The REAL Field-given the Wrong Neutron Standard



 Science > Physics > The REAL Field-given the Wrong Neutron Standard

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Douglas Eagleson"
Date: 29 Jan 2008 02:39:07 PM
Object: The REAL Field-given the Wrong Neutron Standard
note: a note to a friend
A seemingly innocent topic, scientific formal theory was to always be
that which does not raise debate. A certain outcome to the advisor
was the meaning of physical theory as opposed to empirical. A
relation was theoretically advised many years ago. It was the outcome
of single relationship resolution as algebra constrained topology
function. A solid theory matrix was integrated and the symmetric sets
were solved to cause the field.
3.5e? (cm-sec) = |h1|^4+|h2|^4+|h3|^4+|h4|^4 -the topology function
as integral matrix state.
1= |h| -the standard solid theory matrix of eigenstates.
Now integral matrice was only theory. And to fit the field to the
matrice as integrated form was my work.
It has the symmetric form of the h-bomb as an allowed state. Just set
h1...h4 to the right set of zeros and ones! A zero effects the h matrix
along with the placement of the set of ones.
Here is the h-bomb matrix
h1.2.3.4 = |0 0 0 0|
|0 0 0 0|
|0 0 0 0|
|0 0 0 1|
A set of four matrix one four by four matrix for each dimension,
making h1 the space first dimension, h2 the second, h3 the third, and
h4 the time dimension. The h-bomb eigenstates are caused to be
correct given the right constant, 3.?(cm-sec).
If you want to understand h-bombs just let the people understand who
care to.
.

User: "Uncle Al"

Title: Re: The REAL Field-given the Wrong Neutron Standard 29 Jan 2008 03:57:06 PM
Douglas Eagleson wrote:
[snip crap]

Here is the h-bomb matrix

h1.2.3.4 = |0 0 0 0|
|0 0 0 0|
|0 0 0 0|
|0 0 0 1|

[snip rest of crap]
Boring idiot.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
.
User: "Douglas Eagleson"

Title: Re: The REAL Field-given the Wrong Neutron Standard 30 Jan 2008 06:26:22 AM
On Jan 29, 1:57=A0pm, Uncle Al <Uncle...@hate.spam.net> wrote:

Douglas Eagleson wrote:

[snip crap]

Here is the h-bomb matrix


h1.2.3.4 =3D =A0|0 0 0 0|
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0|0 0 0 0|
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0|0 0 0 0|
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0|0 0 0 1|


[snip rest of crap]

Boring idiot.

--
Uncle Alhttp://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
=A0(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)http://www.mazepath.co=

m/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
It is the jackass again, uncle al. Everybody knows what you are.
.
User: ""

Title: Re: The REAL Field-given the Wrong Neutron Standard 01 Feb 2008 03:15:08 PM
On Jan 30, 7:26=A0am, Douglas Eagleson <eaglesondoug...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

On Jan 29, 1:57=A0pm, Uncle Al <Uncle...@hate.spam.net> wrote:





Douglas Eagleson wrote:


[snip crap]


Here is the h-bomb matrix


h1.2.3.4 =3D =A0|0 0 0 0|
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0|0 0 0 0|
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0|0 0 0 0|
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0|0 0 0 1|


[snip rest of crap]


Boring idiot.


--
Uncle Alhttp://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
=A0(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)http://www.mazepath.=

com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2


It is the jackass again, uncle al. Everybody knows what you are.- Hide quo=

ted text -


- Show quoted text -

No, the jackass is a guy signing his posts as Douglas Eagleson.
Eagleson rank high on my list of net kooks, but I give him credit for
at least signing what appears to be his own name.
Harry C.
.
User: "Douglas Eagleson"

Title: Re: The REAL Field-given the Wrong Neutron Standard 04 Feb 2008 08:56:19 AM
On Feb 1, 1:15=A0pm, "hhc...@yahoo.com" <hhc...@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Jan 30, 7:26=A0am, DouglasEagleson<eaglesondoug...@yahoo.com>
wrote:





On Jan 29, 1:57=A0pm, Uncle Al <Uncle...@hate.spam.net> wrote:


DouglasEaglesonwrote:


[snip crap]


Here is the h-bomb matrix


h1.2.3.4 =3D =A0|0 0 0 0|
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0|0 0 0 0|
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0|0 0 0 0|
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0|0 0 0 1|


[snip rest of crap]


Boring idiot.


--
Uncle Alhttp://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
=A0(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)http://www.mazepat=

h.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2


It is the jackass again, uncle al. Everybody knows what you are.- Hide q=

uoted text -


- Show quoted text -


No, the jackass is a guy signing his posts as DouglasEagleson.

Eaglesonrank high on my list of net kooks, but I give him credit for
at least signing what appears to be his own name.

Harry C.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You need to get your crystal ball of correct thinking correcter. You
need to say why I am not correct, not just erratically claim. Do you
have an issue?
.





  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
The Neutron Bomb is a Photon Bomb for real.
Is this for real ? (plasma lifeforms) ?!
Making Star Trek Real
The Real Da Vinci Code
GET REAL EH!
Time travel is real - bid for your chance to try it
The real or occult energy of ideal liquid
David Deutsch's Theorem: Nazi Time Machines are real.
Re: Pentagon 9/11 Fraud was Re: No Second Engine at the Pentagon was Re: The Ultimate Pentagon 9/11 Question Andy Carol couldn't answer. was Re: Flight 175 WAS a FUEL TANKER, for REAL. This is not a "theory".
REAL ALCHEMY in BIOLOGY
Does a "pure" real valued probability make any sen
Re: REAL Internet Bullying
This is the Real Reason the Sun is going ccrazy.
Yes, REAL suspected Black Holes can RiP you APART.!! But NOT in GR gtr Tivity.!! Because in GR Tivity you would be a POiNT ..and if you COULD have a mass, in GR, you would be a POiNT-mass. POiNT-mass CANNOT *STRETCH* with TOP & BOTTOM ROCKETs attache
Re: Findlay's Folly (was Re: plate tectonics and real science)
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER