"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com>
wrote in message news:<421326ed$1@usenet01.boi.hp.com>...
"Bill Hobba" <bhobba@rubbish.net.au> wrote in message news:XbzQd.162847$K7.141657@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
"SDR" <sdrodrian@sdrodrian.com> wrote in message
news:58087ec7.0502150144.7c65764d@posting.google.com...
Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:<42116116.D7319A61@hate.spam.net>...
SDR wrote:
[snip insignificance]
God fart. The universe and everything in it is an ignited god fart.
Well, that's ... nice. But, do you happen to know
what God could have possibly been eating to cause
Him to undergo such an all-get-out (and get-out-of-
my-way) blow?
S D Rodrian
http://poems.sdrodrian.com
http://physics.sdrodrian.com
http://ar.sdrodrian.com
http://music.sdrodrian.com
Always base yourself firmly on reality not math: Math
can be made to stand for anything and thereby give any
results you like. But once you start trying to substitute
other things for reality... well, that's obviously crazy.
Try to explain this:
"F = m * a"
or
"Applied force is mass times forced acceleration"
without using any math.
.... didn't you just do it, *****?...
But, sure thing, *****: Now you try explaining Darwinian
Evolution USING math. [The difference is fundamental, *****:
Darwinian Evolution is the explanation for how\why. Math is
a tool to keep your (whatever) research "reliable," and
NOT (as it hath too often been portrayed) the language of
ultimate truths: A tautology is NOT "a revealing truth" but
only a means to check the truth of some one value against
other value... in order to strengthen one's confidence in
the integrity of the original value. You can't presage the
supremacy of mathematics over understanding without shooting
human reason/human understanding all to heck, *****. --SDR
[BTW, *****, by some astonishing coincidence (which if you had read
my paper with your brain you'd know) it just so happens that my text
explains, for the first time ever, and without using ANY math whatever
not only that "applied force is mass times forced acceleration" but
how and WHY it's so. Just goes to show you what a simple little read
can spare you from.] Spare thyself & read/grasp my simple little read:
http://physics.sdrodrian.com
My text gives the ultimate explanation for the universe, and
is NOT merely some more/less accurate measurements of it. As it
clearly SEZ SO right up there at the very, very start of it.
Such rot always gives me a laugh. Physics is not math and physicists and
mathematicians know this eg Hilberts famous remark - "Every boy in the
streets of Gottingen understands more about four-dimensional geometry than
Einstein. Yet, in spite of that, Einstein did the work and not the
mathematicians.' http://www.math.umn.edu/~wittman/Biography.html.
However math is the natural language of physics. You often see rot from
cranks like GR can not be true because it is just a math theory. Anyone who
has studied math to second year uni level can grasp the math of GR.
Understanding the physics is a lot harder and by far the most important
part.
Hm, I recall my differential geometry course in my 4th year.
It was *not* simple, I can assure you ;-)
But, as is *abundantly* demonstrated on the relativity group,
the same goes for the incredibly *simple* math of special relativity.
In its basics the math takes no more than the handling of a few
square roots (over which even Androcles breaks his mind), and
hardly any of the cranks has the faintest idea about the physical
meaning of the variables (x and t) in the most basic equations.
[ Just look at "Mike" aka "Bill Smith" aka "Undeniable" ;-) ]
Dirk Vdm
I'll take your word for it, *****. Since you seem to be so very
at home in the field of cranks. Careful of those thistles, now!
S D Rodrian (Thistle extraordinaire.)
http://poems.sdrodrian.com
http://physics.sdrodrian.com
http://ar.sdrodrian.com
http://music.sdrodrian.com
.
