| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"SDR" |
| Date: |
02 Feb 2005 10:08:43 AM |
| Object: |
The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian |
From: Davorak (Talk2plant@hotmail.com)
Subject: Re: The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian
Newsgroups: sci.physics, gac.physics.astronomy, sci.astro, alt.astronomy,
alt.sci.physics
Date: 2005-02-01 23:02:09 PST
I am sorry there have been no direct measurements of gravity waves only
very good indirect residence.
It is unfortunate but true that far too many "assumptions"
are taken to be the equivalent of "indisputable proof"
(this is what leads many people to imagine that such
assumptions as "dark matter" and "dark energy" and "gravity
waves" are indisputable/proven facts). The same observations
viewed by more informed eyes by and by have oft revealed
geometrically opposite conclusions to those held before.
Article: http://cgwp.gravity.psu.edu/outreach/ST_oct2000_srcs.pdf
The above article describes how a pulsar-neutron star system matches
GR's prediction of gravity waves very well.
I have also read of how the decaying orbit of a binary neutron star
system matches GR's prediction of gravity waves. The Gravity waves
radiate energy away from the two neutron stars causing they to fall
into one another. While other explanations are possible I have not
heard of one that matches the observed evidence as well as GR's
explaination.
http://physics.sdrodrian.com
Now you have.
I do not in any way dispute the accuracy/truth of general relativity
or The Standard Model. Rather, my text is all about why they work
the way they do. (So my dispute is really with anyone who might claim
they work the way they do for some other reason.)
General relativity describes perfectly the way "universal gravitation"
shapes the universe... GR simply does not explain exactly what
"gravity" is (and that's where I come in). I tell you exactly what
"it" is and why it is the inevitable phenomenon it is "here." (Why
there is mass/inertia, and not simply that it exists & how to measure
it: You will know at last, and not have to remain in doubt any more.)
And I tell you the reason for all this... so you will forever rest assured
that it is the result of an evolutionary process and not the result of
some mysterious magic (forever hidden behind math & more math):
It's really a perfect dichotomy of purpose: You need math to tailor
the universe. But if you're going to explain its whys you need words
not numbers. Come with me, and I will tell you how/why "the man"
walked into the tailor shop to begin with.
S D Rodrian
http://poems.sdrodrian.com
http://physics.sdrodrian.com
http://ar.sdrodrian.com
http://music.sdrodrian.com
.
|
|
| User: "robert j. kolker" |
|
| Title: Re: The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian |
02 Feb 2005 10:48:22 AM |
|
|
SDR wrote:
General relativity describes perfectly the way "universal gravitation"
shapes the universe... GR simply does not explain exactly what
"gravity" is (and that's where I come in).
And neither has anything else. Gravitation is an observable fact. Its
explanations and causes are hypothetical. What counts are the
predictions made from those hypothetical causes and laws. If the
predictions are good, all is well. If not, not.
You have no more valid idea of the basic causes of gravitation than the
smartest physicists who have ever lived.
Bob Kolker
.
|
|
|
| User: "nightbat" |
|
| Title: Re: The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian |
02 Feb 2005 11:51:59 AM |
|
|
nightbat wrote
"robert j. kolker" wrote:
SDR wrote:
General relativity describes perfectly the way "universal gravitation"
shapes the universe... GR simply does not explain exactly what
"gravity" is (and that's where I come in).
Bob
And neither has anything else. Gravitation is an observable fact. Its
explanations and causes are hypothetical. What counts are the
predictions made from those hypothetical causes and laws. If the
predictions are good, all is well. If not, not.
You have no more valid idea of the basic causes of gravitation than the
smartest physicists who have ever lived.
Bob Kolker
nightbat
Ha, ha, you're right Officer Kolker, with the possible exception
of Tesla pointed greatest genius that ever lived, the nightbat.
the nightbat
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
