| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Nick" |
| Date: |
07 Mar 2005 02:42:36 AM |
| Object: |
The Redshift Paradox - The Size of Light |
If light is emited redshifted enough its wavelength could be greater
than the size of the universe - potentially infinite.
A light wave bigger than the universe?
That's the Redshift Paradox.
Where's it going to fit?
Mitch Raemsch -- Light Falls --
.
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: The Redshift Paradox - The Size of Light |
07 Mar 2005 11:06:42 AM |
|
|
Nick wrote:
If light is emited redshifted enough its wavelength could be greater
than the size of the universe - potentially infinite.
A light wave bigger than the universe?
That's the Redshift Paradox.
Where's it going to fit?
Calculate the redshit to qualify for your "paradox" and post it,
idiot, including the mechanism by which it obtains. Because Uncle Al
is a compassionate Conservative who enjoys freak shows, he'll start
you out with a swift kick to your impacted *****,
For velocities at an arbitrary angle theta,
u_parallel = (u'_parallel + v)/(1+(v dot u')/c^2)
u_perp = u'_perp/(gamma_v(1+(v dot u')/c^2))
<http://www.physics.umanitoba.ca/~souther/waves02/feb0402/sld011.htm>
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: The Redshift Paradox - The Size of Light |
07 Mar 2005 03:21:24 AM |
|
|
Nick wrote:
If light is emited redshifted enough its wavelength could be greater
than the size of the universe - potentially infinite.
A light wave bigger than the universe?
That's the Redshift Paradox.
Where's it going to fit?
Mitch Raemsch -- Light Falls --
+------------+ +---------------------------------------------+
| PLEASE | | BEST TO IGNORE ATTENTION SEEKING TROLLS |
| DO NOT | | LIKE RAEMSCH -- THEY DRY |
| FEED | | UP AND BLOW AWAY WITHOUT FEEDBACK |
| DA | | |
| TROLLS | | http://www.angelfire.com/space/usenet/ |
+------------+ +---------------------------------------------+
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
`\ '/ / ' / `\ '/ / ' / `\ '/ / ' /
.
|
|
|
| User: "Nick" |
|
| Title: Re: The Redshift Paradox - The Size of Light |
07 Mar 2005 03:25:34 AM |
|
|
If light is emited redshifted enough its wavelength could be greater
than the size of the universe - potentially infinite.
A light wave bigger than the universe?
That's the Redshift Paradox.
Where's it going to fit?
Mitch Raemsch -- Light Falls --
.
|
|
|
| User: "Franz Heymann" |
|
| Title: Re: The Redshift Paradox - The Size of Light |
07 Mar 2005 02:43:28 PM |
|
|
"Nick" <macromitch@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1110187534.404114.70770@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
If light is emited redshifted enough its wavelength could be greater
than the size of the universe - potentially infinite.
A light wave bigger than the universe?
That's the Redshift Paradox.
Where's it going to fit?
Only half a wavelength fits into the lowest resonant mode of a
rectangular resonant cavity.
--
Franz
"A first-rate laboratory is one in which mediocre scientists can
produce outstanding work"
P.M.S. Blackett
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "PD" |
|
| Title: Re: The Redshift Paradox - The Size of Light |
07 Mar 2005 10:02:11 AM |
|
|
Nick wrote:
If light is emited redshifted enough its wavelength could be greater
than the size of the universe - potentially infinite.
A light wave bigger than the universe?
That's the Redshift Paradox.
Where's it going to fit?
Mitch Raemsch -- Light Falls --
I guess only a fraction of a wavelength would fit. Got a problem with
that?
PD
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The Redshift Paradox - The Size of Light |
07 Mar 2005 12:05:52 PM |
|
|
Nick wrote:
If light is emited redshifted enough its wavelength could be greater
than the size of the universe - potentially infinite.
A light wave bigger than the universe?
That's the Redshift Paradox.
Where's it going to fit?
Nowhere. Since the blueshift paradox is that redshifts
only exist in Chicago. Which makes reshifts that which
trains are made of, rather than that which
logic is made of.
So the wavelength of any infinite lightbeam is 3
no matter if it's bigger or smaller than
the universe.
Mitch Raemsch -- Light Falls --
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Gisse" |
|
| Title: Re: The Redshift Paradox - The Size of Light |
07 Mar 2005 04:49:16 AM |
|
|
Nick wrote:
If light is emited redshifted enough its wavelength could be greater
than the size of the universe - potentially infinite.
A light wave bigger than the universe?
That's the Redshift Paradox.
Where's it going to fit?
Within the empty volume of your skull.
Mitch Raemsch -- Light Falls --
.
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Cardinale" |
|
| Title: Re: The Redshift Paradox - The Size of Light |
07 Mar 2005 01:46:02 PM |
|
|
It's not empty, it's packed overfull with fecal matter.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
