Science > Physics > The Missing "Review Energy" Keyword Papers in arXiv/Front
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"OsherD" |
| Date: |
12 Dec 2005 07:43:27 PM |
| Object: |
The Missing "Review Energy" Keyword Papers in arXiv/Front |
From Osher Doctorow
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
The Missing "Review Energy" Keyword Papers in arXiv/Front
Copyright By Owner Osher Doctorow Ph.D.
First Published 2005
Front For the Mathematics ArXiv/arXiv and its contributors of research
papers have failed to produce papers comparing uses of energy across a
wide variety of scenarios and/or classes/categories and have failed
even to organize available energy papers except according to date or
similar indirect criteria.
One of the secrets of using arXiv and Front For the Mathematics
arXiv/ArXiv is to look up review papers which discuss past work that
has been done on topics. When you do that with "Review Energy" or
"review energy" on Front For the Mathematics ArXiv/arXiv, you find 48
papers total, from 1997 to December 2005, in all of which the word
"energy" is used as a qualifier or adjective for some other main topic
noun except for one occurrence of "zero energy" which is part of a
"qualifying clause" that isn't the main topic and one "Energy-Momentum
Tensor" occurrence which only relates the latter to currents in
classical field theory.
In no case in the above is there a comparison of the different uses of
"energy" in past energy research in mathematics or physics or other
fields of application of mathematics or comparing large classes or
categories of energy research such as quantum vs macroscopic energy
research.
In the case of the keywords "Dark Energy" there is a substantial list
of literature, and some of the authors compare Dark Energy's
explanations and applications (especially acceleration of the Universe)
inside their papers, but again there is no paper which explicitly
compares Dark Energy with a broad range of other types of energy.
Osher Doctorow
.
|
|
| User: "OsherD" |
|
| Title: Re: The Missing "Review Energy" Keyword Papers in arXiv/Front |
12 Dec 2005 08:01:13 PM |
|
|
From Osher Doctorow
As for arXiv, both the keywords "review energy" and "energy review"
produce at most 6 papers between 1998 and May 2005, all of which have
the same deficient characteristics mentioned in the previous posting
except for one by Paul H. Frampton of the University of North Carolina
Department of Physics and Astronomy entitled "Dark Energy - a Pedagogic
Review," astro-ph/0409166 from September 2004 (apparently September
2004 to December 2005 has not yet stirred anybody to summarize).
The paper by Frampton, incidentally or not from a University which is
not even one of the top ones of Princeton, Harvard, Stanford, Chicago,
U. Texas Austin, U. Florida Gainesville, MIT, or CalTech, does
admittedly do a good job on Dark Energy, but does not compare Dark
Energy with other forms of energy across classes or categories or
topics. He presented his paper as the keynote talk to the joint
session of 5th Rencontres du Vietnam, Hanoi August 2004. Are we to
conclude that the only "organizer" around chooses Vietnam to present
papers in rather than the Superpowers or even Catchup Powers?
Osher Doctorow
.
|
|
|
| User: "OsherD" |
|
| Title: Re: The Missing "Review Energy" Keyword Papers in arXiv/Front |
12 Dec 2005 11:24:06 PM |
|
|
From Osher Doctorow
"Energy category" or "category energy" doesn't do much, but "energy
classes" produces 22 papers on arXiv and 31 papers on Front for the
Mathematics ArXiv, with some overlap of which 3 have some generality
but within rather small classes. One Japanese-French paper, for
example, looks general until we notice that it is restricted to the
case k = 0 and/or both k and l = 0 of the radial Schrodinger equation
with spherically symmetric potential and (time independent) wave
function depending on two variables k, r and one parameter l
"el"). A paper from Italy (U. Padova) and U. Minnesota, "The
equivalence postulate of quantum mechanics," by Alon E. Faraggi and
Marco Matone, hep-th/9809127 v2 6 Aug 1999, would have been a nice
place to include cross-class literature review in the "wide sense" and
comparison of many energy scenarios and meanings, but mostly reduces to
the more typical story of showing that the authors' theory can
reproduce some results of/from quantum theory/quantum experiment.
Osher Doctorow
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "OsherD" |
|
| Title: Re: The Missing "Review Energy" Keyword Papers in arXiv/Front |
12 Dec 2005 09:08:58 PM |
|
|
From Osher Doctorow
Another way to look for cross-class or cross-category or cross-scenario
energy papers is to use the keywords "energy across" or "types energy",
noting that arXiv and Front For the Mathematics ArXiv do not ordinarily
accept 3 keywords so that the long form of the above should be "energy
across scenarios" or "types of energy" or something like that, but the
double keyword request "fills in" the 3rd keyword and others
automatically like using * in some computer instruction contexts.
Both sites have papers under these keywords, but again nothing
different in basic form from the previous postings except one paper
from Italy, China, and France on nuclear ground state properties
(rather restricted in scope, but better than many others) and another
from Egypt (Math. Dept.) comparing basically two types of energy
densities associatedwith a very specific spacetime described by the
Weyl metric. Egypt of course is the ancestral beginning of Ancient
Israel more or less, so this is understandable :>)
Osher Doctorow
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
