| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Douglas Eagleson" |
| Date: |
16 Sep 2005 11:10:38 AM |
| Object: |
The Red Dog |
The Red Dog
Douglas Eagleson, 2005
Reading is a skill. And to live appears the skillfull communication.
And so to determine the skill at communication I have written a title
called, "The Red Dog".
A style of writting is connotated by the title. A predicate of the
adjective and the noun comprises the communication.
And to live correctly a person must visualize or image the imagined red
dog as they read.
A slow walk into the life of non-imagery reading can begin with the
dog.
A red dog as opposed to the subject dog is the beginning. A person
always identifiying the dog and then applying the dog's truth value is
the endpoint. A perfection of predicate truth is the final form.
A set of perfect subject causality is the determined reason for this
slow walk. A truth of color is either imaged or the colored dog
appears.
A last concept written is the disparity in the communicators. An
intention to convey a dog's true color without cause is the slow
walker's. And the normal man simply wants the reader to pleasently
image his red dog.
I will talk as I write. And the common complaint of the slow walk is
the lack of form, I have no series of truth to convey. And the
relation I desire imaged is only derided. A single relation discovered
is considered a major discovery. And to convey the discovery I use
relationship imagery communication.
A person is requested to be mature enough to have learned of the
distinction. A common USENET derision is the slow-walker's complaint.
An entire school is a study of the modes of communication. And the
logical analysis of the mode. Abstract form is hard to learn and I try
very hard for perfect form. My mode is of consistent use of the
applied form of Plato.
I can write of it and the only thing difficult is learning to think in
a mode unusual.
And so I sometimes chose a mode called slang.
And in slang the relationship is still givable to image.
And so to help identify the mode of writing for the reader I will at
the end of the prose identify. And this is a prose of abstraction and
the slow walker will read only the truth of the red dog. All else is
truely incomprehesible.
I do not like slow-walker contempt, but they will not be able to read.
So I can deride abstractly.
A real disgusting thing is a room full of slow-walker geniuses. A
speed of truth solution appears the only activity.
And the relation of reality is not present for they only apply the
abstract truth. A philosopher is left to define his experience and
warn of the rather poor mode of existence. For the philosopher finds
they have a pure gramatical existence because of their choice of
consitency.
A relation to be discovered is left to accident for the slow-walker has
no relation imagery.
A scarry thing is the disparity of life style due to the loss of
pleasent imagery.
.
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: The Red Dog |
16 Sep 2005 02:29:45 PM |
|
|
Douglas Eagleson wrote:
The Red Dog
Douglas Eagleson, 2005
Reading is a skill.
[snip crap]
Delusions of competence. Project Head Start inculcates no reading
skills, you racist *****.
A red dog as opposed to the subject dog is the beginning. A person
always identifiying the dog and then applying the dog's truth value is
the endpoint. A perfection of predicate truth is the final form.
[snip more crap]
Illucid.
And so to help identify the mode of writing for the reader I will at
the end of the prose identify. And this is a prose of abstraction and
the slow walker will read only the truth of the red dog. All else is
truely incomprehesible.
[snip rest of crap]
Spewing boring idiot.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Ghost In The Machine" |
|
| Title: Re: The Red Dog |
16 Sep 2005 11:00:10 PM |
|
|
In sci.physics, Douglas Eagleson
<eaglesondouglas@yahoo.com>
wrote
on 16 Sep 2005 09:10:38 -0700
<1126887037.959360.206500@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>:
The Red Dog
Douglas Eagleson, 2005
Reading is a skill. And to live appears the skillfull communication.
And so to determine the skill at communication I have written a title
called, "The Red Dog".
That's nice. Why sci.physics would be even remotely interested
in your literature, since it seems to be more concerned with
carmine canines than red-shifted electromagnetics, is probably
best determined by the denizens of sci.psychology, if there
be such a group.
And it's been done already, anyway.
http://pbskids.org/clifford/
[rest of bad "writting" snipped]
--
#191,
It's still legal to go .sigless.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
