| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"kenseto" |
| Date: |
05 Nov 2007 08:22:52 AM |
| Object: |
The Orgin of Life |
A paper entitled "The Origin of Life as interpreted by Model
Mechanics" is available in my website:
http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm
Ken Seto
.
|
|
| User: "cable" |
|
| Title: Re: The Orgin of Life |
05 Nov 2007 04:31:36 PM |
|
|
On Nov 5, 3:22 pm, kenseto <kens...@erinet.com> wrote:
A paper entitled "The Origin of Life as interpreted by Model
Mechanics" is available in my website:http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm
Ken Seto
is this tha same book as your previous "Origin of Life" ?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "cable" |
|
| Title: Re: The Orgin of Life |
05 Nov 2007 04:28:06 PM |
|
|
On Nov 5, 3:22 pm, kenseto <kens...@erinet.com> wrote:
A paper entitled "The Origin of Life as interpreted by Model
Mechanics" is available in my website:http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm
Ken Seto
nice cover
why only 10 bucks when it is revolutionary?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "cable" |
|
| Title: Re: The Orgin of Life |
05 Nov 2007 03:44:55 PM |
|
|
On Nov 5, 3:22 pm, kenseto <kens...@erinet.com> wrote:
A paper entitled "The Origin of Life as interpreted by Model
Mechanics" is available in my website:http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm
Ken Seto
nice cover ken
why only 10 bucks if it is revolutionary?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "PD" |
|
| Title: Re: The Orgin of Life |
05 Nov 2007 09:05:58 AM |
|
|
On Nov 5, 8:22 am, kenseto <kens...@erinet.com> wrote:
A paper entitled "The Origin of Life as interpreted by Model
Mechanics" is available in my website:http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm
Ken Seto
Seto offers no quantitative predictions from his "theory" using
already available data. So while it is certainly a self-published
paper on his website, it can't be said to be a physical theory of any
value.
PD
.
|
|
|
| User: "kenseto" |
|
| Title: Re: The Orgin of Life |
05 Nov 2007 01:44:33 PM |
|
|
On Nov 5, 10:05 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 5, 8:22 am, kenseto <kens...@erinet.com> wrote:
A paper entitled "The Origin of Life as interpreted by Model
Mechanics" is available in my website:http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm
Ken Seto
Seto offers no quantitative predictions from his "theory" using
already available data. So while it is certainly a self-published
paper on his website, it can't be said to be a physical theory of any
value.
PD
ROTFLOL....PD is a runt of the SRians. He said that using old
measured data in an equation is prediction and that using newly
measured data in an equation is not prediction. At the same time he
asserted that SR equations give predictions even though all SR
equations require newly measured relative velocity data to make
prediction. Go figure!!!!!!
Definition for a runt of the SRians:
A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend
beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their ***** like
gourmet puppy chow. An ***** who will attack anybody who
disagrees with SR
Ken Seto
.
|
|
|
| User: "PD" |
|
| Title: Re: The Orgin of Life |
05 Nov 2007 02:16:08 PM |
|
|
On Nov 5, 1:44 pm, kenseto <kens...@erinet.com> wrote:
On Nov 5, 10:05 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 5, 8:22 am, kenseto <kens...@erinet.com> wrote:
A paper entitled "The Origin of Life as interpreted by Model
Mechanics" is available in my website:http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm
Ken Seto
Seto offers no quantitative predictions from his "theory" using
already available data. So while it is certainly a self-published
paper on his website, it can't be said to be a physical theory of any
value.
PD
ROTFLOL....PD is a runt of the SRians. He said that using old
measured data in an equation is prediction and that using newly
measured data in an equation is not prediction. At the same time he
asserted that SR equations give predictions even though all SR
equations require newly measured relative velocity data
That's incorrect, Seto, the data for relative velocity was in hand for
some key predictions in the paper. Your ignorance about what was
actually written in the papers is abysmal.
to make
prediction. Go figure!!!!!!
Definition for a runt of the SRians:
A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend
beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their ***** like
gourmet puppy chow. An ***** who will attack anybody who
disagrees with SR
Ken Seto
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pmb" |
|
| Title: Re: The Orgin of Life |
06 Nov 2007 06:27:18 PM |
|
|
"PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1194293768.285542.23620@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 5, 1:44 pm, kenseto <kens...@erinet.com> wrote:
On Nov 5, 10:05 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 5, 8:22 am, kenseto <kens...@erinet.com> wrote:
A paper entitled "The Origin of Life as interpreted by Model
Mechanics" is available in my
website:http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm
Ken Seto
Seto offers no quantitative predictions from his "theory" using
already available data. So while it is certainly a self-published
paper on his website, it can't be said to be a physical theory of any
value.
PD
ROTFLOL....PD is a runt of the SRians. He said that using old
measured data in an equation is prediction and that using newly
measured data in an equation is not prediction. At the same time he
asserted that SR equations give predictions even though all SR
equations require newly measured relative velocity data
That's incorrect, Seto, the data for relative velocity was in hand for
some key predictions in the paper. Your ignorance about what was
actually written in the papers is abysmal.
Best to ignore ken. It has made life easier since I started doing it, i.e.
when he came to the Hawking Forum and started creating the exact same thread
over and over and oever again, while ignoring all the comments which were
directed to which demonstrated that he was wrong.
Pete
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: The Orgin of Life |
05 Nov 2007 11:13:09 PM |
|
|
kenseto wrote:
A paper entitled "The Origin of Life as interpreted by Model
Mechanics" is available in my website:
http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm
Ken Seto
Seto shames his parents!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Don Stockbauer" |
|
| Title: Re: The Orgin of Life |
06 Nov 2007 05:58:13 AM |
|
|
On Nov 5, 11:13 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
kenseto wrote:
A paper entitled "The Origin of Life as interpreted by Model
Mechanics" is available in my website:
http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm
Ken Seto
Seto shames his parents!
There is a subtle but almost indiscernible pattern to these posts.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "G=EMC^2 Glazier" |
|
| Title: Re: The Orgin of Life |
08 Nov 2007 03:26:50 PM |
|
|
Sam In African rocks and Greenland traces of life have been found that
are 3.8 billion years old. I don't think that life had any traceable
DNA of life on Earth today. Bert
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
