From: Uncle Al (UncleAl0@hate.spam.net)
Subject: Re: The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian
View: Complete Thread (4 articles)
Newsgroups: sci.physics, gac.physics.astronomy, sci.astro,
alt.astronomy, >alt.sci.physics
Date: 2005-01-20 16:27:44 PST
SDR wrote:
Gravity As Thermodynamics:
The Explanation For The Universe.
There is a fear among thinkers too clever for their
own good that perhaps none of them may prove to be
sufficiently smart to understand the universe. Yet,
unsuspected by them, it is not that they are not smart
enough to understand the universe but that they are
too smart... and instead of seeking to understand they
instead apply their nervous creativity to dreaming up
overly-clever (and ultimately purely imaginative)
illusions--an accomplishment which may be the glory of
literary fiction, but is forever the bane of science.
[snip 1350 lines of crap]
Obviously this is as far as this guy read to reach his
"conclusion." It's actually quite flattering to me!
Provide an empirically viable alternative, idiot.
Sure thing, moron. Just tell me how/where I contradict
your laundry list below. (You forgot to mention the
coffee-milk experiments, by the way.) Grow up for once:
You've been around these newsgroups long enough to be
at least over 40 now. (Empirical evidence provided.)
There!
S D Rodrian
http://poems.sdrodrian.com
http://physics.sdrodrian.com
http://music.sdrodrian.com
re:
Michelson-Morley experiments
Kennedy-Thorndike experiments
Ives-Stilwell experiments
Hughes-Drever experiments
Weak field
<http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/ptti/ptti2002/paper20.pdf>
Nature 425 374 (2003)
http://www.eftaylor.com/pub/projecta.pdf
<http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjjacob/Lecture16.pdf>
<http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2003-1/index.html>
Relativity in the GPS system
and strong field,
Science 303(5661) 1143;1153 (2004)
http://arXiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0401086
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0312071
<http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2003-5/index.html>
Deeply relativistic neutron star binaries
If your opinions veer otherwise you are an empirical *****.
<http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2001-4/index.html>
http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0311039
<http://www.weburbia.demon.co.uk/physics/experiments.html>
Experimental constraints on General Relativity
.
