Science > Physics > The Scientific Community And The Yellow Brick Road To Fantasy Land
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Schoenfeld" |
| Date: |
30 Jul 2006 08:30:16 PM |
| Object: |
The Scientific Community And The Yellow Brick Road To Fantasy Land |
An examination of this video
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329
reveals that the collapse of WTC 7 started at second 17 and completedat
second 23. That is a total of 6 seconds.
It can be easily shown that this building collapsed in the same time it
would take an apple to fall from the roof of this building and hit the
ground - a freefall.
Let's do a simple calculation:
distance travelled = initial velocity * total time + 1/2 *
acceleration * total time^2
or
s = ut + 1/2at^2
Since the apple was stationary before falling (just like building was
prior to collapse), u = 0.
Since the height of the building was 174 meters, s = 174.
Since we are at ground level the gravitational field strength is a
constant, so a = 9.8 m/s^2
Now,
174 = 0 t + 1/2 9.8 t^2
Solving for t
t = sqrt( 2 * 174 / 9.8)
= 5.9590
Well look at that, an apple would take 6 seconds to fall from the roof
of WTC 7, just the same amount of time it took WTC 7 to collapse.
The 10 year old intellect can easily deduce then that WTC 7 must've
freefallen, further deducing that the ENTIRE STRUCTURE MUST'VE
COLLAPSED SIMULTANEOUSLY.
No minor fires can do that, _ONLY_ synchronized explosions can.
That, ladies and gentleman, evidently exceeds the boundaries of the
competence of our 'leading physicists' - the Wittens of the world, the
Wheelers, their loyal groupies, those so called 'experts' who love to
sell fables on gravitation and call others 'laymen', those who love to
tell others that they 'have no chance'.
.
|
|
| User: "BernardZ" |
|
| Title: Re: The Scientific Community And The Yellow Brick Road To Fantasy Land |
31 Jul 2006 06:45:13 AM |
|
|
In article <1154309416.270283.67040@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
schoenfeld1@gmail.com says...
The 10 year old intellect can easily deduce then that WTC 7 must've
freefallen, further deducing that the ENTIRE STRUCTURE MUST'VE
COLLAPSED SIMULTANEOUSLY.
If the bottom falls out of structure, what is on top is in free fall!
--
If you are not there at the close, you will not get the sale.
Observations of Bernard - No 102
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fermat" |
|
| Title: Re: The Scientific Community And The Yellow Brick Road To Fantasy Land |
31 Jul 2006 04:04:59 AM |
|
|
Schoenfeld wrote:
An examination of this video
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329
reveals that the collapse of WTC 7 started at second 17 and completedat
second 23. That is a total of 6 seconds.
It can be easily shown that this building collapsed in the same time it
would take an apple to fall from the roof of this building and hit the
ground - a freefall.
Let's do a simple calculation:
distance travelled = initial velocity * total time + 1/2 *
acceleration * total time^2
or
s = ut + 1/2at^2
Since the apple was stationary before falling (just like building was
prior to collapse), u = 0.
Since the height of the building was 174 meters, s = 174.
Since we are at ground level the gravitational field strength is a
constant, so a = 9.8 m/s^2
Now,
174 = 0 t + 1/2 9.8 t^2
Solving for t
t = sqrt( 2 * 174 / 9.8)
= 5.9590
Well look at that, an apple would take 6 seconds to fall from the roof
of WTC 7, just the same amount of time it took WTC 7 to collapse.
The 10 year old intellect can easily deduce then that WTC 7 must've
freefallen, further deducing that the ENTIRE STRUCTURE MUST'VE
COLLAPSED SIMULTANEOUSLY.
No minor fires can do that, _ONLY_ synchronized explosions can.
That, ladies and gentleman, evidently exceeds the boundaries of the
competence of our 'leading physicists' - the Wittens of the world, the
Wheelers, their loyal groupies, those so called 'experts' who love to
sell fables on gravitation and call others 'laymen', those who love to
tell others that they 'have no chance'.
Actually in an idealised scenario it would free fall. Bu there is
structure under the top of the building that needs to give way. The
mechanical process is longer then free fall, and it does not take a phd
to see that. Also this is not a point particle falling. It is a large
building and there are many forces and different effects at play that
makes this much more different then free fall. Why would you make such
simple assumptions about such a complex process?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster" |
|
| Title: Re: The Scientific Community And The Yellow Brick Road To Fantasy Land |
31 Jul 2006 06:48:11 PM |
|
|
Pierre Duh, that's what our Muslim Fisikist, Schonfeld, is trying to
say:
that the biggest bombs ever to have hit the biggest buildings,
could not have resulted in such a "free fall" collapse, although
that's just a fisikal hypothesis.
makes this much more different then free fall. Why would you make such
simple assumptions about such a complex process?
thus:
I may be extrememly socially retarded but I'm not stupid --
this is a *classic* analysis of Muslim Fisiks,
which also tend to be hardcore examples of it.
the real question is,
Why should Earth's tallest, rather highly tensile structure not
collapse
at the speed of freefall?
I said, Why not?
anyway, there's a good analysis of the comparison
between a surreptitious bombing, and
an inside controlled demo, in the current issue of that MIT mag
-- *Technology & Innovation*, or some thing --
using the Murrah Building for the example.
still, it is high time to impeach Trickier ***** Cheeny,
who did *what* in the Nixon Administration with Don Rumfseld?... oh,
you were convinced by that braindead guy, that he did it?
--it takes some to jitterbug!
http://members.tripod.com/~american_almanac
http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/2006_articles/Amplitude.W05.pdf
http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/plates/figs/plate01.html
http://larouchepub.com/other/2006/3322_ethanol_no_science.html
http://www.wlym.com/pdf/iclc/howthenation.pdf
.
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|