands into
| > > > a bubble where matter is created spread apart.
| > > > The gravity of a "mass" singularity would prevent any mass
expansion.
| > > > Space-time could expand from a point but it couldn't spread out a
| > > > matter singularity along with it.
| > > >
| > > > And about what it takes to create matter:
| > > > It is the increasing pressure of a moving massless space-time that
| > > > makes matter. Mass is born out of an original accelerating
space-time.
| > > > The Unified Field is space-time and matter. The massless space-time
| > > > before matter is not yet the Unified Field.
| > > > When the super pressure of an accelerating space-time creates matter
| > > > the Unified Field is then formed.
| > > >
| > > > Mitch Raemsch
| > > > -- Light Falls --
| > > > -- And is Pushed --
| >
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| --------
| > > Newest fad is that there aren't any singularities. See Hawkings speech
| at
| > > GR17. Or what might fit your level of expertise more Scientific
American
| of
| > > last month. And light doesn't fall it follows a null geodesic.
| > > mw
| > It falls Markus. Whether you like it or not.
| > It follows a curved geodesic.
| >
| > Hwking has said that the singularities of GR predict its failure.
| > But I don't see him standing up for the obvious if this is true.
| > There are no singularities because you can't have mass without
| > time. The end of space-time is the end of everything(else).
| >
| > The first physicists saw this clearly. When they solved the
| > equations for black holes they saw matter literally dropping
| > out of the universe.
| >
| > Hawking dropped the ball. He can't have it both ways.
| > He is self contrdictory because he works with a proclaimed failure of
| > physics and doesn't care. He is just covering his butt.
| >
| > It is obvious that if singularities are wrong then gravity's
| > strength must be finite and limited.
| > Mitch Raemsch
| > -- Light Falls Everywhere --
|
|
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mitchell" |
|
| Title: Re: @@@@@ Re: The Massless Space-time Before Matter's Creation |
11 Aug 2004 07:06:33 PM |
|
|
"Kirk Gregory Czuhai" <lovekgc@altelco.net> wrote in message news:<41198c7c$1_2@Usenet.com>...
Re: The Massless Space-time Before Matter's Creation
Dear Folks,
I, Kirk Gregory Czuhai, will give
$google dollars to ANYONE
who will PROVE
that > Mitch Raemsch
IS WRONG !!!!
--
*** New International SPAM email
Blocking FREE web based SERVICE:
http://www.altelco.net/~lovekgc/kgcLOVE.htm
My Very Beautiful Poetry at
http://www.altelco.net/~lovekgc/Awarm.doc
http://www.altelco.net/~lovekgc/kgcpoetry.doc
peace and love,
(kirk) kirk gregory czuhai
http://www.altelco.net/~churches/BlueRoses.htm
do SEE AT LEAST!!! --->
http://www.altelco.net/~lovekgc/algebrahelp.htm
just to aid Alan Green Span, Practice Tree Conservation!
FREE BEER -->
http://www.altelco.net/~lovekgc/beer.htm
"Mitchell" <macromitch@internetCDS.com> wrote in message
news:9c3da975.0408061442.4943247c@posting.google.com...
Marcus Wellpoth <wellpoth@gmx.de> wrote in message
news:<410df967$0$7303$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net>...
Mitchell wrote:
The universe starts as a massless singularity which expands into
a bubble where matter is created spread apart.
The gravity of a "mass" singularity would prevent any mass expansion.
Space-time could expand from a point but it couldn't spread out a
matter singularity along with it.
And about what it takes to create matter:
It is the increasing pressure of a moving massless space-time that
makes matter. Mass is born out of an original accelerating space-time.
The Unified Field is space-time and matter. The massless space-time
before matter is not yet the Unified Field.
When the super pressure of an accelerating space-time creates matter
the Unified Field is then formed.
Mitch Raemsch
-- Light Falls --
-- And is Pushed --
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
Newest fad is that there aren't any singularities. See Hawkings speech
at
GR17. Or what might fit your level of expertise more Scientific American
of
last month. And light doesn't fall it follows a null geodesic.
mw
It falls Markus. Whether you like it or not.
It follows a curved geodesic.
Hwking has said that the singularities of GR predict its failure.
But I don't see him standing up for the obvious if this is true.
There are no singularities because you can't have mass without
time. The end of space-time is the end of everything(else).
The first physicists saw this clearly. When they solved the
equations for black holes they saw matter literally dropping
out of the universe.
Hawking dropped the ball. He can't have it both ways.
He is self contrdictory because he works with a proclaimed failure of
physics and doesn't care. He is just covering his butt.
It is obvious that if singularities are wrong then gravity's
strength must be finite and limited.
Mitch Raemsch
-- Light Falls Everywhere --
I guess I should have known I would bring the sociopaths out
of the fray.
.
|
|
|
| User: "G=EMC^2 Glazier" |
|
| Title: Re: @@@@@ Re: The Massless Space-time Before Matter's Creation |
13 Aug 2004 04:07:15 AM |
|
|
Before gravity created sub-matter particles out of the fabric of
space(space energy) spacetime was like what you would find inside a
blackhole. Bert
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: @@@@@ Re: The Massless Space-time Before Matter's Creation |
13 Aug 2004 08:37:37 AM |
|
|
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Before gravity created sub-matter particles out of the fabric of
space(space energy) spacetime was like what you would find inside a
blackhole. Bert
I don't think so Herb
.
|
|
|
| User: "hanson" |
|
| Title: Re: @@@@@ Re: The Massless Space-time Before Matter's Creation |
14 Aug 2004 12:06:41 PM |
|
|
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:411CC41B.42CD29DA@mchsi.com...
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Before gravity created sub-matter particles out of the
fabric of space(space energy) spacetime was like
what you would find inside a blackhole. Bert
I don't think so Herb
Sam, it doesn't matter to Herb Glaser what you think.
Herb does know things!...Herb/Bert lives in a black hole! He
knows! Just look at his equation: G=EMC^2, by which he may
tell you:" Glaser = Emotional, Mentally Confused*Cripple".
At his age, 80+, his own fabric is no longer what it used to be.
Isn't that right Herbie?
ahahahaha........ahahahanson
.
|
|
|
| User: "Morituri-Max" |
|
| Title: . |
14 Aug 2004 12:55:43 PM |
|
|
hanson wrote:
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:411CC41B.42CD29DA@mchsi.com...
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Before gravity created sub-matter particles out of the
fabric of space(space energy) spacetime was like
what you would find inside a blackhole. Bert
I don't think so Herb
Sam, it doesn't matter to Herb Glaser what you think.
So? What's your point?
.
|
|
|
| User: "hanson" |
|
| Title: Re: . |
14 Aug 2004 06:25:34 PM |
|
|
was: "Re: @@@@@ Re: The Massless Space-time Before Matter's Creation
Morituri-Max" <newage@sendarico.net> wrote in message
news:zmsTc.10939$nu2.2161@fe2.texas.rr.com...
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Before gravity created sub-matter particles out of the
fabric of space(space energy) spacetime was like
what you would find inside a blackhole. Bert
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in
I don't think so Herb
hanson wrote in:
news:BErTc.21918$9Y6.271@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
Sam, it doesn't matter to Herb Glaser what you think.........
So? What's your point?
........ahahahaha.....you wonder?.....really!....ahahahaha....
.....point in this case is that you spelled your handle wrong.
It should start with an "s" instead of an "n".....ahahahaha...
Thanks for the laugh, dude,
ahahaha......hahahanson
.
|
|
|
| User: "Morituri-Max" |
|
| Title: Re: . |
14 Aug 2004 09:56:57 PM |
|
|
hanson wrote:
.......ahahahaha.....you wonder?.....really!....ahahahaha....
....point in this case is that you spelled your handle wrong.
It should start with an "s" instead of an "n".....ahahahaha...
Thanks for the laugh, dude,
Where do you see an "n" in morituri-max?
.
|
|
|
| User: "hanson" |
|
| Title: Re: . |
15 Aug 2004 01:48:55 AM |
|
|
was: "Re: @@@@@ Re: The Massless Space-time Before Matter's Creation
"Morituri-Max" <newage@sendarico.net> wrote in message
news:ZhATc.13187$nu2.3075@fe2.texas.rr.com...
hanson wrote:
.......ahahahaha.....you wonder?.....really!....ahahahaha....
....point in this case is that you spelled your handle wrong.
It should start with an "s" instead of an "n".....ahahahaha...
Thanks for the laugh, dude,
Where do you see an "n" in morituri-max?
So, you didn't get this neither, ?........
You are like my other Cyberbro, Richard Henry....ahahahaha...
You can argue now: "It's not my handle. It's my address"
Thanks for the laughs, dude,
ahahaha.......ahahanson
.
|
|
|
| User: "Morituri-Max" |
|
| Title: Re: . |
15 Aug 2004 02:50:48 AM |
|
|
hanson wrote:
Where do you see an "n" in morituri-max?
So, you didn't get this neither, ?........
You are like my other Cyberbro, Richard Henry....ahahahaha...
You can argue now: "It's not my handle. It's my address"
Thanks for the laughs, dude,
ahahaha.......ahahanson
What the hell are you babbling about? The address you give above has no
connection to me..
It's neither my handle nor my address.. are you even quoting the right person?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Morituri-Max" |
|
| Title: Re: . |
15 Aug 2004 02:52:33 AM |
|
|
Morituri-Max wrote:
hanson wrote:
Where do you see an "n" in morituri-max?
So, you didn't get this neither, ?........
You are like my other Cyberbro, Richard Henry....ahahahaha...
You can argue now: "It's not my handle. It's my address"
Thanks for the laughs, dude,
ahahaha.......ahahanson
What the hell are you babbling about? The address you give above has no
connection to me..
It's neither my handle nor my address.. are you even quoting the right person?
And I'm still waiting for you to grasp what I am saying....
.
|
|
|
| User: "hanson" |
|
| Title: Re: . |
15 Aug 2004 10:23:11 AM |
|
|
was: "Re: @@@@@ Re: The Massless Space-time Before Matter's Creation
"Morituri-Max" <newage@sendarico.net> wrote in message
news:5DETc.13767$nu2.6322@fe2.texas.rr.com...
Morituri-Max wrote:
Where do you see an "n" in morituri-max?
hanson wrote:
So, you didn't get this neither, ?........
You can argue now: "It's not my handle. It's my address"
Thanks for the laughs, dude,
ahahaha.......ahahanson
Morituri-Max wrote:
What the hell are you babbling about?
The address you give above has no connection to me..
It's neither my handle nor my address..
are you even quoting the right person?
Morituri-Max wrote:
And I'm still waiting for you to grasp what I am saying....
[hanson]
Maxi-baby!.....this should sound familiar to you and apply to you....
"Do you even comprehend how retarded that makes you sound?"
Listen, Maxi-baby!.....ahahahaha......it's about "n" & "s" as in
newage@sendarico.net vs.
and you make 2 posts over this in my honor.....Did I crank you?
AHAHAHAHA....... thanks, buddy, but .......keep on waiting.......
ahahahahaha......
Thanks for the laughs **again**, dude,
ahahaha.......ahahanson
.
|
|
|
| User: "Morituri-Max" |
|
| Title: . |
15 Aug 2004 12:14:39 PM |
|
|
hanson wrote:
[hanson]
Maxi-baby!.....this should sound familiar to you and apply to you....
"Do you even comprehend how retarded that makes you sound?"
Listen, Maxi-baby!.....ahahahaha......it's about "n" & "s" as in
newage@sendarico.net vs.
and you make 2 posts over this in my honor.....Did I crank you?
But that isn't my email.. haven't you figured that out yet?
No? Didn't think so...
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jim Black" |
|
| Title: Re: @@@@@ Re: The Massless Space-time Before Matter's Creation |
11 Aug 2004 04:52:22 PM |
|
|
"Kirk Gregory Czuhai" <lovekgc@altelco.net> wrote in message news:<41198c7c$1_2@Usenet.com>...
Re: The Massless Space-time Before Matter's Creation
Dear Folks,
I, Kirk Gregory Czuhai, will give
$google dollars to ANYONE
who will PROVE
that > Mitch Raemsch
IS WRONG !!!!
And I am still offering $100 to anyone who can *prove* the existence
of terrestrial gravity. You just have to be able to do it on Usenet,
where it is impossible to prove anything, and anyone can successfully
argue for any delusion of his or her choice, provided they have a
sufficiently loose grip on reality. This is still better than your
offer, since I actually have $100. Besides, who cares what general
relativity implies about black holes when gravity may not actually
exist?
On a more serious note, stop spawning new threads. Better yet, stop
posting.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Gisse" |
|
| Title: Re: The Massless Space-time Before Matter's Creation |
02 Aug 2004 11:40:52 AM |
|
|
On 1 Aug 2004 18:40:49 -0700, (Mitchell)
wrote:
The universe starts as a massless singularity which expands into
a bubble where matter is created spread apart.
The gravity of a "mass" singularity would prevent any mass expansion.
Space-time could expand from a point but it couldn't spread out a
matter singularity along with it.
And about what it takes to create matter:
It is the increasing pressure of a moving massless space-time that
makes matter. Mass is born out of an original accelerating space-time.
The Unified Field is space-time and matter. The massless space-time
before matter is not yet the Unified Field.
When the super pressure of an accelerating space-time creates matter
the Unified Field is then formed.
Mitch Raemsch
-- Light Falls --
-- And is Pushed --
-- And drinks on friday --
You continue to show that not only do you not know anything, but you
are not willing to learn. Good Job.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mitchell" |
|
| Title: Re: The Massless Space-time Before Matter's Creation |
02 Aug 2004 07:35:45 PM |
|
|
Eric Gisse <fseggNOSPAM@uaf.edu> wrote in message news:<3jrsg09lapemidgta1bdhu2bosgt163srd@4ax.com>...
On 1 Aug 2004 18:40:49 -0700, (Mitchell)
wrote:
The universe starts as a massless singularity which expands into
a bubble where matter is created spread apart.
The gravity of a "mass" singularity would prevent any mass expansion.
Space-time could expand from a point but it couldn't spread out a
matter singularity along with it.
And about what it takes to create matter:
It is the increasing pressure of a moving massless space-time that
makes matter. Mass is born out of an original accelerating space-time.
The Unified Field is space-time and matter. The massless space-time
before matter is not yet the Unified Field.
When the super pressure of an accelerating space-time creates matter
the Unified Field is then formed.
Mitch Raemsch
-- Light Falls --
-- And is Pushed --
-- And drinks on friday --
You continue to show that not only do you not know anything, but you
are not willing to learn. Good Job.
I have my own ideas. I do not need to follow other people or
their ideas. Everything I can learn I can discover for myself.
The rest of you can study and crack a book. I am a free spirit.
I don't study. I will find the answers that matter in my own time.
Thought is doubt based and of itself is useless. Without values
you can think you have what you really don't.
You may be bright Eric but its in a wrong way.
You can do the right thing in a wrong way Eric.
That's you.
Hawking doesn't have what Einstein had whether he's willing
to see it or not. Hawking is not the next Einstein.
He can't see his own contradictions. The next Einstein
must see where relativity fails. Only that man is the next Einstein.
Mitch Raemsch
-- Hawking has an Imaginary Clock --
.
|
|
|
| User: "MorituriMax" |
|
| Title: Re: The Massless Space-time Before Matter's Creation |
03 Aug 2004 12:05:05 AM |
|
|
Mitchell wrote:
I have my own ideas.
Yeah we know.. too bad they're all full of ***** little taliban wannabe..
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Gisse" |
|
| Title: Re: The Massless Space-time Before Matter's Creation |
03 Aug 2004 12:40:33 AM |
|
|
On 2 Aug 2004 17:35:45 -0700, (Mitchell)
wrote:
Eric Gisse <fseggNOSPAM@uaf.edu> wrote in message news:<3jrsg09lapemidgta1bdhu2bosgt163srd@4ax.com>...
On 1 Aug 2004 18:40:49 -0700, (Mitchell)
wrote:
The universe starts as a massless singularity which expands into
a bubble where matter is created spread apart.
The gravity of a "mass" singularity would prevent any mass expansion.
Space-time could expand from a point but it couldn't spread out a
matter singularity along with it.
And about what it takes to create matter:
It is the increasing pressure of a moving massless space-time that
makes matter. Mass is born out of an original accelerating space-time.
The Unified Field is space-time and matter. The massless space-time
before matter is not yet the Unified Field.
When the super pressure of an accelerating space-time creates matter
the Unified Field is then formed.
Mitch Raemsch
-- Light Falls --
-- And is Pushed --
-- And drinks on friday --
You continue to show that not only do you not know anything, but you
are not willing to learn. Good Job.
I have my own ideas. I do not need to follow other people or
their ideas. Everything I can learn I can discover for myself.
I have ideas too. But none of them worth mentioning are at my level of
comprehension if the full force of GR or QM were brought out to
explain them to me. They are kept away in a book so I don't forget
them.
The difference is, that I don't spout my ideas off day in and day out
without ANY physical justification. That, Mitchell, is what you do.
Everything you learn, will apparently be limited. I would be greatly
amused if you could discover calculus, linear algebra, or SR by
yourself. Discovering any of those things would be beyond most
anyone's abilities - especially your's.
The rest of you can study and crack a book. I am a free spirit.
Hallmark of the crank. There have been many that you have displayed,
but this is the most flagrant.
I don't study. I will find the answers that matter in my own time.
Do you learn anything at school? Do you even go? How many years until
you are in High School?
Thought is doubt based and of itself is useless. Without values
you can think you have what you really don't.
So THAT is why you don't think. I see, now!
You may be bright Eric but its in a wrong way.
You can do the right thing in a wrong way Eric.
That's you.
I notice you are totally unable to quantify what I am doing wrong,
other than reading books instead of making ***** up like you.
Hawking doesn't have what Einstein had whether he's willing
to see it or not. Hawking is not the next Einstein.
He can't see his own contradictions. The next Einstein
must see where relativity fails. Only that man is the next Einstein.
Now I will be even more amused than before if Uncle Al's Eotvos
experiment shows output.
I see you are most definetly not on reading. Hawking is occasionally
wrong and is willing to admit it, if you have the mental skills to
prove it. When I say "you", I really mean "someone who has real
talent" - which isn't you.
Mitch Raemsch
-- Hawking has an Imaginary Clock --
-- when he rotates it 90 degrees.--
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "herbert" |
|
| Title: re:The Massless Space-time Before Matter's Creation |
13 Aug 2004 11:29:10 AM |
|
|
What annoyed me most was that garbage about values...
What has physics to do with such nonsense ?
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
